An analysis of the role of communities in care systems co-created with older people

References

• Aja, E. 2014. Estado Autonómico Y Reforma Federal. Madrid: Alianza.
   Google Scholar
• Akhilesh, K. B. 2017. Co-Creation and Learning Concepts and Cases. New Delhi: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Alford, J. 2014. “The Multiple Facets of Co-Production : Building on the Work of Elinor Ostrom.” Public Management Review 16 (3): 299–316. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.806578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, S., K. Hart, P. Pahl, and Ward, Eds. 2018. Co-producing Research: A Community Development Approach. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beebeejaun, Y., C. Durose, J. Rees, J. Richardson, and L. Richardson. 2014. “‘beyond Text’: Exploring Ethos and Method in Co-producing Research with Communities.” Community Development Journal Volume 49 (Issue 1): 37–53. doi:10.1093/cdj/bst008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beebeejaun, Y., C. Durose, J. Rees, J. Richardson, and L. Richardson. 2015. “Public Harm or Public Value? Towards Coproduction in Research with Communities.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 33: 552–565. doi:10.1068/c12116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, D., and K. Pahl. 2018. “Co-production: Towards a Utopian Approach.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 21 (1): 105–117. doi:10.1080/13645579.2017.1348581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bindels, J., V. Baur, K. Cox, S. Heijing, and T. Abma. 2014. “Older People as Co-researchers: A Collaborative Journey.” Ageing & Society 34 (6): 951–973. doi:10.1017/S0144686X12001298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode, I. 2006. “Disorganized Welfare Mixes: Voluntary Agencies and New Governance Regimes in Western Europe.” Journal of European Social Policy 16 (4): 346–359. doi:10.1177/0958928706068273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. 2007. “Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services.” Public Administration Review Volume 67 (Issue 5): 846–860. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., G. Van Ryzin, E. Loeffler, and S. Parrado. 2015. “Activating Citizens to Participate in Collective Co-Production of Public Services.” Journal of Social Policy 44 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1017/S0047279414000567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., and M. Honingh. 2015. “Distinguishing Diff Erent Types of Coproduction: A Conceptual Analysis Based on the Classical Definitions.” Public Administration Review 76: 427–435. doi:10.1111/puar.12465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., and V. Pestoff. 2006. “Co-production, the Third Sector and the Delivery of Public Services.” Public Management Review 8 (4): 493–501. doi:10.1080/14719030601022874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J., A. Sancino, J. Benington, and E. Sørensen. 2017. “Towards a Multi-actor Theory of Public Value Co- Creation.” Public Management Review 19 (5): 640–654. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1192164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buffel, T., Ed. 2015. Researching Age-Friendly Communities. Stories from Older People as Co-Investigators. Manchester: University of Manchester Library.
   Google Scholar
• Buffel, T. 2018. “Older Coresearchers Exploring Age-Friendly Communities : An “ Insider ” Perspective on the Benefits and Challenges of Peer-Research.” The Gerontologist 59 (3): 538–548. doi:10.1093/geront/gnx216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buffel, T. 2018b. “Social Research and Co-production with Older People : Developing Age-Friendly Communities Social Research and Co-production with Older People : Developing Age- Friendly Communities.” Journal of Aging Studies 44: 52–60. doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2018.01.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cepiku, D., and F. Giordano. 2014. “Co-Production in Developing Countries : Insights from the Community Health Workers Experience.” Public Management Review 16 (3): 317–340. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.822535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cristofoli, D., M. Meneguzzo, and N. Riccucci. 2017. “Collaborative Administration: The Management of Successful Networks.” Public Management Review 19 (3): 275–283. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1209236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Lorito, C., A. Bosco, L. Birt, and A. Hassiotis. 2018. “Co-research with Adults with Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review.” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 31: 669–686. doi:10.1111/jar.12435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doran, P., and T. Buffel. 2018. “Translating Research into Action: Involving Older People in Co-producing Knowledge about Age-friendly Neighbourhood Interventions.” Working with Older People Vol. 22 (Issue 1): 39–47. doi:10.1108/WWOP-11-2017-0033.
   Google Scholar
• Esping- Andersen, G., and B. Palier. 2011. Los tres grandes retos del Estado de bienestar. Barcelona: Ariel.
   Google Scholar
• Fantova, F. 2014. Diseño de políticas sociales. Madrid: CCS.
   Google Scholar
• Ferran, A. 2017. “La aportación de las entidades sociales del ámbito de la inclusión en Gipuzkoa y su relación con la Administración Pública.” Revista Española del Tercer Sector. Nº 37: 109–128.
   Google Scholar
• Fledderus, J., T. Brandsen, and M. Honingh. 2014. “Restoring Trust through the Co-Production of Public Services : A Theoretical Elaboration.” Public Management Review 16 (3): 424–443. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.848920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guribye, E. 2018. “Co-creation of Linking Social Capital in ‘municipality 3.0’.” Journal of Civil Society 14 (1): 77–93. doi:10.1080/17448689.2017.1402857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, J., and J. Benington. 2000. “Co-research: A New Methodology for New Times.” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 9 (4): 463–476. doi:10.1080/13594320050203085.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, T. 2014. “Co-creation: Moving Towards a Framework for Creating Innovation in the Triple Helix.” Prometheus. doi:10.1080/08109028.2014.971613.
   Google Scholar
• Kindred, J., and C. Petrescu. 2015. “Expectations versus Reality in A University–Community Partnership: A Case Study.” VOLUNTAS 26 (3): 823–845. doi:10.1007/s11266-014-9471-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kisnerman, N. 1990. Comunidad (Teoría y Práctica del Trabajo Social). Buenos Aires: Humanitas.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinhans, R. 2017. “False Promises of Co-production in Neighbourhood Regeneration : The Case of Dutch Community Enterprises.” Public Management Review 19 (10): 1500–1518. doi:10.1080/14719037.2017.1287941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littlechild, R., D. Tanner, and K. Hall. 2015. “Co-research with Older People : Perspectives on Impact.” Qualitative Social Work 14 (1): 18–35. doi:10.1177/1473325014556791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowi, T. 2016. Arenas of Power. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martikke, S., Church, A., and Hart, A.,2018. “A Radical Take on Co-production? Community Partner Leadership in Research.” In Co-producing Research: A Community Development Approach, edited by S. Banks and A. Hart, 49–68. Bristol: Bristol Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mckay, S., D. Moro, S. Teasdale, and D. Clifford. 2015. “The Marketisation of Charities in England and Wales.” VOLUNTAS 26 (1): 336–354. doi:10.1007/s11266-013-9417-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merino, S. 2016. “Posibilidades Del Cooperativismo En Un Nuevo Modelo De Servicios Públicos Sociosanitarios y Su Concreción En El País Vasco.” CIRIEC 87: 139–176.
   Google Scholar
• Morales, E., and O. Rebollo. 2014. “Potencialidades y límites de la acción comunitaria como estrategia empoderadora en el contexto actual de crisis.” Revista De Treball Social Nº 203: 9–22.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, L. 2012. La Europa Asocial. Barcelona: Ediciones Península.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. 2018. “From Public Service-dominant Logic to Public Service Logic: Are Public Service Organizations Capable of Co-production and Value Co-creation?” Public Management Review 20 (2): 225–231. doi:10.1080/14719037.2017.1350461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P., Z. Radnor, and K. Strokosch. 2016. “Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services : A Suitable Case for Treatment ?” Public Management Review 18 (5): 639–653. doi:10.1080/14719037.2015.1111927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. 1998. Beyond the Market and State: Social Enterprises and Civil Democracy in a Welfare Society. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. 2006. “Citizens and Co-production of Welfare Services. Childcare in Eight European Countries.” Public Management Review 8 (4): 503–519. doi:10.1080/14719030601022882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. 2011. “Co-Produção, Nova Governança Pública E Serviços Sociais No Terceiro Setor Na Europa.” Ciências Sociais Unisinos 47 (1): 15–24. doi:10.4013/csu.2011.47.1.02.
   Google Scholar
• Poocharoen, O., B. Ting, and B. Ting. 2015. “Collaboration, Co-Production, Networks : Convergence of Theories.” Public Management Review 17 (4): 587–614. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.866479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez Cabrero, G. 2015. “Avances, limitaciones y retos del Tercer Sector de Acción Social en España.” Revista española del tercer sector Nº 30: 75–97.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M. 2015. “Introduction : The Nonprofitization of the Welfare State.” VOLUNTAS 26 (6): 2147–2154. doi:10.1007/s11266-015-9638-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M., and S. Toepler. 2015. “Government-nonprofit Cooperation: Anomaly or Necessity?” VOLUNTAS 26: 2155–2177. doi:10.1007/s11266-015-9651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selloni, D. 2017. CoDesign for Public-Interest Services. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. 2000. La corrosión del carácter. Barcelona: Editorial Anagrama.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, M., and B. Taylor. 2019. “Involving Individuals with Dementia as Co-researchers in Analysis of Findings from a Qualitative Study.” Dementia 18 (2): 701–712. doi:10.1177/1471301217690904.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tanner, D. 2012. “Co-research with Older People with Dementia: Experience and Reflections.” Journal of Mental Health 21 (3): 296–306. doi:10.3109/09638237.2011.651658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, M., and A. Bassi. 1998. “Unpacking the State: The Implications for the Third Sector of Changing Relationships between National and Local Government.” VOLUNTAS 9 (2): 113–136. doi:10.1023/A:1022007320124.
   Google Scholar
• Teisman, G., and E. Klijn. 2008. “Complexity Theory and Public Management.” Public Management Review 10 (3): 287–297. doi:10.1080/14719030802002451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tönnies, F. 1947. Comunidad y sociedad. Buenos Aires: Losada.
   Google Scholar
• Vandenabeele, W. 2007. “Toward a Public Administration Theory of Public Service Motivation.” Public Management Review 9 (4): 545–556. doi:10.1080/14719030701726697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschuere, B., T. Brandsen, and V. Pestoff. 2012. “Co-production: The State of the Art in Research and the Future Agenda.” VOLUNTAS 23 (4): 1083–1101. doi:10.1007/s11266-012-9307-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voorberg, W. H., V. J. J. M. Bekkers, and L. G. Tummers. 2015. “A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production : Embarking on the Social Innovation Journey.” Public Management Review 17 (9): 1333–1357. doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.930505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, P., S. Banks, A. Hart, and K. Pahl. 2018. “Conclusion: Imagining Different Communities and Making Them Happen.” In Co-producing Research: A Community Development Approach, edited by B. S. In and A. Hart, 203–209, Bristol: Bristol Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wayland, C., and J. Crowder. 2002. “Disparate Views of Community in Primary Health Care: Understanding How Perceptions Influence Success.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 16 (2): 230–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. 2002. Active Ageing: A Policy Framework. Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. 2007. Global Age Friendly Cities: A Guide. Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. 2009. WHO Global Network of Age-friendly Cities. Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. 2015. World Report on Ageing and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. 2018. La Red Mundial de Ciudades y Comunidades Adaptadas a las Personas Mayores: Revisar el último decenio y mirar con optimismo hacia el siguiente. Ginebra: Organización Mundial de la Salud.
   Google Scholar
• Wills, J. 2016. “(Re) Locating Community in Relationships : Questions for Public Policy.” The Sociological Review 64 (4): 639–656. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.12431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar