Combined effects of procurement and collaboration on innovation in public-private-partnerships: a qualitative comparative analysis of 24 infrastructure projects

References

• Alam, Q., M. H. Kabir, and V. Chaudhri. 2014. “Managing Infrastructure Projects in Australia: A Shift from A Contractual to A Collaborative Public Management Strategy.” Administration & Society 46 (4): 422–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., and J. Torfing. 2014. “Collaboration and Design: New Tools for Public Innovation. This Is a Chapter.” In Public Innovation through Collaboration and Design, edited by C. Ansell and J. Torfing, 1–19. New York, N.Y.: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barlow, J., and K.-G. Martina. 2008. “Delivering Innovation in Hospital Construction: Contracts and Collaboration in the UK’s Private Finance Initiative Hospitals Program.” California Management Review 51 (2): 126–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brogaard, L. 2017. “The Impact of Innovation Training on Successful Outcomes in Public–private Partnerships.” Public Management Review 19 (8): 1184–1205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbonara, N., and R. Pellegrino. 2018. “Fostering Innovation in Public Procurement through Public Private Partnerships.” Journal of Public Procurement 18 (3): 257–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbonara, N., and R. Pellegrino. 2020. “The Role of Public Private Partnerships in Fostering Innovation.” Construction Management and Economics 38 (2): 140–156. doi:10.1080/01446193.2019.1610184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cinar, E., P. Trott, and C. Simms. 2019. “A Systematic Review of Barriers to Public Sector Innovation Process.” Public Management Review. doi:10.1080/14719037.2018.1473477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby, B. C., P. T. Hart, and J. Torfing. 2017. “Public Value Creation through Collaborative Innovation.” Public Management Review 19 (5): 655–669. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1192165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz, C. O., and R. C. Marques. 2013. “Flexible Contracts to Cope with Uncertainty in Public–private Partnerships.” International Journal of Project Management 31 (3): 473–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damanpour, F., and M. Schneider. 2009. “Characteristics of Innovation and Innovation Adoption in Public Organizations: Assessing the Role of Managers.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19 (3): 495–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, H., V. Bekkers, and L. Tummers. 2016. “Innovation in the Public Sector: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda.” Public Administration 94 (1): 146–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J., and G. R. Teisman. 2008. “Public-private Partnership: On the Edge of Project and Process Management. Insights from Dutch Practice: The Sijtwende Spatial Development Project.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy volume 26: 614–626. doi:10.1068/c66m.
   Google Scholar
• Edler, J., L. Georghiou, E. Uyarra, and J. Yeow. 2015. “The Meaning and Limitations of Public Procurement for Innovation: A Supplier’s Experience.” In Public Procurement for Innovation, edited by C. Edquist, N. C. Vonortas, J. M. Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, and J. Edler. Cheltenham, 35–64. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Edler, J., and L. Georghiou. 2007. “Public Procurement and innovation—Resurrecting the Demand Side.” Research Policy 36: 949–963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edquist, C., N. Vonortas, and J. M. Zabala-Iturriagagoitia. 2015. “Introduction.” In Public Procurement for Innovation, edited by C. Edquist, N. C. Vonortas, J. M. Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, and J. Edler. Cheltenham, 1–27. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C., and J. M. Zabala-Iturriagagoitia. 2014. “Pre-commercial Procurement.” A Demand or Supply Policy Instrument in Relation to Innovation? R&D Management 45: 2.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari, M., and F. Forastieri. 2018. “Managing Innovation in the Public Sector: An Empirical Analysis of Innovation Procurement Projects in Italy.” Dissertation submitted for the Master of Science degree in Management Engineering, School of Industrial and Information Engineering, Politecnico Di Milano, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Georghiou, L., J. Edler, E. Uyarra, and J. Yeow. 2014. “Policy Instruments for Public Procurement of Innovation: Choice, Design and Assessment.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 86: 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimsey, D., and M. Lewis. 2004. “The Governance of Contractual Relationships in Public–Private Partnerships.” Journal of Corporate Citizenship 15: 91–109.
   Google Scholar
• Grimsey, D., and M. Lewis. 2007. “Public Private Partnerships and Public Procurement.” Agenda: A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform 14 (2): 171.
   Google Scholar
• Grotenberg, S., and V. B. Arwin. 2018. “Realizing Innovative Public Waterworks: Aligning Administrative Capacities in Collaborative Innovation Processes.” Journal of Cleaner Production 171 (10): S45–S55.
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, J., and J. Benington. 2006. “Copy and Paste, or Graft and Transplant? Knowledge Sharing through Inter-Organizational Networks.” Public Money & Management 26 (2): 101–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himmel, M., and M. Siemiatycki. 2017. “Infrastructure Public–private Partnerships as Drivers of Innovation? Lessons from Ontario, Canada.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 35 (5): 746–764. doi:10.1177/2399654417701430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodge, G. A., and C. Greve. 2007. “Public – Private Partnerships: An International Performance Review.” Public Administration Review 67 (3): 545–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hueskes, M., and K. Verhoest. 2016. “Innovations through Public-Private Partnership Procurement: Preliminary Results and Observations.” Paper for the 5th International PPP conference series: Smart Governance for Innovation by/in PPPs, Antwerp, Belgium, November 20–22.
   Google Scholar
• Hueskes, M., K. Verhoest, and T. Block. 2017. “Governing Public–private Partnerships for Sustainability - an Analysis of Procurement and Governance Practices of PPP Infrastructure Projects.” International Journal of Project Management 35 (6): 1184–1195. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.02.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jean., H., and L. Rashman. 2018. “Innovation and Inter-organizational Learning in the Context of Public Service Reform.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 84 (2): 231–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E.-H., B. Steijn, and J. Edelenbos. 2010. “The Impact of Network Management on Outcomes in Governance Networks.” Public Administration 88 (4): 1063–1082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppenjan, J. 2005. “The Formation of Public‐Private Partnerships: Lessons from Nine Transport Infrastructure Projects in the Netherlands.” Public Administration 83 (1): 135–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasker, R. D., E. S. Weiss, and R. Miller. 2001. “Partnership Synergy: A Practical Framework for Studying and Strengthening the Collaborative Advantage.” The Milbank Quarterly 79 (2): 179–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiringer, R. 2006. “Technological Innovation in PPPs: Incentives, Opportunities and Actions.” Construction Management and Economics 24 (3): 301–308. doi:10.1080/01446190500435028.
   Google Scholar
• Lember, V., R. Kattel, and T. Kalvet. 2015. “Quo Vadis Public Procurement of Innovation?” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 28 (3): 403–421. doi:10.1080/13511610.2015.1043245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggetti, M., and D. Levi-Faur. 2014. “Dealing with Errors in QCA.” Political Research Quarterly 66 (1): 198–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, A., and A. Dusa. 2011. “Crisp-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (Csqca), Contradictions and Consistency Benchmarks for Model Specification.” Methodological Innovations 6 (2): 103–148.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, D. 2005. “Strategic Procurement in the Public Sector: A Mask for Financial and Administrative Policy.” Journal of Public Procurement 5 (3): 388–399.
   Google Scholar
• Mezirow, J. 2000. “Learning to Think like an Adult Core Concepts of Transformation Theory.” In Learning as Transformation. Critical Perspectives on a Theory in Progress, edited by J. Meziro, 3–33. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S., and L. Brown. 2013. Handbook of Innovation in Public Services, 301–458. Massachusetts, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Parrado, S., and A.-M. Reynaers. 2020. “Agents Never Become Stewards: Explaining the Lack of Innovation in Public–private Partnerships.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 86 (3), 427–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poppo, L., and T. Zenger. 2002. “Do Formal Contracts and Relational Governance Function as Substitutes or Complements?” Strategic Management Journal 23 (8): 707–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. 1987. The Comparative Method. Moving beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. 2008. Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rangel, T., and J. Galende. 2010. “Innovation in Public–private Partnerships (Ppps): The Spanish Case of Highway Concessions.” Public Money & Management 30 (1): 49–54. doi:10.1080/09540960903492380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. J., and M. Siemiatycki. 2015. “Fostering Meaningful Partnerships in Public–private Partnerships: Innovations in Partnership Design and Process Management to Create Value.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 33: 780–793. doi:10.1068/c12250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. Q., and C. Wagemann. 2010. “Standards of Good Practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-sets.” Comparative Sociology 9: 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. Q., and C. Wagemann. 2012. Set-theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. 2006. “Measuring Innovation.” In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, edited by J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, and R. Nelson, 148–180. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, E., and J. Torfing. 2011. “Enhancing Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector.” Administration & Society 43 (8): 842–868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, V., and K. Verhoest. 2016. “How to Metagovern Collaborative Networks for the Promotion of Policy Innovations in a Dualistic Federal System?” The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal 21 (2): article 2.
   Google Scholar
• Tadelis, S., and P. Bajari. 2006. “Incentives and Award Procedures: Competitive Tendering Vs. Negotiations in Procurement.” In Handbook of Procurement, edited by D. Nicola, G. Piga, and G. Spagnola, 121–139. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J. 2019. “Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector: The Argument.” Public Management Review 21 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1080/14719037.2018.1430248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E., J. Edler, J. Garcia-Estevez, L. Georghiou, and J. Yeow. 2014. “Barriers to Innovation through Public Procurement: A Supplier Perspective.” Technovation 34 (10): 631–645. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2014.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Bossche, P., W. Gijselaers, M. Segers, G. Woltjer, and P. Kirschner. 2011. “Team Learning: Building Shared Mental Models.” Instructional Science 39 (3): 283–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Hurk, M., and M. Siemiatycki. 2018. “Public–Private Partnerships and the Design Process: Consequences for Architects and City Building.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 42 (4): 704–722. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ham, H., and J. Koppenjan. 2001. “Building Public-private Partnerships: Assessing and Managing Risks in Port Development.” Public Management Review 3 (4): 593–616.
   Google Scholar
• Verweij, S. 2015. “Achieving Satisfaction When Implementing PPP Transportation Infrastructure Projects: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of the A15 Highway DBFM Project.” International Journal of Project Management 33: 189–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verweij, S., G. R. Teisman, and L. M. Gerrits. 2017. “Implementing Public-private Partnerships: How Management Responses to Events Produce (Un)satisfactory Outcomes.” Public Works Management & Policy 22: 119–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verweij, S., O. Loomans, and W. Leendertse. 2020. “The Role of the Public Partner in Innovation in Transport Infrastructure PPPs: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Nine Dutch DBFM Projects.” Public Works Management & Policy 25 (1): 5–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hippel, E. 1986. “Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts.” Management Science 32: 791–805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M. 2014. “Internal and External Antecedents of Process Innovation: A Review and Extension.” Public Management Review 16 (1): 21–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warsen, R., E.-H. Klijn, and J. Koppenjan. 2019. “Mix and Match: How Contractual and Relational Conditions are Combined in Successful Public–Private Partnerships.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 29 (3): 375–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegrich, K. 2018. “The Blind Spots of Collaborative Innovation.” Public Management Review 21 (1): 12–20. doi:10.1080/14719037.2018.1433311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar