How client characteristics cause extra-role behaviours in public service: uncovering invisible frontline work

References

• Albrecht, Simon. 2005. “Leadership Climate in the Public Sector: Feelings Matter Too!” International Journal of Public Administration 28 (5–6): 397‒416. https://doi.org/10.1081/PAD-200055195.
   Google Scholar
• Alford, John. 2002. “Defining the Client in the Public Sector: A Social‐Exchange Perspective.” Public Administration Review 62 (3): 337‒46. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alford, John. 2009. Engaging Public Sector Clients: From Service-Delivery to Co-Production. Basingstoke England: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association. (n.d.). Well-Being. APA Dictionary of Psychology. Accessed August 18, 2023, from https://dictionary.apa.org/well-being.
   Google Scholar
• Anagnostopoulos, Dorothea. 2003. “The New Accountability, Student Failure, and Teachers’ Work in Urban High Schools.” Educational Policy 17 (3): 291‒316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904803017003001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batson, C. Daniel, Jakob Håkansson Eklund, Valerie L. Chermok, Jennifer L. Hoyt, and Biaggio G. Ortiz. 2007. “An Additional Antecedent of Empathic Concern: Valuing the Welfare of the Person in Need.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93 (1): 65. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baviskar, Siddhartha. 2013. Who Creams? Explaining the Cream-Skimming Behavior of Public School Teachers in Denmark from a Street-Level Bureaucracy Perspective. Copenhagen, Denmark: SFI Advisory Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Baviskar, Siddhartha. 2019. “Who Creams? Explaining the Classroom Cream-Skimming Behaviour of School Teachers from a Street-Level Bureaucracy Perspective.” International Public Management Journal 22 (3): 524‒59. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2018.1478918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belschak, Frank D., and Deanne N. Den Hartog. 2009. “Consequences of Positive and Negative Feedback: The Impact on Emotions and Extra‐Role Behaviours.” Applied Psychology 58 (2): 274‒303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00336.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bøgh Andersen, Lotte, and Søren Serritzlew. 2012. “Does Public Service Motivation Affect the Behaviour of Professionals?” International Journal of Public Administration 35 (1): 19‒29. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2011.635277.
   Google Scholar
• Bryan, Christopher J., Elizabeth Tipton, and David S. Yeager. 2021. “Behavioural Science is Unlikely to Change the World without a Heterogeneity Revolution.” Nature Human Behaviour 5 (8): 980–989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caillier, James Gerard. 2016. “Does Public Service Motivation Mediate the Relationship Between Goal Clarity and Both Organizational Commitment and Extra-Role Behaviours?” Public Management Review 18 (2): 300–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherry, Miriam, Crain Marion, and Poster. Winifred. 2016. Invisible Labor : Hidden Work in the Contemporary World, Edited by Miriam Cherry, Marion Crain, and Winifred Poster. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chetty, Raj., John N. Friedman, and Jonah E. Rockoff. 2014. “Measuring the Impacts of Teachers II: Teacher Value-Added and Student Outcomes in Adulthood.” American Economic Review 104 (9): 2633‒79. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.9.2633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen Zamir, Avner, Adam Lefstein, and Yariv Feniger. 2022. “‘He Doesn’t Deserve to Be in the Higher track’: Teachers’ Justifications in Student Tracking Discussions.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 43 (4): 543–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2020.1858759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, Arlene Kaplan. 1987. “Invisible Work.” Social Problems 34 (5): 403‒15. https://doi.org/10.2307/800538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, Samantha, and Emily Berger. 2019. “Teachers’ Experiences in Responding to students’ Exposure to Domestic Violence.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 44 (11): 96–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Geus, Christa, Alex Ingrams, Lars Tummers, and Sanjay K. Pandey. 2020. “Organizational Citizenship Behaviour in the Public Sector: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda.” Public Administration Review 80 (2): 259–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demerouti, Evangelia, Arnold B. Bakker, and Josette M.P. Gevers. 2015. “Job Crafting and Extra-Role Behaviour: The Role of Work Engagement and Flourishing.” Journal of Vocational Behaviour 91:87‒96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dovidio, John F., Jane Allyn Piliavin, David A. Schroeder, and Louis A. Penner. 2017. The Social Psychology of Prosocial Behaviour. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, Vincent. 2016. The Bureaucrat and the Poor: Encounters in French Welfare Offices. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• El-Gazar, Heba E., and Mohamed A. Zoromba. 2021. “Ethical Leadership, Flourishing, and Extra-Role Behaviour Among Nurses.” SAGE Open Nursing 7:23779608211062669. https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608211062669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fajar, Ananda Putra, and Pantius Drahen Soeling. 2017. “The Effect of HRM Practices on Employee Organizational Citizenship Behaviour in ICT Companies.” In 1st International Conference on Administrative Science, Policy and Governance Studies (ICAS-PGS 2017) and the 2nd International Conference on Business Administration and Policy (ICBAP 2017), Depok, Indonesia, 82‒94.
   Google Scholar
• Glyniadaki, Katerina. 2021. “Mixed Services and Mediated Deservingness: Access to Housing for Migrants in Greece.” Social Policy & Society 20 (3): 464‒74. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746421000014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodsell, Charles T. 1981. The Public Encounter: Where State and Citizen Meet. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodsell, Charles T. 1981. “Looking Once Again at Human Service Bureaucracy.” The Journal of Politics 43 (3): 763‒78. https://doi.org/10.2307/2130636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guul, Thorbjørn Sejr, Mogens Jin Pedersen, and Niels Bjørn Grund Petersen. 2021. “Creaming Among Caseworkers: Effects of Client Competence and Client Motivation on Caseworkers’ Willingness to Help.” Public Administration Review 81 (1): 12‒22. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen, Jan L., and Judith Owens-Manley. 2002. “Issues in Implementing TANF in New York: The Perspective of Frontline Workers.” Social Work 47 (2): 171‒82. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/47.2.171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hainmueller, Jens, Dominik Hangartner, and Teppei Yamamoto. 2015. “Validating Vignette and Conjoint Survey Experiments Against Real-World Behaviour.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 (8): 2395‒400. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1416587112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hainmueller, Jens, Daniel J. Hopkins, and Teppei Yamamoto. 2014. “Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments.” Political Analysis 22 (1): 1‒30. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpt024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, Angela T., and Gerald R. Ferris. 2011. “Accountability and Extra-Role Behaviour.” Employee Responsibilities & Rights Journal 23 (2): 131‒44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-010-9148-9.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, Paw. 2022. “Rule Bending on the Frontlines of Public Service Delivery: How and Why Caseworkers Favor the Strong.” International Public Management Journal 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2022.2138660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, Michael, and Peter Hupe. 2009. Implementing Public Policy. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Horiuchi, Yusaku, Zachary Markovich, and Teppei Yamamoto. 2022. “Does Conjoint Analysis Mitigate Social Desirability Bias?” Political Analysis 30 (4): 535‒49. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2021.30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, Didde Cramer, and Line Bjørnskov Pedersen. 2017. “The Impact of Empathy: Explaining Diversity in Street-Level Decision-Making.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 27 (3): 433‒49. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muw070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jilke, Sebastian, and Lars Tummers. 2018. “Which Clients are Deserving of Help? A Theoretical Model and Experimental Test.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 28 (2): 226‒38. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, Rachel E., Marshall J. Magnusen, and Pamela L. Perrewé. 2012. “Differential Effects of Identification on Extra‐Role Behaviour.” Career Development International 17 (1): 25‒42. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620431211201319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, Amit. 2022. ““Just Let It Pass by and It Will Fall on Some Woman”: Invisible Work in the Labor Market.” Gender & Society 36 (6): 838–868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kullberg, C. 2005. “Differences in the Seriousness of Problems and Deservingness of Help: Swedish Social workers’ Assessments of Single Mothers and Fathers.” British Journal of Social Work 35 (3): 373–386. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bch187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavee, Einat. 2021. “Who is in Charge? The Provision of Informal Personal Resources at the Street Level.” Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 31 (1): 4–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavee, Einat, and Amit Kaplan. 2022. “Invisible Work at Work and the Reproduction of Gendered Social Service Organizations.” Gender, Work, & Organization 29 (5): 1463–1480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeper, Thomas J. 2020. Cregg: Simple Conjoint Analyses and Visualization. R package version 0.4.0. The Comprehensive R Archive Network.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, Michael. 2010. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Loon, Van, Nina Mari, Wouter Vandenabeele, and Peter Leisink. 2017. “Clarifying the Relationship Between Public Service Motivation and In-Role and Extra-Role Behaviors: The Relative Contributions of Person-Job and Person-Organization Fit.” The American Review of Public Administration 47 (6): 699–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marston, Greg, and Catherine McDonald, edited by 2006. Analysing Social Policy: A Governmental Approach. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard-Moody, Steven, and SuzanneLeland. 2000. “Stories from the Front-Lines of Public Management: Street-Level Workers as Responsible Actors with Suzanne Leland.” In Advancing Public Management: New Developments in Theory, Methods, and Practice, Hal Rainey and Jeff Brudney ed, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard-Moody, Steven, and Michael Musheno. 2003. Cops, Teachers, Counselors: Narratives of Street-Level Judgment. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers, M. K., and S. Vorsanger 2003. “Street-level bureaucrats and the implementation of public policy.” In Handbook of public administration, edited by B. Guy Peters and J. Pierre, 245–254. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mik-Meyer, Nanna. 2017. The Power of Citizens and Professionals in Welfare encounters : The Influence of Bureaucracy, Market and Psychology. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, Donald, Pamela Herd, and Hope Harvey. 2015. “Administrative Burden: Learning, Psychological, and Compliance Costs in Citizen-State Interactions.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25 (1): 43–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisar, Sehran Khan, and Muhammad Imran Rasheed. 2020. “Stress and Performance: Investigating Relationship Between Occupational Stress, Career Satisfaction, and Job Performance of Police Employees.” Journal of Public Affairs 20 (1): e1986. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, Mogens Jin, Justin M. Stritch, and Frederik Thuesen. 2018. “Punishment on the Frontlines of Public Service Delivery: Client Ethnicity and Caseworker Sanctioning Decisions in a Scandinavian Welfare State.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 28 (3): 339‒54. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, Niels Bjørn G., Trine V. Laumann, and Morten Jakobsen. 2019. “Acceptance or Disapproval: Performance Information in the Eyes of Public Frontline Employees.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 29 (1): 101‒17. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, Michael Bang, Rune Slothuus, Rune Stubager, and Lise Togeby. 2011. “Deservingness versus Values in Public Opinion on Welfare: The Automaticity of the Deservingness Heuristic.” European Journal of Political Research 50 (1): 24‒52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piatak, Jaclyn S., and Stephen B. Holt. 2020. “Disentangling Altruism and Public Service Motivation: Who Exhibits Organizational Citizenship Behaviour?” Public Management Review 22 (7): 949–973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, Nathan P., Steven W. Whiting, Philip M. Podsakoff, and Brian D. Blume. 2009. “Individual-And Organizational-Level Consequences of Organizational Citizenship Behaviours: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Applied Psychology 94 (1): 122. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rho, Eunju, Taesik Yun, and Kangbok Lee. 2015. “Does Organizational Image Matter? Image, Identification, and Employee Behaviors in Public and Nonprofit Organizations.” Public Administration Review 75 (3): 421–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schram, Sanford F., Joe Soss, Richard C. Fording, and Linda Houser. 2009. “Deciding to Discipline: Race, Choice, and Punishment at the Frontlines of Welfare Reform.” American Sociological Review 74 (3): 398‒422. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somech, Anit, and Anat Drach-Zahavy. 2000. “Understanding Extra-Role Behaviour in Schools: The Relationships Between Job Satisfaction, Sense of Efficacy, and Teachers’ Extra-Role Behaviour.” Teaching and Teacher Education 16 (5‒6): 649‒59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00012-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srithongrung, Arwiphawee. 2011. “The Causal Relationships Among Transformational Leadership, Organizational Commitment, and Employee Effectiveness.” International Journal of Public Administration 34 (6): 376‒88. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2011.569917.
   Google Scholar
• Tummers, Lars. 2017. “The Relationship Between Coping and Job Performance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 27 (1): 150‒62. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muw058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, Lars L.G., Victor Bekkers, Evelien Vink, and Michael Musheno. 2015. “Coping During Public Service Delivery: A Conceptualization and Systematic Review of the Literature.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25 (4): 1099‒126. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dick, Rolf, Daan van Knippenberg, Rudolf Kerschreiter, Guido Hertel, and Jan Wieseke. 2008. “Interactive Effects of Work Group and Organizational Identification on Job Satisfaction and Extra-Role Behaviour.” Journal of Vocational Behaviour 72 (3): 388‒99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dyne, Linn, and Jeffrey A. LePine. 1998. “Helping and Voice Extra-Role Behaviours: Evidence of Construct and Predictive Validity.” Academy of Management Journal 41 (1): 108‒19. https://doi.org/10.2307/256902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voorberg, William H., Viktor JJM Bekkers, and Lars G. Tummers. 2015. “A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the Social Innovation Journey.” Public Management Review 17 (9): 1333‒57. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.930505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, Bernard. 1980. “A Cognitive (Attribution)-Emotion-Action Model of Motivated Behaviour: An Analysis of Judgments of Help-Giving.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (2): 186. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.2.186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, Søren C. 2012. “Implementation Perspectives: Status and Reconsideration.” In The SAGE Handbook of Public Administration, edited by B. Guy Peters and Jon Pierre, 265‒78. 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wollan, Melody L., Mary F. Sully de Luque, and Marko Grunhagen. 2009. “Motives for Helping: Exploring Cultural Influences on Extra‐Role Behaviour.” Multinational Business Review 17 (1): 99–119. https://doi.org/10.1108/1525383X200900005.
   Google Scholar