Conservation or disappearance? The public provider of home care services in a system of choice

References

• Andrews, R., G. A. Boyne, J. Law, and R. M. Walker. 2009. “Strategy, Structure and Process in the Public Sector: A Test of the Miles and Snow Model.” Public Administration 87 (4): 732–749. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01760.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., G. A. Boyne, and R. M. Walker. 2011. “Dimensions of Publicness and Organizational Performance: A Review of the Evidence.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21 (3): 301–319. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anttonen, A., and L. Häikiö. 2011. “Care “Going Market”: Finnish Elderly-care Policies in Transition.” Nordic Journal of Social Research 2. doi:10.7577/njsr.2050.
   Google Scholar
• Ascoli, U., and C. Ranci, eds. 2002. Dilemmas of the Welfare Mix. New York: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Blix, M., and H. Jordahl. 2021. Privatizing Welfare Services: Lessons from the Swedish Experiment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blomqvist, P., and U. Winblad. 2019. “Why No Nonprofits? State, Market, and the Strive for Universalism in Swedish Elder Care.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 48 (3): 513–531. doi:10.1177/0899764018819870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomqvist, P., and U. Winblad. 2020. “Contracting Out Welfare Services: How are Private Contractors Held Accountable?” Public Management Review 1–22. accessed 27 Sep 2020. doi:10.1080/14719037.2020.1817530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode, I. 2006. “Disorganized Welfare Mixes: Voluntary Agencies and New Governance Regimes in Western Europe.” Journal of European Social Policy 16 (4): 346–359. doi:10.1177/0958928706068273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, George A. 1998. “Bureaucratic Theory Meets Reality: Public Choice and Service Contracting in U. S. Local Government.” Public Administration Review 58 (6): 474–484. doi:10.2307/977575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broms, R., C. Dahlström, and M. Nistotskaya. 2020. “Competition and Service Quality: Evidence from Swedish Residential Care Homes.” Governance 33 (3): 525–543. doi:10.1111/gove.12436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., P. Lægreid, and K. A. Røvik. 2020. Organization Theory and the Public Sector. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A., and C. E. Lindblom. 1953. Politics Economics and Welfare: Planning and Politico-Economic Systems Resolved into Basic Social Processes. New York: Harper and Brothers.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. 1967. Inside Bureaucracy. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Edebalk, P., G. Samuelsson, and B. Ingvad. 1995. “How Elderly People Rank-Order the Quality Characteristics of Home Services.” Ageing and Society 15 (1): 83–102. doi:10.1017/S0144686X00002130.
   Google Scholar
• Elinder, M., and H. Jordahl. 2013. “Kommunpolitikers Beslut Och Brukarnas Val.” In Välfärdstjänster I Privat Regi: Framväxt Och Drivkrafter, edited by H. Jordahl, 143–164. Stockholm: SNS förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Erlandsson, S., P. Storm, A. Stranz, M. Szebehely and G. Trydegård. 2013. “Marketising Trends in Swedish Eldercare: Competition, Choice and Calls for Stricter Regulation.” In Marketisation in Nordic Eldercare, edited by G. Meagher and M. Szebehely, 23–84. Stockholm: Department of Social Work: Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• Erlingsson, G., and J. Wänström. 2015. Politik Och Förvaltning I Svenska Kommuner. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Feltenius, D. 2017. “Towards a More Diversified Supply of Welfare Services? Marketisation and the Local Governing of Nursing Homes in the Scandinavian Countries.” In Promoting Active Citizenship, edited by K. H. Sivesind and J. Saglie, 111–157. Cham: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Feltenius, D., and J. Wide. 2015. “Deltagardemokrati Eller Affärsangelägenhet? Om Kollektivt Deltagande I En Marknadiserad Äldreomsorg.” Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift 117 (4): 587–615.
   Google Scholar
• Feltenius, D. and J. Wide. 2019. “Business as usual? Civil society organizations in a marketized Swedish welfare state.“ Journal of Civil Society,15 (3): 230–248. doi:10.1080/17448689.2019
   Google Scholar
• Government Bill2008/09:29. ‘Lag Om Valfrihetssystem.’
   Google Scholar
• Guo, M., and S. Willner. 2017. “Swedish Politicians’ Preferences regarding the Privatisation of Elderly Care.” Local Government Studies 43 (1): 1–21. doi:10.1080/03003930.2016.1237354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, A. 1999. Kommunal självstyrelse: kommuner och landsting i det politiska systemet. Stockholm: SNS.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, M. B. 2010. “Marketization and Economic Performance.” Public Management Review 12 (2): 255–274. doi:10.1080/14719031003616644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardell, S., I. Johansson Sevä, and I. Öun. 2020. “Welfare Service Privatization and Opinions about Service Quality: The Role of Political Ideology among Local Politicians and the Public.” Social Policy Administration 54 (1): 45–59. doi:10.1111/spol.12509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington, C., F. F. Jacobsen, J. Panos, A. Pollock, S. Sutaria, and M. Szebehely. 2017. “Marketization in Long-Term Care: A Cross-Country Comparison of Large For-Profit Nursing Home Chains.” Health Services Insights 10: 1–23. doi:10.1177/1178632917710533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman, L. 2011. “Inledning.” In Konkurrensens Konsekvenser. Vad Händer Med Svensk Välfärd, edited by L. Hartman, 9–31. Stockholm: SNS Förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgkinson, I. R., P. Hughes, M. Hughes, and R. Glennon. 2017. “Does Ownership Matter for Service Delivery Value? an Examination of Citizens’ Service Satisfaction.” Public Management Review 19 (8): 1206–1220. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1272711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höglund, L., M. H. Caicedo, M. Mårtensson, and F. Svärdsten. 2018. “Strategic Management in the Public Sector: How Tools Enable and Constrain Strategy Making.” International Public Management Journal 21 (5): 822–849. doi:10.1080/10967494.2018.1427161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksson, D., P. Blomqvist, and U. Winblad. 2018. “Privatization of Social Care Delivery – How Can Contracts Be Specified?” Public Management Review 20 (11): 1643–1662. doi:10.1080/14719037.2017.1417465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, H., M. Arvidson, and S. Johansson. 2015. “Welfare Mix as a Contested Terrain: Political Positions on Government-Non-profit Relations at National and Local Levels in a Social Democratic Welfare State.” Voluntas 26 (5): 1601–1619. doi:10.1007/s11266-015-9580-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordahl, H. 2013. Välfärdstjänster I Privat Regi. Stockholm: SNS förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Konkurrensverket. 2013. Kommunernas Valfrihetssystem – Med Fokus På Hemtjänst. Stockholm: Konkurrensverket.
   Google Scholar
• Lidström, A. 2011. “Sweden: Party-dominated Subnational Democracy under Challenge?” In The Oxford Handbook of Local and Regional Democracy in Europe, edited by J. Loughlin, F. Hendriks, and A. Lidström, 261–281. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mariani, L., and D. Cavenago. 2013. “Redesigning Welfare Services for Policies Effectiveness: The Non-profit Organizations (Npos) Perspective.” Public Management Review 15 (7): 1011–1039. doi:10.1080/14719037.2012.758307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meagher, G., and M. Szebehely, eds. 2013. Marketisation in Nordic Eldercare. Stockholm: Department of Social Work.
   Google Scholar
• Meagher, G., T. Lundström, M. Sallnäs, and S. Wiklund. 2016. “Big Business in a Thin Market: Understanding the Privatization of Residential Care for Children and Youth in Sweden.” Social Policy & Administration 50 (7): 805–823. doi:10.1111/spol.12172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moberg, L., P. Blomqvist, and U. Winblad. 2016. “‘User Choice in Swedish Eldercare – Conditions for Informed Choice and Enhanced Service Quality.” Journal of European Social Policy 26 (3): 281–295. doi:10.1177/0958928716645076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niskanen, W. A. 1971. Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago, ill.: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Norra Halland. 2020 February 19. (Alm, Kristian), „Kommunen 22 – Privata 11„ [Newspaper Article].
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. 1998. Voluntary Organizations and Innovation in Public Services. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. 2010. “Delivering Public Services: Time for a New Theory?” Public Management Review 12 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1080/14719030903495232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pieper, J. 2018. New Private Sector Providers in the Welfare State. Cham: Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. 2003. The Essential Public Manager. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., and G. Bouckaert. 2011. Public Management Reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rainey, H. G., and Y. H. Chun. 2005. “Public and Private Management Compared.” In The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, edited by E. Ferlie, L. E. Lynn, and C. Pollitt, 72–102. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rainey, H. G., and B. Bozeman. 2000. “Comparing Public and Private Organizations: Empirical Research and the Power of the A Priori.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10 (2): 447–470. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024276.
   Google Scholar
• Rostgaard, T. 2006. “Constructing the Care Consumer: Free Choice of Home Care for the Elderly in Denmark.” European Societies 8 (3): 443–463. doi:10.1080/14616690600822048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M., and A. J. Abramson. 1982. “The Nonprofit Sector.” In The Reagan Experiment, edited by J. L. Palmer and I. V. Sawhill, 219–243. Washington: Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M. 1987. “Of Market Failure, Voluntary Failure, and Third-Party Government: Toward a Theory of Government-Nonprofit Relations in the Modern Welfare State.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 16 (1–2): 29–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M., and H. K. Anheier. 1996. The Emerging Nonprofit Sector: An Overview. Manchester: Manchester Univ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M., T. Lundström, F. Wijkström, and H. K. Anheier. 1997. Defining the Nonprofit Sector: A Cross-national Analysis. Manchester: Manchester Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• SCB.2020. Statistikdatabasen. (accessed 1 June 2020). http://www.statistikdatabasen.scb.se
   Google Scholar
• Segaard, S. B., and J. Saglie. 2017. “Education and Elderly Care in Denmark, Norway and Sweden: National Policies and Legal Frameworks for Private Providers.” In Promoting Active Citizenship: Markets and Choice in Scandinavian Welfare, edited by K. Sivesind and J. Saglie, 75–115. Cham: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Sivesind, K. H., and H. S. Trætteberg. 2017. “Does Out-Contracting of Welfare Services Promote Active Citizenship?” In Promoting Active Citizenship, edited by K. Sivesind and J. Saglie, 1–31. Cham: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Sivesind, K. H. 2017. “The Changing Roles of For-Profit and Nonprofit Welfare Provision in Norway, Sweden and Denmark.” In Promoting Active Citizenship: Markets and Choice in Scandinavian Welfare, edited by K. Sivesind and J. Saglie, 33–74. Cham: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Sivesind, K. H., and J. Saglie. 2017. Promoting Active Citizenship: Markets and Choice in Scandinavian Welfare. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• SKR. 2018. “Kommunernas Valfrihetssystem - Beslutsläge Oktober 2018”.
   Google Scholar
• SKR. 2019a. Köp Av Verksamhet 2019: Kommuner Och Regioner 2006–2018. Stockholm: SKR.
   Google Scholar
• SKR. 2019b. “LOV Införande„ (Xls-file).
   Google Scholar
• SKR. 2019c. 310 Val. 2018 Års Kommun- Och Landstingsval. Stockholm: SKR.
   Google Scholar
• SKR. 2020. “Kommunernas Kostnader Och Intäkter.” (accessed 30 June 2020). http://www.skr.se.
   Google Scholar
• Socialstyrelsen. 2014. Avgifter Inom Äldreomsorgen: Kartläggning Och Analys Av Kommunernas Avgiftssystem. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen.
   Google Scholar
• Socialstyrelsen. 2019a. Vård Och Omsorg Om Äldre. Lägesrapport 2019. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen.
   Google Scholar
• Socialstyrelsen. 2019b. “Statistik Om Äldre Och Personer Med Funktionsnedsättning Efter Regiform 2018.” (accessed 1 June 2020). http://www.socialstyrelsen.se
   Google Scholar
• Socialstyrelsen. 2019c. Öppna Jämförelser 2018 – Vård Och Omsorg Om Äldre. Jämförelser Mellan Kommuner Och Län. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen.
   Google Scholar
• Socialstyrelsen. 2020. “Statistik Om Socialtjänstinsatser till Äldre 2019.” (accessed 2 February 2021). http://www.socialstyrelsen.se
   Google Scholar
• Stolt, R., and U. Winblad. 2009. “Mechanisms behind Privatization: A Case Study of Private Growth in Swedish Elderly Care.” Social Science & Medicine 68 (5): 903–911. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.12.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson, M., and P. G. Edebalk. 2006. ”Kvalitetskonkurrens och kundval inom kommunal äldreomsorg.” Upphandling Och Konkurrens 2006: 6. Stockholm: Konkurrensverket.
   Google Scholar
• Szebehely, M., and G. B. Trydegård. 2018. “Generell Välfärd Och Lokalt Självstyre: Ett Dilemma I Den Svenska Äldreomsorgen?” In Äldreomsorger I Sverige. Lokala Variationer Och Generella Trender, edited by H. Jönson and M. Szebehely, 21–42. Malmö: Gleerups.
   Google Scholar
• Theobald, H. 2012. “Combining Welfare Mix and New Public Management: The Case of Long-term Care Insurance in Germany.” International Journal of Social Welfare 21 (1): 61–74. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2397.2011.00865.x.
   Google Scholar
• Trætteberg, H. D. 2015. “Public, For-Profit, and Nonprofit Welfare Institutions in Norway: Distinctive Goals and Steering Mechanisms or Hybridity in a Dominant State.” Voluntas 26 (5): 1620–1638. doi:10.1007/s11266-015-9565-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trætteberg, H. D. 2017. “Active Citizenship in Scandinavian Schools and Nursing Homes.” In Promoting Active Citizenship, edited by K. Sivesind and J. Saglie, 203–259. Cham: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Trætteberg, H. D., and A. Fladmoe. 2020. “Quality Differences of Public, For-Profit and Nonprofit Providers in Scandinavian Welfare? User Satisfaction in Kindergartens.” Voluntas 31 (1): 153–167. doi:10.1007/s11266-019-00169-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trætteberg, H. D., and K. H. Sivesind. 2015. Ideelle Organisasjoners Særtrekk Og Merverdi På Helse- Og Omsorgsfeltet. Oslo: Senter for forskning på sivilsamfunn and frivillig sektor.
   Google Scholar
• Trydegård, G. B., and M. Thorslund. 2001. “Inequality in the Welfare State? Local Variation in Care of the Elderly – The Case of Sweden.” International Journal of Social Welfare 10 (3): 174–184. doi:10.1111/1468-2397.00170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tullock, G. 1965. The Politics of Bureaucracy. Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vadelius, Elin. 2015. Paradoxernas Marknad: En Studie Om Företagande I Hemtjänsten. Karlstad: Karlstads universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Valfrihetswebben. 2021. Statistik (accessed 26 January 2021). http://www.valfrihetswebben.se/statistik/ Upphandlingsmyndigheten.
   Google Scholar
• Vårdföretagarna. 2016. Hemtjänst Med Förhinder - Villkor I Kommuner Med Valfrihet. Stockholm: Vårdföretagarna, Almega.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, M. E. 2014. “The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability.” In Accountability and Democracy, edited by M Bovens, R Goodin, and T. Schillemans, 39–54. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wide, J., and D. Feltenius. 2016. En Ren Affärsangelägenhet? Pensionärsorganisationerna I Den Marknadiserade Äldreomsorgen. Umeå: Umeå universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Winblad, U., and D. Isaksson. 2013. “Geografisk Närhet Som En Förklaring till Privatisering.” In Välfärdstjänster I Privat Regi: Framväxt Och Drivkrafter, edited by H. Jordahl, 121–142. Stockholm: SNS förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wolmesjö, M. 2014. “Biståndshandläggarrollen.” In Rätt till Bistånd I Äldreomsorg. Etik, Juridik, Praktik Och Profession, edited by M. Wolmesjö and A. Staaf, 33–50. Malmö: Gleerups.
   Google Scholar