REFERENCES

  • Anonymous. 2012. “Do Women Still Have to Be Naked to Get into the Met. Museum?”. www.guerrillagirls.com/naked-through-the-ages/.
  • Asch, A., and M. Fine. 1988. Women with Disabilities: Essays in Psychology, Culture, and Politics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  • Barone, T. 2012. Arts Based Research, Edited by E. W. Eisner. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE.
  • Bergold, J., and S. Thomas. 2012. “Participatory Research Methods: A Methodological Approach in Motion.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 13 (1). Participatory Qualitative Research. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1801/3335
  • Boydell, K. M., B. M. Gladstone, T. Volpe, B. Allemang, and E. Stasiulis. 2012. “The Production and Dissemination of Knowledge: A Scoping Review of Arts-Based Health Research.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 13(1). Participatory Qualitative Research. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1711/3329
  • Bryson, N. 2013. Visual Culture: Images and Interpretations. Edited by M. A. Holly and K. Moxey. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
  • Butler, J. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
  • Calder-Dawe, O., K. Witten, and P. Carroll. 2020. “Being the Body in Question: Young People’s Accounts of Everyday Ableism, Visibility and Disability.” Disability & Society 35 (1): 132–155. doi:10.1080/09687599.2019.1621742.
  • Cho, S., K. W. Crenshaw, and M. Leslie. 2013. “Toward a Field of Intersectionality Studies: Theory, Applications, and Praxis.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 38 (4): 785–810. doi:10.1086/669608.
  • Clark, A., J. Prosser, and R. Wiles. 2010. “Ethical Issues in Image-based Research.” Arts & Health 2 (1): 81–93. doi:10.1080/17533010903495298.
  • Coemans, S., A.-L. Raymakers, J. Vandenabeele, and K. Hannes. 2017. “Evaluating the Extent to Which Social Researchers Apply Feminist and Empowerment Frameworks in Photovoice Studies with Female Participants: A Literature Review.” Qualitative Social Work: Research and Practice. doi:10.1177/1473325017699263.
  • Crawford, D., and A. Dearmun. 2016. “Brittle Bone Disease.” Nursing Children and Young People 28 (7): 17. doi:10.7748/ncyp.28.7.17.s18.
  • Crenshaw, K. 1990. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review 6: 1241–1300. heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/stflr43&i=1260.
  • Dew, A., and K. M. Boydell. 2017. “Knowledge Translation: Bridging the Disability Research-to-practice Gap.” Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 4 (2): 142–157. doi:10.1080/23297018.2017.1315610.
  • Dodd, J., C. Jones, D. Jolly, and R. Sandell. 2010. “Disability Reframed: Challenging Visitor Perceptions in the Museum.” In Re-presenting Disability, edited by R. Sandell, J. Dodd, and R. Garland-Thomson, 92–111. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Dogba, M., C. Bedos, M. Durigova, K. Montpetit, T. Wong, F. Glorieux, and F. Rauch. 2013. “The Impact of Severe Osteogenesis Imperfecta on the Lives of Young Patients and Their Parents - a Qualitative Analysis.” BMC Pediatrics 13 (1): 153. doi:10.1186/1471-2431-13-153.
  • Drew, S., and M. Guillemin. 2014. “From Photographs to Findings: Visual Meaning-making and Interpretive Engagement in the Analysis of Participant-generated Images.” Visual Studies 29 (1): 54–67. doi:10.1080/1472586X.2014.862994.
  • Dunn, D. S., and S. Burcaw. 2013. “Disability Identity: Exploring Narrative Accounts of Disability.” Rehabilitation Psychology 58 (2): 148.
  • Ellis, C., T. E. Adams, and A. P. Bochner. 2011. “Autoethnography: An Overview.” Historical Social research/Historische Sozialforschung 12 (1): 273–290.
  • Emens, E. F. 2007. “Shape Stops Story.” Narrative 15 (1): 124–132. www.jstor.org/stable/20107409.
  • Emmett, T., and E. Alant. 2006. “Women and Disability: Exploring the Interface of Multiple Disadvantage.” Development Southern Africa 23 (4): 445–460. doi:10.1080/03768350600927144.
  • Fraser, K. D., and F. Al Sayah. 2011. “Arts-based Methods in Health Research: A Systematic Review of the Literature.” Arts & Health 3 (2): 110–145. doi:10.1080/17533015.2011.561357.
  • Frohmader, C. 2010. Gendering the National Disability Care and Support Scheme. Women with Disabilities Australia (Hobart). http://wwda.org.au/papers/subs/subs2006/.
  • Frohmader, C. 2019. The Status of Women and Girls with Disability in Australia. Position paper, Women with Disabilities Australia, Disabled People’s Organisations Australia and the National Women’s Alliances, Hobart. http://wwda.org.au/position-paper-the-status-of-women-and-girls-with-disability-in-australia/.
  • Garland-Thomson, R. 2002a. “Integrating Disability, Transforming Feminist Theory.” NWSA Journal 14 (3): 1–32.
  • Garland-Thomson, R. 2002b. “The Politics of Staring: Visual Rhetorics of Disability in Popular Photography.” In Disability Studies: Enabling the Humanities, edited by S. L. Snyder, B. Brueggerman, and R. Garland-Thomson, 56–75. New York: Modern Language Association of America.
  • Glorieux, F. H. 2008. “Osteogenesis Imperfecta.” Best Practice & Research. Clinical Rheumatology 22 (1): 85. doi:10.1016/j.berh.2007.12.012.
  • Green, S., C. Davis, E. Karshmer, P. Marsh, and B. Straight. 2005. “Living Stigma: The Impact of Labeling, Stereotyping, Separation, Status Loss, and Discrimination in the Lives of Individuals with Disabilities and Their Families.” Sociological Inquiry 75 (2): 197–215.
  • Harper, D. 2002. “Talking about Pictures: A Case for Photo Elicitation.” Visual Studies 17 (1): 13–26. doi:10.1080/14725860220137345.
  • Hollins, H. 2010. “Reciprocity, Accountability, Empowerment: Emancipatory Principles and Practices in the Museum.” In Re-presenting Disability: Activism and Agency in the Museum, edited by R. Sandell, J. Dodd, and R. Garland-Thomson, 228–243. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Holman Jones, S. 2005. “Autoethnography: Making the Personal Political.” In The SageHandbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. Lincoln and Y. Lincoln, 3rd ed., 763–791. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Hughes, B., and K. Paterson. 1997. “The Social Model of Disability and the Disappearing Body: Towards a Sociology of Impairment.” Disability & Society 12 (3): 325–340. doi:10.1080/09687599727209.
  • Jordan, S. R. 2014. “Research Integrity, Image Manipulation, and Anonymizing Photographs in Visual Social Science Research.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 17 (4): 441–454. doi:10.1080/13645579.2012.759333.
  • Kafer, A. 2013. Feminist, Queer, Crip. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Knowles, J. G. 2007. Handbook of the Arts in Qualitative Research Perspectives, Methodologies, Examples, and Issues, Edited by A. L. Cole. Los Angeles: SAGE.
  • Lal, S., T. Jarus, and M. J. Suto. 2012. “A Scoping Review of the Photovoice Method: Implications for Occupational Therapy Research.” Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 79 (3): 181–190. doi:10.2182/cjot.2012.79.3.8.
  • Lane, P. 1990. “Images of Disability.” Health Libraries Review 7 (2): 119–120. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2532.1990.7201118.x.
  • Latz, A. O. 2017. PhotoVoice Research in Education and Beyond: A Practical Guide from Theory to Exhibition. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Macdonald, D., A. Dew, and K. Boydell. 2020. “Structuring Photovoice for Community Impact: A Protocol for Research With Women With Physical Disability.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 21(2). Participatory Qualitative Research. https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/3420
  • Major, B., and L. T. O’Brien. 2005. “The Social Psychology of Stigma.” Annual Review of Psychology 56: 393–421. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070137.
  • Margolis, E., and L. Pauwels. 2011. The SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods. London: SAGE.
  • Mitchell, C. 2011. Doing Visual Research. London: SAGE.
  • Mitchell, C., D. L. Naydene, and M. Relebohile. 2017. Participatory Visual Methodologies: Social Change, Community and Policy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Moodley, J., and L. Graham. 2015. “The Importance of Intersectionality in Disability and Gender Studies.” Agenda 29 (2): 24–33. doi:10.1080/10130950.2015.1041802.
  • Muller, J. F. 2011. “Disability, Ambivalence, and the Law.” American Journal of Law & Medicine 37 (4): 469–521. doi:10.1177/009885881103700401.
  • Nin, A. 1961. The Seduction of the Minotaur. Chicago, USA: Swallow Press.
  • Oliver, M. 1992. “Changing the Social Relations of Research Production?” Disability, Handicap & Society 7 (2): 101–114. doi:10.1080/02674649266780141.
  • Pauwels, L. 2008. “Taking and Using.” Visual Communication Quarterly 15 (4): 243–257. doi:10.1080/15551390802415071.
  • Pauwels, L. 2010. “Visual Sociology Reframed: An Analytical Synthesis and Discussion of Visual Methods in Social and Cultural Research.” Sociological Methods Research 38: 545–581.
  • Rauch, F., and F. H. Glorieux. 2004. “Osteogenesis Imperfecta.” Lancet 363 (9418): 1377–1385. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16051-0.
  • Raymond, C. 2017. Women Photographers and Feminist Aesthetics. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Reeves, S., A. Kuper, and B. D. Hodges. 2008. “Qualitative Research Methodologies: Ethnography.” Bmj 337: a1020.
  • Rice, C. 2014. Becoming Women: The Embodied Self in Image Culture. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
  • Rieger, K., and A. S. H. Schultz. 2014. “Exploring Arts-Based Knowledge Translation: Sharing Research Findings through Performing the Patterns, Rehearsing the Results, Staging the Synthesis.” Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing 11 (2): 133–139. doi:10.1111/wvn.12031.
  • Rose, G. 2012. Visual Methodologies an Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials. 4th ed. London: SAGE.
  • Santos, M., C. Dos, A. F. Pires, K. Soares, and L. Barros. 2018. “Family Experience with Osteogenesis Imperfecta Type 1: The Most Distressing Situations.” Disability and Rehabilitation 40 (19): 2281–2287. doi:10.1080/09638288.2017.1334236.
  • Sprague, J., and J. Hayes. 2000. “Self‐determination and Empowerment: A Feminist Standpoint Analysis of Talk about Disability.” American Journal of Community Psychology 28 (5): 671–695.
  • Stets, J. E., and P. J. Burke. 2000. “Identity Theory and Social Identity Theory.” Social Psychology Quarterly 63 (3): 224–237. Accessed 9 June 2020. www.jstor.org/stable/2695870.
  • Susman, J. 1994. “Disability, Stigma and Deviance.” Social Science & Medicine 38 (1): 15–22.
  • Sutton-Brown, C. A. 2014. “Photovoice: A Methodological Guide.” Photography and Culture 7 (2): 169–185. doi:10.2752/175145214X13999922103165.
  • Szto, P., R. Furman, and C. Langer. 2005. “Poetry and Photography: An Exploration into Expressive/Creative Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Social Work 4 (2): 135–156. doi:10.1177/1473325005052390.
  • Tsimicalis, A., G. Denis-Larocque, A. Michalovic, C. Lepage, K. Williams, T.-R. Yao, T. Palomo, N. Dahan-Oliel, S. May, and F. Rauch. 2016. “The Psychosocial Experience of Individuals Living with Osteogenesis Imperfecta: A Mixed-methods Systematic Review.” An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation – Official Journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research 25 (8): 1877–1896. doi:10.1007/s11136-016-1247-0.
  • Wang, C., and M. A. Burris. 1997. “Photovoice: Concept, Methodology, and Use for Participatory Needs Assessment.” Health Education & Behavior 24 (3): 369–387. doi:10.1177/109019819702400309.
  • Wang, C., M. A. Burris, and X. Y. Ping. 1996. “Chinese Village Women as Visual Anthropologists: A Participatory Approach to Reaching Policymakers.” Social Science & Medicine (1982) 42 (10): 1391. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(95)00287-1.
  • Wiles, R., A. Coffey, J. Robinson, and S. Heath. 2012. “Anonymisation and Visual Images: Issues of Respect, ‘Voice’ and Protection.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 15 (1): 41–53. doi:10.1080/13645579.2011.564423.
  • World Bank. 2013. Inclusion Matters: The Foundation for Shared Prosperity (Advance Edition). Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Zitzelsberger, H. 2005. “(In)visibility: Accounts of Embodiment of Women with Physical Disabilities and Differences.” Disability & Society 20 (4): 389–403. doi:10.1080/09687590500086492.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.