References
- Allison, G. T. 1986. “Public and Private Administrative Leadership: Are They Fundamentally Alike in All Unimportant Respects.” In Leadership and Organizational Culture: New Perspectives on Administrative Theory and Practice, edited by J. C. Thomas, 214–234. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
- Aoki, N. 2015. “Institutionalization of New Public Management: The Case of Singapore’s Education System.” Public Management Review 17 (2): 165–186. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.792381.
- Aoki, N. 2019. “After All These Years, What Has Happened to the International Prevalence of NPM-inspired Managerial Practices?” International Journal of Public Sector Management 32 (4): 403–417. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-10-2018-0215.
- Aoki, N., and S. Rawat. 2020. “Performance-based Pay: Investigating Its International Prevalence in Light of National Contexts.” The American Review of Public Administration 50 (8): 865–879. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074020919995.
- Aucoin, P. 2012. “New Political Governance in Westminster Systems: Impartial Public Administration and Management Performance at Risk.” Governance 25 (2): 177–199. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01569.x.
- Baarspul, H. C., and C. P. M. Wilderom. 2011. “Do Employees Behave Differently in Public-vs Private-sector Organizations? A State-of-the-art Review.” Public Management Review 13 (7): 967–1002. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2011.589614.
- Bauhr, M and N, Charron. 2020. “The EU as a Savior and a Saint? Corruption and Public Support for Redistribution.” Journal of European Public Policy 27(4): 509–527. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1578816.
- Beagles, J. E., S. Schnell, and C. Gerard. 2019. “Overcoming Parochialism in American Public Administration.” Perspectives on Public Management and Governance 2 (4): 255–266.
- Bekke, A. J. G. M., and F. M. Meer. 2000. Civil Service Systems in Western Europe. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Boruvka, E., and J. L. Perry. 2020. “Understanding Evolving Public Motivational Practices: An Institutional Analysis.” Governance 33 (3): 565–584. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12460.
- Boyne, G. A. 2002. “Public and Private Management: What’s the Difference?” Journal of Management Studies 39 (1): 97–122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00284.
- Bozeman, B. 1987. All Organizations are Public: Bridging Public and Private Organizational Theories. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Bubbico, A., J. A. Elkink, and M. Okolikj. 2017. “Quality of Government and Regional Competition: A Spatial Analysis of Subnational Regions in the European Union.” European Journal of Political Research 56 (4): 887–911. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12211.
- Bullock, J. B., J. M. Stritch, and H. G. Rainey. 2015. “International Comparison of Public and Private Employees’ Work Motives, Attitudes, and Perceived Rewards.” Public Administration Review 75 (3): 479–489. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12356.
- Bullock, J. B., J. R. Hansen, and D. J. Houston. 2018. “Sector Differences in Employee’s Perceived Importance of Income and Job Security: Can These Be Found across the Contexts of Countries, Cultures, and Occupations?” International Public Management Journal 21 (2): 243–271. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2018.1425226.
- Burgess, S., and M. Ratto. 2003. “The Role of Incentives in the Public Sector: Issues and Evidence.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 19 (2): 285–300. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/19.2.285.
- Byrkjeflot, H., P. Du Gay, and C. Greve. 2018. “What Is the ‘Neo-weberian State’as a Regime of Public Administration?” In The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe, edited by E. Ongaro and S. Van Thiel, 991–1009. London, UK: Springer.
- Castilla, E. J., and S. Benard. 2010. “The Paradox of Meritocracy in Organizations.” Administrative Science Quarterly 55 (4): 543–676. doi:https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2010.55.4.543.
- Charron, N. 2013. “From Åland to Ankara: European Quality of Government Index. 2013 Data, Sensitivity Analysis and Final Results.” The QoG Working Paper Series, no. 11: 1–54.
- Charron, N., N. Harring, and V. Lapuente. 2021. “Trust, Regulation, and Redistribution Why some Governments Overregulate and Under-redistribute.” Regulation & Governance 15(1): 3–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12277.
- Charron, N., C. Dahlström, and V. Lapuente. 2016. “Measuring Meritocracy in the Public Sector in Europe: A New National and sub-National Indicator.” European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 22 (3): 499–523. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-016-9307-0.
- Charron, N., C. Dahlström, V. Lapuente, and M. Fazekas. 2017. “Careers, Connections, and Corruption Risks: Investigating the Impact of Bureaucratic Meritocracy on Public Procurement Processes.” The Journal of Politics 79 (1): 89–104. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/687209.
- Charron, N., L. Dijkstra, and V. Lapuente. 2014. “Regional Governance Matters: Quality of Government within European Union Member States.” Regional Studies 48 (1): 68–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.770141.
- Charron, N., L. Dijkstra, and V. Lapuente. 2015. “Mapping the Regional Divide in Europe: A Measure for Assessing Quality of Government in 206 European Regions.” Social Indicators Research 122 (2): 315–346. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0702-y.
- Charron, N., S. Dahlberg, S. Holmberg, B. Rothstein, A. Khomenko, and R. Svensson. 2016. The Quality of Government EU Regional Dataset, Version Sep16. edited by. University of Gothenburg: The Quality of Government Institute.
- Charron, N., V. Lapuente, and P. Annoni. 2019. “Measuring Quality of Government in EU Regions across Space and Time.” Papers in Regional Science 98: 1925–1953. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12437.
- Christensen, T., and P. Lægreid. 2011. The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
- Cornell, A., C. H. Knutsen, and J. Teorell. 2020. “Bureaucracy and Growth.” Comparative Political Studies 53: 2246–2282. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414020912262.
- Dahlström, C., V. Lapuente, and J. Teorell. 2012. “Public Administration around the World.” In Good Government: The Relevance of Political Science, edited by S. Holmberg and B. Rothstein, 40–67. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Dahlström, C., J. Teorell, S. Dahlberg, F. Hartmann, A. Lindberg, and M. Nistotskaya. 2015. The QoG Expert Survey Dataset II. Gothenburg, Sweden: Quality of Government Institute.
- Dahlström, C., and V. Lapuente. 2017. Organizing the Leviathan: How the Relationship between Politicians and Bureaucrats Shapes Good Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Diefenbach, T. 2009. “New Public Management in Public Sector Organizations: The Dark Sides of Managerialistic ‘Enlightenment’.” Public Administration 87 (4): 892–909. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01766.x.
- Dunleavy, P., and C. Hood. 1994. “From Old Public Administration to New Public Management.” Public Money & Management 14 (3): 9–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09540969409387823.
- Dunleavy, P., H. Margetts, S. Bastow, and J. Tinkler. 2006. “New Public Management Is Dead—long Live Digital-era Governance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16 (3): 467–494. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui057.
- Evans, P., and J. E. Rauch. 1999. “Bureaucracy and Growth: A Cross-national Analysis of the Effects Of” Weberian” State Structures on Economic Growth.” American Sociological Review 64 (5): 748–765. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2657374.
- Filippetti, A., and G. Cerulli. 2018. “Are Local Public Services Better Delivered in More Autonomous Regions? Evidence from European Regions Using a Dose‐response Approach.” Papers in Regional Science 97 (3): 801–826. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12283.
- Fukuyama, F. 2013. “What Is Governance?” Governance 26 (3): 347–368. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12035.
- Gruening, G. 2001. “Origin and Theoretical Basis of New Public Management.” International Public Management Journal 4 (1): 1–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7494(01)00041-1.
- Gualmini, E. 2008. “Restructuring Weberian Bureaucracy: Comparing Managerial Reforms in Europe and the United States.” Public Administration 86 (1): 75–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00691.x.
- Hammerschmid, G., S. Van De Walle, R. Andrews, and A. M. S. Mostafa. 2019. “New Public Management Reforms in Europe and Their Effects: Findings from a 20-country Top Executive Survey.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 85 (3): 399–418. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317751632.
- Haque, M. S., Z. Van Der Wal, and C. Van Den Berg. 2021. “Comparative Studies in Public Administration: Intellectual Challenges and Alternative Perspectives.” Public Administration Review. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13349.
- Hobson, J. M. 2004. The Eastern Origins of Western Civilisation. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
- Hofstede, G., G. J. Hofstede, and M. Minkov. 2010. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind: Intercultural Cooperation and Its Importance for Survival. 3rd ed. New York; London: McGraw-Hill.
- Hood, C. 1991. “A Public Management for All Seasons?” Public Administration 69 (1): 3–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x.
- Hood, C. 1995. “The “New Public Management” in the 1980s: Variations on a Theme.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 20 (2–3): 93–109. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0001-W.
- Houston, D. J. 2011. “Implications of Occupational Locus and Focus for Public Service Motivation: Attitudes toward Work Motives across Nations.” Public Administration Review 71 (5): 761–771. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02415.x.
- Ishihara, Toshihiko. 2021. “Public sector reform and public management theory―cases of Japan.” Public Management Review: 1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1893093.
- Jeannot, G., S. Van De Walle, and G. Hammerschmid. 2018. “Homogeneous National Management Policies or Autonomous Choices by Administrative Units? Inter-and Intra-Country Management Tools Use Variations in European Central Government Administrations.” Public Performance & Management Review 41 (3): 497–518. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2018.1442359.
- Jones, B. S. 2008. “Multilevel Models.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, edited by J. M. Box-Steffensmeier, et al. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Kim, C.-H., and Y.-B. Choi. 2017. “How Meritocracy Is Defined Today?: Contemporary Aspects of Meritocracy.” Economics & Sociology 10 (1): 112. doi:https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2017/10-1/8.
- Krause, G. A., D. E. Lewis, and J. W. Douglas. 2006. “Political Appointments, Civil Service Systems, and Bureaucratic Competence: Organizational Balancing and Executive Branch Revenue Forecasts in the American States.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 770–787. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00215.x.
- Kuhlmann, Sabine, and Hellmut Wollmann. 2019. Introduction to comparative public administration: Administrative systems and reforms in Europe. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing
- Lægreid, P., and L. R. Wise. 2015. “Transitions in Civil Service Systems: Robustness and Flexibility in Human Resource Management.” In Comparative Civil Service Systems in the 21st Century, edited by T. Toonen, et al., 203–222. New York, NY: Palgrave.
- Lægreid, P. 2017. “New Public Management.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, edited by W. R. Thompson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Lapuente, V., and K. Suzuki. 2020. “Politicization, Bureaucratic Legalism, and Innovative Attitudes in the Public Sector.” Public Administration Review 80 (3): 454–467. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13175.
- Lapuente, V., and S. Van De Walle. 2020. “The Effects of New Public Management on the Quality of Public Services.” Governance 33: 461–475. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12502.
- Lijphart, A. 1975. “II. The Comparable-cases Strategy in Comparative Research.” Comparative Political Studies 8 (2): 158–177. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/001041407500800203.
- Lyons, S. T., L. E. Duxbury, and C. A. Higgins. 2006. “A Comparison of the Values and Commitment of Private Sector, Public Sector, and Parapublic Sector Employees.” Public Administration Review 66 (4): 605–618. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00620.x.
- Madeira, A. F., R. Costa-Lopes, J. F. Dovidio, G. Freitas, and M. F. Mascarenhas. 2019. “Primes and Consequences: A Systematic Review of Meritocracy in Intergroup Relations.” Frontiers in Psychology 10: 2007. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02007.
- Magalhães, P. C. 2016. “Economic Evaluations, Procedural Fairness, and Satisfaction with Democracy.” Political Research Quarterly 69 (3): 522–534. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912916652238.
- Meier, K. J., A. Rutherford, and C. N. Avellaneda, eds. 2017. Comparative Public Management: Why National, Environmental, and Organizational Context Matters. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
- Meyer-Sahling, J.-H., W. Lowe, and C. Van Stolk. 2012. “Towards NPM-ization of the Post- communist State?” In Attitudes of Public Officials towards Models of Bureaucracy in Central and Eastern Europe: Executive Politics in Times of Crisis, edited by M. Lodge, and K. Wegrich, 99–117. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Miller, G. 2000. “Above Politics: Credible Commitment and Efficiency in the Design of Public Agencies.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10 (2): 289–328. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024271.
- Milward, B., L. Jensen, A. Roberts, M. I. Dussauge‐Laguna, V. Junjan, R. Torenvlied, A. Boin, H. K. Colebatch, D. Kettl, and R. Durant. 2016. “Is Public Management Neglecting the State?” Governance 29 (3): 311–334. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12201.
- Moon, M. J., and C. Hwang. 2013. “The State of Civil Service Systems in the Asia-Pacific Region: A Comparative Perspective.” Review of Public Personnel Administration 33 (2): 121–139. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X13484831.
- Newman, B. J. 2016. “Breaking the Glass Ceiling: Local Gender‐Based Earnings Inequality and Women’s Belief in the American Dream.” American Journal of Political Science 60 (4): 1006–1025. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12195.
- Newman, B. J., C. D. Johnston, and P. L. Lown. 2015. “False Consciousness or Class Awareness? Local Income Inequality, Personal Economic Position, and Belief in American Meritocracy.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (2): 326–340. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12153.
- Nezlek, J. B. 2008. “An Introduction to Multilevel Modeling for Social and Personality Psychology.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2 (2): 842–860. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00059.x.
- Nistotskaya, M., and L. Cingolani. 2016. “Bureaucratic Structure, Regulatory Quality, and Entrepreneurship in a Comparative Perspective: Cross-Sectional and Panel Data Evidence.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 26 (3): 519–534. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muv026.
- Nistotskaya, M., N. Charron, and V. Lapuente. 2015. “The Wealth of Regions: Quality of Government and SMEs in 172 European Regions.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 33 (5): 1125–1155. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X15610058.
- OECD. 2005. Performance Related Pay Policies for Government Employees. Paris: Secretary-General of the OECD.
- Orelli, R. L., E. Padovani, and E. Katsikas. 2016. “NPM Reforms in Napoleonic Countries: A Comparative Study of Management Accounting Innovations in Greek and Italian Municipalities.” International Journal of Public Administration 39 (10): 778–789. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1034324.
- Painter, M., and B.Peters, eds. 2010. Tradition and Public Administration. UK: Palgrave Macmillan
- Perry, J. L., and H. G. Rainey. 1988. “The Public-private Distinction in Organization Theory: A Critique and Research Strategy.” Academy of Management Review 13 (2): 182–201. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1988.4306858.
- Peters, B. G. 2008. “The Napoleonic Tradition.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 21 (2): 118–132. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550810855627.
- Peters, B. G. 2010. The Politics of Bureaucracy–an Introduction to Comparative Public Administration. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Pollitt, C., and G. Bouckaert. 2017. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis-into the Age of Austerity. 4th ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Poocharoen, O.-O., and A. Brillantes. 2013. “Meritocracy in Asia Pacific: Status, Issues, and Challenges.” Review of Public Personnel Administration 33 (2): 140–163. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X13484829.
- Rainey, H. G. 1989. “Public Management: Recent Research on the Political Context and Managerial Roles, Structures, and Behaviors.” Journal of Management 15 (2): 229–250. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638901500206.
- Rainey, H. G. and Y. H. Chun . 2005 . “Public and Private Management Compared.” In The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, edited by E. Ferlie, L. E. Lynn, and C. Pollitt, 72–102. Oxford: Oxford University Press
- Rainey, H. G., and B. Bozeman. 2000. “Comparing Public and Private Organizations: Empirical Research and the Power of the a Priori.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10 (2): 447–470. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024276.
- Rauch, J. E., and P. B. Evans. 2000. “Bureaucratic Structure and Bureaucratic Performance in Less Developed Countries.” Journal of Public Economics 75 (1): 49–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00044-4.
- Reynolds, J., and H. Xian. 2014. “Perceptions of Meritocracy in the Land of Opportunity.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 36: 121–137. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2014.03.001.
- Roberts, A. 2018. “The Aims of Public Administration: Reviving the Classical View.” Perspectives on Public Management and Governance 1 (1): 73–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvx003.
- Rodríguez-Pose, A., and E. Garcilazo. 2015. “Quality of Government and the Returns of Investment: Examining the Impact of Cohesion Expenditure in European Regions.” Regional Studies 49 (8): 1274–1290. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1007933.
- Rokkan, S. 2009. Citizens, Elections, Parties: Approaches to the Comparative Study of the Processes of Development. Oslo, Norway: ECPR Press.
- Schminke, M., M. L. Ambrose, and R. S. Cropanzano. 2000. “The Effect of Organizational Structure on Perceptions of Procedural Fairness.” Journal of Applied Psychology 85 (2): 294. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.294.
- Schuster, C., J. Meyer‐Sahling, and K. S. Mikkelsen. 2020. “(Un) Principled Principals,(un) Principled Agents: The Differential Effects of Managerial Civil Service Reforms on Corruption in Developing and OECD Countries.” Governance 33 (4): 829–848. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12461.
- Scully, M. A. 1997. “Meritocracy.” In Black-well Encyclopedic Dictionary of Business Ethics, edited by P. H. Werhane and R. E. Freeman, 413–414. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Sundell, A. 2014. “Are Formal Civil Service Examinations the Most Meritocratic Way to Recruit Civil Servants? Not in All Countries.” Public Administration 92 (2): 440–457. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12077.
- Suzuki, K., and H. Hur. 2020. “Bureaucratic Structures and Organizational Commitment: Findings from a Comparative Study of 20 European Countries.” Public Management Review 22 (6): 877–907. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1619813.
- Suzuki, K., and M. A. Demircioglu. 2019. “The Association between Administrative Characteristics and National Level Innovative Activity: Findings from a Cross-National Study.” Public Performance & Management Review 42 (4): 755–782. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2018.1519449.
- Suzuki, K., and M. A. Demircioglu. 2020. “Is Impartiality Enough? Government Impartiality and Citizens’ Perceptions of Public Service Quality.” Governance. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12527.
- Teorell, J., C. Dahlström, and S. Dahlberg. 2011. “The QoG Expert Survey Dataset.” In University of Gothenburg: The Quality of Government Institute. Gothenburg, Sweden.
- Teorell, J., S. Dahlberg, S. Holmberg, B. Rothstein, A. Khomenko, and R. Svensson. 2017. The Quality of Government Standard Dataset, Version Jan17. edited by. University of Gothenburg: The Quality of Government Institute. Gothenburg, Sweden.
- Thompson, J. D. 1962. “Organizations and Output Transactions.” American Journal of Sociology 68 (3): 309–324. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/223351.
- US Merit Systems Protection Board. 2012a. Managing Public Employees in the Public Interest. Washington, DC: US Merit Systems Protection Board.
- US Merit Systems Protection Board. 2012b. The Motivating Potential of Job Characteristics and Rewards. Washington, DC: US Merit Systems Protection Board.
- Van De Walle, S., G. Hammerschmid, A. Oprisor, and V. Štimac. 2016. “Comparative Research in Public Administration and the Contribution of the COCOPS Top Executive Survey.” In Public Administration Reforms in Europe: The View from the Top, edited by G. Hammerschmid, et al., 12–25. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Van De Walle, S., B. Steijn, and S. Jilke. 2015. “Extrinsic Motivation, PSM and Labour Market Characteristics: A Multilevel Model of Public Sector Employment Preference in 26 Countries.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 81 (4): 833–855. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314563899.
- Veit, S. 2020. “Career Patterns in Administrations.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1393
- Vroom, V. H. 1964. Work and Motivation. New York: Wiley.
- Weber, M. [1922] 1978. Economy and Society. Berkeley, US: University of California Press.
- Williamson, O. E. 1999. “Public and Private Bureaucracies: A Transaction Cost Economics Perspectives.” The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 15 (1): 306–342. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/15.1.306.
- Wilson, W. 1887. “The Study of Administration.” Political Science Quarterly 2 (2): 197–222. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2139277.
- Young, K. A., and S. Hassan. 2020. “How Procedural Experiences Shape Citizens’ Perceptions of and Orientations toward Legal Institutions: Evidence from a Household Survey in Bangladesh.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 86(2): 278–294. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852318768097
- Young, M. 2008. The Rise of the Meritocracy. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
- Zhang, Z. 2015. “Crowding Out meritocracy?–Cultural Constraints in Chinese Public Human Resource Management.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 74 (3): 270–282. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12146.