Exploring public participation modes in government: The case of infrastructure policies

References

• Allen Wolters, Erika, Brent S. Steel, and Rebecca L. Warner. 2020. “Ideology and Value Determinants of Public Support for Energy Policies in the U.S.: A Focus on Western States.” Energies 13 (8): 1890. doi:10.3390/en13081890.
   Google Scholar
• Alonso, José M., Rhys Andrews, Judith Clifton, and Daniel Diaz-Fuentes. 2019. “Factors Influencing Citizens’ Co-Production of Environmental Outcomes: A Multi-Level Analysis.” Public Management Review 21 (11): 1620–1645. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1619806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baekgaard, Martin, Julian Christensen, Jonas Krogh Madsen, and Kim Sass Mikkelsen. 2020. “Rallying Around the Flag in Times of COVID-19: Societal Lockdown and Trust in Democratic Institutions.” Journal of Behavioral Public Administration 3 (2): 2. doi:10.30636/jbpa.32.172.
   Google Scholar
• Barbera, Carmela, Mariafrancesca Sicilia, and Ileana Steccolini. 2016. “What Mr Rossi Wants in Participatory Budgeting: Two R’s (Responsiveness and Representation) and Two I’s (Inclusiveness and Interaction).” International Journal of Public Administration 39: 1088–1100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettman, James R., Mary Frances Luce, and John W. Payne. 1998. “Constructive Consumer Choice Processes.” The Journal of Consumer Research 25 (3): 187–217. doi:10.1086/209535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettman, James R, Eric J Johnson, and John W Payne. 1990. “A Componential Analysis of Cognitive Effort in Choice.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 45 (1): 111–139. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(90)90007-V.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bifulco, Robert, and Helen Ladd. 2006. “Institutional Change and Coproduction of Public Services: The Effect of Charter Schools on Parental Involvement.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16 (4): 553–576. doi:10.1093/jopart/muj001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. 2007. “Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services.” Public Administration Review 67 (5): 846–860. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, Tony, Elke Loeffler, Sophie Yates, Gregg Van Ryzin, and John Alford. 2021. “International Survey Evidence on User and Community Co-Delivery of Prevention Activities Relevant to Public Services and Outcomes.” Public Management Review 25 (3, October): 1–23. doi:10.1080/14719037.2021.1991665.
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, Tony, Gerry Stoker, Tricia Jones, Elke Loeffler, and Monica Pinilla Roncancio. 2016. “Activating Collective Co-Production of Public Services: Influencing Citizens to Participate in Complex Governance Mechanisms in the UK.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 82 (1): 47–68. doi:10.1177/0020852314566009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., G. G. Van Ryzin, E. Loeffler, and S. Parrado. 2015. “Activating Citizens to Participate in Collective Co-Production of Public Services.” Journal of Social Policy 44 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1017/S0047279414000567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsen, Taco, and Marlies Honingh. 2016. “Distinguishing Different Types of Coproduction: A Conceptual Analysis Based on the Classical Definitions.” Public Administration Review 76 (3): 427–435. doi:10.1111/puar.12465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody, Samuel D., Sammy Zahran, Arnold Vedlitz, and Himanshu Grover. 2008. “Examining the Relationship Between Physical Vulnerability and Public Perceptions of Global Climate Change in the United States.” Environment and Behavior 40 (1): 72–95. doi:10.1177/0013916506298800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brudney, Jeffrey L., and Robert E. England. 1983. “Toward a Definition of the Coproduction Concept.” Public Administration Review 43 (1): 59. doi:10.2307/975300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan, Kathe. 2007. “Citizen Participation: Models and Methods.” International Journal of Public Administration 30 (11): 1179–1196. doi:10.1080/01900690701225366.
   Google Scholar
• Calzada, Inés, and Eloísa Del Pino. 2008. “Perceived Efficacy and Citizens’ Attitudes Toward Welfare State Reform.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 74 (4): 555–574. doi:10.1177/0020852308098468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cepiku, Denita, Marta Marsilio, Mariafrancesca Sicilia, and Milena Vainieri. 2020. The Co-Production of Public Services: Management and Evaluation. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-60710-4.
   Google Scholar
• Chaebo, Gemael, and Janann Joslin Medeiros. 2017. “Conditions for Policy Implementation via Co-Production: The Control of Dengue Fever in Brazil.” Public Management Review 19 (10): 1381–1398. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1209231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanley, Virginia A., Thomas J. Rudolph, and Wendy M. Rahn. 2000. “The Origins and Consequences of Public Trust in Government.” Public Opinion Quarterly 64 (3): 239–256. doi:10.1086/317987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciuk, David J., and Berwood A. Yost. 2016. “The Effects of Issue Salience, Elite Influence, and Policy Content on Public Opinion.” Political Communication 33 (2): 328–345. doi:10.1080/10584609.2015.1017629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper-Martin, Elizabeth. 1994. “Measures of Cognitive Effort.” Marketing Letters 5 (1): 43–56. doi:10.1007/BF00993957.
   Google Scholar
• Cutter, Susan L. 2016. “The Landscape of Disaster Resilience Indicators in the USA.” Natural Hazards 80 (2): 741–758. doi:10.1007/s11069-015-1993-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, Darren W., and Brian D. Silver. 2004. “Civil Liberties Vs. Security: Public Opinion in the Context of the Terrorist Attacks on America.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (1): 28–46. doi:10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00054.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinner, Isaac, Eric J. Johnson, Daniel G. Goldstein, and Kaiya Liu. 2011. “Partitioning Default Effects: Why People Choose Not to Choose.” Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied 17 (4): 332–341. doi:10.1037/a0024354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragana, Davidovic, Niklas Harring, and Sverker C. Jagers. 2020. “The Contingent Effects of Environmental Concern and Ideology: Institutional Context and People’s Willingness to Pay Environmental Taxes.” Environmental Politics 29 (4): 674–696. doi:10.1080/09644016.2019.1606882.
   Google Scholar
• Dvir, Rotem, Arnold Vedlitz, and Ali Mostafavi. 2022. “Far from Home: Infrastructure, Access to Essential Services, and Risk Perceptions About Hazard Weather Events.” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 80: 80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103185.
   Google Scholar
• Erikson, Robert S., and Kent L. Tedin. 2019. American Public Opinion: Its Origins, Content, and Impact. Tenth ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fledderus, Joost, and Marlies Honingh. 2016. “Why People Co-Produce Within Activation Services: The Necessity of Motivation and Trust – an Investigation of Selection Biases in a Municipal Activation Programme in the Netherlands.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 82 (1): 69–87. doi:10.1177/0020852314566006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogg, Linda M., Lawrence C. Hamilton, and Erin S. Bell. 2020. “Views of the Highway: Infrastructure Reality, Perceptions, and Politics.” SAGE Open 10 (4): 215824402096360. doi:10.1177/2158244020963609.
   Google Scholar
• Fournier, Patrick, André Blais, Richard Nadeau, Elisabeth Gidengil, and Neil Nevitte. 2003. “Issue Importance and Performance Voting.” Political Behavior 25 (1): 51–67. doi:10.1023/A:1022952311518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garbarino, Ellen C., and Julie A. Edell. 1997. “Cognitive Effort, Affect, and Choice.” The Journal of Consumer Research 24 (2): 147–158. doi:10.1086/209500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotham, Kevin Fox, Richard Campanella, Katie Lauve‐moon, and Bradford Powers. 2018. “Hazard Experience, Geophysical Vulnerability, and Flood Risk Perceptions in a Postdisaster City, the Case of New Orleans.” Risk Analysis 38 (2): 345–356. doi:10.1111/risa.12830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grolnick, Wendy S., and Maria L. Slowiaczek. 1994. “Parents’ Involvement in Children’s Schooling: A Multidimensional Conceptualization and Motivational Model.” Child Development 65 (1): 237. doi:10.2307/1131378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy, Mary E. 2021. “Expanding the Toolbox: Why the Citizen-State Encounter Demands It.” Public Performance & Management Review 44 (5): 1100–1117. doi:10.1080/15309576.2019.1677255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattke, Fabian, and Janne Kalucza. 2019. “What Influences the Willingness of Citizens to Coproduce Public Services? Results from a Vignette Experiment.” Journal of Behavioral Public Administration 2 (1): 1. doi:https://doi.org/10.30636/jbpa.21.60.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, Jack S., Yu Wen Hung, Yin-Hung Chen, and Hsieh-Hong Huang. 2013. “Antecedents and Consequences of User Coproduction in Information System Development Projects.” Project Management Journal 44 (2): 67–87. doi:10.1002/pmj.21330.
   Google Scholar
• Huafang, Li. 2020. “Communication for Coproduction: Increasing Information Credibility to Fight the Coronavirus.” The American Review of Public Administration 50 (6–7): 692–697. doi:10.1177/0275074020942104.
   Google Scholar
• Hui, Li, Hank C. Jenkins-Smith, Carol L. Silva, Robert P. Berrens, and Kerry G. Herron. 2009. “Public Support for Reducing US Reliance on Fossil Fuels: Investigating Household Willingness-To-Pay for Energy Research and Development.” Ecological Economics 68 (3): 731–742. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.005.
   Google Scholar
• Islam, Md., Rifat Mahmud Shahriar, and Bulbul Ahmed. 2021. “Trust in Government During COVID-19 Pandemic in Bangladesh: An Analysis of Social Media Users’ Perception of Misinformation and Knowledge About Government Measures.” International Journal of Public Administration: 1–17. December, doi:10.1080/01900692.2021.2004605.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, Morten. 2013. “Can Government Initiatives Increase Citizen Coproduction? Results of a Randomized Field Experiment.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23 (1): 27–54. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, Morten, Oliver James, Donald Moynihan, and Tina Nabatchi. 2019. “JPART Virtual Issue on Citizen-State Interactions in Public Administration Research.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 29 (4): e8–15. doi:10.1093/jopart/muw031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, Jianjun, Xinyu Wan, Yongsheng Lin, Foyuan Kuang, and Jing Ning. 2019. “Public Willingness to Pay for the Research and Development of Solar Energy in Beijing, China.” Energy Policy 134 (November): 110962. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110962.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, Daniel. 1973. Attention and Effort. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. 1st ed. New York: Farrar, Straus; Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Kellstedt, Paul M., Sammy Zahran, and Arnold Vedlitz. 2008. “Personal Efficacy, the Information Environment, and Attitudes Toward Global Warming and Climate Change in the United States.” Risk Analysis 28 (1): 113–126. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01010.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotchen, Matthew J, Zachary M Turk, and Anthony A Leiserowitz. 2017. “Public Willingness to Pay for a US Carbon Tax and Preferences for Spending the Revenue.” Environmental Research Letters 12 (9): 094012. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aa822a.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layne, K. 1989. Perfect Partners: Co-Production and Crime Prevention. United States: Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department.
   Google Scholar
• Lecheler, Sophie, Claes de Vreese, and Rune Slothuus. 2009. “Issue Importance as a Moderator of Framing Effects.” Communication Research 36 (3): 400–425. doi:10.1177/0093650209333028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Chul-Yong, and Hyejin Heo. 2016. “Estimating Willingness to Pay for Renewable Energy in South Korea Using the Contingent Valuation Method.” Energy Policy 94 (July): 150–156. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.051.
   Google Scholar
• Linders, Dennis. 2012. “From E-Government to We-Government: Defining a Typology for Citizen Coproduction in the Age of Social Media.” Government Information Quarterly 29 (4): 446–454. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Xinsheng, Kent E. Portney, Jeryl L. Mumpower, and Arnold Vedlitz. 2019. “Terrorism Risk Assessment, Recollection Bias, and Public Support for Counterterrorism Policy and Spending.” Risk Analysis 39 (3): 553–570. doi:10.1111/risa.13203.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu, Xinsheng, Scott Robinson, and Arnold Vedlitz. 2020. “A Micro Model of Problem Definition and Policy Choice: Issue Image, Issue Association, and Policy Support of Power Plants.” Policy Studies Journal 48 (1): 11–37. doi:10.1111/psj.12233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, Tom M., and Seth D. Guikema. 2020. “Reframing Resilience: Equitable Access to Essential Services.” Risk Analysis 40 (8): 1538–1553. doi:10.1111/risa.13492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCright, Aaron M., Chenyang Xiao, and Riley E. Dunlap. 2014. “Political Polarization on Support for Government Spending on Environmental Protection in the USA, 1974–2012.” Social Science Research 48 (November): 251–260. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.06.008.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meijer, Albert Jacob. 2011. “Networked Coproduction of Public Services in Virtual Communities: From a Government-Centric to a Community Approach to Public Service Support.” Public Administration Review 71 (4): 598–607. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02391.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaud, Kristy E. H., Juliet E. Carlisle, and Eric R. A. N. Smith. 2009. “The Relationship Between Cultural Values and Political Ideology, and the Role of Political Knowledge.” Political Psychology 30 (1): 27–42. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00679.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. M., J. A. Krosnick, and L. R. Fabrigar. 2017. “The origins of policy issue salience: Personal and national importance impact on behavioral, cognitive, and emotional issue engagement.” In Political psychology: New explorations, edited by J. A. Krosnick, I-C. A. Chiang, and T. H. Stark, 125–171. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Morgeson, F. V., D. VanAmburg, and S. Mithas. 2011. “Misplaced Trust? Exploring the Structure of the E-Government-Citizen Trust Relationship.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21 (2): 257–283. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, Tina, and Matthew Leighninger. 2015. Public Participation for 21st Century Democracy. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, Tina, Alessandro Sancino, and Mariafrancesca Sicilia. 2017. “Varieties of Participation in Public Services: The Who, When, and What of Coproduction.” Public Administration Review 77 (5): 766–776. doi:10.1111/puar.12765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, Stephen P, Zoe Radnor, and Kirsty Strokosch. 2016. “Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services: A Suitable Case for Treatment?” Public Management Review 18 (5): 639–653. doi:10.1080/14719037.2015.1111927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, Elinor. 1996. “Crossing the Great Divide: Coproduction, Synergy, and Development.” World Development 24 (6): 1073–1087. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, Vincent, and Elinor Ostrom. 1977. “Public Goods and Public Choices.“ In Alternatives for Delivering Public Services: Toward Improved Performance, edited byE.S. Savas, 7–49. Boulder, CO: Westview press.
   Google Scholar
• Pestoff, Victor. 2012. “Co-Production and Third Sector Social Services in Europe.“ In New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-Production, edited byPestoff Victor, Brandsen Taco, Verschuere Bram, 13–34. New York; London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Realpe, Alba, and Louise Wallace. 2010. What is Co-Production?. London, UK: The Health Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, S. E., X. Liu, J. W. Stoutenborough, and A. Vedlitz. 2013. “Explaining Popular Trust in the Department of Homeland Security.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23 (3): 713–733. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, Scott E, James W Stoutenborough, and Arnold Vedlitz. 2017. Understanding Trust in Government Environmental Sustainability, Fracking, and Public Opinion in American Politics. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Salvador, Parrado, Gregg G. Van Ryzin, Tony Bovaird, and Elke Löffler. 2013. “Correlates of Co-Production: Evidence from a Five-Nation Survey of Citizens.” International Public Management Journal 16 (1): 85–112. doi:10.1080/10967494.2013.796260.
   Google Scholar
• Schachter, Hindy Lauer. 1995. “Reinventing Government or Reinventing Ourselves: Two Models for Improving Government Performance.” Public Administration Review 55 (6): 530. doi:10.2307/3110344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Gerald E., and Carole A. Huntsman. 1997. “Reframing the Metaphor of the Citizen-Government Relationship: A Value-Centered Perspective.” Public Administration Review 57 (4): 309. doi:10.2307/977312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Chuanwang, Nan Lyu, and Xiaoling Ouyang. 2014. “Chinese Public Willingness to Pay to Avoid Having Nuclear Power Plants in the Neighborhood.” Sustainability 6 (10): 7197–7223. doi:10.3390/su6107197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suyeon, Jo, and Tina Nabatchi. 2016. “Getting Back to Basics: Advancing the Study and Practice of Coproduction.” International Journal of Public Administration: 1–8. June, doi:10.1080/01900692.2016.1177840.
   Google Scholar
• Suyeon, Jo, and Tina Nabatchi. 2021. “Different Processes, Different Outcomes? Assessing the Individual‐level Impacts of Public Participation.” Public Administration Review 81 (1): 137–151. doi:10.1111/puar.13272.
   Google Scholar
• Tuurnas, Sanna. 2016. “Looking Beyond the Simplistic Ideals of Participatory Projects: Fostering Effective Co-Production?”. International Journal of Public Administration:1–11. June, 10.1080/01900692.2016.1178284
   Google Scholar
• Uzochukwu, Kelechi, and John Clayton Thomas. 2018. “Who Engages in the Coproduction of Local Public Services and Why? The Case of Atlanta, Georgia: Who Engages in the Coproduction of Local Public Services and Why? The Case of Atlanta, Georgia.” Public Administration Review 78 (4): 514–526. doi:10.1111/puar.12893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Eijk, Carola, and Trui Steen. 2016. “Why Engage in Co-Production of Public Services? Mixing Theory and Empirical Evidence.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 82 (1): 28–46. doi:10.1177/0020852314566007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ryzin, G. G. 2011. “Outcomes, Process, and Trust of Civil Servants.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21 (4): 745–760. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehde, Wesley, Joseph T. Ripberger, Hank Jenkins-Smith, Benjamin A. Jones, Jinan N. Allan, and Carol L. Silva. 2021. “Public Willingness to Pay for Continuous and Probabilistic Hazard Information.” Natural Hazards Review 22 (2): 04021004. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Kiseol. 2010. “Determinants of US Consumer Mobile Shopping Services Adoption: Implications for Designing Mobile Shopping Services.” Journal of Consumer Marketing 27 (3): 262–270. doi:10.1108/07363761011038338.
   Google Scholar
• Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge [England]; New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Youlang, Xinsheng Liu, and Arnold Vedlitz. 2020a. “How Social Capital Shapes Citizen Willingness to Co‐invest in Public Service: The Case of Flood Control.” Public Administration 98 (3): 696–712. doi:10.1111/padm.12646.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Youlang, Xinsheng Liu, and Arnold Vedlitz. 2020b. “Issue-Specific Knowledge and Willingness to Coproduce: The Case of Public Security Services.” Public Management Review 22 (10): 1464–1488. doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1635193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar