The influence of network orchestration and organizational formalization on goal orientation in public service delivery networks: an experimental study

References

• Agranoff, R., and M. McGuire. 2001. “Big Questions in Public Network Management Research.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11 (3): 295–326. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., and A. Gash. 2008. “Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (4): 543–571. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartelings, J. A., J. Goedee, J. Raab, and R. Bijl. 2017. “The Nature of Orchestrational Work.” Public Management Review 19 (3): 342–360. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1209233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechky, B. A. 2006. “Gaffers, Gofers, and Grips: Role-Based Coordination in Temporary Organizations.” Organization Science 17 (1): 3–21. doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouwman, R., and S. Grimmelikhuijsen. 2016. “Experimental Public Administration from 1992 to 2014: A Systematic Literature Review and Ways Forward.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 29 (2): 110–131. doi:10.1108/IJPSM-07-2015-0129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busquets, J. 2010. “Orchestrating Smart Business Network Dynamics for Innovation.” European Journal of Information Systems 19 (4): 481–493. doi:10.1057/ejis.2010.19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carboni, J. L., A. Saz-Carranza, J. Raab, and K. R. Isett. 2019. “Taking Dimensions of Purpose-Oriented Networks Seriously.” Perspectives on Public Management and Governance 2 (3): 187–201. doi:10.1093/ppmgov/gvz011.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Conteh, C., and B. Harding. 2021. “Boundary-Spanning in Public Value Co-Creation Through the Lens of Multilevel Governance.” Public Management Review 25 (1): 1–25. doi:10.1080/14719037.2021.1942529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cristofoli, D., M. Meneguzzo, and N. Riccucci. 2017. “Collaborative Administration: The Management of Successful Networks.” Public Management Review 19 (3): 275–283. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1209236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cristofoli, D., B. Trivellato, and S. Verzillo. 2019. “Network Management as a Contingent Activity. A Configurational Analysis of Managerial Behaviors in Different Network Settings.” Public Management Review 21 (12): 1775–1800. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1577905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby, B. C., and J. M. Bryson. 2010. “Integrative Leadership and the Creation and Maintenance of Cross-Sector Collaborations.” The Leadership Quarterly 21 (2): 211–230. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhanaraj, C., and A. Parkhe. 2006. “Orchestrating Innovation Networks.” Academy of Management Review 31 (3): 659–669. doi:10.5465/amr.2006.21318923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dörner, D. 1996. The Logic of Failure: Recognizing and Avoiding Error in Complex Situations. New York: Metropolitan Books.
   Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J., A. Van Buuren, and E. H. Klijn. 2013. “Connective Capacities of Network Managers: A Comparative Study of Management Styles in Eight Regional Governance Networks.” Public Management Review 15 (1): 131–159. doi:10.1080/14719037.2012.691009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goedee, J., and A. Entken. 2019. [Collaboration and Orchestration] Den Haag: Boom Bestuurskunde. 2nd ed.
   Google Scholar
• Gulati, R., and H. Singh. 1998. “The Architecture of Cooperation: Managing Coordination Costs and Appropriation Concerns in Strategic Alliances.” Administrative Science Quarterly 43 (4): 781–814. doi:10.2307/2393616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hage, J., and M. Aiken. 1967. “Relationship of Centralization to Other Structural Properties.” Administrative Science Quarterly 12 (1): 72–92. doi:10.2307/2391213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoefnagel, R., L. Oerlemans, and J. Goedee. 2014. “How Anchoring and Adjusting Influence Citizens’ Acceptance of Video-Mediated Crime Reporting: A Narrative Approach.” Journal of Strategic Information Systems 23 (4): 305–322. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2014.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P., H. Olander, K. Blomqvist, and V. Panfilii. 2012. “Orchestrating R&D Networks: Absorptive Capacity, Network Stability, and Innovation Appropriability.” European Management Journal 30 (6): 552–563. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2012.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, J. J., F. A. Van Den Bosch, and H. W. Volberda. 2006. “Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators.” Management Science 52 (11): 1661–1674. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joldersma, C. 2000. “Policy Learning Through Simulation/Gaming.” International Simulation and Gaming Research Yearbook 8: 77–88.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, G. R. 2013. Organizational Theory, Design, and Change. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Kam, C. D., J. R. Wilking, and E. J. Zechmeister. 2007. “Beyond the “Narrow Data Base”: Another Convenience Sample for Experimental Research.” Political Behavior 29 (4): 415–440. doi:10.1007/s11109-007-9037-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., and J. Edelenbos. 2007. “Meta-Governance as Network Management.” In Theories of Democratic Network Governance, 199–214. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., B. Steijn, and J. Edelenbos. 2010. “The Impact of Network Management on Outcomes in Governance Networks.” Public Administration 88 (4): 1063–1082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppenjan, J., and E. H. Klijn. 2004. Managing Uncertainties in Networks: A Network Approach to Problem Solving and Decision Making. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lecy, J. D., I. A. Mergel, and H. P. Schmitz. 2014. “Networks in Public Administration: Current Scholarship in Review.” Public Management Review 16 (5): 643–665. doi:10.1080/14719037.2012.743577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A., and G. P. Latham. 2002. “Building a Practically Useful Theory of Goal Orientation and Task Motivation: A 35-Year Odyssey.” The American Psychologist 57 (9): 705. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunenburg, F. C. 2012. “Organizational Structure: Mintzberg’s Framework.” International Journal of Scholarly, Academic, Intellectual Diversity 14 (1): 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., and H. A. Simon. 1958. Organizations. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Markovic, J. 2017. “Contingencies and Organizing Principles in Public Networks.” Public Management Review 19 (3): 361–380. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1209237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, M. 2002. “Managing Networks: Propositions on What Managers Do and Why They Do It.” Public Administration Review 62 (5): 599–609. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. 1992. Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Mom, T. J., F. A. Van Den Bosch, and H. W. Volberda. 2009. “Understanding Variation in Managers’ Ambidexterity: Investigating Direct and Interaction Effects of Formal Structural and Personal Coordination Mechanisms.” Organization Science 20 (4): 812–828. doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nambisan, S., and M. Sawhney. 2011. “Orchestration Processes in Network-Centric Innovation: Evidence from the Field.” Academy of Management Perspectives 25 (3): 40–57. doi:10.5465/AMP.2011.63886529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowell, B. L., and P. Kenis. 2019. “Purpose-Oriented Networks: The Architecture of Complexity.” Perspectives on Public Management and Governance 2 (3): 169–173. doi:10.1093/ppmgov/gvz012.
   Google Scholar
• O’leary, R., Y. Choi, and C. M. Gerard. 2012. “The Skill Set of the Successful Collaborator.” Public Administration Review 72 (s1): S70–83. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02667.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. 2006. “The New Public Governance? 1.” Public Management Review 8 (3): 377–387. doi:10.1080/14719030600853022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 2000. “Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 14 (3): 137–158. doi:10.1257/jep.14.3.137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paquin, R. L., and J. Howard-Grenville. 2013. “Blind Dates and Arranged Marriages: Longitudinal Processes of Network Orchestration.” Organization Studies 34 (11): 1623–1653. doi:10.1177/0170840612470230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popp, J., G. MacKean, A. Casebeer, H. B. Milward, and R. Lindstrom. 2014. Inter-Organizational Networks. A Critical Review of the Literature to Inform Practice. Washington, DC: IBM Center for The Business Development.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad, B. D. 2008. “Content Analysis. A Method in Social Science Research.” Research Methods for Social Work 5: 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., and H. B. Milward. 1995. “A Preliminary Theory of Interorganizational Network Effectiveness: A Comparative Study of Four Community Mental Health Systems.” Administrative Science Quarterly 40 (1): 1–33. doi:10.2307/2393698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raab, J., R. S. Mannak, and B. Cambré. 2015. “Combining Structure, Governance, and Context: A Configurational Approach to Network Effectiveness.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25 (2): 479–511. doi:10.1093/jopart/mut039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoofs, J. 2014. The Managerial Role of Orchestration: Substantiation in Intra- and Interorganizational Collaboration Context. ( Master thesis, Tilburg University).
   Google Scholar
• Silva, C., and M. McGuire. 2010. “Leading Public Sector Networks: An Empirical Examination of Integrative Leadership Behaviours.” The Leadership Quarterly 21 (2): 264–277. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tushman, M. L., and T. J. Scanlan. 1981. “Boundary Spanning Individuals: Their Role in Information Transfer and Their Antecedents.” Academy of Management Journal 24 (2): 289–305. doi:10.2307/255842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Berg, K. (2014. The Role of the Orchestrator Explained: A Substantiation of the Different Tasks in the Context of Profit and Nonprofit Organizations. ( Master Thesis Tilburg University).
   Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg, L.F.P.A. 2017. Orchestrating Interorganizational Collaboration. ( Master Thesis Tilburg University).
   Google Scholar
• van Meerkerk, I., and J. Edelenbos. 2014. “The Effects of Boundary Spanners on Trust and Performance of Urban Governance Networks: Findings from Survey Research on Urban Development Projects in the Netherlands.” Policy Sciences 47 (1): 3–24. doi:10.1007/s11077-013-9181-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Meerkerk, I., and J. Edelenbos. 2018. “Facilitating Conditions for Boundary-Spanning Behaviour in Governance Networks.” Public Management Review 20 (4): 503–524. doi:10.1080/14719037.2017.1302248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlaar, P. W., F. A. Van den Bosch, and H. W. Volberda. 2007. “On the Evolution of Trust, Distrust, and Formal Coordination and Control in Interorganizational Relationships: Toward an Integrative Framework.” Group & Organization Management 32 (4): 407–428. doi:10.1177/1059601106294215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, P. 2002. “The Competent Boundary Spanner.” Public Administration 80 (1): 103–124. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, P. 2012. Collaboration in Public Policy and Practice: Perspectives on Boundary Spanners. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar