Following the yellow brick road? (Dis)enchantment with co-design, co-production and value co-creation in public services

References

• Alford, J. 2002. “Defining The Client in The Public Sector: a Social‐exchange Perspective.” Public Administration Review 62 (3): 337–346. doi:10.1111/puar.2002.62.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alford, J. 2016. “Co-Production, Interdependence and Publicness: Extending Public Service-dominant Logic.” Public Management Review 18: 673–691. doi:10.1080/14719037.2015.1111659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alford, J., and J. O’Flynn. 2009. “Making Sense of Public Value: Concepts, Critiques and Emergent Meanings.” Intl Journal of Public Administration 32 (3–4): 171–191. doi:10.1080/01900690902732731.
   Google Scholar
• Alonso, J. M., R. Andrews, J. Clifton, and D. Diaz-Fuentes. 2019. “Factors Influencing Citizens’ Co-Production of Environmental Outcomes: A Multi-Level Analysis.” Public Management Review 21 (11): 1620–1645. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1619806.
   Google Scholar
• Best, B., S. Moffett, and R. McAdam. 2019. “Stakeholder Salience in Public Sector Value Co-creation.” Public Management Review 21 (11): 1707-1732. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1619809.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, C., T. Bovaird, and E. Loeffler. 2017. “Applying a Dynamic Performance Management Framework to Wicked Issues: How Coproduction Helps to Transform Young People’s Services in Surrey County Council, UK.” International Journal of Public Administration 40 (10): 833–846. doi:10.1080/01900692.2017.1280822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., and E. Löffler. 2012a. “From Engagement to Co-Production: How Users and Communities Contribute to Public Services.” In New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-Production, edited by V. Pestoff, T. Brandsen, and B. Verschuere, 53–78. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., and E. Loeffler. 2012b. “From Engagement to Co-production: The Contribution of Users and Communities to Outcomes and Public Value.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 23 (4): 1119–1138. doi:10.1007/s11266-012-9309-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., and E. Loeffler. 2014. “The New Commissioning Model of Services for Young People in Surrey: Evaluation of Achievements and Implications.” Report to Surrey County Council. Birmingham: INLOGOV and Governance International.
   Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., and M. Honingh. 2016. “Distinguishing Different Types of Coproduction: A Conceptual Analysis Based on the Classical Definitions.” Public Administration Review 76: 427–435. doi:10.1111/puar.12465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., and M. Honingh. 2018. “Definitions of Co-production and Co-creation.” In Co-production and Co-creation. Engaging Citizens in Public Services, edited by T. Brandsen, T. Steen, and B. Verschuere, 9–17. New York & London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., T. Steen, and B. Verschuere, eds. 2018. Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services. New York & London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., T. Steen, and B. Verschuere. forthcoming. Co-production. In Routledge Companion to Nonprofit Management, edited by H. Anheier and S. Toepler. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., V. Pestoff, and B. Verschuere. 2012. “Co-production as a Maturing Concept” In New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-Production, edited by V. Pestoff, T. Brandsen, and B. Verschuere, 19–28. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brudney, J. L., and R. E. England. 1983. “Toward a Definition of the Coproduction Concept.” Public Administration Review 43: 59–65. doi:10.2307/975300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carstensen, H. V., and C. Bason. 2012. “Powering Collaborative Policy Innovation: Can Innovation Labs Help.” The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal 17 (1): 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, D.S., L.L. Cheng, C. Hummels, and I. Koskinen. 2016. “Social Design: an Introduction.” International Journal of Design 10 (1): 1-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby, B. C., and J. M. Bryson. 2018. “Why Leadership of Public Leadership Research Matters: And What to Do about It.” Public Management Review 20 (9): 1265–1286. doi:10.1080/14719037.2017.1348731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorst, K. 2011. “The Core of ‘design Thinking’and Its Application.” Design Studies 32 (6): 521–532. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudau, A., G. Kominis, and M. Szocs. 2018. “Innovation Failure in the Eye of the Beholder: Towards a Theory of Innovation Shaped by Competing Agendas within Higher Education.” Public Management Review 20 (2): 254–272. doi:10.1080/14719037.2017.1302246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, E. M. 2019. “Representative Co-production: Broadening the Scope of the Public Service Logic.” Public Management Review 21 (2): 291–314. doi:10.1080/14719037.2018.1487575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evetts, J. 2006. “Short Note: the Sociology of Professional Groups: New Directions.” Current Sociology 54 (1): 133–143. doi:10.1177/0011392106057161.
   Google Scholar
• Fledderus, J. 2018. “The Effects of Co-production on Trust.” In Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services, edited by T. Brandsen, T. Steen, and B. Verschuere, 258–263. New York & London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, A. 2005. “Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers: Now Who Calls The Shots?.” Review of African Political Economy 104 (5): 317-340. doi: 10.1080/03056240500329346.
   Google Scholar
• George, J. M. 2017. The Ontology of Gods: An Account of Enchantment, Disenchantment, and Re-Enchantment. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gleeson, D., and D. Knights. 2006. “Challenging Dualism: Public Professionalism in ‘troubled’times.” Sociology 40 (2): 277–295. doi:10.1177/0038038506062033.
   Google Scholar
• Grönroos, C. 2006. “Adopting a Service Logic for Marketing.” Marketing Theory 6 (3): 317–333. doi:10.1177/1470593106066794.
   Google Scholar
• Hardyman, W., M. Kitchener, and K. L. Daunt. 2019. “What Matters to Me! User Conceptions of Value in Specialist Cancer Care.” Public Management Review 21 (11): 1687–1706. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1619808.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, J., S. Parker, and J. Beashel. 2019. “Leading and Recognizing Public Value.” Public Administration 97: 264–278. doi:10.1111/padm.2019.97.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hefetz, A., and M. Warner. 2004. “Privatization and Its Reverse: Explaining the Dynamics of the Government Contracting Process.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14: 171–190. doi:10.1093/jopart/muh012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinonen, K., T. Strandvik, K. J. Mickelsson, B. Edvardsson, E. Sundström, and P. Andersson. 2010. “A Customer-dominant Logic of Service.” Journal of Service Management 21 (4): 531–548. doi:10.1108/09564231011066088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgkinson, I. R., C. Hannibal, B. W. Keating, R. Chester Buxton, and N. Bateman. 2017. “Toward a Public Service Management: Past, Present, and Future Directions.” Journal of Service Management 28 (5): 998–1023. doi:10.1108/JOSM-01-2017-0020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgkinson, I. R., and P. Hughes. 2014. “Strategy Content and Public Service Provider Performance in the UK: An Alternative Approach.” Public Administration 92 (3): 707–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, M. 2013. “Can Government Initiatives Increase Citizen Coproduction? Results of a Randomized Field Experiment.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART 23: 27–54. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, R. 2000. “Disenchantment, Enchantment and Re-enchantment: Max Weber at the Millennium.” Max Weber Studies 1 (1): 11–32.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, S., and G. G. Van Ryzin. 2019. “Coproduction and Trust in Government: Evidence from Survey Experiments.” Public Management Review 21 (11): 1646–1664. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1619812.
   Google Scholar
• Karlberg, S. 2005. Max Weber: Readings and Commentary on Modernity. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Laing, A. 2003. “Marketing in the Public Sector: Towards a Typology of Public Services.” Marketing Theory 3: 427–445. doi:10.1177/1470593103042005.
   Google Scholar
• Lember, V., T. Brandsen, and P. Tõnurist. 2019. “The Potential Impacts of Digital Technologies on Co-production and Co-creation.” Public Management Review 21 (11): 1665–1686. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1619807.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, C., and M. Moran. 2018. “The Tale of the Veil: Unweaving Big Society and the Social Enterprise Myth.” In Social Entrepreneurship. An Affirmative Critique, edited by P. Dey and C. Steyaert, 75–99. Cheltenham & Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, K. 2004. “Towards A’modernized’voluntary and Community Sector?” Public Management Review 6 (4): 555–562. doi:10.1080/1471903042000303337.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. H. 1995. Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noordegraaf, M. 2015. Public Management: Performance, Professionalism and Politics. London: Macmillan International Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• O’flynn, J. 2007. “From New Public Management to Public Value: Paradigmatic Change and Managerial Implications.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 66: 353–366. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.2007.00545.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. 2018. “From Public Service-dominant Logic to Public Service Logic: Are Public Service Organizations Capable of Co-production and Value Co-creation?” Public Management Review 20 (2): 225–231. doi:10.1080/14719037.2017.1350461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P., Z. Radnor, and G. Nasi. 2013. “A New Theory for Public Service Management? Towards A (public) Service-dominant Approach.” American Review of Public Administration 43: 135–158. doi:10.1177/0275074012466935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1996. “Crossing the Great Divide: Coproduction, Synergy, and Development.” World Development 24: 1073–1087. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, R. B., P. C. Baker, L. Kiser, R. Oakerson, E. Ostrom, V. Ostrom, S. L. Percy, M. B. Vandivort, G. P. Whitaker, and R. Wilson. 1981. “Consumers as Coproducers of Public Services: Some Economic and Institutional Considerations.” Policy Studies Journal 9: 1001–1011. doi:10.1111/psj.1981.9.issue-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrescu, M. 2019. “From Marketing to Public Value: Towards a Theory of Public Service Ecosystems.” Public Management Review 21 (11): 1733–1752. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1619811.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., and P. Hupe. 2011. “Talking about Government: The Role of Magic Concepts.” Public Management Review 13: 641–658. doi:10.1080/14719037.2010.532963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prebble, M. 2016. “Has the Study of Public Service Motivation Addressed the Issues that Motivated the Study?” The American Review of Public Administration 46 (3): 267–291. doi:10.1177/0275074014554651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prebble, M. 2018. “Is “we” Singular? the Nature of Public Value.” The American Review of Public Administration 48 (2): 103–118. doi:10.1177/0275074016671427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radnor, Z., S. P. Osborne, T. Kinder, and J. Mutton. 2014. “Operationalizing Co-production in Public Services Delivery: The Contribution of Service Blueprinting.” Public Management Review 16 (3): 402–423. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.848923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Relly, J. E., and M. Sabharwal. 2009. “Perceptions of Transparency of Government Policymaking: A Cross-national Study.” Government Information Quarterly 26 (1): 148–157. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2008.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saks, M. 1995. Professions and the Public Interest. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Siebert, S., F. Wilson, and J. R. Hamilton. 2017. “‘Devils May Sit Here:’ the Role of Enchantment in Institutional Maintenance.” Academy of Management Journal 60: 1607–1632. doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, T., T. Brandsen, and B. Verschuere. 2018. “The Dark Side of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Seven Evils.” In Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services, edited by T. Brandsen, T. Steen, and B. Verschuere, 284–293. New York & London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Suddaby, R., M. Ganzin, and A. Minkus. 2017. “Craft, Magic and the Re-enchantment of the World.” In Management Research, edited by S. Siebert, 41–72. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J.C. 2013. “Citizen, Customer, Partner: Rethinking the Place of the Public in Public Management.” Public Administration Review 73 (6): 786-796. doi: 10.1111/puar.2013.73.issue-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torjman, L. 2012. Labs: Designing the Future. Ontario, Canada: MaRS Discovery District.
   Google Scholar
• Trischler, J., and M. Charles. 2019. “The Application of a Service Ecosystems Lens to Public Policy Analysis and Design: Exploring the Frontiers.” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 38 (1): 19–35. doi:10.1177/0743915618818566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trischler, J., S. J. Pervan, S. J. Kelly, and D. R. Scott. 2018. “The Value of Codesign: The Effect of Customer Involvement in Service Design Teams.” Journal of Service Research 21 (1): 75–100. doi:10.1177/1094670517714060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trischler, J., T. Dietrich, and S. Rundle-Thiele. 2019. “Co-Design: From Expert- to User-driven Ideas in Public Service Design.” Public Management Review 21 (11): 1595–1619. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1619810.
   Google Scholar
• Van Eijk, C., T. Steen, and B. Verschuere. 2017. Co-producing Safety in the Local Community: A Q-methodology Study on the Incentives of Belgian and Dutch Members of Neighbourhood Watch Schemes. Local Government Studies 43 (3): 323–343. doi:10.1080/03003930.2017.1281803
   Google Scholar
• Vargo, S. L., and R. F. Lusch. 2016. “Institutions and Axioms: An Extension and Update of Service-dominant Logic.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 44 (1): 5–23. doi:10.1007/s11747-015-0456-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargo, S. L., and R. F. Lush. 2004. “Evolving a Services Dominant Logic.” Journal of Marketing 68 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschuere, B., T. Brandsen, and V. Pestoff. 2012. “Co-production: The State of the Art in Research and the Future Agenda.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 23: 1083–1101. doi:10.1007/s11266-012-9307-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voorberg, W. H., V. J. Bekkers, and L. G. Tummers. 2015. “A Systematic Review of Co-creation and Co-production: Embarking on the Social Innovation Journey.” Public Management Review 17 (9): 1333–1357. doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.930505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voorberg, W. H., V. J. Bekkers, and L. G. Tummers. 2014. “Co-creation in Social Innovation: A Comparative Case-study on the Influential Factors and Outcomes of Co-creation.” Paper presented at the 18th Annual IRSPM Conference, Ottawa, Canada, April 9–11.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 1946. “Science as a vocation”. In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, edited and translated by H.H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whimster, S., and S. Lash. 2014. Max Weber, Rationality and Modernity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar