Citizens as an innovation source in sustainability transitions – linking the directionality of innovations with the locus of the problem in transformative innovation policy

References

• Alexandratos, N., and J. Bruinsma. 2012. World Agriculture Towards 2030/2050: The 2012 Revision. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organizations of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Alford, J., and B. W. Head. 2017. “Wicked and Less Wicked Problems: A Typology and a Contingency Framework.” Policy & Society 36 (3): 397–413. doi:10.1080/14494035.2017.1361634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, C., C. Hienerth, and E. Von Hippel. 2006. “How User Innovations Become Commercial Products: A Theoretical Investigation and Case Study.” Research Policy 35 (9): 1291–1313. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, C., and E. von Hippel. 2011. “Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation.” Organization Science 22 (6): 1399–1417. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baruch, A., A. May, and D. Yu. 2016. “The Motivations, Enablers and Barriers for Voluntary Participation in an Online Crowdsourcing Platform.” Computers in Human Behavior 64: 923–931. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, L., and C. Edquist. 2020. Towards a Holistic User Innovation Policy. Lund: Lund University, CIRCLE-Center for Innovation Research.
   Google Scholar
• Block, L. G., P. A. Keller, B. Vallen, S. Williamson, M. M. Birau, A. Grinstein, K. L. Haws, M. C. LaBarge, C. Lamberton, and E. S. Moore. 2016. “The Squander Sequence: Understanding Food Waste at Each Stage of the Consumer Decision-making Process.” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 35 (2): 292–304. doi:10.1509/jppm.15.132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boon, W., and J. Edler. 2018. “Demand, Challenges, and Innovation. Making Sense of New Trends in Innovation Policy.” Science & Public Policy 45 (4): 435–447. doi:10.1093/scipol/scy014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., and E. Loeffler. 2012. “From Engagement to Co-production: The Contribution of Users and Communities to Outcomes and Public Value.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 23 (4): 1119–1138. doi:10.1007/s11266-012-9309-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradonjic, P., N. Franke, and C. Lüthje. 2019. “Decision-makers’ Underestimation of User Innovation.” Research Policy 48 (6): 1354–1361. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby, B. C., P. T Hart, and J. Torfing. 2017. “Public Value Creation through Collaborative Innovation.” Public Management Review 19 (5): 655–669. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1192165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Danish Environmental Protection Agency (2018), Kortlægning af sammensætningen af dagrenovation og kildesorteret organisk affald fra husholdninger, available at: https://www2.mst.dk/Udgiv/publikationer/2018/03/978-87-93614-78-9.pdf, accessed on 8 December 2021.
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, J. P. 2016. “The Empirical Scope of User Innovation”, in Revolutionizing Innovation: Users, Communities, and Open Innovation, eds. D. Harhoff and K. R. Lakhani., 67–87. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, J. P., S. M. Ben-Menahem, N. Franke, J. Füller, and G. von Krogh. 2021. “Treading New Ground in Household Sector Innovation Research: Scope, Emergence, Business Implications, and Diffusion.” Research Policy 50 (8): 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2021.104270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong, J. P., N. L. Gillert, and R. M. Stock. 2018. “First Adoption of Consumer Innovations: Exploring Market Failure and Alleviating Factors.” Research Policy 47 (2): 487–497. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong, J. P., E. von Hippel, F. Gault, J. Kuusisto, and C. Raasch. 2015. “Market Failure in the Diffusion of Consumer-developed Innovations: Patterns in Finland.” Research Policy 44 (10): 1856–1865. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.06.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMonaco, H. J., P. Oliveira, A. W. Torrance, E. A. von Hippel, and C. von Hippel. 2019. “When Patients Become Innovators.” In MIT Sloan Management Review, 81–88. Spring.
   Google Scholar
• Diercks, G. 2019. “Lost in Translation: How Legacy Limits the OECD in Promoting New Policy Mixes for Sustainability Transitions.” Research Policy 48 (10): 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diercks, G., H. Larsen, and F. Steward. 2019. “Transformative Innovation Policy: Addressing Variety in an Emerging Policy Paradigm.” Research Policy 48 (4): 880–894. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edquist, C. 2013. Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C. 2019. “Towards a Holistic Innovation Policy: Can the Swedish National Innovation Council (NIC) Be a Role Model?” Research Policy 48 (4): 869–879. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission (2017), Stop food waste, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/food/safety/food_waste/stop_en, accessed on 14 December 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, D. 2014. Food Waste: Home Consumption, Material Culture and Everyday Life. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fagerberg, J. 2018. “Mobilizing Innovation for Sustainability Transitions: A Comment on Transformative Innovation Policy.” Research Policy 47 (9): 1568–1576. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO (2014), “Food Wastage Footprint – Full-Cost Accounting: Final Report.” Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• FAO, IFAD and WFP. 2014. The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2014. Strengthening the Enabling Environment for Food Security and Nutrition. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organizations of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Franke, N., P. Keinz, and K. Klausberger. 2013. “Does this sound like a fair deal? Antecedents and consequences of fairness expectations in the individual’s decision to participate in firm innovation.” Organization Science 24 (5): 1495–1516. doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke, N., F. Schirg, and K. Reinsberger. 2016. “The Frequency of End-user Innovation: A Re-estimation of Extant Findings.” Research Policy 45 (8): 1684–1689. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambardella, A., C. Raasch, and E. von Hippel. 2016. “The User Innovation Paradigm: Impacts on Markets and Welfare.” Management Science 63 (5): 1450–1468. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2015.2393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W., and J. Schot. 2007. “Typology of Sociotechnical Transition Pathways.” Research Policy 36 (3): 399–417. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham-Rowe, E., D. C. Jessop, and P. Sparks. 2014. “Identifying Motivations and Barriers to Minimising Household Food Waste.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 84: 15–23. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., T. Hansen, L. Coenen, J. Miörner, and J. Moodysson. 2019. “Innovation Policy for System-wide Transformation: The Case of Strategic Innovation Programmes (Sips) in Sweden.” Research Policy 48 (4): 1048–1061. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halbinger, M. A. 2018. “The Role of Makerspaces in Supporting Consumer Innovation and Diffusion: An Empirical Analysis.” Research Policy 47 (10): 2028–2036. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, T., S. Hielscher, G. Seyfang, and A. Smith. 2013. “Grassroots Innovations in Community Energy: The Role of Intermediaries in Niche Development.” Global Environmental Change 23 (5): 868–880. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, B. W. 2008. “Wicked Problems in Public Policy.” Public Policy 3 (2): 101–118.
   Google Scholar
• Head, B. W. 2019. “Forty Years of Wicked Problems Literature: Forging Closer Links to Policy Studies.” Policy and Society 38 (2): 180–197. doi:10.1080/14494035.2018.1488797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiskanen, E., S. Hyysalo, M. Jalas, J. K. Juntunen, and R. Lovio. 2014. “The Role of Users in Heating Systems Transitions: The Case of Heat Pumps in Finland.” In Highways and Byways of Radical Innovation: The Perspective of Design, edited by P. R. Christensen and S. Junginger, 171–196. Kolding: Kolding School of Design.
   Google Scholar
• Heiskanen, E., M. Johnson, and E. Vadovics. 2013. “Learning about and Involving Users in Energy Saving on the Local Level.” Journal of Cleaner Production 48: 241–249. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hekkert, M. P., M. J. Janssen, J. H. Wesseling, and S. O. Negro. 2020. “Mission-oriented Innovation Systems.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 34: 76–79. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, M. 2019. Waste Not, Want Not: Reducing Food Loss and Waste in North America through Life Cycle-based Approaches. Washington: United Nations Environment Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Hienerth, C., E. Von Hippel, and M. B. Jensen. 2014. “User Community Vs. Producer Innovation Development Efficiency: A First Empirical Study.” Research Policy 43 (1): 190–201. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain, M. 2016. “Grassroots Innovation: A Systematic Review of Two Decades of Research.” Journal of Cleaner Production 137: 973–981. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyysalo, S., M. Johnson, and J. K. Juntunen. 2017. “The Diffusion of Consumer Innovation in Sustainable Energy Technologies.” Journal of Cleaner Production 162: 70–82. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyysalo, S., J. K. Juntunen, and S. Freeman. 2013. “User Innovation in Sustainable Home Energy Technologies.” Energy Policy 55: 490–500. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyysalo, S., J. K. Juntunen, and M. Martiskainen. 2018. “Energy Internet Forums as Acceleration Phase Transition Intermediaries.” Research Policy 47 (5): 872–885. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeppesen, L. B. 2021. “Social Movements and Free Innovation.” Research Policy 50 (6): 104238. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2021.104238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P. 2014. “Government-affiliated Intermediary Organisations as Actors in System-level Transitions.” Research Policy 43 (8): 1370–1380. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P., W. Boon, S. Hyysalo, and L. Klerkx. 2019. “Towards A Typology of Intermediaries in Sustainability Transitions: A Systematic Review and A Research Agenda.” Research Policy 48 (4): 1062–1075. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhler, J., F. W. Geels, F. Kern, J. Markard, E. Onsongo, A. Wieczorek, … P. Wells. 2019. “An Agenda for Sustainability Transitions Research: State of the Art and Future Directions.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 31: 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S., and A. Rip. 2018. “Next-generation Innovation Policy and Grand Challenges.” Science & Public Policy 45 (4): 448–454. doi:10.1093/scipol/scy011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livsmedelsverket, (2020), “Report Summaries from the Swedish Government Commission to Reduce Food Loss and Waste.” Stockholm: Swedish Food Agency. Available at: https://www.livsmedelsverket.se/globalassets/publikationsdatabas/rapporter/2020/2020-report-summaries-food-lost-and-waste-2017-2019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Livsmedelsverket, Jordbruksverket, and Naturvårdsverket. 2018. Action Plan for Food Loss and Food Waste Reduction by 2030. Stockholm: Swedish Food Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Loeffler, E., and T. Bovaird. 2016. “User and Community Co-production of Public Services: What Does the Evidence Tell Us?” International Journal of Public Administration 39 (13): 1006–1019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markard, J., R. Raven, and B. Truffer. 2012. “Sustainability Transitions: An Emerging Field of Research and Its Prospects.” Research Policy 41 (6): 955–967. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, C. J., P. Upham, and L. Budd. 2015. “Commercial Orientation in Grassroots Social Innovation: Insights from the Sharing Economy.” Ecological Economics 118: 240–251. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. 2016. “From Market Fixing to Market-creating: A New Framework for Innovation Policy.” Industry and Innovation 23 (2): 140–156. doi:10.1080/13662716.2016.1146124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, T., A. Sancino, and M. Sicilia. 2017. “Varieties of Participation in Public Services: The Who, When, and What of Coproduction.” Public Administration Review 77 (5): 766–776. doi:10.1111/puar.12765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nambisan, S., and R. A. Baron. 2009. “Virtual Customer Environments: Testing a Model of Voluntary Participation in Value Co‐creation Activities.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 26 (4): 388–406. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00667.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D., and P. Monteiro. 2016. “The Practice Approach: For a Praxeology of Organisational and Management Studies.” In The Sage Handbook of Process Organization Studies, edited by A. Langley, T. Haridimos, 110–126. London: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781473957954.n7.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, K. R. 2020. “Policymakers’ Views on Sustainable End-user Innovation: Implications for Sustainable Innovation.” Journal of Cleaner Production 257: 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, K. R., L. A. Reisch, and J. Thøgersen. 2016. “Sustainable User Innovation from A Policy Perspective: A Systematic Literature Review.” Journal of Cleaner Production 133: 65–77. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, P., and E. von Hippel. 2011. “Users as Service Innovators: The Case of Banking Services.” Research Policy 40 (6): 806–818. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.03.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, P., L. Zejnilovic, H. Canhão, and E. von Hippel. 2015. “Innovation by Patients with Rare Diseases and Chronic Needs.” Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 10 (1): 2–9. doi:10.1186/s13023-015-0257-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ornetzeder, M., and H. Rohracher. 2013. “Of Solar Collectors, Wind Power, and Car Sharing: Comparing and Understanding Successful Cases of Grassroots Innovations.” Global Environmental Change 23 (5): 856–867. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P., G. Nasi, and M. Powell. 2021. “Beyond Co‐production: Value Creation and Public Services.” Public Administration early view 99 (4): 641–657. doi: 10.1111/padm.12718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P., Z. Radnor, T. Kinder, and I. Vidal. 2015. “The SERVICE Framework: A Public‐SERVICE‐dominant Approach to Sustainable Public Services.” British Journal of Management 26 (3): 424–438. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, A. L., J. M. Field, D. Fotheringham, M Subramony, A. Gustafsson, K. N. Lemon, M. Huang, and J. R. McColl-Kennedy. 2021. “Service Research Priorities: Managing and Delivering Service in Turbulent Times“ Journal of Service Research 24 (3): 329–353. doi:10.1177/10946705211021915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pel, B., A. Haxeltine, F. Avelino, A. Dumitru, R. Kemp, T. Bauler, M. S. Jørgensen, J. Dorland, J. Wittmayer, and M S. Jørgensen. 2020. “Towards A Theory of Transformative Social Innovation: A Relational Framework and 12 Propositions.” Research Policy 49 (8): 104080. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2020.104080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quested, T. E., E. Marsh, D. Stunell, and A. D. Parry. 2013. “Spaghetti Soup: The Complex World of Food Waste Behaviours.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 79: 43–51. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.04.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W., and M. M. Webber. 1973. “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.” Policy Sciences 4 (2): 155–169. doi:10.1007/BF01405730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachs, J., G. Schmidt-Traub, C. Kroll, G. Lafortune, and G. Fuller (2019), “Sustainable Development Report 2019.” New York: Bertelsmann Stiftung and Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. 2002. The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schemmann, B., A. M. Herrmann, M. M. Chappin, and G. J. Heimeriks. 2016. “Crowdsourcing Ideas: Involving Ordinary Users in the Ideation Phase of New Product Development.” Research Policy 45 (6): 1145–1154. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheurenbrand, K., E. Parsons, B. Cappellini, and A. Patterson. 2018. “Cycling into Headwinds: Analysing Mobility Practices that Inhibit Sustainability.” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 37 (2): 227–244. doi:10.1177/0743915618810440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schot, J., L. Kanger, and G. Verbong. 2016. “The Roles of Users in Shaping Transitions to New Energy Systems.” Nature Energy 1 (5): 1–7. doi:10.1038/nenergy.2016.54.
   Google Scholar
• Schot, J., and W. E. Steinmueller. 2018. “Three Frames for Innovation Policy: R&D, Systems of Innovation and Transformative Change.” Research Policy 47 (9): 1554–1567. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Søndergaard, H. A., and J. Thøgersen. 2021. “The Value Priorities of Consumer Innovators.” Science & Public Policy 48 (5): 679–696. doi:10.1093/scipol/scab040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spurling, N. J., A. McMeekin, D. Southerton, E. A. Shove, and D. Welch. 2013. Interventions in Practice: Reframing Policy Approaches to Consumer Behaviour. Manchester: Lanchester University, Sustainable Practices Research Group.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Sweden (2018), 97 kilo matavfall per person från hushållen, available at: https://www.scb.se/hitta-statistik/artiklar/2018/97-kilo-matavfall-per-person-fran-hushallen/, accessed on 8 March 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Stöckli, S., E. Niklaus, and M. Dorn. 2018. “Call for Testing Interventions to Prevent Consumer Food Waste.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 136: 445–462. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.03.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson, P., and L. Bengtsson. 2010. “Users’ Influence in Social-service Innovations: Two Swedish Case Studies.” Journal of Social Entrepreneurship 1 (2): 190–212. doi:10.1080/19420676.2010.511813.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, P. O., and R. K. Hartmann. 2018. “Policies to Promote User Innovation: Makerspaces and Clinician Innovation in Swedish Hospitals.” Research Policy 47 (1): 277–288. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trischler, J., and M. Charles. 2019. “The Application of a Service Ecosystems Lens to Public Policy Analysis and Design: Exploring the Frontiers.” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 38 (1): 19–35. doi:10.1177/0743915618818566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trischler, J., T. Dietrich, and S. Rundle-Thiele. 2019. “Co-design: From Expert- to User-driven Ideas in Public Service Design.” Public Management Review 21 (11): 1595–1619. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1619810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trischler, J., M. Johnson, and P. Kristensson. 2020. “A Service Ecosystem Perspective on the Diffusion of Sustainability-oriented User Innovations.” Journal of Business Research online first. 117 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.034.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• United Nations. 2015. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Environment Programme. 2021. Food Waste Index Report 2021, Nairobi: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• van Eijk, C. 2018. “Helping Dutch Neighborhood Watch Schemes to Survive the Rainy Season: Studying Mutual Perceptions on Citizens’ and Professionals’ Engagement in the Co-production of Community Safety.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 29 (1): 222–236. doi:10.1007/s11266-017-9918-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Geffen, L., E. van Herpen, and S. J. Sijtsema. 2020. “A Broader Perspective on Household Food Waste: A Call for Encompassing Consumers’ Food Related Goals, the Food System, and the Impact of Reduction Activities.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 163: 1–2. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanleene, D., J. Voets, and B. Verschuere. 2020. “The Co-production of Public Value in Community Development: Can Street-level Professionals Make a Difference?” International Review of Administrative Sciences 86 (3): 582–598. doi:10.1177/0020852318804040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinnova, (2020), About Us, available at: https://www.vinnova.se/en/about-us/, accessed on 25 February 2020.
   Google Scholar
• von Hippel, E. 1994. “Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation.” Management Science 40 (4): 429–439. doi:10.1287/mnsc.40.4.429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hippel, E. 2016. Free Innovation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• von Hippel, C. D., and A. B. Cann. 2021. “Behavioral Innovation: Pilot Study and New Big Data Analysis Approach in Household Sector User Innovation.” Research Policy 50 (8): 103992. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2020.103992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hippel, E., J. P. de Jong, and S. Flowers. 2012. “Comparing Business and Household Sector Innovation in Consumer Products: Findings from a Representative Study in the United Kingdom.” Management Science 58 (9): 1669–1681. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1110.1508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hippel, E., and R. Katz. 2002. “Shifting Innovation to Users via Toolkits.” Management Science 48 (7): 821–833. doi:10.1287/mnsc.48.7.821.2817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hippel, E., and S. Kaulartz. 2021. “Next-generation Consumer Innovation Search: Identifying Early-stage Need-solution Pairs on the Web.” Research Policy 50 (8): 104056. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2020.104056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waitt, G., and C. Phillips. 2016. “Food Waste and Domestic Refrigeration: A Visceral and Material Approach.” Social & Cultural Geography 17 (3): 359–379. doi:10.1080/14649365.2015.1075580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, E. P., and A. M. Khademian. 2008. “Wicked Problems, Knowledge Challenges, and Collaborative Capacity Builders in Network Settings.” Public Administration Review 68 (2): 334–349. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00866.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, K. M., and H. Rohracher. 2012. “Legitimizing Research, Technology and Innovation Policies for Transformative Change: Combining Insights from Innovation Systems and Multi-level Perspective in a Comprehensive ‘Failures’ Framework.” Research Policy 41 (6): 1037–1047. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, H., A. Lindström, J. Trischler, F. Wikström, and Z. Rowe. 2020. “Avoiding Food Becoming Waste in Households – The Role of Packaging in Consumers’ Practices across Different Food Categories.” Journal of Cleaner Production 265: 121775. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WIPO. 2019. Global Innovation Index. Geneva: WIPO, INSEAD and Cornell University.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerling, E., H. Purtik, and I. M. Welpe. 2017. “End-users as Co-developers for Novel Green Products and Services: An Exploratory Case Study Analysis of the Innovation Process in Incumbent Firms.” Journal of Cleaner Production 162: 51–58. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar