Illusory effects of performance management: the case of contracts for excellence in New York school districts

References

• Andersen, S. C. 2008. “The Impact of Public Management Reforms on Student Performance in Danish Schools.” Public Administration 886: 2541–2558.
   Google Scholar
• AQENY, Alliance for Quality Education. 2015. “New York State’s Opportunity Gap Is Wider than Ever”.
   Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A. 2010. “Performance Management: Does It Work?” In Public Management and Performance: Research Directions, edited by R. M. Walker, G. A. Boyne, and G. A. Brewer, 207–226. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, D. E., J. M. Cowen, and D. J. Fleming. 2013. “Third-Party Governance and Performance Measurement: A Case Study of Publicly Funded Private School Vouchers.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24 (4): 897–922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, D. E., and S. Lavertu. 2018. “School Improvement Grants in Ohio: Effects on Student Achievement and School Administration.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 40 (3): 287–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnoy, M., and S. Loeb. 2002. “Does External Accountability Affect Student Outcomes? A Cross-state Analysis.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 24 (4): 305–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cascio, E. U., N. Gordon, and S. Reber. 2013. “Local Responses to Federal Grants: Evidence from the Introduction of Title 1 in the South.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 5 (3): 126–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childress, S., M. Higgins, A. Ishimaru, and S. Takahashi. 2011. “Managing for Results at the New York City Department of Education.” In Education Reform in New York City: Ambitious Change in the Nation’s Most Complex School System, edited by J. O’Day, C. Bitter, and L. M. Gomez. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dee, T. S. 2012. “Title. NBER Working Papers”.
   Google Scholar
• Dee, T. S., and B. A. Jacob. 2011. “The Impact of No Child Left behind on Student Achievement.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 30 (3): 418–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dee, T. S., B. A. Jacob, C. M. Hoxby, and H. F. Ladd. 2010. “The Impact of No Child Left behind on Students, Teachers and Schools”. Brookings papers on economic activity. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Destler, K. N. 2016. “Creating a Performance Culture: Incentives, Climate and Organizational Change.” American Review of Public Administration 46 (2): 201–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragoset, L., J. Thomas, M. Herrmann, J. Deke, S. James-Burdumy, C. Graczewski, A. Boyle, R. Upton, C. Tanenbaum, and J. Giffin. 2017. School Improvement Grants: Implementation and Effectiveness (NCEE 2017- 4013). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Duncombe, W., and J. Yinger. 2000. “Financing Higher Student Performance Standards: The Case of New York State.” Economics of Education Review 19 (4): 363–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egami, N., and S. Tamauchi. 2019. “How to Improve the Difference-in-Differences Design with Multiple Pre-treatment Periods” Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Figlio, D., and S. Loeb. 2011. “School Accountability.” In Handbook of the Economics of Education, edited by E. A. Hanushek, S. Machin, and L. Woessman, 383–421. The Netherlands: North-Holland: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Frederickson, D. G., and H. George Frederickson. 2006. Measuring the Performance of the Hollow State. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerrish, E. 2016. “The Impact of Performance Management on Performance in Public Organizations: A Meta-analysis.” Public Administration Review 76 (1): 48–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, N. 2004. “Do Federal Grants Boost School Spending? Evidence from Title1.” Journal of Public Economics 88: 1771–1792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A., and M. E. Raymond. 2005. “Does School Accountability Lead to Improved Student Performance?” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 24 (2): 297–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J., C. Heinrich, and J. Smith. 1997. “Assessing the Performance of Performance Standards in Public Bureaucracies.” The American Economic Review: P&P 87 (2):389–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich, C., and G. Marschke. 2010. “Incentives and Their Dynamics in Public Sector Performance Management Systems.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 29 (1): 183–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heissel, J. A., and H. F. Ladd. 2018. “School Turnaround in North Carolina: A Regression Discontinuity Analysis.” Economics of Education Review 62: 302–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. 2006. “Gaming in Targetworld: The Targets Approach to Managing British Public Services.” Public Administration Review 66 (4): 515–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. 2012. “Public Management by Numbers as a Performance-Enhancing Drug: Two Hypotheses.” Public Administration Review 72 (S1): 585–592.
   Google Scholar
• Hvidman, U., and S. C. Andersen. 2013. “Impact of Performance Management in Public and Private Organizations.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24: 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, K. C., R. C. Johnson, and C. Persico. 2016. “The Effects of School Spending on Educational and Economic Outcomes: Evidence from School Finance Reforms.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 131 (1): 157–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, A. 2015a. “Drivers of Performance Information Use: Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Future Research.” Public Performance & Management Review 38 (3): 459–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, A. 2015b. “Exploring the Link between Performance Information Use and Organizational Performance: A Contingency Approach.” Public Performance & Management Review 39: 7–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladd, H. F. 2017. “No Child Left Behind: A Deeply Flawed Federal Policy.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 36 (2): 461–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladd, H. F., and D. L. Lauen. 2010. “Status versus Growth: The Distributional Effects of School Accountability Policies.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 29 (3): 426–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaFortune, J., J. Rothstein, and D. W. Schanzenbach. 2018. “School Finance Reform and the Distribution of Student Achievement.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 10 (2): 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., and T. Reeves. 2012. “Revisiting the Impact of NCLB High-Stakes School Accountability, Capacity, and Resources: State NAEP 1990-2009 Reading and Math Achievement Gap and Trends.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 34 (2): 209–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina, J. October 10 2010. “On New York School Tests, Warning Signs Ignored” The New York Times.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J., and L. J. O’Toole. 2007. “Modeling Public Management: Empirical Analysis of the Management-performance Nexus”. Public Management Review 9 (4): 503–527.
   Google Scholar
• Melo, A. I., C. S. Sarrico, and Z. Radnor. 2010. “The Influence of Performance Management Systems on Key Actors in Universities: The Case of an English University.”Public Management Review 12 (2): 233–254.
   Google Scholar
• Mora, R., and I. Reggio. 2019. “Alternative Diff-in-diffs Estimators with Several Pre-treatment Periods.” Econometric Reviews 38 (5): 465–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. 2006. “Managing for Results in State Government: Evaluating a Decade of Reform.” Public Administration Review 66 (1): 77–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. 2008. The Dynamics of Performance Management: Constructing Information and Reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• NAEP. 2018. “State Profiles.” https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/profiles/stateprofile?chort=1&sub=MAT&sj=&sfj=NP&st=MN&year=2017R3
   Google Scholar
• New York State Education Department. 2017. “Contracts for Excellence”.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, P. A. 2013. “Performance Management, Managerial Authority, and Public Service Performance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24 (2): 431–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ossege, C. 2012. “Accountability - are We Better off without It? an Empirical Study on the Effects of Accountability on Public Manager’s Work Behaviour.” Public Management Review 14 (5): 585–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Toole, L. J., and Kenneth J. M. 2015. “Public Management, Context, and Performance: in a Quest of a More General Theory.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25 (1): 237–256.
   Google Scholar
• Pandey, S., S. K. Pandey, and L. Miller. 2017. “Measuring Innovativeness of Public Organizations Using Natural Language Processing Techniques in Computer-Aided Textual Analysis.” International Public Management Journal 20 (1): 78–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J. L., and L. R. Wise. 1990. “The Motivational Bases of Public Service.” Public Administration Review 50 (3): 367–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poister, T. H., O. Q. Pasha, and L. H. Edwards. 2013. “Does Performance Management Lead to Better Outcomes? Evidence from the U.S. Public Transit Industry.” Public Administration Review 73 (4): 625–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radin, B. A. 2006. Challenging the Performance Movement: Accountability, Complexity, and Democratic Values. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reback, R., J. Rockoff, and H. L. Schwartz. 2014. “Under Pressure: Job Security, Resource Allocation, and Productivity in Schools under No Child Left Behind.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 6 (3): 207–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, R., and G. G. Van Ryzin. 2014. “Are Performance Management Practices Associated with Better Outcomes? Empirical Evidence from New York Public Schools.” American Review of Public Administration 44 (3): 324–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M., F. Damanpour, and C. A. Devece. 2011. “Management Innovation and Organizational Performance: The Mediating Effect of Performance Management.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21 (2): 367–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W., and R. Yeung. 2019. “Testing the Effectiveness of “Managing for Results”: Evidence from an Education Policy Innovation in New York City.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 29 (1): 84–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar