(Mis)taking social responsibility? Implementing welfare state reform by private and non-profit organizations

References

• Advisory Committee on Incapacity for Work (Committee Donner). 2001. “Making Work of Labor Fitness.” Advice to the Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment. The Hague, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Ashworth, R., G. Boyne, and R. Delbridge. 2009. “Escape from the Iron Cage? Organizational Change and Isomorphic Pressures in the Public Sector.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19 (1): 165–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, E., T. Chen, and D. Cole. 2018. “Institutional Analysis for New Public Governance Scholars.” Public Management Review ( published online November 8). doi:10.1080/14719037.2018.1538427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitektine, A., and P. Haack. 2015. “The “macro” and the “micro” of Legitimacy: Toward a Multilevel Theory of the Legitimacy Process.” Academy of Management Review 40 (1): 49–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode, I., J. Lange, and M. Märker. 2017. “Caught in Organized Ambivalence: Institutional Complexity and Its Implications in the German Hospital Sector.” Public Management Review 19 (4): 501–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boxenbaum, E. 2006. “Lost in Translation: The Making of Danish Diversity Management.” American Behavioral Scientist 49 (7): 939–948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodkin, E. Z. 2016. “Street-Level Organizations, Inequality, and the Future of Human Services.” Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance 40 (5): 444–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A. D., and S. Toyoki. 2013. “Identity Work and Legitimacy.” Organization Studies 34 (7): 875–896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, M. J. R., and P. M. Allen. 2008. “Understanding Policy Implementation Processes as Self-Organizing Systems.” Public Management Review 10 (3): 421–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., and P. Laegreid. 2017. Transcending New Public Management: The Transformation of Public Sector Reforms. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cloutier, C., J.-L. Denis, A. Langley, and L. Lamothe. 2016. “Agency at the Managerial Interface: Public Sector Reform as Institutional Work.” Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 26 (2): 259–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deephouse, D. L., J. Bundy, L. P. Tost, and M. C. Suchman. 2017. “Organizational Legitimacy: Six Key Questions”. Chap. 1 In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 2nd ed. edited by R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. Lawrence, and R. Meyer, 27–54. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Denis, J.-L., E. Ferlie, and N. Van Gestel. 2015. “Understanding Hybridity in Public Organizations.” Public Administration 93 (2): 273–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., and W. W. Powell. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman, L. B., C. Uggen, and H. S. Erlanger. 1999. “The Endogeneity of Legal Regulation: Grievance Procedures as Rational Myth.” The American Journal of Sociology 105 (2): 406–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2016, October 17). “Sick Pay and Sickness Benefit Schemes in the European Union”. Background report for the Social Protection Committee’s In-Depth Review on sickness benefits. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• George, A. L., and A. A. Bennett. 2004. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., A. Magán Díaz, S. Xiao Li, and J. Céspedes Lorente. 2010. “The Multiplicity of Institutional Logics and the Heterogeneity of Organizational Responses.” Organization Science 21 (2): 521–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., M. Raynard, F. Kodeih, E. R. Micelotta, and M. Lounsbury. 2011. “Institutional Complexity and Organizational Responses.” Academy of Management Annals 5 (1): 317–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood., R., R. Suddaby, and C. R. Hinings. 2002. “Theorizing Change: The Role of Professional Associations in the Transformation of Institutionalized Fields.” Academy of Management Journal 45 (1): 58–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammerschmid, G., S. Van de Walle, R. Andrews, and P. Bezes, eds. 2016. Public Administration Reforms in Europe: The View from the Top. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hupe, P. L., and M. J. Hill. 2016. “’and the Rest Is Implementation.’ Comparing Approaches to What Happens in Policy Processes beyond Great Expectations.” Public Policy and Administration 31 (2): 103–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehoel-Gijsbers, G., ed. 2010. Beperkt Aan Het Werk. Rapportage Ziekteverzuim, Arbeidsongeschiktheid En Arbeidsparticipatie. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
   Google Scholar
• Jordana, J., and D. Levi-Faur, eds. 2004. The Politics of Regulation: Institutions and Regulatory Reforms for the Age of Governance. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kaghan, W., and M. Lounsbury. 2011. “Institutions and Work” [A Comment on Lawrence, Suddaby and Leca].” Journal of Management Inquiry 20 (1): 73–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluve, Jochen, David Card, Michael Fertig, Marek Góra, Lena Jacobi, Peter Jensen, Reelika Leetmaa, et al. 2007. Active Labor Market Policies in Europe: Performances and Perspectives. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kraatz, M. S., and E. S. Block. 2008. “Organizational Implications of Institutional Pluralism.” In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, and R. Suddaby, 243–275. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Landau, D., I. Drori, and S. Terjesen. 2014. “Multiple Legitimacy Narratives and Planned Organizational Change.” Human Relations 67 (11): 1321–1345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, J.-E., ed. 1997. Public Sector Reform; Rationale, Trends and Problems. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, T. B., R. Suddaby, and B. Leca. 2009. “Introduction: Theorizing and Studying Institutional Work.” In Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations, edited by T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby, and B. Leca, 1–27. Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mariani, L., and D. Cavenago. 2013. “Redesigning Welfare Services for Policies Effectiveness: The Non-profit Organizations (NPOs) Perspective.” Public Management Review 15 (7): 1011–1039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., and B. Rowan. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 103: 144–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2010. Sickness, Disability and Work: Breaking the Barriers - a Synthesis of Findings across OECD Countries. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2015. Fit Mind, Fit Job: From Evidence to Practice in Mental Health and Work. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, C. 1991. “Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes.” Academy of Management Review 16: 182–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S., ed. 2010. The New Public Governance? Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pache, A. C., and F. Santos. 2010. “When Worlds Collide: The Internal Dynamics of Organizational Responses to Conflicting Institutional Demands.” The Academy of Management Review 35 (3): 455–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pache, A.-C., and F. Santos. 2013. “Inside the Hybrid Organization: Selective Coupling as a Response to Competing Institutional Logics.” Academy of Management Journal 56 (4): 9721001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey, S. E., and B. E. Wright. 2006. “Connecting the Dots in Public Management: Political Environment, Organizational Goal Ambiguity, and the Public Manager’s Role Ambiguity.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16 (4): 511–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. 1956. “Suggestions for a Sociological Approach to the Theory of Organizations – I.” Administrative Science Quarterly 1: 63–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., and G. Bouckaert. 2017. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis-into the Age of Austerity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W., and J. A. Colyvas. 2008. “Microfoundations of Institutional Theory.” In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, and R. Suddaby, 276–298. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Quick, J. C., M. Macik-Frey, and C. L. Cooper. 2007. “Managerial Dimensions of Organizational Health: The Healthy Leader at Work.” Journal of Management Studies 44 (2): 189–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radaelli, G., and L. Sitton-Kent. 2016. “Middle Managers and the Translation of New Ideas in Organizations: A Review of Micro-practices and Contingencies.” International Journal of Management Reviews 18 (3): 311–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reay, T., and C. Hinings. 2009. “Managing the Rivalry of Competing Institutional Logics.” Organization Studies 30 (6): 629–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, H. J., and I. S. Rubin. 2005. Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlin, K., and L. Wedlin. 2008. “Circulating Ideas: Imitation, Translation and Editing.” In Handbook of organizational institutionalism, edited by R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, and R. Suddaby, 218–242. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. 2014. Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities. Fourth ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Seing, I., E. MacEachen, K. Ekberg, and C. Ståhl. 2015. “Return to Work or Job Transition? Employer Dilemmas in Taking Social Responsibility for Return to Work in Local Workplace Practice.” Disability and Rehabilitation 37 (19): 1760–1769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo, M.-G., and W. E. D. Creed. 2002. “Institutional Contradictions, Praxis, and Institutional Change: A Dialectical Perspective.” Academy of Management Review 27 (2): 222–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skelcher, C., and S. R. Smith. 2015. “Theorizing Hybridity: Institutional Logics, Complex Organizations, and Actor Identities: The Case of Non-Profits.” Public Administration 93 (3): 433–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smets, M., A. Aristidou, and R. Whittington. 2017. “Towards a Practice-driven Institutionalism.” In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 2nd ed. edited by R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B. Lawrence, and R. Meyer, 384–411. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. C. 1995. “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches.” Academy of Management Review 20: 571–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suddaby, R., A. Bitektine, and P. Haack. 2016. “Legitimacy.” Academy of Management Annals 11 (1): 451–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomann, E., P. Hupe, and F. Sager. 2018. “Serving Many Masters: Public Accountability in Private Policy Implementation.” Governance 31: 299–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, P., W. Ocasio, and M. Lounsbury. 2012. The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure and Process. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gestel, N., and B. Hillebrand. 2011. “Explaining Stability and Change: The Rise and Fall of Logics in Pluralistic Fields.” Organization Studies 32 (2): 231–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Oorschot, W. J. H. 2006. “The Dutch Welfare State: Recent Trends and Challenges in Historical Perspective.” European Journal of Social Security 8 (1): 57–76.
   Google Scholar
• Van Oorschot, W. J. H., and K. Boos. 2000. “The Battle against Numbers: Disability Policies in the Netherlands.” European Journal of Social Security 2 (4): 343–361.
   Google Scholar
• Versantvoort, M., and P. van Echtelt. 2016. Beperkt in Functie. Trendrapportage Ziekteverzuim, Arbeidsongeschiktheid En Arbeidsdeelname Van Mensen Met Gezondheidsbeperkingen. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
   Google Scholar
• Voronov, M., D. D. Clercq, and C. Hinings. 2013. “Institutional Complexity and Logic Engagement: An Investigation of Ontario Fine Wine.” Human Relations 66 (12): 1563–1596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wæraas, A., and H. L. Sataøen. 2014. “Trapped in Conformity? Translating Reputation Management into Practice.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 30: 242–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wæraas, A., and J. A. Nielsen. 2016. “Translation Theory ‘translated’: Three Perspectives on Translation in Organizational Research.” International Journal of Management Reviews 18 (3): 236–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldorff, S. B. 2013. “Accounting for Organizational Innovations: Mobilizing Institutional Logics in Translation.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 29: 219–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldorff, S. B. and R. Greenwood. 2011. “The Dynamics of Community Translation: Danish Health-Care Centres.” In Communities and Organizations (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Volume 33), edited by C. Marquis, M. Lounsbury, and R. Greenwood, 113–142, Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Willmott, H. 2011. “Institutional Work’ for What? Problems and Prospects of Institutional Theory.” Journal of Management Inquiry 20 (1): 67–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zilber, T. B. 2016. “How Institutional Logics Matter: A Bottom-Up Exploration.” In How Institutions Matter!, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, edited by J. Gehman, M. Lounsbury, and R. Greenwood, 137–155. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar