Transformative public procurement for innovation: ordinary, dynamic and functional capabilities

References

• Auerbach, C., and L. B. Silverstein. 2003. Qualitative Data: An Introduction to Coding and Analysis. Vol. 21. New York: NYU press.
   Google Scholar
• Bali, A. S., M. Howlett, J. M. Lewis, and M. Ramesh. 2021. “Procedural Policy Tools in Theory and Practice.” Policy and Society 40 (3): 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2021.1965379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrás, S. 2011. “Policy Learning and Organizational Capacities in Innovation Policies.” Science and Public Policy 38 (9): 725–734. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234211X13070021633323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrás, S., and C. Edquist. 2013. “The Choice of Innovation Policy Instruments.” Technological Forecasting & Social Change 80 (8): 1513–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrás, S., S. Haakonsson, R. Taudal Poulsen, T. Pallesen, C. Hendriksen, L. Somavilla, S. Kugelberg, H. Larsen, and F. Gerli 2023. “The Transformative Capacity of Public Sector Organizations in Sustainability Transitions: A Conceptualization (No. 2023/2).” Lund University, CIRCLE-Centre for Innovation Research.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. 2015. “Towards an Evolutionary Perspective on Regional Resilience.” Regional Studies 49 (5): 733–751. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.959481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capano, G., and M. Howlett. 2020. “The Knowns and Unknowns of Policy Instrument Analysis: Policy Tools and the Current Research Agenda on Policy Mixes.” SAGE Open 10 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Dalpé, R., C. DeBresson, and H. Xiaoping. 1992. “The Public Sector as First User of Innovations.” Research Policy 21 (3): 251–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(92)90019-Z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demircioglu, M. A., and D. B. Audretsch. 2017. “Conditions for Innovation in Public Sector Organizations.” Research Policy 46 (9): 1681–1691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demircioglu, M. A., and R. Vivona. 2021. “Positioning Public Procurement as a Procedural Tool for Innovation: An Empirical Study.” Policy and Society 40 (3): 379–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2021.1955465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edler, J. 2023. “Demand, Public Procurement and Transformation (No. 79). Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Papers-Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis.”
   Google Scholar
• Edler, J., and L. Georghiou. 2007. “Public Procurement and Innovation—Resurrecting the Demand Side.” Research Policy 36 (7): 949–963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edler, J., and J. Yeow. 2016. “Connecting Demand and Supply: The Role of Intermediation in Public Procurement of Innovation.” Research Policy 45 (2): 414–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edquist, C., and L. Hommen. 1999. “Systems of Innovation: Theory and Policy for the Demand Side.” Technology in Society 21 (1): 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-791X(98)00037-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edquist, C., L. Hommen, and L. Tsipouri, Eds. 2000. Public Technology Procurement and Innovation. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C., N. S. Vonortas, J. M. Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, and J. Edler, Eds. 2015. Public Procurement for Innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Edquist, C., and J. M. Zabala‐Iturriagagoitia. 2015. “Pre‐Commercial Procurement: A Demand or Supply Policy Instrument in Relation to Innovation?” R&D Management 45 (2): 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edquist, C., and J. M. Zabala-Iturriagagoitia. 2012. “Public Procurement for Innovation as Mission-Oriented Innovation Policy.” Research Policy 41 (10): 1757–1769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edquist, C., and J. M. Zabala-Iturriagagoitia. 2021. “Functional Procurement for Innovation, Welfare, and the Environment.” Science and Public Policy 47 (5): 595–603. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaa046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Taliawi, O. G., and Z. van der Wal. 2019. “Developing Administrative Capacity: An Agenda for Research and Practice.” Policy Design and Practice 2 (3): 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2019.1595916.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2006. “Pre-Commercial Procurement. Public Sector Needs as a Driver of Innovation.” European Commission. September 2006.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2015. “ERAC Opinion on Innovation Procurement. European Research Area and Innovation Committee (ERAC 1209/15).” Brussels. June 23 2015.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2018. “Guidance on innovation procurement. Commission notice. C(2018)3051 final.” Brussels. May 15 2018.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 2014. “Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on Public Procurement and Repealing Directive 2004/18/EC.” European Parliament, Council of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Farazmand, A. 2009. “Building Administrative Capacity for an Age of Rapid Globalization: A Modest Prescription for Twenty-First Century.” Public Administration Review 69 (6): 1007–1020. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02054.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felin, T., N. J. Foss, K. H. Heimeriks, and T. L. Madsen. 2012. “Microfoundations of Routines and Capabilities: Individuals, Processes, and Structure.” Journal of Management Studies 49 (8): 1351–1374. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01052.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan, K., E. Uyarra, and M. Laranja. 2011. “Reconceptualising the ‘Policy mix’ for Innovation.” Research Policy 40 (5): 702–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georghiou, L., J. Edler, E. Uyarra, and J. Yeow. 2014. “Policy Instruments for Public Procurement of Innovation: Choice, Design and Assessment.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 86:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., and A. L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Grimbert, S. F., and J. M. Zabala-Iturriagagoitia. 2023. “Public Procurement as a Transformative Innovation Policy Instrument: Urban Rehabilitation in Malmö.” In European Regional Policy and Development: Forgotten Regions and Spaces, edited by M.C. Sánchez-Carreira, P.J. Reis Mourão, and B. Blanco-Varela, 169–188. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. (Chapter 8).
   Google Scholar
• Grimbert, S. F., and J. M. Zabala-Iturriagagoitia. 2024. “Closing the Loop without Reinventing the Wheel: Public Procurement for Innovation Promoting a Circular Economy.” Science & Public Policy. scad084, in press. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scad084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gullmark, P. 2021. “Do All Roads Lead to Innovativeness? A Study of Public Sector Organizations’ Innovation Capabilities.” The American Review of Public Administration 51 (7): 509–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740211010464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haque, M. S., M. Ramesh, J. A. P. de Oliveira, and A. de Avila Gomide. 2021. “Building Administrative Capacity for Development: Limits and Prospects.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 87 (2): 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523211002605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hekkert, M. P., M. J. Janssen, J. H. Wesseling, and S. O. Negro. 2020. “Mission-Oriented Innovation Systems.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 34:76–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfat, C. E., S. Finkelstein, W. Mitchell, M. Peteraf, H. Singh, D. Teece, and S. G. Winter. 2007. Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Huitema, D., A. Jordan, S. Munaretto, and M. Hildén. 2018. Policy experimentation: core concepts, political dynamics, governance and impacts. Policy Sciences 51: 143–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, M. J., J. C. L. Torrens, J. Wesseling, I. Wanzenböck, and J. Patterson 2020. “Position Paper ‘Mission-Oriented Innovation Policy observatory’.” Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/415101/Janssen_et_al_2020_MIPO_position.pdf?sequence=1.
   Google Scholar
• Kattel, R., and M. Mazzucato. 2018. “Mission-Oriented Innovation Policy and Dynamic Capabilities in the Public Sector.” Industrial and Corporate Change 27 (5): 787–801. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, J. 1983. “A Theory of Qualitative Methodology: The Social System of Analytical Fieldwork.” In Contemporary Field Research: A Collection of Readings, edited by R. Emerson, 127–148. Boston, MA: Little Brown Company.
   Google Scholar
• Knutsson, H., and A. Thomasson. 2014. “Innovation in the Public Procurement Process: A Study of the Creation of Innovation-Friendly Public Procurement.” Public Management Review 16 (2): 242–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.806574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labory, S., and P. Bianchi. 2021. “Regional Industrial Policy in Times of Big Disruption: Building Dynamic Capabilities in Regions.” Regional Studies 55 (10–11): 1829–1838. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1928043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, S. D., and C. G. Loiselle. 2008. “Combining Individual Interviews and Focus Groups to Enhance Data Richness.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 62 (2): 228–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04559.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrue, P. 2021. “The Design and Implementation of Mission-Oriented Innovation Policies: A New Systemic Policy Approach to Address Societal Challenges.” In OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers Vol. 100, 1–22. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/3f6c76a4-en.
   Google Scholar
• Magro, E., M. Navarro, and J. M. Zabala‐Iturriagagoitia. 2014. “Coordination‐Mix: The Hidden Face of STI Policy.” Review of Policy Research 31 (5): 367–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. 2017. Mission-Oriented Innovation Policy: Challenges and Opportunities. London: UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. 2018a. “Mission-oriented innovation policies: Challenges and opportunities.” Industrial and Corporate Change 27 (5): 803–815. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. 2018b. Mission-Oriented Research & Innovation in the European Union. A Problem-Solving Approach to Fuel Innovation-Led Growth. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M., and R. Kattel. 2020. “COVID-19 and Public-Sector Capacity.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 36 (822781): 256–269. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/graa031.
   Google Scholar
• McFadgen, B., and D. Huitema. 2018. “Experimentation at the Interface of Science and Policy: A Multi-Case Analysis of How Policy Experiments Influence Political Decision-Makers.” Policy sciences 51: 161–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaren, J., and R. Kattel 2022. “Policy Capacities for Transformative Innovation Policy: A Case Study of UK Research and Innovation.” Working Paper Series, 2020-04. UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose
   Google Scholar
• Neij, L. 2001. “Methods of Evaluating Market Transformation Programmes: Experience in Sweden.” Energy Policy 29 (1): 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00100-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obwegeser, N., and S. D. Müller. 2018. “Innovation and public procurement: Terminology, concepts, and applications.” Technovation 74-75:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.02.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2011. Government at a Glance. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2017a. Developing Public Procurement Capacities in Europe. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2017b. Public Procurement for Innovation: Good Practices and Strategies. Paris: OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2020. Public Procurement. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pablo, A. L., T. Reay, J. R. Dewald, and A. L. Casebeer. 2007. “Identifying, Enabling and Managing Dynamic Capabilities in the Public Sector.” Journal of Management Studies 44 (5): 687–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00675.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penna, C. C., J. Schot, D. Velasco, and J. Molas-Gallart 2021. “Transformative” Mission-Oriented Policies: A Case Study of Vinnova and New Design and Implementation Framework. Paper presented at the EU-SPRI International Conference 2021 “Science and innovation – an uneasy relationship? Rethinking the roles and relations of STI policies”, held in Oslo (online), June 9-11 2021. https://www.euspri2021.no/.
   Google Scholar
• Piening, E. P. 2013. “Dynamic Capabilities in Public Organizations: A Literature Review and Research Agenda.” Public Management Review 15 (2): 209–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.708358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainville, A. 2017. “Standards in Green Public Procurement–A Framework to Enhance Innovation.” Journal of Cleaner Production 167:1029–1037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainville, A. 2021. “Stimulating a More Circular Economy Through Public Procurement: Roles and Dynamics of Intermediation.” Research Policy 50 (4): 104193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, D. K., and M. Mazzucato. 2019. “The Evolution of Mission-Oriented Policies: Exploring Changing Market Creating Policies in the US and European Space Sector.” Research Policy 48 (4): 936–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokkan, A. I., and S. A. Haugland. 2022. “A Transaction Cost Approach for Public Procurement.” Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 37 (2): 341–352. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-09-2019-0393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothwell, R., and W. Zegveld. 1981. “Government Regulations and Innovation: Industrial Innovation and Public Policy.” In Industrial Innovation and Public Policy: Preparing for the 1980s and the 1990s, edited by R. Rothwell and W. Zegveld, 116–147. London: Pinter Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Saussier, S., and J. Tirole. 2015. “Renforcer l’efficacité de la commande Publique.” Notes Du Conseil d’analyse Économique 22 (3): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3917/ncae.022.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Selviaridis, K., A. Hughes, and M. Spring. 2023. “Facilitating Public Procurement of Innovation in the UK Defence and Health Sectors: Innovation Intermediaries as Institutional Entrepreneurs.” Research Policy 52 (2): 104673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Suddaby, R. 2006. “From the Editors: What Grounded Theory is Not.” Academy of Management Journal 49 (4): 633–642. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22083020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talebi, A., D. Rezania, and G. Bragues. 2022. “Developing Capabilities to Engage Start-Ups in the Context of Public Procurement of Innovation: A Template Analysis.” The Innovation 24 (4): 492–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2021.1960535.
   Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J. 2016. “Dynamic Capabilities and Entrepreneurial Management in Large Organizations: Toward a Theory of the (Entrepreneurial) Firm.” European Economic Review 86:202–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J. 2020. “Innovation, Governance, and Capabilities: Implications for Competition Policy: A Tribute to Nobel Laureate Oliver Williamson by His Colleague and Mentee David J.” Teece Industrial and Corporate Change 29 (5): 1075–1099. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtaa043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J., G. Y. Pisano, and A. Shuen. 1997. “Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management.” Strategic Management Journal 18 (7): 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509:AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trivellato, B., M. Martini, and D. Cavenago. 2021. “How do Organizational Capabilities Sustain Continuous Innovation in a Public Setting?” The American Review of Public Administration 51 (1): 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074020939263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E., J. Edler, J. Garcia-Estevez, L. Georghiou, and J. Yeow. 2014. “Barriers to Innovation Through Public Procurement: A Supplier Perspective.” Technovation 34 (10): 631–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E., and K. Flanagan. 2010. “Understanding the Innovation Impacts of Public Procurement.” European Planning Studies 18 (1): 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310903343567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uyarra, E., J. M. Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, K. Flanagan, and E. Magro. 2020. “Public Procurement, Innovation and Industrial Policy: Rationales, Roles, Capabilities and Implementation.” Research Policy 49 (1): 103844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valovirta, V. 2015. “Building Capability for Public Procurement of Innovation.” In Public Procurement for Innovation, edited by C. Edquist, N.S. Vonortas, J.M. Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, and J. Edler, 65–86. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• van Berkel, J. R. J., and F. Schotanus. 2021. “The Impact of “Procurement with impact”: Measuring the Short-Term Effects of Sustainable Public Procurement Policy on the Environmental Friendliness of Tenders.” Journal of Public Procurement 21 (3): 300–317. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-10-2020-0070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hippel, E. 1986. “Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts.” Management Science 32 (7): 791–805. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.7.791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanzenböck, I., and K. Frenken. 2020. “The Subsidiarity Principle in Innovation Policy for Societal Challenges.” Global Transitions 2:51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2020.02.002.
   Google Scholar
• Wanzenböck, I., J. H. Wesseling, K. Frenken, M. P. Hekkert, and K. M. Weber. 2020. “A Framework for Mission-Oriented Innovation Policy: Alternative Pathways Through the Problem–Solution Space.” Science and Public Policy 47 (4): 474–489. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaa027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesseling, J. H., and C. Edquist. 2018. “Public Procurement for Innovation to Help Meet Societal Challenges: A Review and Case Study.” Science and Public Policy 45 (4): 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittmann, F., M. Hufnagl, F. Roth, M. Yorulmaz, and R. Lindner 2021. “From Mission Definition to Implementation: Conceptualizing Mission-Oriented Policies as a Multi-Stage Translation Process.” Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Papers-Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis No. 71.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, X., M. Ramesh, and M. Howlett. 2015. “Policy Capacity: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Policy Competences and Capabilities.” Policy and Society 34 (3–4): 165–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeow, J., E. Uyarra, and S. Gee. 2015. “Closing the Loop: Examining the Case of the Procurement of a Sustainable Innovation.” In Public Procurement for Innovation, edited by C. Edquist, N.S. Vonortas, J.M. Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, and J. Edler, 235–262. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M. 2022. “Fostering Regional Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Growth Through Public Procurement.” Small Business Economics 58 (2): 1205–1222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00466-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar