Do visionary and servant leaders reduce cognitive uncertainty of professionals? A study of team-based settings in public organizations

References

• Andersen, L. B., B. Bjørnholt, L. L. Bro, and C. Holm-Petersen. 2018a. “Achieving High Quality through Transformational Leadership: A Qualitative Multilevel Analysis of Transformational Leadership and Perceived Professional Quality.” Public Personnel Management 47 (1): 51–72. doi:10.1177/0091026017747270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, L. B., B. Bjørnholt, L. L. Bro, and C. Holm-Petersen. 2018b. “Leadership and Motivation: A Qualitative Study of Transformational Leadership and Public Service Motivation.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 84 (4): 675–691. doi:10.1177/0020852316654747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, T., and R. Liff. 2012. “Multiprofessional Cooperation and Accountability Pressures: Consequences of a Post-new Public Management Concept in a New Public Management Context.” Public Management Review 14 (6): 835–855. doi:10.1080/14719037.2011.650053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backhaus, L., A. Reuber, D. Vogel, and R. Vogel. 2021. “Giving Sense about Paradoxes: Paradoxical Leadership in the Public Sector.” Public Management Review 1–21. doi:10.1080/14719037.2021.1906935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1977. Social Learning Theory. Vol. 1. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bass, B. M., B. J. Avolio, D. I. Jung, and Y. Berson. 2003. “Predicting Unit Performance by Assessing Transformational and Transactional Leadership.” Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (2): 207. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentein, K., M. È. Lapalme, S. Guerrero, X. Parent‐Rocheleau, and G. Simard. 2021. “How Can Servant Leaders Foster Public Employees’ Service‐Oriented Behaviors? A Multilevel Multisource Study in Canadian Libraries.” Public Administration Review. doi:10.1111/puar.13416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernards, B., J. van der Voet, S. van der Pas, and S. Groeneveld. 2021. “Organizational Rules and Cognitive Uncertainty among Public Professionals: A Daily Diary Study.” Review of Public Personnel Administration 41 (4): 792–813 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berson, Y., and B. J. Avolio. 2004. “Transformational Leadership and the Dissemination of Organizational Goals: A Case Study of A Telecommunication Firm.” The Leadership Quarterly 15 (5): 625–646. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliese, P. D. (2000). “Within-group Agreement, Non-independence, and Reliability: Implications for Data Aggregation and Analysis.”
   Google Scholar
• Bosselut, G., C. D. McLaren, M. A. Eys, and J. P. Heuzé. 2012. “Reciprocity of the Relationship between Role Ambiguity and Group Cohesion in Youth Interdependent Sport.” Psychology of Sport and Exercise 13 (3): 341–348. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breaugh, J. A., and J. P. Colihan. 1994. “Measuring Facets of Job Ambiguity: Construct Validity Evidence.” Journal of Applied Psychology 79 (2): 191–202. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.2.191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronkhorst, B., B. Steijn, and B. Vermeeren. 2015. “Transformational Leadership, Goal Setting, and Work Motivation: The Case of a Dutch Municipality.” Review of Public Personnel Administration 35 (2): 124–145. doi:10.1177/0734371X13515486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M. E., and L. K. Treviño. 2006. “Ethical Leadership: A Review and Future Directions.” The Leadership Quarterly 17 (6): 595–616. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, S. A., and C. De Paola. 2000. “The Measurement of Cohesion in Work Teams.” Small Group Research 31 (1): 71–88. doi:10.1177/104649640003100104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuang, C. H., S. E. Jackson, and Y. Jiang. 2016. “Can Knowledge-intensive Teamwork Be Managed? Examining the Roles of HRM Systems, Leadership, and Tacit Knowledge.” Journal of Management 42 (2): 524–554. doi:10.1177/0149206313478189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicchetti, D. V. 1994. “Guidelines, Criteria, and Rules of Thumb for Evaluating Normed and Standardized Assessment Instruments in Psychology.” Psychological Assessment 6 (4): 284. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S.G., and D.E. Bailey. 1997. “What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite.” Journal of Management 23 (3): 239–290. doi:10.1177/014920639702300303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, R. S., and E. C. Stazyk. 2014. “Developing and Testing a New Goal Taxonomy: Accounting for the Complexity of Ambiguity and Political Support.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25 (3): 751–775. doi:10.1093/jopart/muu015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Sousa, M. J. C., and D. Van Dierendonck. 2014. “Servant Leadership and Engagement in a Merge Process under High Uncertainty.” Journal of Organizational Change Management 27 (6): 877–899. doi:10.1108/JOCM-07-2013-0133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Densten, I. L. 2005. “The Relationship between Visioning Behaviours of Leaders and Follower Burnout.” British Journal of Management 16 (2): 105–118. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00428.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Empson, L., and A. Langley. 2015. “Leadership and Professionals.” In The Oxford Handbook of Professional Service Firms, edited by L. Empson, D. Muzio, J. P. Broschak, and C. R. Hinings, 163–188. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eva, N., M. Robin, S. Sendjaya, D. van Dierendonck, and R. C. Liden. 2019. “Servant Leadership: A Systematic Review and Call for Future Research.” The Leadership Quarterly 30 (1): 111–132. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eys, M. A., and A. V. Carron. 2001. “Role Ambiguity, Task Cohesion, and Task Self-efficacy.” Small Group Research 32 (3): 356–373. doi:10.1177/104649640103200305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favero, N., and J. B. Bullock. 2014. “How (Not) to Solve the Problem: An Evaluation of Scholarly Responses to Common Source Bias.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25 (1): 285–308. doi:10.1093/jopart/muu020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., and D. F. Larcker. 1981. “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error.” Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1): 39–50. doi:10.1177/002224378101800104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gajduschek, G. 2003. “Bureaucracy: Is It Efficient? Is It Not? Is that the Question? Uncertainty Reduction: An Ignored Element of Bureaucratic Rationality.” Administration & Society 34 (6): 700–723. doi:10.1177/0095399702239171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, B., and S. K. Pandey. 2017. “We Know the Yin—But Where Is the Yang? Toward a Balanced Approach on Common Source Bias in Public Administration Scholarship.” Review of Public Personnel Administration 37 (2): 245–270. doi:10.1177/0734371X17698189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenleaf, R. K. 2002. Servant Leadership: A Journey into the Nature of Legitimate Power and Greatness. New York, NY: Paulist Press.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, M. A., and G. Grote. 2020. “When Is More Uncertainty Better? A Model of Uncertainty Regulation and Effectiveness.” Academy of Management Review 45 (4): 745–765. doi:10.5465/amr.2018.0271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groeneveld, S., and B. S. Kuipers. 2014. “Teamwork in the Public Cage: Antecedents of Self-management of Teams in Public Organizations.” In Academy of Management Proceedings. 2014 Vols, No. 1. 12064. Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.
   Google Scholar
• Heifetz, R., A. Grashow, and M. Linsky. 2009. “Leadership in a (Permanent) Crisis.” Harvard Business Review 87 (7/8): 62–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. 1991. “A Public Management for All Seasons?.” Public Administration 69 (1): 3–19. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hox, J. J., Moerbeek, M., & Van de Schoot, R. 2017. Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., and P. M. Bentler. 1999. “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6 (1): 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, C. B., and L. B. Andersen. 2015. “Is Leadership in the Eye of the Beholder? A Study of Intended and Perceived Leadership Practices and Organizational Performance.” Public Administration Review 75 (6): 829–841. doi:10.1111/puar.12380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, U. T., L. B. Andersen, and C. B. Jacobsen. 2019. “Only When We Agree! How Value Congruence Moderates the Impact of Goal‐oriented Leadership on Public Service Motivation.” Public Administration Review 79 (1): 12–24. doi:10.1111/puar.13008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, U. T., L. B. Andersen, L. L. Bro, A. Bøllingtoft, T. L. M. Eriksen, A. L. Holten, … A. Würtz. 2019. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Transformational and Transactional Leadership.” Administration & Society 51 (1): 3–33. doi:10.1177/0095399716667157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keulemans, S., and S. Groeneveld. 2020. “Supervisory Leadership at the Frontlines: Street-level Discretion, Supervisor Influence, and Street-level Bureaucrats’ Attitude Towards Clients.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 30 (2): 307–323. doi:10.1093/jopart/muz019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, S. A., and E. A. Locke. 1996. “Direct and Indirect Effects of Three Core Charismatic Leadership Components on Performance and Attitudes.” Journal of Applied Psychology 81 (1): 36. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.1.36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klenke, K. 2015. Qualitative Research in the Study of Leadership. Second Edition. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., N. de Boer, and J. Eshuis. 2020. “Leading Frontline Enforcers: How Supervisors’ Leadership Style Impacts Inspectors’ Enforcement Style.” Public Management Review 1–20. doi:10.1080/14719037.2020.1833610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. 2016. Principals and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. fourth ed. London, UK and New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. W., H. G. Rainey, and Y. H. Chun. 2010. “Goal Ambiguity, Work Complexity, and Work Routineness in Federal Agencies.” The American Review of Public Administration 40 (3): 284–308. doi:10.1177/0275074009337620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leo, F. M., I. González-Ponce, T. García-Calvo, D. Sánchez-Oliva, and E. Filho. 2019. “The Relationship among Cohesion, Transactive Memory Systems, and Collective Efficacy in Professional Soccer Teams: A Multilevel Structural Equation Analysis.” Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 23 (1): 44. doi:10.1037/gdn0000097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. P., A. J. Fairchild, and M. S. Fritz. 2007. “Mediation Analysis.” Annual Review of Psychology 58 (1): 593–614. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G., and H. A. Simon. 1958. Organizations. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Miao, Q., A. Newman, G. Schwarz, and L. Xu. 2014. “Servant Leadership, Trust, and the Organizational Commitment of Public Sector Employees in China.” Public Administration 92 (3): 727–743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel, A. A. 2007. “A Distributed Cognition Perspective on Newcomers’ Change Processes: The Management of Cognitive Uncertainty in Two Investment Banks.” Administrative Science Quarterly 52 (4): 507–557. doi:10.2189/asqu.52.4.507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. 1980. “Structure in 5’s: A Synthesis of the Research on Organization Design.” Management Science 26 (3): 322–341. doi:10.1287/mnsc.26.3.322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Toole, L. J, Jr, and K. J. Meier. 2003. “Uncertainty in American Politics.” In Bureaucracy and Uncertainty, edited by B.C. Burden, 98–117. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paarlberg, L. E., and B. Lavigna. 2010. “Transformational Leadership and Public Service Motivation: Driving Individual and Organizational Performance.” Public Administration Review 70 (5): 710–718. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02199.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porath, C., G. Spreitzer, C. Gibson, and F. G. Garnett. 2012. “Thriving at Work: Toward Its Measurement, Construct Validation, and Theoretical Refinement.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 33 (2): 250–275. doi:10.1002/job.756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raaphorst, N. 2018. “How to Prove, How to Interpret and What to Do? Uncertainty Experiences of Street-level Tax Officials.” Public Management Review 20 (4): 485–502. doi:10.1080/14719037.2017.1299199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainey, H. G., & Jung, C. S. 2015. A conceptual framework for analysis of goal ambiguity in public organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 71–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainey, H. G. 1983. “Public Agencies and Private Firms: Incentive Structures, Goals, and Individual Roles.” Administration & Society 15 (2): 207–242. doi:10.1177/009539978301500203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainey, H.G., and C.S. Jung. 2010. “Extending Goal Ambiguity Research in Government.” In Public Management and Performance: Research Directions, edited by R.M. Walker, G.A. Boyne, and G.A. Brewer, 110–126. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. 2012. “Lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling and More. Version 0.5–12 (BETA).” Journal of Statistical Software 48 (2): 1–36. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamir, B., & Howell, J.M. 1999. Organizational and contextual influences on the emergence and effectiveness of charismatic leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 10, 257–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H.A. 1976. Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-making Processes in Administrative Organization. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Song, C., K. R. Park, and S. W. Kang. 2015. “Servant Leadership and Team Performance: The Mediating Role of Knowledge-sharing Climate.” Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal 43 (10): 1749–1760. doi:10.2224/sbp.2015.43.10.1749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stam, D., R. G. Lord, D. V. Knippenberg, and B. Wisse. 2014. “An Image of Who We Might Become: Vision Communication, Possible Selves, and Vision Pursuit.” Organization Science 25 (4): 1172–1194. doi:10.1287/orsc.2013.0891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trastek, V. F., N. W. Hamilton, and E. E. Niles. 2014. “Leadership Models in Health Care—a Case for Servant Leadership.” Mayo Clinic Proceedings 89 (3): 374–381. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.10.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuan, L. T., and Dr Lars Tummers,Prof Stephen Teo,Prof. Yvonne Brunetto. 2016. “How Servant Leadership Nurtures Knowledge Sharing.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 29 (1): 91–108. doi:10.1108/IJPSM-06-2015-0112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C. 1975. “Social Comparison and Social Identity: Some Prospects for Intergroup Behaviour.” European Journal of Social Psychology 5 (1): 1–34. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420050102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, M. E., A. R. Pratkanis, P. Probasco, and C. Leve. 1992. “Threat, Cohesion, and Group Effectiveness: Testing a Social Identity Maintenance Perspective on Groupthink.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63 (5): 781. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.5.781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Hoek, M., S. Groeneveld, and B. Kuipers. 2018. “Goal Setting in Teams: Goal Clarity and Team Performance in the Public Sector.” Review of Public Personnel Administration 38 (4): 472–493. doi:10.1177/0734371X16682815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Voet, J., and B. Steijn. 2021. “Team Innovation through Collaboration: How Visionary Leadership Spurs Innovation via Team Cohesion.” Public Management Review 23 (9): 1275–1294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Wal, Z. 2017. The 21st century public manager. London, UK: Macmillan International Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dierendonck, D., D. Stam, P. Boersma, N. De Windt, and J. Alkema. 2014. “Same Difference? Exploring the Differential Mechanisms Linking Servant Leadership and Transformational Leadership to Follower Outcomes.” The Leadership Quarterly 25 (3): 544–562. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dierendonck, D., and I. Nuijten. 2011. “The Servant Leadership Survey: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Measure.” Journal of Business and Psychology 26 (3): 249–267. doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9194-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg, D., C. K. De Dreu, and A. C. Homan. 2004. “Work Group Diversity and Group Performance: An Integrative Model and Research Agenda.” Journal of Applied Psychology 89 (6): 1008. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg, D., and D. Stam. 2014. “Visionary Leadership.” The Oxford Handbook of Leadership and Organizations 241: 259.
   Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg, D., and S. B. Sitkin. 2013. “A Critical Assessment of Charismatic—transformational Leadership Research: Back to the Drawing Board?” The Academy of Management Annals 7 (1): 1–60. doi:10.5465/19416520.2013.759433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Mierlo, H., J. K. Vermunt, and C. G. Rutte. 2009. “Composing Group-level Constructs from Individual-level Survey Data.” Organizational Research Methods 12 (2): 368–392. doi:10.1177/1094428107309322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Zijl, A. L., B. Vermeeren, F. Koster, and B. Steijn. 2019. “Towards Sustainable Local Welfare Systems: The Effects of Functional Heterogeneity and Team Autonomy on Team Processes in Dutch Neighbourhood Teams.” Health & Social Care in the Community 27 (1): 82–92. doi:10.1111/hsc.12604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venus, M., D. Stam, and D. Van Knippenberg. 2019. “Visions of Change as Visions of Continuity.” Academy of Management Journal 62 (3): 667–690. doi:10.5465/amj.2015.1196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, R., and D. Masal. 2015. “Public Leadership: A Review of the Literature and Framework for Future Research.” Public Management Review 17 (8): 1165–1189. doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.895031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, R., and L. Werkmeister. 2021. “What Is Public about Public Leadership? Exploring Implicit Public Leadership Theories.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 31 (1): 166–183. doi:10.1093/jopart/muaa024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldman, D. A., G. G. Ramirez, R. J. House, and P. Puranam. 2001. “Does Leadership Matter? CEO Leadership Attributes and Profitability under Conditions of Perceived Environmental Uncertainty.” Academy of Management Journal 44 (1): 134–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 1972 [1922]. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriß der verstehenden Soziologie. (fünfte, revidierte Auflage, besorgt von Johannes Winckelmann). Tübingen: Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
   Google Scholar
• West, S. G., A. B. Taylor, and W. Wu. 2012. “Model Fit and Model Selection in Structural Equation Modeling.” Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling 1: 209–231.
   Google Scholar
• Whittington, J. L., V. L. Goodwin, and B. Murray. 2004. “Transformational Leadership, Goal Difficulty, and Job Design: Independent and Interactive Effects on Employee Outcomes.” The Leadership Quarterly 15 (5): 593–606. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaccaro, S. J., A. L. Rittman, and M. A. Marks. 2001. “Team Leadership.” The Leadership Quarterly 12 (4): 451–483. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(01)00093-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar