The potential impacts of digital technologies on co-production and co-creation

References

• Aceto, G., V. Persico, and A. Pescapé. 2018. “The Role of Information and Communication Technologies in Healthcare: Taxonomies, Perspectives, and Challenges.” Journal of Network and Computer Applications 107: 125–154. doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2018.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alford, J. 2002. “Why Do Public Sector Clients Co-Produce? Towards a Contingency Theory.” Administration & Society 34 (1): 32–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Athey, S. 2017. “Beyond Prediction: Using Big Data for Policy Problems.” Science 355 (6324): 483–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batalden, M., P. Batalden, P. Margolis, M. Seid, G. Armstrong, L. Opipari-Arrigan, and H. Hartung 2016. “Coproduction of Healthcare Service.” BMJ Quality and Safety 25 (7): 509–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett Moses, L., and J. Chan. 2018. “Algorithmic Prediction in Policing: Assumptions, Evaluation, and Accountability.” Policing and Society 28 (7): 806–822. doi:10.1080/10439463.2016.1253695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berk, R. A. 2019. “Accuracy and Fairness for Juvenile Justice Risk Assessments.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 16: 175–194. doi:10.1111/jels.2019.16.issue-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. 2007. “Beyond Engagement & Participation: User & Community Co-Production of Public Services.” Public Administration Review 846–860. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., and E. Loeffler. 2013. “The Role of Co-Production for Better Health and Wellbeing: Why We Need Change.” In Co-Production of Health and Wellbeing in Scotland, edited by E. Loeffler, G. Power, T. Bovaird, and F. Hine-Hughes, 20–27. Birmingham: Governance International.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M., and S. Zouridis. 2002. “From Street‐Level to System‐Level Bureaucracies: How Information and Communication Technology Is Transforming Administrative Discretion and Constitutional Control.” Public Administration Review 62 (2): pp.174–184. doi:10.1111/puar.2002.62.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., and M. Honingh. 2016. “Distinguishing Different Types of Co-Production: A Conceptual Analysis Based on the Classical Definitions.” Public Administration Review 76 (3): pp. 427–435. doi:10.1111/puar.12465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., and M. Honingh. 2018. “Definitions of Co-Production and Co-Creation.” In Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services, edited by T. Brandsen, T. Steen, and B. Verschuere, 2018. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., and V. Pestoff. 2006. “Co-Production, the Third Sector and the Delivery of Public Services: An Introduction.” Public Management Review 8: 493–501. doi:10.1080/14719030601022874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A., J. Fishenden, M. Thompson, and W. Venters. 2017. “Appraising the Impact and Role of Platform Models and Government as a Platform (Gaap) in UK Government Public Service Reform: Towards a Platform Assessment Framework (PAF).” Government Information Quarterly 34 (2): 167–182. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2017.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardullo, P., and R. Kitchin. 2018. “Being a ‘Citizen’ in the Smart City: Up and down the Scaffold of Smart Citizen Participation in Dublin, Ireland.” GeoJournal 84 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1007/s10708-018-9845-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, H., and M. Choi. 2016. “Big Data and Healthcare: Building an Augmented World.” Healthcare Informatics Research 22 (3): 153–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, B., J. Brudney, and S.-G. Jang. 2013. “Coproduction of Government Services and the New Information Technology: Investigating the Distributional Biases.” Public Administration Review 73 (5): 687–701. doi:10.1111/puar.2013.73.issue-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, B. Y., N. C. Zingale, and J. Logan. 2017. “Intelligence and Information Gathering through Deliberative Crowdsourcing.” Journal of Public & Non-Profit Affairs 3 (1): 55–78. doi:10.20899/jpna.3.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobos, B., K. Haskard-Zolnierek, and K. Howard. 2015. “White Coat Hypertension: Improving the Patient–Health Care Practitioner Relationship.” Psychology Research and Behavior Management 8: 133–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottam, H. 2018. Radical Help: How We Can Remake the Relationships between Us and Revolutionise the Welfare State. Hachette, UK: Virago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson, H., C. Smith, N. Carey, and G. Carey. 2018. Robots and the Delivery of Care Services: What Is the Role for Government in Stewarding Disruptive Innovation? Melbourne: ANZSOG.
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P., H. Margetts, J. Tinkler, and S. Bastow. 2006. Digital Era Governance: IT Corporations, the State, and E-Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Falco, E., and R. Kleinhans. 2018. “Digital Participatory Platforms for Co-Production in Urban Development: A Systematic Review.” International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR) 7 (3): 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forst, B. 2000. “The Privatization and Civilianization of Policing.” Criminal Justice 2 (24): 19–78.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, K. C., J. A. Meltzer, and F. Rudzicz. 2016. “Linguistic Features Identify Alzheimer’s Disease in Narrative Speech.” Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease 49 (2): 407–422. doi:10.3233/JAD-150417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G., and A. J. Meijer. 2015. “Does Twitter Increase Perceived Police Legitimacy?” Public Administration Review 75 (4): 598–607. doi:10.1111/puar.12378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grönroos, C., and P. Voima. 2013. “Critical Service Logic: Making Sense of Value Creation and Co-Creation.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 41 (2): 133–150. doi:10.1007/s11747-012-0308-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honingh, M., E. Bondarouk, and T. Brandsen. 2018. “Co-Production in Primary Schools: A Systematic Literature Review.” International Review of Administrative Sciences. doi:10.1177/0020852318769143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, P., J. Saunders, and J. S. Hollywood 2014. Evaluation of the Shreveport Predictive Policing Experiment. The Rand Corporation. http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR500/RR531/RAND_RR531.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2016. The Ethics of Invention. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, A., and M. Moore. 2004. “Institutionalised Co-Production: Unorthodox Public Service Delivery in Challenging Environments.” Journal of Development Studies 40 (4): 31–49. doi:10.1080/00220380410001673184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornberger, M., R. E. Meyer, C. Brandtner, and M. A. Höllerer. 2017. “When Bureaucracy Meets the Crowd: Studying “Open Government” in the Vienna City Administration.” Organization Studies 38 (2): 179–200. doi:10.1177/0170840616655496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lember, V. 2018. “The Role of New Technologies in Co-Production and Co-Creation.” In Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Service Delivery, edited by T. Brandsen, T. Steen, and B. Verschuere, 115–127. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Linders, D. 2012. “From E-Government to We-Government: Defining a Typology for Citizen Coproduction in the Age of Social Media.” Government Information Quarterly 29 (4): 446–454. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litwak, E., and J. Figueira. 1968. “Technological Innovation and Theoretical Functions Of Primary Groups and Bureaucratic Structures.” American Journal of Sociology 73 (4): 468–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMullin, C., and C. Needham. 2018. “Co-Production in Healthcare.” In Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services, edited by T. Brandsen, B. Verschuere, and T. Steen, 150–160. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. J. 2011. “Networked Coproduction of Public Services in Virtual Communities: From a Government-Centric to a Community Approach to Public Service Support.” Public Administration Review 71 (4): 598–607. doi:10.1111/puar.2011.71.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. J. 2012. “Co-production in an Information Age: Individual and Community Engagement Supported by New Media.” VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 23 (4): 1156–1172.
   Google Scholar
• Mergel, I. 2016. “Social Media in the Public Sector.” In Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy, edited by D. Bearfield and M. Dubnick, Vol. 3, 3018–3021. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, T., A. Sancino, and M. Sicilia. 2017. “Varieties of Participation in Public Services: The Who, When, and What of Coproduction.” Public Administration Review 77 (5): 766–776. doi:10.1111/puar.2017.77.issue-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam, T. 2012. “Suggesting Frameworks of Citizen-Sourcing via Government 2.0.” Government Information Quarterly 29 (1): 12–20. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R., and S. G. Winter. 1977. “In Search of Useful Theory of Innovation.” Research Policy 6: 36–76. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(77)90029-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niaros, V., V. Kostakis, and W. Drechsler. 2017. “Making (In) the Smart City: The Emergence of Makerspaces.” Telematics and Informatics 34 (7): 1143−1152. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2017.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noveck, B. S. 2015. Smart Citizens, Smarter State. The Technologies of Expertise and the Future of Governing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neil, C. 2016. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. UK: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2017. Systems Approaches to Public Sector Challenges: Working with Change. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2018. Observatory of Public Sector Innovation. Global Innovation Review 2018: Case Collection. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P., and K. Strokosch. 2013. “It Takes Two to Tango? Understanding the Co-Production of Public Services by Integrating the Services Management and Public Administration Perspectives.” British Journal of Management 24: S31–S47. doi:10.1111/bjom.2013.24.issue-s1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. 2010. The New Public Governance: Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1996. “Crossing the Great Divide: Coproduction, Synergy, and Development.” World Development 24 (6): 1073–1087. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paletti, A. 2016. “Co-Production through ICT in the Public Sector: When Citizens Reframe the Production of Public Services.” In Digitally Supported Innovation, edited by L. Caporarello, F. Cesaroni, R. Giesecke, and M. Missikoff, 141–152. Berlin: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Parrado, S., G. G. Van Ryzin, T. Bovaird, and E. Löffler. 2013. “Correlates of Co-Production: Evidence from a Five-Nation Survey of Citizens.” International Public Management Journal 16 (1): 85–112. doi:10.1080/10967494.2013.796260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pazaitis, A., P. De Filippi, and V. Kostakis 2017. Blockchain and Value Systems in the Sharing Economy: The Illustrative Case of Backfeed. Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics no. 73. Tallinn University of Technology and The Other Canon Foundation. http://technologygovernance.eu/files/main/2017012509590909.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. 2018. “Co-Production at the Crossroads of Public Administration Regimes.” In Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services, edited by T. Brandsen, B. Verschuere, and T. Steen, 27–36. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, D. O. 2012. “Co-Production and Network Structures in Public Education.” In New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-Production, edited by V. Pestoff, T. Brandsen, and B. Verschuere, 145–168. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Poslad, S., A. Ma, Z. Wang, and H. Mei. 2015. “Using a Smart City IoT to Incentivise and Target Shifts in Mobility behaviour—Is It a Piece of Pie?” Sensors 15 (6): 13069–13096. doi:10.3390/s150613069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sale, P. 2018. “Gerontechnology, Domotics, and Robotics.” In Rehabilitation Medicine for Elderly Patients, edited by S. Masiero and U. Carraro, 161–169. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Short, E. S., E. C. Deng, D. Feil-Seifer, and M. J. Matarić. 2017. “Understanding Agency in Interactions between ChildrenWith Autism and Socially Assistive Robots.” Journal of Human-Robot Interaction 6 (3): 21–47. doi:10.5898/JHRI.6.3.Short.
   Google Scholar
• Shoval, N., and R. Ahas. 2016. “The Use of Tracking Technologies in Tourism Research: The First Decade.” Tourism Geographies 18 (5): 587–606. doi:10.1080/14616688.2016.1214977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, B. M., J. J Rodrigues, I. de la Torre Díez, M. López-Coronado, and K. Saleem. 2015. “Mobile-health: A Review of Current State in 2015.” Journal of Biomedical Informatics 56: 265–272.
   Google Scholar
• Snellen, I. Th. M., and W. B. H. J. Van De Donk, eds. 1998. Public Administration in an Information Age: A Handbook (Volume 6). Amsterdam: IOS press.
   Google Scholar
• Soete, L. 2013. “Is Innovation Always Good?” In Innovation Studies: Evolution and Future Challenges, edited by J. Fagerberg, B. R. Martin, and E. S. Andersen, 134‒144. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, T., and S. Tuurnas. 2018. “The Roles of the Professional in Co-Production and Co-Creation Processes.” In Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services, edited by T. Brandsen, B. Verschuere, and T. Steen, 80–92. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, T., T. Brandsen, and B. Verschuere. 2018. “The Dark Side of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Seven Evils.” In Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services, 284–293. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Symons, T., and T. Bass 2017. Me, My Data and I: The Future of the Personal Data Economy. DECODE Project Report. https://www.decodeproject.eu/file/207/download
   Google Scholar
• Teece, D. 2018. “Profiting from Innovation in the Digital Economy: Enabling Technologies, Standards, and Licensing Models in the Wireless World.” Research Policy 47: 1367–1387. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.01.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Economist. 2013. Civic Crowdfunding. Breaking Ground. https://www.economist.com/news/international/21578039- online-start-ups-are-rallying-citizens-revamp-their-neighbourhoodsbreaking-ground
   Google Scholar
• Tõnurist, P., and L. Surva. 2017. “Is Volunteering Always Voluntary? between Compulsion and Coercion in Co-Production.” VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 28 (1): 223–247. doi:10.1007/s11266-016-9734-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tõnurist, P., and W. De Tavernier. 2017. “The Welfare State in Flux: Individual Responsibility and Changing Accountability Relations in Social Services.” In Routledge Handbook to Accountability and Welfare State Reforms in Europe, edited by T. Christensen and P. Lægreid, 90–104. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Toots, M., K. McBride, T. Kalvet, and R. Krimmer. 2017. “Open Data as Enabler of Public Service Co-Creation: Exploring the Drivers and Barriers.” In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (Cedem 2017), edited by P. Parycek and N. Edelmann, 102–112. Krems: IEEE Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, A. M. 2013. Smart Cities: Big Data, Civic Hackers, and the Quest for a New Utopia. New York: WW Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Van Eijk, C. 2017. “Engagement of Citizens and Public Professionals in the Co-Production of Public Services.” PhD diss., The Institute of Public Administration, Governance and Global Affairs, Leiden.
   Google Scholar
• Van Eijk, C., and T. Steen. 2016. “Why Engage in Co-Production of Public Services? Mixing Theory and Empirical Evidence.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 82 (1): 28–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanleene, D., J. Voets, and B. Verschuere. 2017. “The Co-Production of a Community : Engaging Citizens in Derelict Neighbourhoods.” VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 29 (1): 201–221.
   Google Scholar
• Verschuere, B., D. Vanleene, T. Steen, and T. Brandsen. 2018. “Democratic Co-production: Concepts and Determinants.” In Co-production and Co-creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services, edited by T. Brandsen, T. Steen, and B. Verschuere, 243–251. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Verschuere, B., T. Brandsen, and V. Pestoff. 2012. “Co-Production: The State of the Art in Research and the Future Agenda.” Voluntas 23: 1083–1101. doi:10.1007/s11266-012-9307-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Versichele, M., T. Neutens, M. Delafontaine, and N. Van de Weghe. 2012. “The Use of Bluetooth for Analysing Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Human Movement at Mass Events: A Case Study of the Ghent Festivities.” Applied Geography 32 (2): 208–220. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.05.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Hippel, E. 2016. Free Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Voorberg, W., V. Bekkers, and L. Tummers. 2015. “A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the Social Innovation Journey.” Public Management Review 17: 1333–1357. doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.930505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wherton, J., P. Sugarhood, R. Procter, S. Hinder, and T. Greenhalgh. 2015. “Co-Production in Practice: How People with Assisted Living Needs Can Help Design and Evolve Technologies and Services.” Implementation Science 10 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0271-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Young, J. E., J. Sung, A. Voida, E. Sharlin, T. Igarashi, H. I. Christensen, and R. E. Grinter. 2011. “Evaluating Human-Robot Interaction.” International Journal of Social Robotics 3 (1): 53–67. doi:10.1007/s12369-010-0081-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. London: Profile Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar