Challenges and opportunities for equity in public management: Digital applications in multicultural Smart cities

References

• Websites:
   Google Scholar
• Website -https://www.265.org.il/?lang=en
   Google Scholar
• Interviews:
   Google Scholar
• Interview 1: Key Stakeholder, Tel Aviv – Jaffa; Date: 14/10/2021.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 2: Key Stakeholder, Haifa; Date: 31/10/2021.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 3: Key Stakeholder, Jerusalem; Date: 11/11/2021.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 4: Key Stakeholder, Jerusalem; Date: 11/11/2021.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 5: Key Stakeholder, Tel Aviv – Jaffa; Date: 14/11/2021.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 6: Key Stakeholder, Jerusalem; Date: 21/11/2021.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 7: Key Stakeholder, Tel Aviv – Jaffa; Date: 23/11/2021.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 8: Key Stakeholder; Jerusalem; Date: 14/12/2021.
   Google Scholar
• Interview 9: Key Stakeholder, Haifa; 19/12/2021.
   Google Scholar
• Ahern, J. 2011. “From Fail-Safe to Safe-To-Fail: Sustainability and Resilience in the New Urban World.” Landscape and Urban Planning 100 (4): 341–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn, M., and E. Baldwin. 2022. “Who Benefits from Collaborative Governance? An Empirical Study from the Energy Sector.” Public Management Review 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2044505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albino, V., U. Berardi, and R. M. Dangelico. 2015. “Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives.” Journal of Urban Technology 22 (1): 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.942092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alford, J. 2014. “The Multiple Facets of Co-Production: Building on the Work of Elinor Ostrom.” Public Management Review 16 (3): 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.806578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., and S. Van de Walle. 2013. “New Public Management and Citizens’ Perceptions of Local Service Efficiency, Responsiveness, Equity and Effectiveness.” Public Management Review 15 (5): 762–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.725757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. 1969. “A Ladder of Citizen Participation.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35 (4): 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, P., and S. Jack. 2008. “Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novices.” The Qualitative Report 13 (4): 544–559. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1573.
   Google Scholar
• Beeri, I. 2021. “Lack of Reform in Israeli Local Government and Its Impact on Modern Developments in Public Management.” Public Management Review 23 (10): 1423–1435. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1823138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchini, D., and I. Avila. 2014. “Smart Cities and Their Smart Decisions: Ethical Considerations.” IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 33 (1): 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2014.2301854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blessett, B., J. Dodge, B. Edmond, H. T. Goerdel, S. T. Gooden, A. M. Headley, and B. N. Williams. 2019. “Social Equity in Public Administration: A Call to Action.” Perspectives on Public Management and Governance 2 (4): 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvz016.
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. 2007. “Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services.” Public Administration Review 67 (5): 846–860. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brake, S. 2016. The Arabs in the Mixed Towns in Israel: Comparative Political Analysis. Haifa: University of Haifa and the Jewish-Arab Center (in Hebrew).
   Google Scholar
• Bucher, T. 2018. If…then: Algorithmic Power and Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cairney, P., M. Keating, S. Kippin, and E. St Denny. 2022. Public Policy to Reduce Inequalities Across Europe: Hope versus Reality. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192898586.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Cardullo, P., and R. Kitchin. 2019. “Smart Urbanism and Smart Citizenship: The Neoliberal Logic of ‘Citizen-Focused’ Smart Cities in Europe.” Environment & Planning C: Politics & Space 37 (5): 813–830. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X18806508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castelnovo, W., G. Misuraca, and A. Savoldelli. 2016. “Smart Cities Governance: The Need for a Holistic Approach to Assessing Urban Participatory Policy Making.” Social Science Computer Review 34 (6): 724–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315611103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo de Mesa, J., and L. Gómez Jacinto. 2021. “Digital Competences and Skills as Key Factors Between Connectedness and Tolerance to Diversity on Social Networking Sites: Case Study of Social Work Graduates on Facebook.” Current Sociology 70 (2): 210–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392120983341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cepiku, D., and F. Giordano. 2014. “Co-Production in Developing Countries: Insights from the Community Health Workers Experience.” Public Management Review 16 (3): 317–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.822535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cepiku, D., and M. Mastrodascio. 2021. “Equity in Public Services: A Systematic Literature Review.” Public Administration Review 81 (6): 1019–1032. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, T. J., R. Gil-Garcia, and M. Gasco-Hernandez. 2022. “Understanding Social Sustainability for Smart Cities: The Importance of Inclusion, Equity, and Citizen Participation as Both Inputs and Long-Term Outcomes.” Journal of Smart Cities and Society 1 (2): 135–148. https://doi.org/10.3233/SCS-210123.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, B. Y., J. L. Brudney, and S. G. Jang. 2013. “Coproduction of Government Services and the New Information Technology: Investigating the Distributional Biases.” Public Administration Review 73 (5): 687–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, B. Y., J. L. Brudney, S. G. Jang, and B. Davy. 2020. “Do Advanced Information Technologies Produce Equitable Government Responses in Coproduction: An Examination of 311 Systems in 15 US Cities.” The American Review of Public Administration 50 (3): 315–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074019894564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Club de Madrid - http://www.clubmadrid.org/sspguide.
   Google Scholar
• David, N. 2023. “Structuring More, Inclusive, and Smart Participation in Planning: Lessons from the Field.” In Digital (In)justice in the Smart City, edited by D. Mackinnon, R. Burns, and V. Fast, 350–365. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Decidim - https://www.decidim.barcelona/processes/JocsPouFiguera/f/4949/meetings/5058.
   Google Scholar
• Dempsey, N., G. Bramley, S. Power, and C. Brown. 2011. “The Social Dimension of Sustainable Development: Defining Urban Social Sustainability.” Sustainable Development 19 (5): 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denhardt, J. V., and R. B. Denhardt. 2015. “The New Public Service Revisited.” Public Administration Review 75 (5): 664–672. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dery, D. 1998. “Elected Mayors and de Facto Decentralisation, Israeli Style.” Local Government Studies 24 (2): 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003939808433908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diab, A., I. Shdema, and I. Schnell. 2022. “Arab Integration in New and Established Mixed Cities in Israel.” Urban Studies 59 (9): 1800–1818. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211021346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DigiTel: https://www.tel-aviv.gov.il/Residents/Digitel.
   Google Scholar
• D’Ignazio, C., E. Gordon, and E. Christoforetti. 2019. “Sensors and Civics: Toward a Community-Centered Smart City.” In The Right to the Smart City, edited by P. Cardullo, C. Di Feliciantonio, and R. Kitchin, 113–124. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78769-139-120191008.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., and E. Hargittai. 2001. From the ‘Digital Divide’ to ‘Digital Inequality’: Studying Internet Use as Penetration Increases. Princeton University Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies, Working Paper Series number 15. https://culturalpolicy.princeton.edu/sites/culturalpolicy/files/wp15_dimaggio_hargittai.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dobbin, K. B., M. Kuo, M. Lubell, D. Bostic, J. Mendoza, and E. Echeveste. 2022. ““Drivers of (In) Equity in Collaborative Environmental Governance.” Policy Studies Journal 51 (2): 375–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowd, R. 2022. The Birth of Digital Human Rights: Digitized Data Governance as a Human Rights Issue in the EU. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82969-8.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 2006. “Difference and Conflict in the Struggle Over Natural Resources: A Political Ecology Framework.” Development 49 (3): 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.development.1100267.
   Google Scholar
• Faraji, S. J., M. Jafari Nozar, and M. Arash. 2019. “The Analysis of Smart Governance: Scenarios of the Urban Culture in Multicultural Cities Based on Two Concepts of ‘Cultural Intelligence’ and ‘Smart Governance’.” GeoJournal 86 (1): 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-019-10074-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, M. R. 2021. “Considering Social Equity in a New Public Management Reform: Evidence from Milwaukee, Wisconsin.” Public Integrity 23 (4): 369–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2021.1908730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederickson, H. G. 2010. Social Equity and Public Administration: Origins, Developments and Applications. Armonk, New York: M.C. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Gandy, M. 2010. “Rethinking Urban Metabolism: Water, Space and the Modern City.” City 8 (3): 363–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360481042000313509.
   Google Scholar
• Gooden, S. T. 2017. “Social Equity and Evidence: Insights from Local Government.” Public Administration Review 77 (6): 822–828. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gooden, S., and S. Portillo. 2011. “Advancing Social Equity in the Minnowbrook Tradition.” Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 21 (suppl_1): i61–i76. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq067.
   Google Scholar
• Green, B. 2019. The Smart Enough City: Putting Technology in Its Place to Reclaim Our Urban Future. Cambridge: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11555.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, G. P., and J. Jiao 2019. “The Geography and Equity of Crowdsourced Public Participation for Active Transportation Planning.” Transportation Research Record 2673 (1): 460–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haifa Municipality. 2021. Haifa Statistical Yearbook 2021. https://www.haifa.muni.il/city-and-muni/socio-economic-research/statistical. (visited: 17 March 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Haifa’s Consultation Website: https://haifa.insights.us/processes.
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E., edited by 2021. Handbook of Digital Inequality. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788116572.
   Google Scholar
• Hatuka, T., I. Rosen-Zvi, M. Birnhack, E. Toch, and H. Zur. 2018. “The Political Premises of Contemporary Urban Concepts: The Global City, the Sustainable City, the Resilient City, the Creative City, and the Smart City.” Planning Theory & Practice 19 (2): 160–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2018.1455216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatuka, T., and H. Zur. 2020. “From Smart Cities to Smart Social Urbanism: A Framework for Shaping the Socio-Technological Ecosystems in Cities.” Telematics and Informatics 55:101430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICBS (Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics). 2019. Population in Mixed Cities, by Statistical Area, Population Group and Age, End of 2019. https://www.cbs.gov.il/he/publications/doclib/2017/population_madaf/population_madaf_2019_5.xlsx. (visited: 18 March 2022).
   Google Scholar
• ICBS (Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics). 2020. Population Growth in Mixed Towns by Statistical Area and Population Group, 2020. https://www.cbs.gov.il/he/publications/doclib/2017/population_madaf/population_madaf_2020_6.xls.
   Google Scholar
• ICBS (Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics). 2021a. Personal Security Survey 2020. https://www.cbs.gov.il/he/publications/pages/2021/סקר-ביטחון-אישי-2020.aspx. (visited: 20 January 2022).
   Google Scholar
• ICBS (Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics). 2021b. Population of Israel on the Eve of 2022. 30 December 2021. https://www.cbs.gov.il/he/mediarelease/DocLib/2021/447/11_21_447b.pdf. (visited: 30 December 2022).
   Google Scholar
• ICBS (Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics). 2022a. Personal Security Survey 2021. https://www.cbs.gov.il/he/publications/pages/2022/סקר-ביטחון-אישי-2021.aspx. (visited: 8 September 2022).
   Google Scholar
• ICBS (Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics). 2022b. Selected Data on the Occasion of Jerusalem Day, 2022. https://www.cbs.gov.il/he/mediarelease/Pages/2022/לקט-נתונים-לרגל-יום-ירושלים-2022.aspx. (visited: 8 September 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, H. 2020. “Smart Urban Governance in the ‘Smart’ Era: Why is It Urgently Needed?” Cities. online first111:103004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.103004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, H., S. Geertman, and P. Witte. 2020. “Smart Urban Governance: An Alternative to Technocratic “Smartness”.” GeoJournal 87 (3): 1639–1655. online first. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10326-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jos, P. H. 2016. “Advancing Social Equity: Proceduralism in the New Governance.” Administration & Society 48 (6): 760–780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399714544942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juvenile Ehwi, R., H. Holmes, S. Maslova, and G. Burgess. 2022. “The Ethical Underpinnings of Smart City Governance: Decision-Making in the Smart Cambridge Programme, UK.” Urban Studies 59 (14): 1–17. online first. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211064983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kekez, A., M. Howlett, and M. Ramesh. 2019. “Collaboration in Public Service Delivery: What, When and How.” In Collaboration in Public Service Delivery, 2–19. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788978583.00009.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. 2019. “The Timescape of Smart Cities.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 109 (3): 775–790. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2018.1497475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R., P. Cardullo, and C. Di Feliciantonio. 2019. “Citizenship, Justice, and the Right to the Smart City.” In The Right to the Smart City, edited by P. Cardullo, C. Di Feliciantonio, and R. Kitchin, 1–24. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78769-139-120191001.
   Google Scholar
• Komninos, N., C. Kakderi, A. Panori, and P. Tsarchopoulos. 2019. “Smart City Planning from an Evolutionary Perspective.” Journal of Urban Technology 26 (2): 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2018.1485368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahat, L., and N. Sher-Hadar 2021. “A Threefold Perspective: Conditions for Collaborative Governance.” Collaborative Governance: Theory and Lessons from Israel 77–99.
   Google Scholar
• Lambright, K. T., P. A. Mischen, and C. B. Laramee. 2010. “Building Trust in Public and Nonprofit Networks: Personal, Dyadic, and Third-Party Influences.” The American Review of Public Administration 40 (1): 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074008329426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, K. K. 2021. “Digitization or Equality: When Government Automation Covers Some, but Not All Citizens.” Government Information Quarterly 38 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lember, V., T. Randma-Liiv, and K. Maria 2022. “Engaging Citizens in Policy Making: The Potential and Challenges of E-Participation.” Engaging Citizens in Policy Making1–10:
   Google Scholar
• Loukis, E., and Y. Charalabidis. 2015. “Active and Passive Crowdsourcing in Government.” In Policy Practice and Digital Science. Public Administration and Information Technology, edited by M. Janssen, M. A. Wimmer, and A. Deljoo, 261–289. Vol. 10. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12784-2_12.
   Google Scholar
• Luque-Ayala, A., and S. Marvin. 2016. “The Maintenance of Urban Circulation: An Operational Logic of Infrastructural Control.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 34 (2): 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775815611422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, P., A. Parsons, E. Nyanzu, and A. Rae. 2022. “Dog Fouling and Potholes: Understanding the Role of Coproducing ‘Citizen sensors’ in Local Governance.” Local Government Studies 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer-Schönberger, V., and K. Cukier. 2013. Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Meerow, S., J.-P. Newell, and M. Stults. 2016. “Defining Urban Resilience: A Review.” Landscape and Urban Planning 147:38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. J. 2011. “Networked Coproduction of Public Services in Virtual Communities: From a Government‐Centric to a Community Approach to Public Service Support.” Public Administration Review 71 (4): 598–607. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02391.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejias, U. A., and N. Couldry. 2019. “Datafication.” Internet Policy Review 8 (4): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, S. J., R. G. Johnson III, and S. McCandless. 2022. “Meet the New Es: Empathy, Engagement, Equity, and Ethics in Public Administration.” Public Integrity 24 (4–5): 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2022.2074764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, B. 2021. “Is Technology Value-Neutral?” Science, Technology, & Human Values 46 (1): 53–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919900965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Interior- https://www.gov.il/he/Departments/Guides/local-goverment-criticism.
   Google Scholar
• Mirbabaie, M., D. Bunker, S. Stieglitz, J. Marx, and C. Ehnis. 2020. “Social Media in Times of Crisis: Learning from Hurricane Harvey for the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic Response.” Journal of Information Technology 35 (3): 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268396220929258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, N. 2021. “‘How to Break the Silos’: Knowledge Sharing in Public Municipality’s Systems.” YouTube Lecture, 17/10/2021. URL: https://youtu.be/0GrciSNSHeY. (visited: 24 January 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, T., A. Sancino, and M. Sicilia. 2017. “Varieties of Participation in Public Services: The Who, When, and What of Coproduction.” Public Administration Review 77 (5): 766–776. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathansohn, R., and L. Lahat 2022. “From Urban Vitality to Urban Vitalisation: Trust, Distrust, and Citizenship Regimes in a Smart City Initiative.” Cities 131: 103969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, A., and J. Piatak. 2021. “Intersectionality, Leadership, and Inclusion: How Do Racially Underrepresented Women Fare in the Federal Government?” Review of Public Personnel Administration 41 (2): 294–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X19881681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman-Major, K. 2011. “Balancing the Four E S; or Can We Achieve Equity for Social Equity in Public Administration?” Journal of Public Affairs Education 17 (2): 233–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2011.12001640.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Equity and Human Rights, City of Portland, Oregon. 2016. Racial Equity Plan Manual, January 2016. https://www.portlandoregon.gov/oehr/article/564886/.
   Google Scholar
• O’Flynn, J. 2021. “Confronting the Big Challenges of Our Time: Making a Difference During and After COVID-19.” Public Management Review 23 (7): 961–980. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1820273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. 2018. “From Public Service-Dominant Logic to Public Service Logic: Are Public Service Organizations Capable of Co-Production and Value Co-Creation?” Public Management Review 20 (2): 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1350461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagiotopoulos, P., B. Klievink, and A. Cordella. 2019. “Public Value Creation in Digital Government.” Government Information Quarterly 36 (4): 101421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S. 2022. “A Representative-Represented Matrix: Exploring the Symbolic Effect of Minority Representation.” Public Management Review 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2124536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pina, V., L. Torres, S. Royo, and J. Garcia-Rayado. 2022. “Decide Madrid: A Spanish Best Practice on E-Participation.” In Engaging Citizens in Policy Making, edited by T. Randma-Liiv and V. Lember, 152–165. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800374362.00018.
   Google Scholar
• Przeybilovicz, E., M. A. Cunha, S. Geertman, C. Leleux, A. Michels, Z. Tomor, C. W. R. Webster, and A. Meijer. 2022. “Citizen Participation in the Smart City: Findings from an International Comparative Study.” Local Government Studies 48 (1): 23–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2020.1851204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez, E. 2013. “The Privacy Challenges of Big Data: A View from the Lifeguard’s Chair.” Technology Policy Institute Aspen Forum, Keynote Address, 19 August 2013. https://www.ftc.gov/public-statements/2013/08/privacy-challenges-big-data-view-lifeguard%E2%80%99s-chair.
   Google Scholar
• Riccucci, N. M., and G. G. Van Ryzin. 2017. “Representative Bureaucracy: A Lever to Enhance Social Equity, Coproduction, and Democracy.” Public Administration Review 77 (1): 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RIC (Research and Information Center), the Knesset. 2021a. Arabs in the Mixed Cities: An Overview. 27 May 2021 (in Hebrew). https://fs.knesset.gov.il/globaldocs/MMM/723dfb8c-b1b8-eb11-8111-00155d0aee38/2_723dfb8c-b1b8-eb11-8111-00155d0aee38_11_17923.pdf. (visited: 18 March 2022).
   Google Scholar
• RIC (Research and Information Center), the Knesset. 2021b. Representation of Arabs Among Municipal Employees in Israeli Mixed Cities. 30 November 2021 (in Hebrew). https://fs.knesset.gov.il/globaldocs/MMM/c7879475-9ed2-eb11-8126-00155d0af32a/2_c7879475-9ed2-eb11-8126-00155d0af32a_11_18284.pdf. (visited: 6 January 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Sadowski, J. 2020. Too Smart: How Digital Capitalism is Extracting Data, Controlling Our Lives, and Taking Over the World. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12240.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Sadowski, J., and F. Pasquale. 2015. “The Spectrum of Control: A Social Theory of the Smart City.” First Monday 20 (7). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v20i7.5903.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, D., and S. Singh. 2016. “Instituting Environmental Sustainability and Climate Resilience into the Governance Process: Exploring the Potential of New Urban Development Schemes in India.” International Area Studies Review 19 (1): 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/2233865916632942.
   Google Scholar
• Shelton, T., and T. Lodato. 2019. “Actually Existing Smart Citizens.” City 23 (1): 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2019.1575115.
   Google Scholar
• Sloboda, M., K. Staronová, and A. P. Suchalová. 2022. “Enhancing Law-Making Efficiency, Public Value or Both: Case Study of E-Participation Platform in Slovakia.” In Engaging Citizens in Policy Making, edited by T. Randma-Liiv and V. Lember, 71–90. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800374362.000.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. 2018. “Generalizability in Qualitative Research: Misunderstandings, Opportunities and Recommendations for the Sport and Exercise Sciences.” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise & Health 10 (1): 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2017.1393221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. 2010. Qualitative Research: Studying How Things Work. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Starman, A. B. 2013. “The Case Study as a Type of Qualitative Research.” Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies/Sodobna Pedagogika 64 (1): 28–43.
   Google Scholar
• State of Israel State Comptroller. 2022. Special Audit Report: Municipal Services in Mixed Cities. July 2022. URL: https://www.mevaker.gov.il/sites/DigitalLibrary/Documents/2022/Mixed-Cities/2022-Mixed-Cities-102.pdf. (in Hebrew).
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, C., S. K. Pandey, L. DeHart‐Davis, J. L. Hall, K. Newcomer, S. Portillo, and J. Wright. 2023. “Beyond Social Equity: Talking Social Justice in Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 83 (2): 229–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. 2007. Republic.com 2.0. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Svara, J. H., and J. R. Brunet. 2005. “Social Equity is a Pillar of Public Administration.” Journal of Public Affairs Education 11 (3): 253–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2005.12001398.
   Google Scholar
• Svara, J. H., and J. R. Brunet. 2020. “The Importance of Social Equity to Prevent a Hollow Public Administration.” The American Review of Public Administration 50 (4–5): 352–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074020910509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. 2016. “The Mirage of the Sustainable ‘Smart’ City: Planetary Urbanization and the Spectre of Combined and Uneven Apocalypse.” In Cities in the 21st Century, edited by O. Nel-Lo and R. Mele, 134–143. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, S., and K. Dunn. 2002. “Multicultural Services in Local Government in Australia: An Uneven Tale of Access and Equity.” Urban Policy & Research 20 (3): 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/0811114022000005906.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., e. Sørensen, and A. Røiseland. 2019. “Transforming the Public Sector into an Arena for Co-creation: Barriers, Drivers, Benefits, and Ways Forward.” Administration & Society 51 (5): 795–825. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716680057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, Y. S. 2022. “Algorithmic Empowerment: A Comparative Ethnography of Two Open-Source Algorithmic Platforms – Decide Madrid and vTaiwan.” Big Data & Society 9 (2): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517221123505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, G. 2008. “Living with Difference: Reflections on Geographies of Encounter.” Progress in human geography 32 (3): 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133308089372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, J. 2020. The Digital Divide. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Voorberg, W., V. Bekkers, S. Flemig, K. Timeus, P. Tonurist, and L. Tummers. 2017. “Does Co-creation Impact Public Service Delivery? The Importance of State and Governance Traditions.” Public Money & Management 37 (5): 365–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2017.1328798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiig, A. 2015. “IBM’s Smart City as Techno-Utopian Policy Mobility.” City 19 (2–3): 258–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2015.1016275.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, B. N., S. C. Kang, and J. Johnson. 2016. “(Co)-contamination as the dark side of co-production: Public value failures in co-production processes.” Public Management Review 18 (5): 692–717. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1111660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, K. S. 2019. “Whose Right to the Smart City?.” In The Right to the Smart City, edited by P. Cardullo, C. Di Feliciantonio, and R. Kitchin, 27–41. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78769-139-120191002.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B., and A. Chakraborty. 2019. “Planning Smart(er) Cities: The Promise of Civic Technology.” Journal of Urban Technology 26 (4): 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2019.1631097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winner, L. 1989. The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226902098.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, C. K., and T. Tang. 2020. “Closing the gap or widening the divide: The impacts of technology‐enabled coproduction on equity in public service delivery.” Public administration review 80 (6): 962–975. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yacobi, H. 2016. “From ‘Ethnocracity’ to Urban Apartheid: The Changing Urban Geopolitics of Jerusalem\al-Quds.” Cosmopolitan Civil Societies Journal 8 (3): 100–114. https://doi.org/10.5130/ccs.v8i3.5107.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2003. Applications of Case Study Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. M. 2022. “The impact of technological innovation on service delivery: social media and smartphone integration in a 311 system.” Public Management Review 24 (6): 926–950. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1877794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavattaro, S. M., and D. Bearfield. 2022. “Weaponization of Wokeness: The Theater of Management and Implications for Public Administration.” Public administration review 82 (3): 585–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zukin, S. 2020. “Seeing Like a City: How Tech Became Urban.” Theory & Society 49 (5–6): 941–964. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-020-09410-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar