281
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Money matters: teachers in the public and private sectors

&

References

  • Ali, S. B. 2018. “Is All Turnover Intent the Same? Exploring Future Job Preference and Environmental Considerations.” Public Management Review 20 (12): 1768–1789. doi:10.1080/14719037.2017.1417464.
  • Baker, B. 2009. “Private Schooling in the U.S.: Expenditures, Supply, and Policy Implications.” Boulder and Tempe: Education and the Public Interest Center.
  • Ballou, D., and M. Podgursky. 1998. “Teacher Recruitment and Retention in Public and Private Schools.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: The Journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management 17 (3): 393–417. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199822)17:3<393::AID-PAM2>3.0.CO;2-B.
  • Boselie, P., J. Van Harten, and M. Veld. 2021. “A humanresource management review on public management and public administration research.” Public Management Review 23 (4): 483–500. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1695880.
  • “Boulder and Tempe: Education and the Public Interest Center &.” Education Policy Research Unit Retrieved [052521] from. http://epicpolicy.org/publication/private-schooling-US
  • Breaugh, J., A. Ritz, and K. Alfes. 2018. “Work Motivation and Public Service Motivation: Disentangling Varieties of Motivation and Job Satisfaction.” Public Management Review 20 (10): 1423–1443. doi:10.1080/14719037.2017.1400580.
  • Brown, H. 2009. “Incentives in U.S. Charter Schools: For-Profit and Nonprofit Choices.” Journal of School Choice 2 (4): 415–439. doi:10.1080/15582150802618675.
  • Bulkley, K E, and P Burch. 2011. The Changing Nature of Private Engagement in Public Education: For-Profit and Nonprofit Organizations and Educational Reform. Peabody Journal of Education, 86(3), 236–251. 10.1080/0161956X.2011.578963
  • Burian-Fitzgerald, M., M. T. Luekens, and G. A. Strizek. 2004. “Less Red Tape or More Green Teachers: Charter School Autonomy and Teacher Qualifications.” Taking Account of Charter Schools: What’s Happened and What’s Next 11–31.
  • Center, Niskanen. No. 2. on Nonprofit Millennial Workers Sector-Switching Intentions. Review of Public Nov. 23. 2019. Why Americans Dislike Government. Even When it Works. https://www.niskanencenter.org/why-american-dislike-government-even-when-it-works/
  • characteristics:,“A Multilevel Model of Public Sector Employment Preference in 26 Countries”. International Review of Administrative Sciences 81(4):833–885
  • Dee, T. S., and H. Fu. 2004. “Do Charter Schools Skim Students or Drain Resources?” Economics of Education Review 23 (3): 259–271. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2003.10.001.
  • Dee, T. S. 2004. “Teachers, Race, and Student Achievement in a Randomized Experiment.” Review of Economics and Statistics 86 (1): 195–210. doi:10.1162/003465304323023750.
  • Dee, T. S. 2005. “A Teacher like Me: Does Race, Ethnicity, or Gender Matter?” American Economic Review 95 (2): 158–165. doi:10.1257/000282805774670446.
  • Dee, T. S., and J. Wyckoff. 2015. “Incentives, Selection, and Teacher Performance: Evidence from IMPACT.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 34 (2): 267–297. doi:10.1002/pam.21818.
  • DeVaro, J., and D. Brookshire. 2007. “Promotions and Incentives in Nonprofit and For-Profit Economic Perspectivs.” Ilr Review 60 (3): 311–339.
  • “Environmental Considerations.” Public Management Review 20 (12): 1768–1789.
  • Figlio, D. N. 2002. “Can Public Schools Buy Better-qualified Teachers?” ILR Review 55 (4): 686–699. doi:10.1177/001979390205500407.
  • Gibbon, R., L. F. Katz, T. Lemieux, and D. Parent. 2002. “Comparative Advantage, Learning, and Sectoral Wage Determination.” NBER Working Paper Series 8889
  • Goldhaber, D., and J. Walch. 2012. “Strategic Pay Reform: A Student Outcomes-based Evaluation of Denver’s ProComp Teacher Pay Initiative.” Economics of Education Review 31 (6): 1067–1083. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2012.06.007.
  • Grissom, J. A. 2011. “Can Good Principals Keep Teachers in Disadvantaged Schools? Linking Principal Effectiveness to Teacher Satisfaction and Turnover in Hard-to-staff Environments.” Teachers College Record 113 (11): 2552–2585. doi:10.1177/016146811111301102.
  • Himmelstein, D. U., D. Ariely, and S. Woolhandler. 2014. “Pay-for-performance: Toxic to Quality? Insights from Behavioral Economics.” International Journal of Health Services 44 (2): 203–214. doi:10.2190/HS.44.2.a.
  • Hoxby, C. M. 1994. “Do Private Schools Provide Competition for Public Schools?” NBER working paper, (w4978).
  • Ingersoll, R. M. 2001. “Teacher Turnover and Teacher Shortages: An Organizational Analysis.” American Educational Research Journal 38 (3): 499–534. doi:10.3102/00028312038003499.
  • Jacobs, L. R, and S. Mettler. 2018. “When and How New Policy Creates New Politics: Examining the feedback effects of the Affordable Care Act on public opinion.” Perspectives on politics 16 (2): 345–363.
  • Kennedy, Robert. 2017. For Profit Vs. Not for Profit Schools. Private School Review. https://www.privateschoolreview.com/blog/for-profit-vs-not-for-profit-schools
  • Langbein, L., and G. Lewis. 1998. “Pay, productivity, and the public sector: The case of electrical engineers.“ Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8 (3): 391–412.
  • Lavertu, S. 2016. “We All Need help:“Big Data” and the Mismeasure of Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 76 (6): 864–872. doi:10.1111/puar.12436.
  • Lazear, E. P. 1991. “Labor Economics and the Psychology of Organizations.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 5 (2): 89–110. doi:10.1257/jep.5.2.89.
  • Lewis, H. G. 1986. “Union Relative Wage Effects.” Handbook of Labor Economics 2: 1139–1181.
  • Llorens, J. J., J. B. Wenger, and J. E. Kellough. 2007. “Choosing public sector employment: The impact of wages on the representation of women and minorities in state bureaucracies.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (3): 397–413.
  • Loewus, L. 2017. Participation in Teachers’ Unions is Down, and Likely to Tumble Further. Education Week. Retrieved from https://www.edweek.org/leadership/participation-in-teachers-unions-is-down-and-likely-to-tumble-further/2017/10
  • Malloy, C. L., and P. Wohlstetter. 2003. “Working Conditions in Charter Schools: What’s the Appeal for Teachers?” Education and Urban Society 35 (2): 219–241. doi:10.1177/0013124502239393.
  • Maynard-Moody, S. W., M. Musheno, and M. C Musheno. 2022. Cops, Teachers, Counselors: Stories from the Front Lines of Public Service. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  • McGinnis Johnson, J., and E. S. Ng. 2016. “Money Talks or Millennials Walk: The Effect of Compensation on Nonprofit Millennial Workers Sector-switching Intentions.” Review of Public Personnel Administration 36 (3): 283–305. doi:10.1177/0734371X15587980.
  • Meier, K., and J. Bohte. 2001. “Structure and Discretion: Missing Links in Representative Bureaucracy.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11 (4): 455–470. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003511.
  • Meier, K., and A. Rutherford. 2017. The Politics of African-American Education : Representation, Partisanship, and Educational equity/Kenneth J. Meier, Texas A & M University and Cardiff University, Amanda Rutherford, Indiana University. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mettler, S. 2019. “Making What Government Does Apparent to Citizens: Policy Feedback Effects, Their Limitations, and How They Might Be Facilitated.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 685 (1): 30–46. doi:10.1177/0002716219860108.
  • Mincer, J. 1974. “Schooling, Experience, and Earnings. Human Behavior & Social Institutions.” National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Moon, K-K. 2017. “Government: The Moderating Role of High-commitment Human Resource Practices.” Public Management Review 19 (10): 1480–1499. doi:10.1080/14719037.2017.1287940.
  • Morley, J. 2005. “For-profit and Nonprofit Charter Schools: An Agency Costs Approach.” Yale LJ 115 (7): 1782. doi:10.2307/20455669.
  • Mulholland, L. A. 1999. Arizona Charter School Progress Evaluation. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED429339.pdf
  • NCES. 2021. “Public School Expenditures.” Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/cmb
  • O’-Leary, Chris. 2019. “Public Service Motivation: A Rationalist Critique.” Public Pesonnel Management 48 (1): 82–96. doi:10.1177/0091026018791962.
  • Oberfield, Z. W. 2017. Are Charters Different? Public Education, Teachers, and the Charter School Debate, 02138. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press. 8 Story Street First Floor.
  • Organizations. “Industrial & Labor Relations Review” 60 (3, article 6) Available at: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/ilrreview/vol60/iss3/6
  • Podgursky, M. J., and M. G. Springer. 2007c. “Teacher Performance Pay: A Review.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 26 (4): 909–949. doi:10.1002/pam.20292.
  • Podgursky, M., and M. Springer. 2011. “Teacher Compensation Systems in the United States K-12 Public School System.” National Tax Journal 64 (1): 165–192. doi:10.17310/ntj.2011.1.07.
  • Rainey, Hal G. 2014. Understanding and Managing Public Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Smith, S. 1976a. “Government Wage Differentials by Sex.” Journal of Human Resources 11 (2): 185. doi:10.2307/145452.
  • Smith, S. 1976b. “Pay Differentials between Federal Government and Private Sector Workers.” ILR Review 29 (2): 179–197.
  • Springer, M. G. 2009. “Rethinking teacher compensation policies: Why now, why again.” In Performance Incentives: Their Growing Impact on American K-12 Education, 1–22. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  • Stuit, D. A., and T. M. Smith. 2012. “Explaining the Gap in Charter and Traditional Public School Teacher Turnover Rates.” Economics of Education Review 31 (2): 268–279. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.09.007.
  • Van de Walle, S., B. Steijn, and S. Jilke. 2015. “Extrinsic Motivation, PSM and Labour marketwhen-it-works/Nursing Economics:.” Pitman 33 (1): 8–13,35.
  • Work Experience: “A New Human Capital Measure. Asian Development BankYale Law Journal” 115: 1782–1821.
  • Zveglich, J. E., Jr, Y. van der Meulen Rodgers, and E. A. Laviña. 2019. “Expected Work Experience and the Gender Wage Gap: A New Human Capital Measure.” Economic Modelling 83: 372–383. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2019.09.003.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.