Governing collaborations: how boards engage with their communities in multi-academy trusts in England

References

• Abbott, M., C. Walton, Y. Tapia, and C. R. Greenwood. 1999. “Research to Practice: A “Blueprint” for Closing the Gap in Local Schools.” Exceptional Children 65 (3): 339–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agranoff, R. 2006. “Inside Collaborative Networks: Ten Lessons for Public Managers.” Public Administration Review 66: 56–65. doi:10.1111/puar.2006.66.issue-s1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allcroft, G. 2016. Welcome to a Multi Academy Trust: A Guide for Newly Appointed Trustees. Birmingham: National Governance Association.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, J. 2016. School Performance and Leadership: School Performance in Multi-Academy Trusts and Local Authorities– 2015. London: Education Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, J, J Belsky, and KA Broomfield et al. 2006. “Neighbourhood Deprivation, School Disorder and Academic Achievement in Primary Schools in Deprived Communities in England.” International Journal Of Behavioral Development 30: 127–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, J. 2020. “New Modes of Collaborative Governance: Governing Collaborations in a new School Landscape, Power, Control and Communication.” In School Governance: Closing the Gap in Education. World Yearbook of Education, edited by J. Allan, V. Harwood, and C. R. Jorgensen, 33–55. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, J. 2016a. “School Boards in England in Multi Academy Trusts: Understandings Of Strategy and Their Role in Creating It.” Belmas, Carden Park Cheshire, July 8−10.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, J. 2016b. Policy and Practices. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, J. 2017. School Inspectors: Policy Implementers. Policy Shapers in National Contexts. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, J. forthcoming. “School Boards and Their Role in the Governance of Education.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education, edited by R. Papa. New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.ORE_EDU-00704.R1.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, J., and J. Clarke. 2013. “Farewell to The Tickbox Inspector ?ofsted and the Changing Regime of School Inspection in England.” Oxford Review Of Education 39 (5): 702–718. doi:10.1080/03054985.2013.846852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, J., S. Grek, C. and, and. 2015. “Regulatory Frameworks: Shifting Frameworks, Shifting Critieria.” Baxter, J., S. Grek, C. and, and, edited by. Governing by Inspection, 74–96. London:Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• BBC. 2017. “Wakefield City Academies Trust Pulls Out of 21 Schools.” BBC. Accessed 11 November 2017. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-41198403
   Google Scholar
• Beech, N., and C. Huxham. 2003. “Cycles of Identity Formation in Interorganizational Collaborations.” International Studies of Management and Organisation 33 (2): 28–52. doi:10.1080/00208825.2003.11043686.
   Google Scholar
• Blyth, M. 2013. Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, P., and M. Toubiana. 2014. “The Dynamics of Nested Governance.” In Nonprofit Governance: Innovative Perspectives and Approaches, edited by C. Cornforth and W. A. Brown, 231–249. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. E. 2005. “Schools and Civic Norms.” Education Next 5 (3): 62.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. E. 2006. Why We Vote: How Schools and Communities Shape Our Civic Life. Vol. 87. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, C., and D. Muijs. 2013. “Does School to school Collaboration Promote school Improvement? a Study of the Impact of school Federations on Student Outcomes.” School Effectiveness & School Improvement 25 (3): 351–393. doi:10.1080/09243453.2013.840319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., and P. Laegreid. 2001. “New Public Management: The Effects of Contractualism and Devolution on Political Control.” Public Management Review 3 (1): 73–94. doi:10.1080/14616670010009469.
   Google Scholar
• Cinquini, L., C. Campanale, G. Grossi, S.G. Mauro, and A. Sancino. 2017. “Co-production and Governance” In Global Encylopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy and Governance edited by A. Farazmand. The Netherlands: Springer
   Google Scholar
• Cinquini, L., C. Campanale, G. Grossi, S. G. Mauro, and A. Sancino. 2017. “Co-Production and Governance.” In Global Encylopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy and Governance, edited by A. Farazmand. The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, J., and J. Newman. 1997. The Managerial State: Power, Politics and Ideology in the Remaking of Social Welfare. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cornforth, C. 2001. “What Makes Boards Effective? an Examination of the Relationships between Board Inputs, Structures, Processes and Effectiveness in Non‐profit Organisations.” Corporate Governance: An International Review 9 (3): 217–227. doi:10.1111/corg.2001.9.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornforth, C. 2012. “Nonprofit Governance Research: Limitations of the Focus on Boards and Suggestions for New Directions.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 41 (6): 1116–1135. doi:10.1177/0899764011427959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DfE. 2018. “Official Statistics: Multi-academy Trust Performance Measures: England, 2016 to 2017.” Accessed 12 December 2018. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/multi-academy-trust-performance-measures-2016-to-2017
   Google Scholar
• Editorial. 2016. “Education Excellence Everywhere: Forum’s Response to the White Paper Forum.” 58 (2).
   Google Scholar
• Ehren, M, and J. Perryman 2018. “Accountability of school networks: Who is accountable to whom and for what?” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 46 (6):942-959. doi: 10.1177/1741143217717272
   Google Scholar
• Ehren, Melanie CM, and David Godfrey. 2017. “External Accountability Of Collaborative Arrangements; a case Study Of a Multi Academy Trust in England.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 29 (4): 339-362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, C. M., and J. Jones. 2000. “Evaluating Stakeholder Participation in Public Services–Parents and Schools.” Policy & Politics 28 (2): 251–262. doi:10.1332/0305573002500956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnigan, K. S. 2007. “Charter School Autonomy: The Mismatch between Theory and Practice.” Educational Policy 21 (3): 503–526. doi:10.1177/0895904806289189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, M. R., and D. M. Ihrke. 2016. “Comparing Nonprofit Charter and Traditional Public School Board Member Perceptions of the Public, Conflict, and Financial Responsibility: Is There a Difference and Does It Matter?” Public Management Review 18 (7): 972–992. doi:10.1080/14719037.2015.1028975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, B. 2011. (Un)satisfactory: Enhanginglife Chances by Improving ‘Satisfactory Schools’. https://www.thersa.org/globalassets/pdfs/blogs/unsatisfactory_schools_updated.pdf .
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. 1996. Pedagogy of the Oppressed (Revised). New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Gorard, S., C. Taylor, and J. Fitz. 2001. “Social Exclusion and Public Policy: The Relationship between Local School Admission Arrangements and Segregation by Poverty.” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 21 (4/5/6): 10–36. doi:10.1108/01443330110789420.
   Google Scholar
• Gunnarsson, V., P. F. Orazem, M. A. Sánchez, and A. Verdisco. 2009. “Does Local School Control Raise Student Outcomes? Evidence on the Roles of school Autonomy and Parental Participation.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 58 (1): 25–52. doi:10.1086/605209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1968. “Technik Und Wissenschaft Als ‘Ideologie’?” Man and World 1 (4): 483–523. doi:10.1007/BF01247043.
   Google Scholar
• Hambleton, R., and J. Howard. 2013. “Place-based Leadership and Public Service Innovation.” Local Government Studies 39 (1): 47–70. doi:10.1080/03003930.2012.693076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, L., R. Kvalsund, and M. Galton. 2009. “Reviews of Research on Rural Schools and Their Communities in British and Nordic Countries: Analytical Perspectives and Cultural Meaning.” International Journal of Educational Research 48 (2): 80–88. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2009.02.001.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, Linda, Rune Kvalsund, and Maurice Galton. 2009. “Reviews Of Research on Rural Schools and Their Communities in British and Nordic Countries: Analytical Perspectives and Cultural Meaning.” International Journal Of Educational Research 48 (2): 80-88.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, J., and M. Allison. 2002. “Good, Better, Best? Inter-organizational Learning in a Network of Local Authorities.” Public Management Review 4 (1): 101–118. doi:10.1080/14616670110117332.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, J., S. Parker, and J. Beashel. 2019. “Leading and Recognizing Public Value.” Public Administration. doi:10.1111/padm.12563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HCEC. 2014–2015. House of Commons Education Committee: Academies and Free Schools. London: House of Commons Education Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Higham, R., and D. Hopkins. 2007. “System Leadership for Educational Renewal in England: The Case of Federations and Executive Heads.” Australian Journal of Education-Hawthorn 51 (3): 299. doi:10.1177/000494410705100307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A. O. 1978. “Exit, Voice, and the State.” World Politics 31 (1): 90–107. doi:10.2307/2009968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HMSO. 2017. “Multi-Academy Trusts: Seventh Report of Session 2016–17.” London. Accessed 02 February 2019. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmeduc/204/204.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Huxham, C., and S. Vangen. 2013. Managing to Collaborate: The Theory and Practice of Collaborative Advantage. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Izzo, C. V., R. P. Weissberg, W. J. Kasprow, and M. Fendrich. 1999. “A Longitudinal Assessment of Teacher Perceptions of Parent Involvement in Children’s Education and School Performance.” American Journal of Community Psychology 27 (6): 817–839. doi:10.1023/A:1022262625984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kooiman, J. (1993) Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions. London: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Kvalsund, R., and L. Hargreaves. 2009. “Reviews of Research in Rural Schools and Their Communities: Analytical Perspectives and a New Agenda.” International Journal of Educational Research 48 (2): 140–149. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2009.02.002.
   Google Scholar
• Lawton, D. 1994. The Tory Mind on Education 1979–94. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mandell, M., and R. Keast. 2007. “Evaluating Network Arrangements: Toward Revised Performance Measures.” Public Performance & Management Review 30 (4): 574–597. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576300406.
   Google Scholar
• Mayo, M., and M. Taylor. 2001. “Partnerships and Power in Community Regeneration.” In Partnership Working: Policy and Practice 39–56 edited by Balloch, S and Taylor, M. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, M., and R. Agranoff. 2011. “The Limitations of Public Management Networks.” Public Administration 89 (2): 265–284. doi:10.1111/padm.2011.89.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, R. H. 1982. Coffin Nails and Corporate Strategies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• NASBM. 2017. “National Association of School Business Management.” National Association of School Business Management. Accessed 01 March 2017. http://www.nasbm.co.uk/
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2006. “Parent and Community ‘voice’ in Schools.” Accessed 02 January 2019. https://www.oecd.org/site/schoolingfortomorrowknowledgebase/themes/demand/parentandcommunityvoiceinschools.html
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. 2006. The New Public Governance? London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1996. “Crossing the Great Divide: Coproduction, Synergy, and Development.” World Development 24 (6): 1073–1087. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrower, F., and M. M. Stone. 2010. “Moving Governance Research Forward: A Contingency-based Framework and Data Application.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 39 (5): 901–924. doi:10.1177/0899764009338962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paletta, A. 2012. “Public Governance and School Performance: Improving Student Learning through Collaborative public Management.” Public Management Review 14 (8): 1125–1151. doi:10.1080/14719037.2012.657838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parliament. 2010. The Academies Act 2010. London: HMSO. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/32/pdfs/ukpga_20100032_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Parliament, UK. 2017. Multi-Academy Trusts: Seventh Report of Session 2016–17. Edited by House of Commons Education Committee. London: House of Commons.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, E., and B. Francis. 2010. The Social Class Gap for Educational Achievement. London. https://www.thersa.org/discover/publications-and-articles/reports/the-social-class-gap-for-educational-achievement-a-review-of-the-literature
   Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne, Donald E. 1988. Narrative knowing and the human sciences.New York: Suny Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reardon, S. F. 2011. “The Widening Academic Achievement Gap between the Rich and the Poor: New Evidence and Possible Explanations.” In Whither Opportunity, 91–116 edited by Duncan, G. and Murnane, R. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Reese, J., D. Mullins, and T. Boviard (2012) “Third Sector Partnerships for Public Service Delivery: An Evidence Review.” Thirds Sector Research Centre Working Paper 60. London. Cabinet Office.
   Google Scholar
• Rochester, C, A Ellis Paine, and S. Howlett. 2012. Volunteering and Society in the 21st Century. Basingstoke: Palgrave macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Salokangas, M., and C. Chapman. 2014. “Exploring Governance in Two Chains of Academy Schools: A Comparative Case Study.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 42 (3): 372–386. doi:10.1177/1741143214521588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J, and Ally Kuzin. 2011. ““Parent Involvement in Urban Charter Schools: New Strategies for Increasing Participation.”school.” Community Journal 21 (1): 71.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, M. M., B. C. Crosby, and J. M. Bryson. 2010. “Governing Public–Nonprofit Collaborations: Understanding Their Complexity and the Implications for Research.” Voluntary Sector Review 1 (3): 309–334. doi:10.1332/204080510X538310.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, M. M., B. C. Crosby, and J. M. Bryson. 2013. “Adaptive Governance in Collaborations.” In Nonprofit Governance: Innovative Perspectives and Approaches, edited by C. Cornforth and W.H. Brown, 249–272. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J. 2019. “Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector: The Argument.” Public Management Review 21 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1080/14719037.2018.1430248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Puyvelde, S., R. Caers, C. Du Bois, and M. Jegers. 2016. “Managerial Objectives and the Governance of Public and Non-profit Organizations.” Public Management Review 18 (2): 221–237. doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.969760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waslander, S. 2010. “Markets in Education: An Analytical Review of Empirical Research on Market Mechanisms in Education.” OECD Education Working Papers, No. 52. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, A. S. 2002. Where Charter School Policy Fails: The Problems of Accountability and Equity. Vol. 12. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Widmer, C. H., and S. Houchin. 1999. Governance of National Federated Organizations. Washington, DC : National Center for Nonprofit Boards.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, A. 2009. “School Choice and Constructing the Active Citizen: Representations and Negotiations of Active, Responsible Parenting.” PhD diss., Open University Milton Keynes.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, A. 2014. “Good Governance, Managerialist Realism and the State-market Entanglement: The Changing Role of School Governors in England.” www.saseproject.com
   Google Scholar
• Wilkoszewski, H., and E. Sundby. 2014. Looking Beyond the Numbers: Stakeholders and Multiple School Accountability. OECD Working Papers. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wohlstetter, P., R. Wenning, and K. L. Briggs. 1995. “Charter Schools in the United States: The Question of Autonomy.” Educational Policy 9 (4): 331–358. doi:10.1177/0895904895009004001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, D., and T. Brighouse. 2014. The Story of the London Challenge. London: London Leadership Strategy.
   Google Scholar
• Young, D. R., N. Bania, and D. Bailey. 1996. “Structure and Accountability a Study of National Nonprofit Associations.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership 6 (4): 347–365. doi:10.1002/nml.4130060405.
   Google Scholar