Navigating the ‘meaningless’ of social innovation: perspectives of social care practitioners in Scotland

References

• Alexander, J., and K. Fernandez. 2020, October.“The Impact of Neoliberalism on Civil Society and Nonprofit Advocacy.” Nonprofit Policy Forum 12 (2): 367–394. https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2020-0016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvidson, M., F. Lyon, S. McKay, and D. Moro. 2013. “Valuing the Social? The Nature and Controversies of Measuring Social Return on Investment (SROI).” Voluntary Sector Review 4 (1): 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1332/204080513X661554.
   Google Scholar
• Audit Scotland. 2016. Social Work in Scotland. Audit Scotland. https://www.audit-scotland.gov.uk/publications/social-work-in-scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Audit Scotland. 2018. Local Government in Scotland: Challenges and Performance 2018. Audit Scotland. https://www.audit-scotland.gov.uk/publications/local-government-in-scotland-challenges-and-performance-2018.
   Google Scholar
• Audit Scotland. 2022. Local Government in Scotland: Financial Overview 2020/21. Audit Scotland. https://www.audit-scotland.gov.uk/publications/local-government-in-scotland-financial-overview-202021.
   Google Scholar
• Avelino, F., J. M. Wittmayer, B. Pel, P. Weaver, A. Dumitru, A. Haxeltine, R. Kemp, et al. 2019. “Transformative Social Innovation and (Dis) Empowerment.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 145:195–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayob, N., S. Teasdale, and K. Fagan. 2016. “How Social Innovation ‘Came to be’: Tracing the Evolution of a Contested Concept.” Journal of Social Policy 45 (4): 635–653. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004727941600009X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BEPA (Bureau of European Policy Advisers). 2011. Empowering People, Driving Change: Social Innovation in the EU. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Bragaglia, F. 2021. “Social Innovation as a ‘Magic concept’ for Policy-Makers and Its Implications for Urban Governance.” Planning Theory 20 (2): 102–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095220934832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T. 2016. “Governments and Self-Organization: A Hedgehog’s Dilemma.” In Critical Reflections on Interactive Governance: Self-Organization and Participation in Public Governance, edited by J. Edelenbos and I. van Meerkerk. Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783479078.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, H. 2009. “Competition and Contracts in the Voluntary Sector: Exploring the Implications for Homelessness Service Providers in Southampton.” Policy & Politics 37 (2): 235–254. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557309X441045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calò, F., F. Scognamiglio, E. Bellazzecca, and E. Ongaro. 2023. “Social Innovation During Turbulent Times: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda.” Public Management Review 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2219998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calò, F., S. Teasdale, C. Donaldson, M. J. Roy, and S. Baglioni. 2018. “Collaborator or Competitor: Assessing the Evidence Supporting the Role of Social Enterprise in Health and Social Care.” Public Management Review 20 (12): 1790–1814. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1417467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S., G. Sharma, and P. Muñoz. 2022. “In Pursuit of Impact: From Research Questions to Problem Formulation in Entrepreneurship Research.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 47 (2): 232–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587221111736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Converge. 2022. The Create Change Challenge. Converge. https://www.convergechallenge.com/our-challenges/create-change-challenge/.
   Google Scholar
• Defourny, J., and M. Nyssens. 2017. “Fundamentals for an International Typology of Social Enterprise Models.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 28 (6): 2469–2497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-017-9884-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Pieri, B., and S. Teasdale. 2021. “Radical Futures? Exploring the Policy Relevance of Social Innovation.” Social Enterprise Journal 17 (1): 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-11-2020-0111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey, P., C. Steyaert, and S. Teasdale. 2012. “Social Entrepreneurship: Critique and the Radical Enactment of the Social.” Social Enterprise Journal 8 (2): 90–107. https://doi.org/10.1108/17508611211252828.
   Google Scholar
• DiCicco‐Bloom, B., and B. F. Crabtree. 2006. “The Qualitative Research Interview.” Medical Education 40 (4): 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domanski, D., J. Howaldt, and C. Kaletka. 2020. “A Comprehensive Concept of Social Innovation and Its Implications for the Local Context–On the Growing Importance of Social Innovation Ecosystems and Infrastructures.” European Planning Studies 28 (3): 454–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1639397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FirstPort. 2022. “Social Innovation Challenge.” FirstPort. https://www.firstport.org.uk/funding/social-innovation-competition/.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, K., R. Miller, and R. Millar. 2016. “Public, Private or Neither? Analysing the Publicness of Health Care Social Enterprises.” Public Management Review 18 (4): 539–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1014398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, A. V., L. Fuglsang, F. Gallouj, and A. Scupola. 2022. “Social Entrepreneurs as Change Makers: Expanding Public Service Networks for Social Innovation.” Public Management Review 24 (10): 1632–1651. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1916065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazenberg, R., M. Bajwa-Patel, M. J. Roy, M. Mazzei, and S. Baglioni. 2016. “A Comparative Overview of Social Enterprise ‘Ecosystems’ in Scotland and England: An Evolutionary Perspective.” International Review of Sociology 26 (2): 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2016.1181395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazenberg, R., and K. Hall. 2016. “Public Service Mutuals: Towards a Theoretical Understanding of the Spin-Out Process.” Policy and Politics 44 (3): 441–463. https://doi.org/10.1332/147084414X13988685244243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HEI (Highland and Islands Enterprise). 2023. Annual report and accounts 2021/22. https://www.hie.co.uk/media/13202/hie-annual-report-and-accounts-2021-22.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, F., K. Hall, A. Mutongi, and G. Whittam. 2019. “Social Enterprise, Social Innovation and Self-Directed Care: Lessons from Scotland.” Social Enterprise Journal 15 (4): 438–456. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-12-2018-0080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, F., C. Reilly, D. Moyes, and G. Whittam. 2018. “From Charity to Social Enterprise: The Marketization of Social Care.” International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research 24 (3): 651–666. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-10-2016-0344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, F., A. Steiner, M. Mazzei, and C. Docherty. 2020. “Social enterprises’ Impact on Older People’s Health and Wellbeing: Exploring Scottish Experiences.” Health Promotion International 35 (5): 1074–1084. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daz102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Hunter Foundation. 2022. Innovation Fund. The Hunter Foundation. https://www.thehunterfoundation.co.uk/the-innovation-fund/.
   Google Scholar
• Krlev, G., T. Einarsson, F. Wijkström, L. Heyer, and G. Mildenberger. 2020. “The Policies of Social Innovation: A Cross-National Analysis.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 49 (3): 457–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764019866505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 2003. “Why Do Empty Signifiers Matter to Politics?” In Jacques Lacan: Critical Evaluations in Cultural Theory, edited by Žižek Slavoj, 305–313. Vol. 3. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Louw, S., R. W. Todd, and P. Jimarkon 2011. “Active Listening in Qualitative Research Interviews.” Proceedings of the International Conference: Research in Applied Linguistics, Bangkok, Thailand, April.
   Google Scholar
• Low, J. 2019. “A Pragmatic Definition of the Concept of Theoretical Saturation.” Sociological Focus 52 (2): 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2018.1544514.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J. 2017. Qualitative Researching. 3rd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, A., and K. Johnston-Miller. 2016. “Governance: public governance to social innovation.” Policy & Politics 44 (4): 663–675. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557314X14042230109592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, R., and K. Hall. 2013. “Social Return on Investment (SROI) and Performance Measurement: The Opportunities and Barriers for Social Enterprises in Health and Social Care.” Public Management Review 15 (6): 923–941. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.698857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F. 2009. “Social Innovation: Institutionally Embedded, Territorially (Re) Produced.” In Social Innovation and Territorial Development, edited by D. MacCallum, F. Moulaert, J. Hillier, and S.V. Haddock, 11–23. Farnham UK: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., A. Mehmood, D. MacCallum, and B. Leubolt. 2017. Social Innovation as a Trigger for Transformations-The Role of Research. Publications Office of the European Union. https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/a7b4de0a-1070-11e8-9253-01aa75ed71a1/language-en.
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, G., S. Tucker, R. Ali, and B. Sanders. 2007. Social Innovation: What It Is, Why It Matters and How It Can Be Accelerated. London: The Basingstoke Press. ( ISBN 978-1-905551-0 3)
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, A., and R. Ziegler, Eds. 2019. Creating Economic Space for Social Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Notarnicola, E., S. Berloto, and E. Perobelli. 2022. “Social Innovation in Social Care Services: Actors and Roles in the Innovation Process.” Public Management Review 24 (2): 182–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1805918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noy, C. 2008. “Sampling Knowledge: The Hermeneutics of Snowball Sampling in Qualitative Research.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 11 (4): 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570701401305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Offe, C. 2009. “Governance: An“empty signifier”?” Constellations 16 (4): 550. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8675.2009.00570.x.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P., and L. Brown. 2011. “Innovation, Public Policy and Public Services Delivery in the UK. The Word That Would Be King?” Public Administration 89 (4): 1335–1350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01932.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, M. J., C. Donaldson, R. Baker, and S. Kerr. 2014. “The Potential of Social Enterprise to Enhance Health and Well-Being: A Model and Systematic Review.” Social Science & Medicine 123:182–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.07.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, H., and I. Rubin. 2005. Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sandberg, B., A. M. Eikenberry, and R. M. Mirabella. 2019. “Symposium on Critical Perspectives on Nongovernmental Organizations and Action: Introduction.” Administrative Theory & Praxis 41 (3): 195–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2019.1633834.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. 2017. “Social Innovation Fund.” Scottish Government. https://www.gov.scot/publications/social-innovation-fund-guidance/#:~:text=The%20Social%20Innovation%20Fund%20enables,to%20tackle%20poverty%20and%20disadvantage.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. 2021a. “A National Care Service for Scotland: Consultation.” Scottish Government. https://www.gov.scot/publications/national-care-service-scotland-consultation/.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. 2021b. “A Scotland for the Future: Opportunities and Challenges of Scotland’s Changing Population.” Scottish Government. https://www.gov.scot/publications/scotland-future-opportunities-challenges-scotlands-changing-population/documents/.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. 2023. “National Innovation Strategy 2023 to 2033.” https://www.gov.scot/publications/scotlands-national-innovation-strategy/.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Parliament. 2022. “National Care Service (Scotland) Bill.” Scottish Parliament. https://www.parliament.scot/bills-and-laws/bills/National-Care-Service-Scotland-Bill.
   Google Scholar
• SIX and the Young Foundation. 2010. “Study on Social Innovation.” Bureau of European Policy Advisers, European Commission. SIX and the Young Foundation. https://youngfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Study-on-Social-Innovation-for-the-Bureau-of-European-Policy-Advisors-March-2010.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Talmage, J. B. 2012. “Listening To, and For, the Research Interview.” In The SAGE Handbook of Interview Research: The Complexity of the Craft, edited by Jaber F. Gubrium, James A. Holstein, Amir Marvasti, and Karyn D. McKinney, 295–304. London, UK: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tarde, G. 1899. Social Laws: An Outline of Sociology. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Teasdale, S., E. Bellazzecca, A. de Bruin, and M. J. Roy. 2023. “The (R) Evolution of the Social Entrepreneurship Concept: A Critical Historical Review.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 52 (1_suppl): 212S–240S. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640221130691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teasdale, S., M. J. Roy, A. Nicholls, and C. Hervieux. 2022. “Turning Rebellion into Money? Social Entrepreneurship as the Strategic Performance of Systems Change.” Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 17 (1): 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teasdale, S., M. J. Roy, R. Ziegler, S. Mauksch, P. Dey, and E. B. Raufflet. 2021. “Everyone a Changemaker? Exploring the Moral Underpinnings of Social Innovation Discourse Through Real Utopias.” Journal of Social Entrepreneurship 12 (3): 417–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2020.1738532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torfing, J. 2019. “Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector: The Argument.” Public Management Review 21 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1430248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaismoradi, M., H. Turunen, and T. Bondas. 2013. “Content Analysis and Thematic Analysis: Implications for Conducting a Qualitative Descriptive Study.” Nursing & Health Sciences 15 (3): 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, R. 2017. “Social innovation as a collaborative concept.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 30 (4): 388–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2017.1348935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar