A tension lens for understanding public innovation diffusion processes

References

• Alves, H. 2013. “Co-Creation and Innovation in Public Services.” The Service Industries Journal 33 (7–8): 671–682. doi:10.1080/02642069.2013.740468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, E.S., and B.A. Lundvall. 1988. “Small National Systems of Innovation Facing Technological Revolutions—An Analytical Framework.” In Small Countries Facing the Technology Revolution, edited by C. Freeman and B.A. Lundvall, 9–36. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Andriopoulos, C., and M.W. Lewis. 2010. “Managing Innovation Paradoxes: Ambidexterity Lessons from Leading Product Design Companies.” Long Range Planning 43 (1): 104–122. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2009.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andriopoulos, C., and M.W. Lewis. 2009. “Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organisational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation.” Organisation Science 20 (4): 696–717. doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benington, J. 2009. “Creating the Public in order to Create Public Value?” International Journal of Public Administration 32 (3–4): 232–249. doi:10.1080/01900690902749578.
   Google Scholar
• Borins, S. 2014. The Persistence of Innovation in Government. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bouchikhi, H. 1998. “Living with and Building on Complexity: A Constructivist Perspective on Organisations.” Organisation 5 (2): 217–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J., A. Sancino, J Benington, and E. Sørensen. 2017. “Towards a Multi-actor Theory of Public Value Co-creation.” Public Management Review 19 (5): 640–654. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1192164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M. 2004. “What to Do When Stakeholders Matter: Stakeholder Identification and Analysis Techniques.” Public Management Review 6 (1): 21–53. doi:10.1080/14719030410001675722.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., B. C. Crosby, and D. Seo. 2020. “Using a Design Approach to Create Collaborative Governance.” Policy and Politics 48 (1): 167–189. doi:10.1332/030557319X15613696433190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cinar, E., P. Trott, and C. Simms. 2019. “A Systematic Review of Barriers to Public Sector Innovation Process.” Public Management Review 21 (2): 264–290. doi:10.1080/14719037.2018.1473477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cinar, E., P. Trott, and C. Simms. 2021. “An International Exploration of Barriers and Tactics in the Public Sector Innovation Process.” Public Management Review 23 (3): 326–353. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1668470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and C. N. Poth. 2018. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Criado, J. I., R. Sandoval-Almazan, and J. R. Gil-Garcia. 2013. “Government Innovation through Social Media.” Government Information Quarterly 30 (4): 319–326. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Este, P., S. Iammarino, M. Savona, and N. Von Tunzelmann. 2012. “What Hampers Innovation? Revealed Barriers versus Deterring Barriers.” Research Policy 41 (2): 482–488. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daglio, M., D. Gerson, and H. Kitchen. 2015. “Building Organisational Capacity for Public Sector Innovation.” Background Paper prepared for the OECD Conference “Innovating the Public Sector: from Ideas to Impact”, Paris, 12–13 November 2014.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, H., V. Bekkers, and L. Tummers. 2016. “Innovation in the Public Sector: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda.” Public Administration 94 (1): 146–166. doi:10.1111/padm.12209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker, R., P. Van Den Brink, and A. Meijer. 2020. “Social Media Adoption in the Police: Barriers and Strategies.” Government Information Quarterly 37 (2): 101441. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.101441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougherty, D. 1999. “Organizing for Innovation.” In Managing Organizations: Current Issues, edited by S.R. Clegg, C. Hardy, and W.R. Nord, 174–189. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Douglass, B. 1980. “The Common Good and the Public Interest.” Political Theory 8 (1): 103–117. doi:10.1177/009059178000800108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewens, H., and J. van der Voet. 2019. “Organizational Complexity and Participatory Innovation: Participatory Budgeting in Local Government.” Public Management Review 21 (12): 1848–1866. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1577908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, L., E. Ferlie, M. Wood, and C. Hawkins. 2002. “Interlocking Interactions, the Diffusion of Innovations in Health Care.” Human Relations 55 (12): 1429–1449. doi:10.1177/001872602128782213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flemig, S., S. Osborne, and T. Kinder. 2016. “Risky Business-Reconceptualizing Risk and Innovation in Public Services.” Public Money and Management 36 (6): 425–432. doi:10.1080/09540962.2016.1206751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, J. D., and L. W. Ford. 2010. “Stop Blaming Resistance to Change and Start Using It.” Organisational Dynamics 39 (1): 24–36. doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2009.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuglsang, L., and R. Rønning. 2015. “On Innovation Patterns and Value-Tensions in Public Services.” The Service Industries Journal 35 (9): 467–482. doi:10.1080/02642069.2015.1042971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. 1973. “Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture.” In Chap. 1. The Interpretation of Cultures. 3-30. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gioia, D.A., K. G. Corley, and A.L. Hamilton. 2013. “Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research.” Organisational Research Methods 16 (1): 15–31. doi:10.1177/1094428112452151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, T, and E. Knight. 2021. “The Ontology of Organisational Paradox: A Quantum Approach.” Academy of Management Review 46 (2): 362–384. doi:10.5465/amr.2018.0408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, J.A., and S. Pihl-Thingvad. 2019. “Managing Employee Innovative Behaviour through Transformational and Transactional Leadership Styles.” Public Management Review 21 (6): 918–944. doi:10.1080/14719037.2018.1544272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargrave, T. J., and A. H. Van De Ven. 2017. “Integrating Dialectical and Paradox Perspectives on Managing Contradictions in Organisations.” Organisation Studies 38 (3–4): 319–339. doi:10.1177/0170840616640843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, J., E. Sørensen, and J. Torfing. 2013. “Collaborative Innovation: A Viable Alternative to Market Competition and Organisational Entrepreneurship.” Public Administration Review 73 (6): 821–830. doi:10.1111/puar.12136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander, J.A., and R.L. Einwohner. 2004. “Conceptualizing Resistance.” Sociological Forum 19 (4): 533–554. doi:10.1007/s11206-004-0694-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, M., C. Roberts, A. Preece, and D. Rogers. 2016. “Of Instruments and Data: Social Media Uses, Abuses and Analysis.” In The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods, edited by N Fielding, R.M. Lee, and G. Blank, 108–124. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Jaspers, S., and T. Steen. 2019. “Realizing Public Values: Enhancement or Obstruction? Exploring Value Tensions and Coping Strategies in the Co-production of Social Care.” Public Management Review 21 (4): 606–627. doi:10.1080/14719037.2018.1508608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kattel, R., V. Lember, and P. Tõnurist. 2020. “Collaborative Innovation and Human-machine Networks.” Public Management Review 22 (11): 1652–1673. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1645873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linders, D. 2012. “From E-government to We-government: Defining a Typology for Citizen Coproduction in the Age of Social Media.” Government Information Quarterly 29 (4): 446–454. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lövstål, E., and A.M. Jontoft. 2017. “Tensions at the Intersection of Management Control and Innovation: A Literature Review.” Journal of Management Control 28 (1): 41–79. doi:10.1007/s00187-016-0244-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. 2015. “E-governance Innovation: Barriers and Strategies.” Government Information Quarterly 32 (2): 198–206. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2015.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, A., and J. De Jong. 2020. “Managing Value Conflicts in Public Innovation: Ostrich, Chameleon, and Dolphin Strategies.” International Journal of Public Administration 43 (11): 977–988. doi:10.1080/01900692.2019.1664568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. J., and R. Torenvlied. 2016. “Social Media and the New Organisation of Government Communications: An Empirical Analysis of Twitter Usage by the Dutch Police.” The American Review of Public Administration 46 (2): 143–161. doi:10.1177/0275074014551381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mergel, I. 2012. “The Social Media Innovation Challenge in the Public Sector.” Information Polity 17 (3–4): 281–292. doi:10.3233/IP-2012-000281.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña. 2019. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S., and F. Berry. 2014. “Successful Diffusion of a Failed Policy: The Case of Pay-For Performance in the US Federal Government.” Public Management Review 16 (6): 763–781. doi:10.1080/14719037.2012.750835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J. L., and H. G. Rainey. 1988. “The Public-Private Distinction in Organisation Theory: A Critique and Research Strategy.” Academy of Management Review 13 (2): 182–201. doi:10.5465/amr.1988.4306858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, L. L., G.T. Fairhurst, and S. Banghart. 2016. “Contradictions, Dialectics, and Paradoxes in Organisations: A Constitutive Approach.” Academy of Management Annals 10 (1): 65–171. doi:10.5465/19416520.2016.1162421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raipa, A., and V. Giedraityte. 2014. “Innovation Process Barriers in Public Sector: A Comparative Analysis in Lithuania and the European Union.” International Journal of Business and Management 9 (10): 10. doi:10.5539/ijbm.v9n10p10.
   Google Scholar
• Ramaswamy, M. 2009. “E-government Implementation in Transition Countries.” In Handbook of Research on ICT-enabled Transformational Government: A Global Perspective, edited by V. Weerakkody, Y. K. Dwivedi, and M. Janssen, 441–451. Hershey: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Schad, J., M.W. Lewis, S. Raisch, and W. K. Smith. 2016. “Paradox Research in Management Science: Looking Back to Move Forward.” Academy of Management Annals 10 (1): 5–64. doi:10.5465/19416520.2016.1162422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheep, M.L, G. T. Fairhurst, and S. Khazanchi. 2017. “Knots in the Discourse of Innovation: Investigating Multiple Tensions in a Reacquired Spin-Off.” Organisation Studies 38 (3–4): 463–488. doi:10.1177/0170840616640845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, W. K. 2014. “Dynamic Decision Making: A Model of Senior Leaders Managing Strategic Paradoxes.” Academy of Management Journal 57 (6): 1592–1623. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, W.K, M. Erez, S. Jarvenpaa, M. W. Lewis, and P. Tracey. 2017. “Adding Complexity to Theories of Paradox, Tensions, and Dualities of Innovation and Change: Introduction to Organisation Studies Special Issue on Paradox, Tensions, and Dualities of Innovation and Change.” Organisation Studies 38 (3–4): 303–317. doi:10.1177/0170840617693560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, W.K., and M. W. Lewis. 2011. “Toward A Theory of Paradox: A Dynamic Equilibrium of Organizing.” Academy of Management Review 36 (2): 381–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E, and J. Torfing. 2011. “Enhancing Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector.” Administration and Society 43 (8): 842–868. doi:10.1177/0095399711418768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talbot, C. 2011. “Paradoxes and Prospects of ‘Public Value’.” Public Money and Management 31 (1): 27–34. doi:10.1080/09540962.2011.545544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, K. W. 1992. “Conflict and Conflict Management: Reflections and Update.” Journal of Organisational Behaviour 13 (3): 265–274. doi:10.1002/job.4030130307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torfing, J. 2019. “Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector: The Argument.” Public Management Review 21 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1080/14719037.2018.1430248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, J. 1993. “Everyday Forms of Employee Resistance.” Sociological Forum 8 (1): 25–45. doi:10.1007/BF01112329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J.A., K. Rijswijk, T. Williams, T. Barnard, and L. Klerkx. 2013. “Challenges to Effective Interaction in the New Zealand Agricultural Research and Extension System: An Innovation Systems Analysis.” Extension Farming Systems 9 (1): 89.
   Google Scholar
• Van Buuren, A., J. M. Lewis, B. Guy Peters, and W. Voorberg. 2020. “Improving Public Policy and Administration: Exploring the Potential of Design.” Policy and Politics 48 (1): 3–19. doi:10.1332/030557319X15579230420063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargo, S.L., M. A. Akaka, and H. Wieland. 2020. “Rethinking the Process of Diffusion in Innovation: A Service-ecosystems and Institutional Perspective.” Journal of Business Research 116: 526–534. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voorberg, W. H., V. J. Bekkers, and L. G. Tummers. 2015. “A Systematic Review of Co-creation and Co-production: Embarking on the Social Innovation Journey.” Public Management Review 17 (9): 1333–1357. doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.930505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H., and M. Wood. 2018. “The Precarious Politics of Public Innovation.” Politics and Governance 6 (1): 150–160. doi:10.17645/pag.v6i1.1275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wipulanusat, W., K. Panuwatwanich, R. A. Stewart, and J. Sunkpho. 2019. “Drivers and Barriers to Innovation in the Australian Public Service: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis.” Engineering Management in Production and Services 11 (1): 7–22. doi:10.2478/emj-2019-0001.
   Google Scholar