Agency autonomy, public service motivation, and organizational performance

References

• Anand, Paul, Mark Exworthy, Francesca Frosini, and Lorelei Jones. 2012. “Autonomy and Improved Performance: Lessons from an NHS Policy Reform.” Public Money & Management 32 (3): 209–216. doi:10.1080/09540962.2012.676279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, Sarah E., and Matthew Potoski. 2016. “Agency Structure and the Distribution of Federal Spending.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 26 (3): 461–474. doi:10.1093/jopart/muw002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, Rhys, George A. Boyne, and Richard M. Walker. 2006. “Subjective and Objective Measures of Organizational Performance: An Empirical Exploration.” In Public Service Performance: Perspectives on Measurement and Management, edited by George A. Boyne, Kenneth J. Meier, Kenneth J. Meier, Laurence J. O’Toole Jr, and Richard M. Walker, 14–34. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aulich, Chris, Heba Batainah, and Roger Wettenhall. 2010. “Autonomy and Control in Australian Agencies: Data and Preliminary Findings from a Cross‐National Empirical Study.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 69 (2): 214–228. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.2010.00679.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aulich, Chris. 2012. “Autonomy and control in three Australian Capital Territory-based integrity agencies.„ Policy Studies 33 (1): 49–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battaglio Jr, R. Paul, and Salih Gelgec. 2017. “Exploring the structure and meaning of public service motivation in the Turkish public sector: A test of the mediating effects of job characteristics.” Public Management Review 19 (8): 1066–1084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellé, Nicola. 2014. “Leading to Make A Difference: A Field Experiment on the Performance Effects of Transformational Leadership, Perceived Social Impact, and Public Service Motivation.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24 (1): 109–136. doi:10.1093/jopart/mut033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendor, Jonathan, Amihai Glazer, and Thomas Hammond. 2001. “Theories of Delegation.” Annual Review of Political Science 4 (1): 235–269. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, William D., Matt Golder, and Daniel Milton. 2012. “Improving Tests of Theories Positing Interaction.” The Journal of Politics 74 (3): 653–671. doi:10.1017/S0022381612000199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezes, Philippe, and Gilles Jeannot. 2018. “Autonomy and Managerial Reforms in Europe: Let or Make Public Managers Manage?” Public Administration 96 (1): 3–22. doi:10.1111/padm.12361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjørnholt, Bente, and Heidi Houlberg Salomonsen. 2015. “Contracting and performance in agencies: A question of control, dialogue or autonomy?.” Public Organization Review 15 (4): 509–530.
   Google Scholar
• Bjurstrøm, Karl Hagen. 2021. “How Interagency Coordination Is Affected by Agency Policy Autonomy.” Public Management Review 23 (3): 397–421. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1679236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braadbaart, Okke, Van Eybergen Niels, and Jan Hoffer. 2007. “Managerial Autonomy: Does It Matter for the Performance of Water Utilities?” Public Administration and Development 27 (2): 111–121. doi:10.1002/pad.447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, Gene A. 2005. “In the Eye of the Storm: Frontline Supervisors and Federal Agency Performance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15 (4): 505–527. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, Gene A. 2008. “Employee and Organizational Performance.” In Motivation in Public Management: The Call of Public Service, edited by James L. Perry and Annie Hondeghem, pp. 136-156. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, Gene A., and Sally Coleman Selden. 2000. “Why Elephants Gallop: Assessing and Predicting Organizational Performance in Federal Agencies.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10 (4): 685–712. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024287.
   Google Scholar
• Bryk, Anthony S., and Stephen W. Raudenbush. 1992. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Sage Publications, .
   Google Scholar
• Bundt, Julie. 2000. “Strategic Stewards: Managing Accountability, Building Trust.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10 (4): 757–778. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024290.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, Daniel. 2001. The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chun, Young Han, and Hal G. Rainey. 2005. “Goal Ambiguity and Organizational Performance in U.S. Federal Agencies.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15 (4): 529–557. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordery, John L., David Morrison, Brett M. Wright, and Toby D. Wall. 2010. “The Impact of Autonomy and Task Uncertainty on Team Performance: A Longitudinal Field Study.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 31 (2): 240–258. doi:10.1002/job.657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crucke, Saskia, Tom Kluijtmans, Kenn Meyfroodt, and Sebastian Desmidt. 2021. “How Does Organizational Sustainability Foster Public Service Motivation and Job Satisfaction? The Mediating Role of Organizational Support and Societal Impact Potential.” Public Management Review 1–27. doi:10.1080/14719037.2021.1893801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, James H., F. David Schoorman, and Lex Donaldson. 1997. “Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management.” Academy of Management Review 22 (1): 20–47. doi:10.5465/amr.1997.9707180258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, James H., F. David Schoorman, and Lex Donaldson. 1997. “Davis, Schoorman, and Donaldson reply: The distinctiveness of agency theory and stewardship theory.” Academy of Management Review 22 (3): 611–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeHart-Davis, Leisha, and Sanjay K. Pandey. 2005. “Red Tape and Public Employees: Does Perceived Rule Dysfunction Alienate Managers?” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15 (1): 133–148. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dicke, Lisa A. 2002. “Ensuring Accountability in Human Services Contracting: Can Stewardship Theory Fill the Bill?” The American Review of Public Administration 32 (4): 455–470. doi:10.1177/027507402237870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dicke, Lisa A., and J. Steven Ott. 2002. “A Test: Can Stewardship Theory Serve as A Second Conceptual Foundation for Accountability Methods in Contracted Human Services?” International Journal of Public Administration 25 (4): 463–487. doi:10.1081/PAD-120013252.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. 1989. “Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review.” Academy of Management Review 14 (1): 57–74. doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4279003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennser-Jedenastik, Laurenz. 2016. “The politicization of regulatory agencies: Between partisan influence and formal independence.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 26 (3): 507–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finer, Herman. 1941. “Administrative Responsibility in Democratic Government.” Public Administration Review 1 (4): 335–350. doi:10.2307/972907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, Bruno S., Fabian Homberg, and Margit Osterloh. 2013. “Organizational control systems and pay-for-performance in the public service.” Organization studies 34 (7): 949–972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrich, Carl J. 1940. “Public Policy and the Nature of Administrative Responsibility.” Public Policy 1: 3–24.
   Google Scholar
• Gailmard, Sean. 2010. “Politics, Principal–agent Problems, and Public Service Motivation.” International Public Management Journal 13 (1): 35–45. doi:10.1080/10967490903547225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gailmard, Sean, and John W. Patty. 2007. “Slackers and Zealots: Civil Service, Policy Discretion, and Bureaucratic Expertise.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (4): 873–889. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00286.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallo, Nick, and David E. Lewis. 2012. “The Consequences of Presidential Patronage for Federal Agency Performance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22 (2): 219–243. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmour, John B., and David E. Lewis. 2006. “Assessing Performance Budgeting at OMB: The Influence of Politics, Performance, and Program Size.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16 (2): 169–186. doi:10.1093/jopart/muj002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, Jonathan, Ewen Speed, Pauline Allen, Imelda McDermott, Anna Coleman, and Kath Checkland. 2019. “Autonomy, Accountability, and Ambiguity in Arm’s-length Meta-governance: The Case of NHS England.” Public Management Review 21 (8): 1148–1169. doi:10.1080/14719037.2018.1544660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez, Morela. 2012. “Toward an Understanding of the Psychology of Stewardship.” Academy of Management Review 37 (2): 172–193. doi:10.5465/amr.2010.0363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honig, Dan. 2019. “When reporting undermines performance: The costs of politically constrained organizational autonomy in foreign aid implementation.” International Organization 73 (1): 171–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, Michael C., and William H. Meckling. 1976. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4): 305–360. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, C S. 2014. “Why are Goals Important in the Public Sector? Exploring the Benefits of Goal Clarity for Reducing Turnover Intention.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24 (1): 209–234. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, Chan Su, and Geon Lee. 2013. “Goals, Strategic Planning, and Performance in Government Agencies.” Public Management Review 15 (6): 787–815. doi:10.1080/14719037.2012.677212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, Chan Su, and H G. Rainey. 2011. “Organizational Goal Characteristics and Public Duty Motivation in U.S. Federal Agencies.” Review of Public Personnel Administration 31 (1): 28–47. doi:10.1177/0734371X10394404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ki, Namhoon. 2021. “Public Service Motivation and Government Officials’ Willingness to Learn in Public Sector Benchmarking Process.” Public Management Review 23 (4): 610–632. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1708437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Nanyoung, and Wonhyuk Cho. 2014. “Agencification and Performance: The Impact of Autonomy and Result-control on the Performance of Executive Agencies in Korea.” Public Performance & Management Review 38 (2): 214–233. doi:10.1080/15309576.2015.983826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Sangmook. 2004. “Individual-level Factors and Organizational Performance in Government Organizations.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15 (2): 245–261. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Sangmook. 2009. “Revising Perry’s Measurement Scale of Public Service Motivation.” The American Review of Public Administration 39 (2): 149–163. doi:10.1177/0275074008317681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Sangmook. 2017. “Comparison of a Multidimensional to a Unidimensional Measure of Public Service Motivation: Predicting Work Attitudes.” International Journal of Public Administration 40 (6): 504–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Doo-Rae. 2008. “Political control and bureaucratic autonomy revisited: A multi-institutional analysis of OSHA enforcement.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18(1): 33-55.
   Google Scholar
• Kjeldsen, A M. 2014. “Dynamics of Public Service Motivation: Attraction-Selection and Socialization in the Production and Regulation of Social Services.” Public Administration Review 74 (1): 101–112. doi:10.1111/puar.12154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjeldsen, A M., and C B. Jacobsen. 2013. “Public Service Motivation and Employment Sector: Attraction or Socialization?” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23 (4): 899–926. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambright, K T. 2009. “Agency Theory and Beyond: Contracted Providers‘ Motivations to Properly Use Service Monitoring Tools.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19 (2): 207–227. doi:10.1093/jopart/mun009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langbein, Laura. 2010. “Economics, Public Service Motivation, and Pay for Performance: Complements or Substitutes?” International Public Management Journal 13 (1): 9–23. doi:10.1080/10967490903547134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin, Ian, Lamar Pierce, and Francesca Gino. 2012. “The Psychological Costs of Pay-for-performance: Implications for the Strategic Compensation of Employees.” Strategic Management Journal 33 (10): 1194–1214. doi:10.1002/smj.1974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, David E. 2004. Presidents and the Politics of Agency Design: Political Insulation in the United States Government Bureaucracy, 1946-1997. Redwood City, California: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, David E. 2010. The Politics of Presidential Appointments: Political Control and Bureaucratic Performance. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loon, N M. 2016. “Is Public Service Motivation Related to Overall and Dimensional Work-unit Performance as Indicated by Supervisors?” International Public Management Journal 19 (1): 78–110. doi:10.1080/10967494.2015.1064839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupia, Arthur, and M D. McCubbins. 1994. “Learning from Oversight: Fire Alarms and Police Patrols Reconstructed.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 10 (1): 96–125. doi:10.1093/jleo/10.1.96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggetti, Martino, and Koen Verhoest. 2014. “Unexplored aspects of bureaucratic autonomy: a state of the field and ways forward.” International review of administrative sciences 80 (2): 239–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K J. 1980. “Measuring Organizational Power: Resources and Autonomy of Government Agencies.” Administration & Society 12 (3): 357–375. doi:10.1177/009539978001200307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, Kenneth J., and Laurence J. O’Toole. 2013. “Subjective organizational performance and measurement error: Common source bias and spurious relationships.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23 (2): 429–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao, Qing, Nathan Eva, Alexander Newman, and Gary Schwarz. 2019. “Public Service Motivation and Performance: The Role of Organizational Identification.” Public Money & Management 39 (2): 77–85. doi:10.1080/09540962.2018.1556004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D P., and S K. Pandey. 2010. “The Big Question for Performance Management: Why Do Managers Use Performance Information?” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20 (4): 849–866. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naff, K C., and John Crum. 1999. “Working for America: Does Public Service Motivation Make a Difference?” Review of Public Personnel Administration 19 (4): 5–16. doi:10.1177/0734371X9901900402.
   Google Scholar
• Neshkova, M I. 2014. “Does Agency Autonomy Foster Public Participation?” Public Administration Review 74 (1): 64–74. doi:10.1111/puar.12180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palus, C K., and S W. Yackee. 2016. “Clerks or Kings? Partisan Alignment and Delegation to the US Bureaucracy.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 26 (4): 693–708. doi:10.1093/jopart/muw001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papenfuß, U., and Florian Keppeler. 2020. “Does Performance-related Pay and Public Service Motivation Research Treat State-owned Enterprises like A Neglected Cinderella? A Systematic Literature Review and Agenda for Future Research on Performance Effects.” Public Management Review 22 (7): 1119–1145. doi:10.1080/14719037.2020.1740300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S M., and H G. Rainey. 2008. “Leadership and Public Service Motivation in U.S. Federal Agencies.” International Public Management Journal 11 (1): 109–142. doi:10.1080/10967490801887954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J L. 1996. “Measuring Public Service Motivation: An Assessment of Construct Reliability and Validity.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 6 (1): 5–22. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024303.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, J L., Annie Hondeghem, and L R. Wise. 2010. “Revisiting the Motivational Bases of Public Service: Twenty Years of Research and an Agenda for the Future.” Public Administration Review 70 (5): 681–690. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02196.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J L., and L R. Wise. 1990. “The Motivational Bases of Public Service.” Public Administration Review 50 (3): 367–373. doi:10.2307/976618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J L., and Wouter Vandenabeele. 2015. “Public Service Motivation Research: Achievements, Challenges, and Future Directions.” Public Administration Review 75 (5): 692–699. doi:10.1111/puar.12430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrovsky, Nicolai, and Adrian Ritz. 2014. “Public Service Motivation and Performance: A Critical Perspective.” Evidence-based HRM: A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship , 2(1): 57-79
   Google Scholar
• Rainey, H G., and Paula Steinbauer. 1999. “Galloping Elephants: Developing Elements of a Theory of Effective Government Organizations.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 9 (1): 1–32. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024401.
   Google Scholar
• Ritz, Adrian. 2009. “Public Service Motivation and Organizational Performance in Swiss Federal Government.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 75 (1): 53–78. doi:10.1177/0020852308099506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritz, Adrian, G A. Brewer, and Oliver Neumann. 2016. “Public Service Motivation: A Systematic Literature Review and Outlook.” Public Administration Review 76 (3): 414–426. doi:10.1111/puar.12505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schillemans, Thomas. 2013. “Moving beyond the Clash of Interests: On Stewardship Theory and the Relationships between Central Government Departments and Public Agencies.” Public Management Review 15 (4): 541–562. doi:10.1080/14719037.2012.691008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schillemans, Thomas, and K H. Bjurstrøm. 2020. “Trust and Verification: Balancing Agency and Stewardship Theory in the Governance of Agencies.” International Public Management Journal 23 (5): 650–676. doi:10.1080/10967494.2018.1553807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schott, Carina, Oliver Neumann, Muriel Baertschi, and Adrian Ritz. 2019. “Public Service Motivation, Prosocial Motivation and Altruism: Towards Disentanglement and Conceptual Clarity.” International Journal of Public Administration 42 (14): 1200–1211. doi:10.1080/01900692.2019.1588302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selden, S C. 2004. “Testing a Multi-dimensional Model of Organizational Performance: Prospects and Problems.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14 (3): 395–416. doi:10.1093/jopart/muh025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squire, Peverill. 2007. “Measuring state legislative professionalism: The squire index revisited.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 7 (2): 211–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taliercio Jr, Robert R. 2004. “Administrative reform as credible commitment: the impact of autonomy on revenue authority performance in Latin America.” World Development 32(2): 213–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavakol, Mohsen, and Reg Dennick. 2011. “Making Sense of Cronbach’s Alpha.” International Journal of Medical Education 2: 53–55. doi:10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Loon, N., A M. Kjeldsen, L B. Andersen, Wouter Vandenabeele, and Peter Leisink. 2018. “Only When the Societal Impact Potential Is High? A Panel Study of the Relationship between Public Service Motivation and Perceived Performance.” Review of Public Personnel Administration 38 (2): 139–166. doi:10.1177/0734371X16639111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Slyke, David M. 2007. “Agents or stewards: Using theory to understand the government-nonprofit social service contracting relationship.” Journal of public administration research and theory 17 (2): 157–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoest, Koen. 2005. “Effects of Autonomy, Performance Contracting, and Competition on the Performance of A Public Agency: A Case Study.” Policy Studies Journal 33 (2): 235–258. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00104.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verzulli, Rossella, Rowena Jacobs, and Maria Goddard. 2018. “Autonomy and performance in the public sector: the experience of English NHS hospitals.” The European Journal of Health Economics 19 (4): 607–626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigoda-Gadot, Eran. 2006. “Citizens‘ Perceptions of Politics and Ethics in Public Administration: A Five-Year National Study of Their Relationship to Satisfaction with Services, Trust in Governance, and Voice Orientations.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 17 (2): 285–305. doi:10.1093/jopart/muj018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterman, R W., and K J. Meier. 1998. “Principal-agent Models: An Expansion?” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8 (2): 173–202. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024377.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, J A., and S K. Piderit. 1999. “The Value of Mission Statements in Public Agencies.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 9 (2): 193–224. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024408.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B E., R K. Christensen, and S K. Pandey. 2013. “Measuring Public Service Motivation: Exploring the Equivalence of Existing Global Measures.” International Public Management Journal 16 (2): 197–223. doi:10.1080/10967494.2013.817242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynen, Jan, Koen Verhoest, Edoardo Ongaro, Sandra Van Thiel, and in cooperation with the COBRA network. 2014. “Innovation-oriented culture in the public sector: Do managerial autonomy and result control lead to innovation?.” Public Management Review 16 (1): 45–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynen, Jan, and Koen Verhoest. 2016. “Internal Performance-based Steering in Public Sector Organizations: Examining the Effect of Organizational Autonomy and External Result Control.” Public Performance & Management Review 39 (3): 535–559. doi:10.1080/15309576.2015.1137769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto, Kiyoshi. 2006. “Performance of Semi-autonomous Public Bodies: Linkage between Autonomy and Performance in Japanese Agencies.” Public Administration and Development 26 (1): 35–44. doi:10.1002/pad.369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar