Funny bikes: a symmetrical study of urban space, vehicular units and mobility through the voyeuristic spokesperson of a video lens

REFERENCES

• Akrich, M., M. Callon, and B. Latour. 2002. “The Key to Success in Innovation, Part I & II.” International Journal of Innovation Management 6 (2): 187–225. doi:10.1142/S1363919602000550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appelyard, D., K. Lynch, and J. Myer. 1964. The View from the Road. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloor, D. 1991. Knowledge and Social Imagery. 2nd ed. (in original 1976), Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloor, D. 1999. “Anti-Latour.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 30 (1): 81–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bücher, M., J. Urry, and K. Witchger. 2011. Mobile Methods. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Büscher, M., and J. Urry. 2009. “Mobile Methods and the Empirical.” European Journal of Social Theory 12 (1): 99–116. doi:10.1177/1368431008099642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 1986a. “The Sociology of an Actor-Network: The Case of the Electric Vehicle.” In Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology, edited by M. Callon, J. Law, and A. Rip, 19–34. London: Macmillan press.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 1986b. “Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay.” In Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? edited by J. Law, 196–223. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Canu, R., C. Calvignac, and F. Cochoy. 2014. “Des détails qui comptent : Pour une archéologie statistique de l’action ordinaire.” In Le sens du détail, edited by C. Datchary, 91–104. Lormont: Le Bord de l’Eau (à paraître).
   Google Scholar
• Chauvin, P.-M., and F. Reix. 2013. “Intérêts et difficultés de l’usage des images comme outils de recherche en sociologie”, CinémAction. No. 147.
   Google Scholar
• Cochoy, F. 2008. “Calculation, Qualculation, Calqulation: Shopping Cart’s Arithmetic, Equipped Cognition and Clustered Consumers.” Marketing Theory, Special Issue on Markets Forms and Marketing Practices 8 (1): 15–44.
   Google Scholar
• Cochoy, F., and C. Calvignac. 2013. “Mort de l’acteur, vie des clusters? Leçons d’une pratique sociale très ordinaire”. Réseaux, 2013/6, n° 182: 89–118.
   Google Scholar
• Cochoy, F., and C. Calvignac. 2016. “From ‘Market Agencements’ to ‘Vehicular Agencies’: Insights from the Quantitative Observation of Consumer Logistics.” Consumption, Markets and Culture 19 (1): 133–147. doi:10.1080/10253866.2015.1067617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochoy, F., J. Hagberg, D. Normark, H. Ducourant, U. Holmberg, and C. Calvignac. 2019. “Bicycles, Cyclists and Loads: A Comparative Analysis of Cycling Practices in Gothenburg and Toulouse.” Applied Mobilities 4 (1): 1–25. doi:10.1080/23800127.2017.1347026.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H., and S. Yearly. 1992. “Epistemological Chicken.” In Science as Practice and Culture, edited by A. Pickering, 301–326. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• D’Andrea, A., L. Ciolfi, and B. Gray. 2011. “Methodological Challenges and Innovations in Mobilities Research.” Mobilities 6 (2): 149–160. doi:10.1080/17450101.2011.552769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dant, T. 2004. “The Driver-Car.” Theory, Culture & Society 21 (4/5): 61–80. doi:10.1177/0263276404046061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, F. 1959. “The Cabdriver and His Fare: Facets of a Fleeting Relationship.” The American Journal of Sociology 65 (2): 158–165. doi:10.1086/222656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Certeau, M. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Filion, N. 2011. “Compter le réel, Réflexions autour de l’observation quantitative.” Terrains et travaux, (n° 19): 37–55.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, E., S. Washington, and N. Haworth. 2012. “Barriers and Facilitators to Public Bicycle Scheme Use: A Qualitative Approach.” Transportation Research: Part F. 15 (6): 686–698.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. 2002. Ethnomethodology’s Program: Working Out Durkheim’s Aphorism. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Hannam, K., M. Sheller, and J. Urry. 2006. “Mobilities, Immobilities and Moorings.” Mobilities 1 (1): 1–22. doi:10.1080/17450100500489189.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, P. 2005. “Performing the City: A Body and a Bicycle Take on Birmingham, UK.” Social & Cultural Geography 6 (6): 813–830. doi:10.1080/14649360500353046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, J. 1999. How Emotions Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lahire, B. 2011. The Plural Actor. Malden, MA: Polity Press [1998].
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1988. “The Politics of Explanation: An Alternative.” In Knowledge and Reflexivity, New Frontiers in the Sociology of Knowledge, edited by S. Woolgar, 155–177. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1991. Nous n’avons jamais été modernes. Essai d’anthropologie symétrique. Paris: La Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1992a. “Where are the Missing Masses: Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts.” In Shaping Technology-Building Society. Studies in Sociotechnical Change, edited by W. Bijker and J. Law, 225–259. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1992b. Aramis, ou l’amour des techniques. Paris: La Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1993[1988]. The Pasteurization of France. Translated by A. Sheridan and J. Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1996. “On Interobjectivity.” Mind, Culture & Activity 3 (4): 228–245. doi:10.1207/s15327884mca0304_2.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1999a. Pandoras Hope. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1999b. “On Recalling ANT.” In Actor Network Theory and After, edited by J. Law and J. Hassard, 15–26. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2004. “Gabriel Tarde og det sociales endeligt.” [Gabriel Tarde and the End of the Social.] Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 5 (2): 33–47.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., and E. Hermant. 1998. Paris, ville invisible, Les Empêcheurs de penser en rond. Paris: La Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., P. Jensen, T. Venturini, S. Grauwin, and D. Boullier. 2012. “‘The Whole Is Always Smaller than Its Parts’ – A Digital Test of Gabriel Tardes’ Monads.” The British Journal of Sociology 63 (4): 590–615. doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2012.01428.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurier, E. 1995. City of Glas/z, Unpublished thesis
   Google Scholar
• Laurier, E. 2004. “The Spectacular Showing: Houdini and the Wonder of Ethnomethodology.” Human Studies 27 (4): 377–399. doi:10.1007/s10746-004-3341-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurier, E. 2011. “Driving: Pre-Cognition and Driving.” In Geographies of Mobilities: Practices, Spaces, Subjects, edited by T. Cresswell and P. Merriman, 69–81. Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Laurier, E. 2014. “Capturing Motion: Video Set-Ups for Driving, Cycling and Walking.” In The Routledge Handbook of Mobilities, edited by P. Adey, D. Bissell, K. Hannam, P. Merriman, and M. Sheller, 493–502. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Laurier, E., I. Stebel, and B. Brown. 2008. “Video Analysis: Lessons from Professional Video Editing Practice.” Forum: Qualitative Research 9 (3): Art 37.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. 2004. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. 1 ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, M. 2016. “‘It’s on Video, Every Second of It’: A Micro-Sociological Analysis of Cycle Rage.” Visual Studies 31 (3): 206–220. doi:10.1080/1472586X.2016.1209986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorimer, J. 2010. “Moving Image Methodologies for More-Than-Human Geographies.” Cultural Geographies 17 (2): 237–258. doi:10.1177/1474474010363853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, K. 1976. Managing the Sense of a Region. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manderschield, K. 2014. “Criticising the Solitary Mobile Subject: Researching Relational Mobilities and Reflecting on Mobile Methods.” Mobilities 9 (2): 188–219. doi:10.1080/17450101.2013.830406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, K. 2007. “Promoting Bike-And-Ride: The Dutch Experience.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy & Practice 41 (4): 326–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIlvenny, P. 2014. “Vélomobile Formations-in-Action: Biking and Talking Together.” Space and Culture 17 (2): 137–156. doi:10.1177/1206331213508494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriman, P. 2014. “Rethinking Mobile Methods.” Mobilities 9 (2): 167–187. doi:10.1080/17450101.2013.784540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael, M. 2000. Reconnecting Culture, Technology and Nature: From Society to Heterogeneity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. 1993. “Les artefacts cognitifs”. Raisons Pratiques, n° 4, Les objets dans l’action, Paris, Presses de l’EHESS, pp. 15–34.
   Google Scholar
• Normark, D., F. Cochoy, J. Hagberg, and H. Ducourant. 2018. “Mundane Intermodality: A Comparative Analysis of Bike-Renting Practices.” Mobilities 13 (6): 791–807. doi:10.1080/17450101.2018.1504651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldenziel, R., M. Emanuel, A. A. Albert de la Bruhèze, and F. Veraart, eds. 2016. Cycling Cities: The European Experience. Eindhoven: Foundation for the History of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Pérec, G. 2008. Tentative d’épuisement d’un lieu parisien. Paris: Christian Bourgois.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. 2004. Home Truths: Gender, Domestic Objects and Everyday Life. London: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. 2007. Doing Visual Ethnography. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. 2009. Doing Sensory Ethnography. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rastogi, R. 2011. “Promotion of Non-Motorized Modes as a Sustainable Transportation Option: Policy and Planning Issues.” Current Science 100 (9): 1340–1348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenblueth, A., N. Wiener, and J. Bigelow. 1943. “Behaviour Purpose and Teleology.” Philosophy of Science 10: 18–24. doi:10.1086/286788.
   Google Scholar
• Sayes, E. 2014. “Actor−Network Theory and Methodology: Just What Does It Mean to Say that Nonhumans Have Agency?” Social Studies of Science 44 (1): 134–149. doi:10.1177/0306312713511867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaeffer, J. H. 1995. “Videotape: New Techniques of Observation and Analysis in Anthropology.” In Principles of Visual Anthropology, edited by P. Hockings, 255–284. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, M., and J. Urry. 2006. “The New Mobilities Paradigm.” Environment and Planning A 38 (2): 207–226. doi:10.1068/a37268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheller, M., and J. Urry. 2016. “Mobilizing the Mobilities Paradigm.” Applied Mobilities 1 (1): 10–25. doi:10.1080/23800127.2016.1151216.
   Google Scholar
• Speck, O. C. 2010. Funny Frames: The Filmic Concepts of Michel Haneke. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Spinney, J. 2010. “Performing Resistance? Re-Reading Practices of Urban Cycling on London’s South Bank.” Environment and Planning A 42 (12): 2914–2937. doi:10.1068/a43149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinney, J. 2011. “A Chance to Catch A Breath: Using Mobile Video Ethnography in Cycling Research.” Mobilities 6 (2): 161–182. doi:10.1080/17450101.2011.552771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinney, J. 2015. “Close Encounters? Mobile Methods, (Post)Phenomenology and Affect.” Cultural Geographies 22 (2): 231–246. doi:10.1177/1474474014558988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L. 1993. “Essai sur les objets usuels. Propriétés, fonctions, usages.”In Les objets dans l’action, De la maison au laboratoire, Raisons Pratiques, n° 4 B, edited by B. Conein, N. Dodier and L. Thévenot, 85–111. Paris: éd. de l’EHESS.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. 2004. “Driving in the City.” Theory, Culture & Society 21 (4/5): 41–59. doi:10.1177/0263276404046060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2000. Sociology Beyond Societies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2004. “The ‘System’ of Automobility.” Theory, Culture and Society 21 (4/5): 25–39. doi:10.1177/0263276404046059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2007. Mobilities. Oxford: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Velkovska, J., and M. Zouinar. 2012. “Jugements et émotions dans les interactions institutionnelles”, ethnographiques.org, n° 25, décembre, Filmer le travail: Chercher, montrer, démontrer, (consulté le 30 août 2013) http://www.ethnographiques.org/Jugements-et-emotions-dans-les
   Google Scholar
• Vigour, C. 2005. La comparaison dans les sciences sociales. Pratiques et méthodes. Paris: La Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, W. H., and P. Underhill. 2009[1988]. City: Rediscovering the Center. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar