The networked bureaucracy: reinventing formalization in the context of collaborative governance

References

• Adler, P. S., and B. Borys. 1996. “Two Types of Bureaucracy: Enabling and Coercive.” Administrative Science Quarterly 41 (1): 61–89. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., E. Sørensen, and J. Torfing. 2021. “The COVID-19 Pandemic as a Game Changer for Public Administration and Leadership? The Need for Robust Governance Responses to Turbulent Problems.” Public Management Review 23 (7): 949–960. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1820272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bache, I., I. Bartle, M. Flinders, and G. Marsden. 2015. “Blame Games and Climate Change: Accountability, Multi-Level Governance and Carbon Management.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 17 (1): 64–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.12040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau, P. M., W. V. Heydebrand, and R. E. Stauffer. 1966. “The Structure of Small Bureaucracies.” American Sociological Review 31 (2): 179–191. https://doi.org/10.2307/2090903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brorström, S., and M. Norbäck. 2020. “‘Keeping Politicians at Arm’s Length’: How Managers in a Collaborative Organization Deal with the Administration–Politics Interface.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 86 (4): 657–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852318822090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candel, J. J., and R. Biesbroek. 2016. “Toward a Processual Understanding of Policy Integration.” Policy Sciences 49 (3): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9248-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courpasson, D., and M. Reed. 2004. “Introduction: Bureaucracy in the Age of Enterprise.” Organization 11 (1): 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508404039656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cristofoli, D., J. Markovic, and M. Meneguzzo. 2014. “Governance, Management and Performance in Public Networks: How to Be Successful in Shared-Governance Networks.” Journal of Management & Governance 18 (1): 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-012-9237-2.
   Google Scholar
• Crosby, B. C., P. Hart, and J. Torfing. 2017. “Public Value Creation Through Collaborative Innovation.” Public Management Review 19 (5): 655–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1192165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doberstein, C. 2016. “Designing Collaborative Governance Decision-Making in Search of a ‘Collaborative Advantage’.” Public Management Review 18 (6): 819–841. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1045019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• du Gay, P. 2005. “The Values of Bureaucracy: An Introduction.” In The Values of Bureaucracy, edited by P. du Gay, 1–13. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, E., T. Andersson, A. Hellström, C. Gadolin, and S. Lifvergren. 2020. “Collaborative Public Management: Coordinated Value Propositions Among Public Service Organizations.” Public Management Review 22 (6): 791–812. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1604793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewens, H., and J. van der Voet. 2019. “Organizational Complexity and Participatory Innovation: Participatory Budgeting in Local Government.” Public Management Review 21 (12): 1848–1866. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1577908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferraro, F., D. Etzion, and J. Gehman. 2015. “Tackling Grand Challenges Pragmatically: Robust Action Revisited.” Organization Studies 36 (3): 363–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614563742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, C., K. Broughton, K. Broadhurst, and J. Ferreira. 2023. “Collaborative Innovation in a Local Authority – ‘Local Economic Development-By-project’?” Public Management Review 1–19. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2185663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florian, M. 2018. “Unlikely allies: Bureaucracy as a cultural trope in a grassroots volunteer organization.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 34 (2): 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2018.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freidson, E. 2001. Professionalism, the Third Logic: On the Practice of Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
   Google Scholar
• Geddes, L. 2012. “In Search of Collaborative Public Management: The Prolific and Other Priority Offender Programme.” Public Management Review 14 (7): 947–966. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2011.650057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. B., P. D. Dunlop, and J. L. Cordery. 2019. “Managing Formalization to Increase Global Team Effectiveness and Meaningfulness of Work in Multinational Organizations.” Journal of International Business Studies 50 (6): 1021–1052. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00226-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjaltema, J., R. Biesbroek, and K. Termeer. 2020. “From Government to Governance … to Meta-Governance: A Systematic Literature Review.” Public Management Review 22 (12): 1760–1780. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1648697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guarneros-Meza, V., and S. Martin. 2016. “Boundary Spanning in Local Public Service Partnerships: Coaches, Advocates or Enforcers?” Public Management Review 18 (2): 238–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.969761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, M. P., P. Triantafillou, and S. H. Christensen. 2022. “Two Logics of Democracy in Collaborative Governance: A Mapping of Clashes and Compromises.” Public Management Review 1–22. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2107696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasselbladh, H., and J. Kallinikos. 2000. “The Project of Rationalization: A Critique and Reappraisal of Neo-Institutionalism in Organization Studies.” Organization Studies 21 (4): 697–720. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840600214002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooge, E. H., S. Waslander, and H. C. Theisens. 2022. “The Many Shapes and Sizes of Meta-Governance. An Empirical Study of Strategies Applied by a Well-Advanced Meta-Governor: The Case of Dutch Central Government in Education.” Public Management Review 24 (10): 1591–1609. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1916063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull, M. S. 2012. “Documents and bureaucracy.” Annual Review of Anthropology 41 (1): 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallinikos, J. 2004. “The Social Foundations of the Bureaucratic Order.” Organization 11 (1): 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508404039657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallinikos, J. 2011. “Bureaucracy Under Siege: On Information, Collaboration and Networks.” In Managing Modernity: Beyond Bureaucracy, edited by S. Clegg, M. Harris, and H Höpfl, 130–153. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kanon, M., and T. Andersson. 2023. “Working on Connective Professionalism: What Cross-Sector Strategists in Swedish Public Organizations Do to Develop Connectivity in Addressing ‘Wicked’ Policy Problems.” Journal of Professions and Organization 10 (1): 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joac020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krogh, A. H. 2020. “Facilitating Collaboration in Publicly Mandated Governance Networks.” Public Management Review 24 (4): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1862288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lægreid, P., and L. H. Rykkja. 2022. “Accountability and Inter-Organizational Collaboration within the State.” Public Management Review 24 (5): 683–703. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1963822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., and M. Esteve. 2022. “What Drives the Perceived Legitimacy of Collaborative Governance? An Experimental Study.” Public Management Review 25 (8): 1517–1538. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2026692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markovic, J. 2017. “Contingencies and Organizing Principles in Public Networks.” Public Management Review 19 (3): 361–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1209237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. 1979. The Structuring of Organizations. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Monteiro, P., and P. S. Adler. 2022. “Bureaucracy for the 21st Century: Clarifying and Expanding Our View of Bureaucratic Organization.” Academy of Management Annals 16 (2): 427–475. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2019.0059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. 2006. “The New Public Governance?” Public Management Review 8 (3): 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030600853022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrow, C. 1979. Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
   Google Scholar
• Rijshouwer, E., J. Uitermark, and W. de Koster. 2023. “Wikipedia: a self-organizing bureaucracy.” Information, Communication & Society 26 (7): 1285–1302. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1994633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W., and M. M. Webber. 1973. “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.” Policy Sciences 4 (2): 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segato, F., and J. Raab. 2018. “Mandated Network Formation.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 32 (2): 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-01-2018-0018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, J. N. 2013. The Terrorist’s Dilemma: Managing Violent Covert Organizations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., and J. Torfing. 2009. “Making Governance Networks Effective and Democratic Through Metagovernance.” Public Administration 87 (2): 234–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01753.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staggenborg, S. 2022. “Bureaucratization and Social Movements.” In Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements, edited by D.A. Snow, D. Porta, B. Klandermans, and D. McAdam, 1–4. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Styhre, A. 2007. The Innovative Bureaucracy in an Age of Fluidity. New York, NY: Francis & Taylor.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, P. 2019. “Formalized Policy Entrepreneurship as a Governance Tool for Policy Integration.” International Journal of Public Administration 42 (14): 1212–1221. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1590401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, P., and M. Alvesson. 2005. “Bureaucracy at Work: Misunderstandings and Mixed Blessings.” In The Values of Bureaucracy, edited by P. du Gay, 89–113. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J. 2019. “Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector: The Argument.” Public Management Review 21 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1430248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., and C. Ansell. 2017. “Strengthening Political Leadership and Policy Innovation Through the Expansion of Collaborative Forms of Governance.” Public Management Review 19 (1): 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1200662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosun, J., and A. Lang. 2017. “Policy Integration: Mapping the Different Concepts.” Policy Studies 38 (6): 553–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2017.1339239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turrini, A., D. Cristofoli, F. Frosini, and G. Nasi. 2010. “Networking Literature About Determinants of Network Effectiveness.” Public Administration 88 (2): 528–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01791.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Voet, J., and B. Steijn. 2021. “Team Innovation Through Collaboration: How Visionary Leadership Spurs Innovation via Team Cohesion.” Public Management Review 23 (9): 1275–1294. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1743344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vangen, S., J. P. Hayes, and C. Cornforth. 2015. “Governing Cross-Sector, Inter-Organizational Collaborations.” Public Management Review 17 (9): 1237–1260. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.903658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waardenburg, M., M. Groenleer, J. de Jong, and B. Keijser. 2020. “Paradoxes of Collaborative Governance: Investigating the Real-Life Dynamics of Multi-Agency Collaborations Using a Quasi-Experimental Action-Research Approach.” Public Management Review 22 (3): 386–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1599056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. [1922] 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wegrich, K. 2019. “The Blind Spots of Collaborative Innovation.” Public Management Review 21 (1): 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1433311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willem, A., and S. Lucidarme. 2014. “Pitfalls and Challenges for Trust and Effectiveness in Collaborative Networks.” Public Management Review 16 (5): 733–760. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.744426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar