Reporting multiple dimensions of public service performance: information order effects on citizens’ willingness to use services

References

• Andrews, R., G. A. Boyne, and R. M. Walker. 2006. “Subjective and Objective Measures of Organizational Performance: An Empirical Exploration.” In Public Service Performance: Perspectives on Measurement and Management, edited by G. A. Boyne, K. J. Meier, L. J. O’Toole, and R. M. Walker, 14–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511488511.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., 1993. “Education Markets, Choice and Social Class: The Market as a Class Strategy in the UK and the USA.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 14(1): 3–19. doi:10.1080/0142569930140101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battaglio, P .R., P. Belardinelli, N. Bellé, and P. Cantarelli. 2019. “Behavioral Public Administration Ad Fontes: A Synthesis of Research on Bounded Rationality, Cognitive Biases, and Nudging in Public Organizations.” Public Administration Review 79(3): 304–320. doi:10.1111/puar.12994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belardinelli, P., N. Bellé, M. Sicilia, and I. Steccolini. 2018. “Framing Effects under Different Uses of Performance Information: An Experimental Study on Public Managers.” Public Administration Review 78(6): 841–851. doi:10.1111/puar.12969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellé, N., P. Cantarelli, and P. Belardinelli. 2018. “Prospect Theory Goes Public: Experimental Evidence on Cognitive Biases in Public Policy and Management Decisions.” Public Administration Review 78(6): 828–840. doi:10.1111/puar.12960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blom-Hansen, J., M. Baekgaard, and S. Serritzlew. 2017. “How Bureaucrats May Shape Political Decisions: The Role of Policy Information.” Working paper presented at the 2017 NORKOM Meeting, Reykjavík, Iceland.
   Google Scholar
• Blom-Hansen, J., R. Morton, and S. Serritzlew. 2015. “Experiments in Public Management Research.” International Public Management Journal 18(2): 151–170. doi:10.1080/10967494.2015.1024904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, S. D., K. A. Carlson, M. G. Meloy, J. E. Russo, and R. J. Tanner. 2007. “Information Distortion in the Evaluation of a Single Option.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 102(2): 240–254. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.04.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A. 2002. “Concepts and Indicators of Local Authority Performance: An Evaluation of the Statutory Frameworks in England and Wales.” Public Money & Management 22(2): 17–24. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-9302.00303%5Cnhttp://www.tandfonline.com.ezproxyd.bham.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-9302.00303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, K. A., M. G. Meloy, and J. Edward Russo. 2006. “Leader-Driven Primacy: Using Attribute Order to Affect Consumer Choice.” Journal of Consumer Research 32(4): 513–518. doi:10.1086/500481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chingos, M. M., M. Henderson, and M. R. West. 2012. “Citizen Perceptions of Government Service Quality: Evidence from Public Schools.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 7: 411–445. doi:10.1561/100.00011071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, J., C. M. Dahlmann, A. H. Mathiasen, D. P. Moynihan, and N. B. G. Petersen. 2018. “How Do Elected Officials Evaluate Performance? Goal Preferences, Governance Preferences and the Process of Goal Reprioritization.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 28(2): 197–211. doi:10.1093/jopart/muy001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, J. 2018. “Biased, not blind: An experimental test of self-serving biases in service users’ evaluations of performance information.” Public Administration 96(3): 468–80. doi:10.1111/padm.2018.96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, Y. H., and H. G. Rainey. 2005. “Goal Ambiguity and Organizational Performance in U.S. Federal Agencies.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15(4): 529–557. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. H. 1984. “Order in the Courtroom.” In Perspectives in Psychology and Law.,edited byD. J. Miller, D. G. Blackman, and A. J. Chapman, 251–265. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dowding, K., and P. John. 2007. “The Three Exit, Three Voice and Loyalty Framework: A Test with Survey Data On.” Political Studies 56(2): 288–311. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00688.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N. 2001a. “On the Limits of Framing Effects: Who Can Frame?” The Journal of Politics 63(4): 1041–1066. doi:10.1111/0022-3816.00100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N. 2001b. “The Implications of Framing Effects for Citizen Competence.” Political Behavior 23(3): 225–256. doi:10.1023/A:1015006907312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N., and T. J. Leeper. 2012. “Learning More from Political Communication Experiments: Pretreatment and Its Effects.” American Journal of Political Science 56(4): 875–896. doi:10.1111/ajps.2012.56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Jilke, S., Olsen, A. L., and Tummers, L. 2017. “Behavioral Public Administration: Combining Insights from Public Administration and Psychology.” Public Administration Review 77(1): 45–56. doi:10.1111/puar.12609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatry, H. P. 2006. Performance Measurement: Getting Results. 2nd. Washington D.C.: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hjortskov, M. 2017. “Priming and Context Effects in Citizen Satisfaction Surveys.” Public Administration 95(4): 912–926. doi:10.1111/padm.12346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogarth, R. M., and H. J. Einhorn. 1992. “Order Effects in Belief Updating : The Belief-Adjustment Model.” Cognitive Psychology 24: 1–55. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(92)90002-J.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm, J. M. 2018. “Successful Problem Solvers? Managerial Performance Information Use to Improve Low Organizational Performance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 28(3): 303–320. https://academic.oup.com/jpart/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jopart/muy017/4993635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. 2011. The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy, and Self-Preservation in Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, R., J. W. Snyder, and A. Saultz. 2014. “Informing or Shaping Public Opinion? The Influence of School Accountability Data Format on Public Perceptions of School Quality.” American Journal of Education 121(1): 1–27. doi:10.1086/678136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, O. 2011. “Performance Measures and Democracy: Information Effects on Citizens in Field and Laboratory Experiments.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21(3): 399–418. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, O., S. R. Jilke, and G. G. Van Ryzin. 2017. “Introduction: Experiments in Public Management Research.” In Experiments in Public Management Research: Challenges and Contributions, edited byO. James, S. R. Jilke, and G. G. Van Ryzin, 3–19. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• James, O., and G. G. Van Ryzin. 2019. “Rates and the Judgment of Government Performance.” Journal of Behavioral Public Administration 2(2): 1–10. doi:10.30636/jbpa.22.41.
   Google Scholar
• Jilke, S. R., and G. G. Van Ryzin. 2017. “Survey Experiments for Public Management Research.” In Experiments in Public Management Research: Challenges and Contributions, edited by O. James, S. Jilke, and G. Van Ryzin, 117–138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S., and D. P. Norton. 1992. “The Balanced Scorecard - Measures That Drive Performance.” Harvard Business Review 70(1): 71–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarland, S. G. 1981. “Effects of Question Order on Survey Responses.” Public Opinion Quarterly 45(2): 208. https://academic.oup.com/poq/article-lookup/doi/10.1086/268651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. 2008. The Dynamics of Performance Management: Constructing Information and Reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nickerson, R. 1998. “Confirmation Bias: A Unique Phenomenon in Many Guises.” Review of General Psychology 2(2): 175–220. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, A. L. 2015. “Citizen (Dis)Satisfaction: An Experimental Equivalence Framing Study.” Public Administration Review 75(3): 469–478. doi:10.1111/puar.12337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, R. T. 2017. “Ratio Bias and Policy Preferences: How Equivalency Framing of Numbers Can Affect Attitudes.” Political Psychology 38(6): 1103–1120. doi:10.1111/pops.12362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., M. Heesacker, and J. N. Hughes. 1997. “The Elaboration Likelihood Model: Implications for the Practice of School Psychology.” Journal of School Psychology 35(2): 107–136. doi:10.1016/S0022-4405(97)00003-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Z. L. Tormala, C. Hawkins, and D. T. Wegener. 2001. “Motivation to Think and Order Effects in Persuasion: The Moderating Role of Chunking.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27(3): 332–344. doi:10.1177/0146167201273007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E. and Cacioppo, J. T. 1986. Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Propper, C., and D. Wilson. 2003. “The Use and Usefulness of Performance Measures in the Public Sector.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 19(2): 250–267. doi:10.1093/oxrep/19.2.250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, R., R. Jacobsen, and T. Wilder. 2008. Grading Education: Getting Accountability Right. New York, NY: Teachers College Press & Economic Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, M., P. Teske, and M. Marschall. 2000. Choosing Schools: Consumer Choice and the Quality of American Schools. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sheffer, L., P. Loewen, S. Soroka, S. Walgrave, and T. Sheafer. 2018. “Non-Representative Representatives: An Experimental Study of the Decision Making Traits of Elected Politicians.” American Political Science Review 112(2): 302–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, M., and K. J. Meier. 2018. “Citizen Satisfaction and the Kaleidoscope of Government Performance: How Multiple Stakeholders See Government Performance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 28(4): 489–505. doi:10.1093/jopart/muy006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teske, P. and Schneider, M. 2001. “What Research Can Tell Policymakers About School Choice.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: The Journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management 20(4): 609–631. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6688.
   Google Scholar
• Tetlock, P. E. 1983. “Accountability and the Perseverance of First Impressions.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Social Psychology Quarterly 46(4): 285–292.
   Google Scholar
• Thaler, R., and C. Sunstein. 2008. “Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness.” In Nudge: Improving Desicions Abouth Health, Wealth and Happiness. London: Penguin Books, Publisher location.
   Google Scholar
• Thau, M., M. F. Mikkelsen, M. J. Pedersen, and M. H. Larsen. 2020. “Question Order Bias Revisited: A Split‐Ballot Experiment on Satisfaction with Public Services among Experienced and Professional Users.” Public Administration (forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• Van de Walle, S., and G. G. Van Ryzin. 2011. “The Order of Questions in a Survey on Citizen Satisfaction with Public Services: Lessons from a Split-Ballot Experiment.” Public Administration 89(4): 1436–1450. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01922.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dooren, W., G. Bouckaert, and J. Halligan. 2010. Performance Management in the Public Sector. Paperback. Abingdon, Oxton: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B. E. 2004. “The Role of Work Context in Work Motivation: A Public Sector Application of Goal and Social Cognitive Theories.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14(1): 59–78. doi:10.1093/jopart/muh004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaller, J. R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge Uni. Press.
   Google Scholar