The painter’s discipline: aesthetics and form in Scottish painting

References

• Ardalan, Z., ed. 2013. Merlin James. London: Parasol Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Belting, H. 2011. The Anthropology of the Image: Picture, Medium, Body. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, W. 1999. Walter Benjamin: Selected Writings Vol. 2 1927-1934. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bois, Y. A., and R. Krauss. 1997. Formless: A User’s Guide. New York: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bourriaud, N. 2002. Relational Aesthetics. France: Presses du Réel.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, F., ed. 2005. Louise Hopkins: Freedom of Information. Edinburgh: Fruitmarket Gallery.
   Google Scholar
• Brereton, R. 2011. Cut & Paste: 21st-Century Collage. London: Laurence King Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, N. 2003. “A Walk for A Walk’s Sake.” In The Stage of Drawing: Gesture and Act, edited by A. Newman, C. de Zegher., A. Newman, and J. Fisher, 149–158. selected from the Tate Collection by. London: Tate publishing and New York: The Drawing Center.
   Google Scholar
• Buchloh, B. 2006. “Hesse’s Endgame: Facing the Diagram.” In Eva Hesse Drawings, edited by C. de Zegher and N. Haven, 117–153. New York: The Drawing Center. London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, N. 2003. Beyond Aesthetics: Philosophical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charlesworth, J. J. 2009. “Louise Hopkins: Harness.” Art Review, 29 (January/February 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Danto, A. 2005. The Philosophical Disenfranchisement of Art. New York and Chichester: Colombia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elkins, J. 2008. “On Some Limits of Materiality in Art History.”31: Das Magazin des Instituts für Theorie[Zurich], 12: 25-30.
   Google Scholar
• Elkins, J., and H. Montgomery, eds. 2013. Beyond the Aesthetic and the Anti-Aesthetic. University Park, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fenves, P. 2002. “An Introduction to ‘Aesthetics and the Disciplines’.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 35 (3): 339–341. doi:10.1353/ecs.2002.0024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Focillon, H. 1989. The Life of Forms in Art. New York: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fuglerud, Ø., and L. Wainwright, eds. 2015. Objects and Imagination: Perspectives on Materialisation and Meaning. Oxford: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Gell, A. 1998. Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, C., and P. Wood, Eds. 1992. Art in Theory: 1900-1990. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hilty, G. 2005. “Adjustment.” In Louise Hopkins: Freedom of Information, edited by F. Bradley, 38–46. Edinburgh: The Fruitmarket Gallery.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T., ed. 1996. Key Debates in Anthropology. London; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T., ed. 2011. Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. 2006. “Rethinking the Animate, Re-animating Thought”. Ethnos 71 (1): 9–20. doi:10.1080/00141840600603111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, M. 1996. “Reckoning Katz.” Modern Painters 9 (2): 41–125.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, A. 2013. How Glasgow Stole the Idea of Contemporary Art. UK: Kadmon.
   Google Scholar
• Knappett, C. 2007. “Materials with Materiality?” Archaeological Dialogues 14 (1): 20–23. doi:10.1017/S1380203807002140.
   Google Scholar
• Krauss, R. 1986. The Originality of the Avant-Garde and Other Modernist Myths. London and Cambridge, Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krauss, R. 1992. “The Motivation of the Sign.” In Picasso and Braque: A Symposium, edited by L. Zelevansky. 261–287. New York: Museum of Modern Art.
   Google Scholar
• Loock, U. 2005. “Reproduction and Repression.” In Louise Hopkins: Freedom of Information, edited by F. Bradley, 76–80. Edinburgh: The Fruitmarket Gallery.
   Google Scholar
• Merjian, A. H. 2013. “Merlin James.” In Merlin James, edited by Z. Ardalan. London: Parasol Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Molino, J. 1989. “Introduction.” In The Life of Forms in Art, edited by H. Focillon, 9–31. New York: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Molotiu, A. 2001. “Focillon’s Bergsonian Rhetoric and the Possibility of Deconstruction.” Visible Culture: An Electronic Journal for Visual Studies 3. http://www.rochester.edu/in_visible_culture/issue3/molotiu.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Pies, D. 2015. “Martin Boyce – After Modernism.” In Manual No. 3, edited by S. Grammel and S. Hero, 47–53 Basel: Museum Für Gegenwartskunst.
   Google Scholar
• Pinney, C., and N. Thomas, eds. 2001. Beyond Aesthetics: Art and the Technologies of Enchantment. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, J. 2004. The Politics of Aesthetics: The Distribution of the Sensible. London; New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, J. 2009. The Future of the Image. London; New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. 2007. The Intangibilities of Form: Skill and Deskilling in Art after the Readymade. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Sansi, R. 2015. Art, Anthropology and the Gift. London. New York: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, K. L. 1970. “Categories of Art.” Philosophical Review 79 (3): 334–367. doi:10.2307/2183933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zangwill, N. 2000. “In Defence of Moderate Aesthetic Formalism.” The Philosophical Quarterly 50 (201): 476–493. doi:10.1111/1467-9213.00201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar