Policy attention and the adoption of public sector innovation

References

• Alexandrova, P. 2016. “Explaining Political Attention Allocation with the Help of Issue Character: Evidence from the European Council.” European Political Science Review 8 (3): 405–425. doi:10.1017/S1755773915000107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexandrova, P., A. Rasmussen, and D. Toshkov. 2016. “Agenda Responsiveness in the European Council: Public Priorities, Policy Problems and Political Attention.” West European Politics 39 (4): 605–627. doi:10.1080/01402382.2015.1104995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åström, J., M. Karlsson, J. Linde, and A. Pirannejad. 2012. “Understanding the Rise of E-participation in Mon-democracies: Domestic and International Factors.” Government Information Quarterly 29 (2): 142–150. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F., and B. Jones. 1991. “Agenda Dynamics and Policy Subsystems.” Journal of Politics 53 (4): 1044–1074. doi:10.2307/2131866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, F. S., and W. D. Berry. 2007. “Innovations and Diffusions Models in Policy Research.” In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by P. A. Sabatier and C. M. Weible, 307–363. 3rd ed. Boulder,CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatti, Y., A. L. Olsen, and L. H. Pedersen. 2011. “Administrative Professionals and the Diffusion of Innovations: The Case of Citizen Service Centres.” Public Administration 89 (2): 577–594. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01882.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blei, D.M., A.Y. Ng, and M.I. Jordan. 2003. “Latent Dirichlet Allocation.” Journal of Machine Learning Research 3 (Jan): 993–1022.
   Google Scholar
• Boushey, G. 2016. “Targeted for Diffusion? How the Use and Acceptance of Stereotypes Shape the Diffusion of Criminal Justice Policy Innovations in the American States.” American Political Science Review 110 (1): 198–214. doi:10.1017/S0003055415000532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boydstun, A.E., S. Bevan, and H.F. Thomas. 2014. “The Importance of Attention Diversity and How to Measure It.” Policy Studies Journal 42 (2): 173–196. doi:10.1111/psj.12055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castelnovo, W., and M. Sorrentino. 2018. “The Digital Government Imperative: A Context-aware Perspective.” Public Management Review 20 (5): 709–725. doi:10.1080/14719037.2017.1305693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L., and A.K. Aklikokou. 2021. “Relating E-government Development to Government Effectiveness and Control of Corruption: A Cluster Analysis.” Journal of Chinese Governance 6 (1): 155–173. doi:10.1080/23812346.2019.1698693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., S. Bretschneider, J.M. Stritch, N. Darnall, and L. Hsueh. 2021. “E-procurement System Adoption in Local Governments: The Role of Procurement Complexity and Organizational Structure.” Public Management Review 1–23. doi:10.1080/14719037.2021.1874497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S., T. Christensen, and L. Ma. 2019. “Competing for Father’s Love? the Politics of Central Government Agency Termination in China.” Governance 32 (4): 761–777. doi:10.1111/gove.12405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.C., and J.Y. Hsieh. 2009. “Advancing E-governance: Comparing Taiwan and the United States.” Public Administration Review 69 (s1): s151–s158. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02103.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., and Y. Fan. 2018. “Post-New Public Management: A New Administrative Paradigm for China.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 84 (2): 389–404. doi:10.1177/0020852316633513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damanpour, F. 1987. “The Adoption of Technological Administrative and Ancillary Innovations Impacts of Organizational Factors.” Journal of Management 13 (4): 675–688. doi:10.1177/014920638701300408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, H., V Bekkers, and L. Tummers. 2016. “Innovation in the Public Sector: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda.” Public Administration 94 (1): 146–166. doi:10.1111/padm.12209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman,R.M. 1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm”. Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, Z, Q Meng, and N. Wei. 2020. “Fiscal Slack or Environmental Pressures: Which Matters More for Technological Innovation Assimilation? A Configurational Approach.” International Public Management Journal 23 (3): 380–404. doi:10.1080/10967494.2019.1647318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feeney, M.K., and E.W. Welch. 2012. “Electronic Participation Technologies and Perceived Outcomes for Local Government Managers.” Public Management Review 14 (6): 815–833. doi:10.1080/14719037.2011.642628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez, S., and L.R. Wise. 2010. “An Exploration of Why Public Organizations Ingest Innovations.” Public Administration 88 (4): 979–998. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01857.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilad, S. 2015. “Political Pressures, Organizational Identity, and Attention to Tasks: Illustrations from Pre-crisis Financial Regulation.” Public Administration 93 (3): 593–608. doi:10.1111/padm.12155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmelikhuijsen, S.G., and M.K. Feeney. 2017. “Developing and Testing an Integrative Framework for Open Government Adoption in Local Governments.” Public Administration Review 77 (4): 579–590. doi:10.1111/puar.12689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan, T., and T. Liu. 2019. “Fears, Hopes and the Politics of Time-space: The Media Frames of Japan in the Chinese People’s Daily.” International Communication Gazette 81 (6–7–8): 664–685. doi:10.1177/1748048518802248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, M.B., and I. Nørup. 2017. “Leading the Implementation of ICT Innovations.” Public Administration Review 77 (6): 851–860. doi:10.1111/puar.12807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, W, S Farrall, E Gray, C. Hay. 2020. “Moral Panics and Punctuated Equilibrium in Public Policy: An Analysis of the Criminal Justice Policy Agenda in Britain.” Policy Studies Journal 48 (1): 207–234. DOI:10.1111/psj.12239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon, Y., and D P. Haider-Markel. 2001. “Tracing Issue Definition and Policy Change: An Analysis of Disability Issue Images and Policy Response.” Policy Studies Journal 29 (2): 215–231. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2001.tb02087.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, BD, and FR. Baumgartner. 2005. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jun, K. N., and C. Weare. 2011. “Institutional Motivations in the Adoption of Innovations: The Case of E-Government.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21 (3): 495–519. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluver, A.R. 2005. “The Architecture of Control: A Chinese Strategy for e-Governance.” Journal of Public Policy 25 (1): 75–97. doi:10.1017/S0143814X05000218.
   Google Scholar
• Lavie, N. 1995. “Perceptual Load as a Necessary Condition for Selective Attention.” The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 (3): 451–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C., K.J. Chang, and F.S. Berry. 2011. “Testing the Development and Diffusion of E-government and E-democracy: A Global Perspective.” Public Administration Review 71 (3): 444–454. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02228.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J., L.M. Ricard, and E.H. Klijn. 2018. “How Innovation Drivers, Networking and Leadership Shape Public Sector Innovation Capacity.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 84 (2): 288–307. doi:10.1177/0020852317694085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., and L. Zhou. 2005. “Political Turnover and Economic Performance: The Incentive Role of Personnel Control in China.” Journal of Public Economics 89 (9–10): 1743–1762. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y. 2018. “A Comparison of Selected Western and Chinese Smart Governance: The Application of ICT in Governmental Management, Participation and Collaboration.” Telecommunications Policy 42 (10): 800–809. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2018.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., Robinson, S., & Vedlitz, A. 2016. “Public Problem Characterization, Policy Solution Generation, and Intra‐Agenda Connectivity”. Policy Studies Journal, 44: 396–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., S Robinson, and A Vedlitz. 2020. “A Micro Model of Problem Definition and Policy Choice: Issue Image, Issue Association, and Policy Support of Power Plants.” Policy Studies Journal 48 (1): 11–37. doi:10.1111/psj.12233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowery, D., V. Gray, and F. R. Baumgartner. 2010. “Policy Attention in State and Nation: Is Anyone Listening to the Laboratories of Democracy?” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 41 (2): 286–310. doi:10.1093/publius/pjq039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, L. 2014. “Diffusion and Assimilation of Government Microblogging: Evidence from Chinese Cities.” Public Management Review 16 (2): 274–295. doi:10.1080/14719037.2012.725763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, L. 2017. “Political Ideology, Social Capital, and Government Innovativeness: Evidence from the US States.” Public Management Review 19 (2): 114–133. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1177108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, L, J Chung, and S. Thorson. 2005. “E-government in China: Bringing Economic Development through Administrative Reform.” Government Information Quarterly 22 (1): 20–37. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2004.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, L., and X. Wu. 2020. “Citizen Engagement and Co-production of E-Government Services in China.” Journal of Chinese Governance 5 (1): 68–89. doi:10.1080/23812346.2019.1705052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maerz, S.F. 2016. “The Electronic Face of Authoritarianism: E-government as a Tool for Gaining Legitimacy in Competitive and Non-competitive Regimes.” Government Information Quarterly 33 (4): 727–735. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2016.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, P.J., S. Workman, and B.D. Jones. 2008. “Organizing Attention: Responses of the Bureaucracy to Agenda Disruption.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (4): 517–541. doi:10.1093/jopart/mun015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng, Q., and Z. Fan. 2021. “Punctuations and Diversity: Exploring Dynamics of Attention Allocation in China’s E-government Agenda.” Policy Studies 1–20. doi:10.1080/01442872.2021.1961719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R.K., B.R. Agle, and D.J. Wood. 1997. “Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts.” Academy of Management Review 22 (4): 853–886. doi:10.2307/259247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortensen, P.B. 2009. “Political Attention and Public Spending in the United States.” Policy Studies Journal 37 (3): 435–455. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00322.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortensen, P.B. 2010. “Political Attention and Public Policy: A Study of How Agenda Setting Matters.” Scandinavian Political Studies 33 (4): 356–380. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2010.00254.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortensen, P.B., and C. Green-Pedersen. 2015. “Institutional Effects of Changes in Political Attention: Explaining Organizational Changes in the Top Bureaucracy.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25 (1): 165–189. doi:10.1093/jopart/muu030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowlin, MC. 2016. “Modeling Issue Definitions Using Quantitative Text Analysis.” Policy Studies Journal 44 (3): 309–331. doi:10.1111/psj.12110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Toole, L. J., Jr, and K. J. Meier. 2010. “In Defense of Bureaucracy: Public Managerial Capacity, Slack and the Dampening of Environmental Shocks.” Public Management Review 12 (3):341–61 doi:10.1080/14719030903286599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricard, L.M., E.H. Klijn, J. Lewis, and T. Ysa. 2017. “Assessing Public Leadership Styles for Innovation: A Comparison of Copenhagen, Rotterdam and Barcelona.” Public Management Review 19 (2): 134–156. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1148192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochefort, D A, and R W. Cobb. 1993. “Problem Definition, Agenda Access, and Policy Choice.” Policy Studies Journal 21 (1): 56–71. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.1993.tb01453.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, I., and T. Gong. 2021. “Coordinating Government Silos: Challenges and Opportunities.” Global Public Policy and Governance 1 (1): 20–38. doi:10.1007/s43508-021-00004-z.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 1947. Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-making Processes in Administrative Organizations. Chicago, IL: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Soroka, S.N., and E.T. Lim. 2003. “Issue Definition and the Opinion-policy Link: Public Preferences and Health Care Spending in the US and UK.” British Journal of Politics & International Relations 5 (4): 576–593. doi:10.1111/1467-856X.00120.
   Google Scholar
• Stier, S. 2015. “Political Determinants of E-government Performance Revisited: Comparing Democracies and Autocracies.” Government Information Quarterly 32 (3): 270–278. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2015.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, J., M. Cole, Z. Huang, and S. Wang. 2019. “Chinese Leadership: Provincial Perspectives on Promotion and Performance.” Environment and Planning C:Politics and Space 37: 750–772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M. 2006. “Innovation Type and Diffusion: An Empirical Analysis of Local Government.” Public Administration 84 (2): 311–335. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00004.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M. 2008. “An Empirical Evaluation of Innovation Types and Organizational and Environmental Characteristics: Towards a Configuration Framework.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (4): 591–615. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R M. 2014. “Internal and External Antecedents of Process Innovation.” Public Management Review 16 (1): 21–44. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.771698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, G. 1994. “Command Communication: The Politics of Editorial Formulation in the People’s Daily.” The China Quarterly 137: 194–211. doi:10.1017/S0305741000034111.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, J., L. Ma, and Y. Yang. 2013. “Innovation in the Chinese Public Sector: Typology and Distribution.” Public Administration 91 (2): 347–365. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.02010.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yackee, S.W. 2006. “Assessing Inter-Institutional Attention to and Influence on Government Regulations.” British Journal of Political Science 36 (4): 723–744. doi:10.1017/S000712340600038X.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., and X. Zhu. 2019. “Multiple Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion in China.” Public Management Review 21 (4): 495–514. doi:10.1080/14719037.2018.1497695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, X., and Y. Zhang. 2019. “Diffusion of Marketization Innovation with Administrative Centralization in a Multilevel System: Evidence from China.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 29 (1): 133–150. doi:10.1093/jopart/muy034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, X, and H Zhao. 2021. “Experimentalist Governance with Interactive Central-Local Relations: Making New Pension Policies in China.” Policy Studies Journal 49 (1): 13–36. doi:10.1111/psj.12254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar