Reform, hybridization, and revival: the status of new public management in Australia and New Zealand

References

• AGRAGA/Advisory Group on the Reform of Australian Government Administration. 2010. Ahead of the Game: Blueprint for the Reform of Australian Government Administration. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, E., and D. Thodey. 2018. Independent Review into the Operation of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013 and Rule. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• ANAO/Australian National Audit Office. 2020. Australian Government Procurement Contract Reporting Update, Auditor-General Report No. 27 2019-20. Commonwealth of Australia: Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• ANAO/Australian National Audit Office. 2023. “Using Performance Information to Drive Effectiveness.” Accessed November 30, 2023. https://www.anao.gov.au/work/insights/using-performance-information-to-drive-effectiveness.
   Google Scholar
• APS Academy. 2023. “APS Craft.” Accessed January 20, 2023. https://www.apsacademy.gov.au/aps-craft.
   Google Scholar
• APSC/Australia Public Service Commission. 2022. State of the Service Report 2021-22. Canberra: Commonwealth Government.
   Google Scholar
• Belcher, B. 2015. Independent Review of Whole-Of-Government Internal Regulation: Report to the Secretaries Committee on Transformation, Volume 1 Recommendations. Canberra: Department of Finance.
   Google Scholar
• Boston, J., J. Martin, J. Pallot, and P. Walsh. 1996. Public Management: The New Zealand Model. Auckland: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, J., and G. Duncan. 2007. “Is There Now a New ‘New Zealand model’?” Public Management Review 9 (1): 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., and P. Lægreid. 2011. “Complexity and Hybrid Public Administration —Theoretical and Empirical Challenges.” Public Organization Review 11:407–423.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., and P. Lægreid. 2013. “Contexts and Administrative Reforms: A Transformative Approach.” In Context in Public Policy and Management: The Missing Link? edited by Christopher Pollitt, 131–156. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Craft, J., and J. Halligan. 2020. Advising Governments in the Westminster Tradition: Policy Advisory Systems in Australia, Britain, Canada and New Zealand. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, G. 2021. “The first task is to find the right answer …. Public service and the decline of capability, the Jim Carlton Annual Integrity Lecture.” Melbourne Law School, Melbourne University, May 7.
   Google Scholar
• DFD/Department of Finance and Deregulation. 2012. Sharpening the Focus: A Framework for Improving Commonwealth Performance. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Digital.Govt.NZ. 2022. “2022–23 Action Plan for the Digital Strategy for Aotearoa” Accessed November 29, 2023. https://www.digital.govt.nz/dmsdocument/238~202223-action-plan-for-the-digital-strategy-for-aotearoa/html.
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P., H. Margetts, S. Bastow, and J. Tinkler. 2006. “New Public Management is Dead – Long Live Digital-Era Governance.” Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory 16:467–494. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, B. 2023. “Bryce Edwards: Time for a Big Debate About Govt Use of Business Consultants.” New Zealand Herald. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/politics/bryce-edwards-time-for-a-big-debate-about-govt-use-of-business-consultants/WRFGYFZGRZC2RFLIOPA2VEZJUY/.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, M., J. Halligan, B. Horrigan, and G. Nicoll. 2012. Public Sector Governance in Australia. Canberra: ANU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, K. 2022. “Albanese Government’s APS Reform agenda. Speech to the Institute of Public Administration Australia.” October 13.
   Google Scholar
• Goldfinch, S. 1998. “Evaluating Public Sector Reform in New Zealand: Have the Benefits Been Oversold?” Asian Journal of Public Administration 20 (2): 203–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/02598272.1998.10800354.
   Google Scholar
• Goldfinch, S. 2009. “New Zealand: Reforming an NPM Exemplar?” In International Handbook of Public Management Reform, edited by S. Goldfinch and J. Wallis, 155–172. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Goldfinch, S. 2023. “New Zealand: Reunifying the State and the (Really, Truly, This Time) Death of the New Zealand Model?” In International Handbook of Public Administration Reform, edited by S. Goldfinch, 351–372. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Goldfinch, S., K. DeRouen, and P. Pospieszna. 2012. “Flying Blind? Evidence for Good Governance Public Management Reform Agendas, Implementation and Outcomes in Low Income Countries.” Public Administration and Development 33 (1): 50–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldfinch, S., and V. Roberts. 2013. “New Public Management and Public Sector Reform in Victoria and New Zealand: Policy Transfer, Elite Networks and Legislative Copying.” Australian Journal of Politics & History 59 (1): 80–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajph.12005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldfinch, S., and J. Wallis, eds. 2009. International Handbook of Public Management Reform. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Goldfinch, S., and J. Wallis. 2010. “Two Myths of Convergence in Public Management Reform.” Public Administration 88 (4): 1099–1115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldfinch, S., and K. Yamamoto. 2019. “Citizen Perceptions of Public Management: Hybridisation and Post-New Public Management in Japan and New Zealand.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 78 (1): 79–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halligan, J. 2007. “Reintegrating Government in Third Generation Reforms of Australia and New Zealand.” Public Policy and Administration 22 (2): 217–238. https://do-org.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/10.1177/0952076707075899.
   Google Scholar
• Halligan, J. 2010. “Post-NPM Responses to Disaggregation Through Coordinating Horizontally and Integrating Governance.” In Governance of Public Sector Organizations – Autonomy, Control and Performance, edited by P. Lægreid and K. Verhoest, 235–254. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Halligan, J. 2016. “Mapping the Central State in Australia.” Paper for Panel 13 Mapping the State: Old and New Explanatory Perspectives, Research Committee 27, IPSA 2016 World Congress, Poznan, July 23-28.
   Google Scholar
• Halligan, J. 2020. Reforming Public Management: Impact and Lessons from Anglophone Countries. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Halligan, J. 2021a. “Contradictions in Implementing Performance Management.” In Politics, Policy and Public Administration in Theory and Practice: Essays in Honour of Professor John Wanna, edited by A. Podger, M. de Percy, and S. Vincent, 105–132. Canberra: ANU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halligan, J. 2021b. “Politicization of Public Services in Comparative Perspective.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, edited by William R. Thompson, 1–33. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halligan, J. 2023a. “Corruption and Accountability in Australian Government.” In Corruption and Accountability Problems in Modern Government: A Comparative Analysis, edited by. Ali Farazmand and C. Atkinson, Routledge: Milton Keynes.
   Google Scholar
• Halligan, J. 2023b. “Public Administrative Reform in Australia.” In International Handbook of Public Administration Reform, edited by S. Goldfinch, 390–410. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Halligan, J. 2024. “Education and Training of Public Servants in Australia.” In Training and Education of Civil Servants, edited by T. Kerkhoff and D. Moschopoulos, London: Palgrave Macmillan. forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Halligan, John. 2022. “Public Management Reform.” In Encyclopedia of Public Management, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. International Handbook of Public Administration Reform, edited by K. Schedler, 283–287. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Halligan, J., and J. Power. 1992. Political Management in the 1990s. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halton, J. 2015. “Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Reforms.” In Speech for 2015 Senate Occasional Lecture Series. Canberra: Parliament House. https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Whats_On/Senate_training_and_lectures/Senate_lecture_series/Transcripts/Copy_of_index.
   Google Scholar
• Hipkins, C. 2019a. “Cabinet Paper: Public Service Legislation: Paper 1- Overview of Proposals.” Cabinet.
   Google Scholar
• Hipkins, C. 2019b. “Chris Hipkins: The Next Phase of Modernising the New Zealand Public Service”. [Online]. Accessed June Thursday 27. https://www.themandarin.com.au/110619-chris-hipkins-the-next-phase-of-modernising-the-new-zealand-public-service/.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. 1991. “A Public Management for All Seasons?” Public Administration 69 (1): 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, P. 2020. “New Public Service Act Underlines Spirit of Service [Online].” Public Service Commission Accessed July 22, 2021. https://www.publicservice.govt.nz/news/new-public-service-act-underlines-spirit-of-service/.
   Google Scholar
• Ingraham, P. W., P. G. Joyce, and A. K. Donahue. 2003. Government Performance: Why Management Matters. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• IRAPS (Independent Review of the Australian Public Service). 2019. Our Public Service Our Future: Independent Review of the Australian Public Service. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J., and K. Thelen. 2010. “A Gradual Theory of Institutional Change.” In Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power, edited by J. Mahoney and K. Thelen, 1–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Commission of Audit. 2014. Towards Responsible Government: The Report of the National Commission of Audit Phase One, Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2014) 2023. The Principles of Public Administration. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G., and J. Pierre. 2004. “Politicization of the Civil Service: Concepts, Causes, Consequences.” In Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective: The Quest for Control, edited by B.G. Peters and J. Pierre, 1–13. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Podger, A. 2021. Submission 7, Senate Finance and Public Administration References Committee Inquiry into the Current Capability of the Australian Public Service.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., and G. Bouckaert. 2017. Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis – into the Age of Austerity. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Public Service Commission. 2021. Te Taunaki Public Service Census. At: https://www.publicservice.govt.nz/research-and-data/te-taunaki-public-service-census-2021
   Google Scholar
• RC/Royal Commission into the Robodebt Scheme (Royal Commissioner: C. Holmes). 2023. Report. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. 2016. “Recovering the Craft of Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 76 (4): 638–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, R. J., and R. Boyd. 2017. “Joined-Up for What? Response to Carey and Harris on Adaptive Collaboration.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 76 (1): 138–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, R., and M. Macaulay. 2020. “Making Sense of New Zealand’s ‘Spirit of service’: Social Identity and the Civil Service.” Public Money & Management 40 (8): 579–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearer, C. 2022. Constructing the Craft of Public Administration: Perspectives from Australia. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Spann, R. N. 1981. “Fashions and Fantasies in Public Administration.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 40 (1): 12–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speagle, D., S. Goldfinch, and R. Dufficy. 2021. Developing Agency Capability. A New Agency Capability Review Framework. Melbourne: ANZSOG Research Insights.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., L. B. Andersen, C. Greve, and K. K. Klausen. 2020. Public Governance Paradigms: Public Governance Paradigms: Competing and Co-Existing. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., and P. Triantafillou. 2013. “What’s in a Name? Grasping New Public Governance As a Political-Administrative System.” International Review of Public Administration 18 (2): 9–25.
   Google Scholar