Portfolio implementation for self-reflection and professional growth of students in the arts

REFERENCES

• Alverson, M., and D. Karreman. 2011. Qualitative Research and Theory Development: Mystery as Method. New York: Sage Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, C., and A. Collins. 1997. Portfolio Assessment: A Handbook for Education. New York: Dale Seymer Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bless, C., C Higson-Smith, and S.L. Sithole. 2013. Fundamentals of Social Science Research Methods: An African Perspective. Cape Town: Juta and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Calderhead, J., and P. Gates, Eds. 1995. Conceptualising Reflection in Teacher Development. London and New York: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, D. 1995. “Is Understanding the Professional Knowledge of Teaching a Theory-practice Problem?” Journal of Philosophy of Education 29 (3): 311–332. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9752.1995.tb00363.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, W., and S. Kemmis. 1986. Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge and Action Research. London: Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Cary, R. 2011. Critical Art Pedagogy: Foundations for Postmodern Art Education. New York, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, K.B., L.R. Struyk, D. Kinder, J.K. Sheehan, and C.I.K. Kish. 1997. “Portfolio Assessment: Challenges in Secondary Education.” The High School Journal 80 (4): 261–272.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, A., and P. LeMahieu. 2003. “Assessment for Learning: Reconsidering Portfolios and Research Evidence.” In Optmising New Methods of Assessment: In Search of Qualities and Standards, edited by M. Segers and F. Dochy, 141–168. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, D.J. 1993. “Art Education in the 1990s: Meeting the Challenges of Accountability.” Studies in Art Education 34 (2): 82–90. doi:10.2307/1320445.
   Google Scholar
• Efland, A. 1990. A History of Art Education: Intellectual and Social Currents in Teaching the Visual Arts. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U., and J. Saldanha. 2011. Fundamentals of Qualitative Research. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, P.D. 2005. “Metacognition and Art Production as Problem-solving: A Case Study of Third-grade Students.” Visual Arts Research 31 (2): 67–75.
   Google Scholar
• Gravetter, F.J., and L.A.B. Forzano 2012. “Research Methods for the Behavioural Science.” Accessed 23 August 2019. www.cerigage.com
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, C, P. Wood, and J. Gaiger, Eds. 2015. Art in Theory 1648-1815: An Anthology of Changing Ideas. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kothari, C.R. 2004. Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. 2nd ed. New Delhi: New Age International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kraus, S., S.R. Sears, and B.L. Burke. 2013. “Is Truthiness Enough? Classroom Activities for Encouraging Evidence-based Critical Thinking.” The Journal of Effective Teaching 13 (2): 83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Land, S.M., and C. Zembal-Saul. 2003. “Scaffolding Reflection and Articulation of Scientific Explanations in a Data-rich, Project-based Learning Environment: An Investigation of Progress Portfolio.” Educational Technology Research and Development 51 (4): 65–84. doi:10.1007/BF02504544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marczyk, G., D. DeMatteo, and D. Festinger. 2005. Essentials of Research Design and Methodology. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Mojtaba, V., H. Turunen, and T. Bondas. 2013. “Content Analysis and Thematic Analysis: Implications for Conducting a Qualitative Descriptive Study.” Nursing and Health Sciences 15: 398–405. doi:10.1111/nhs.12048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, J.A. 2005. Reflection in Learning and Professional Development: Theory and Practice. Abingdon: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, I., and C.R. Benz. 1998. Qualitative-quantitative Research Methodology: Exploring the Interactive Continuum. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Hanlon, C. 1993. “The Importance of an Articulated Personal Theory of Professional Development.” In Reconstructing Teacher Education: Teacher Development, edited by J. Elliot, 243–256. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Okeke, C., and M. Van Wyk. 2015. Educational Research: An African Perspective. Cape Town: Oxford University Press, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, M.J. 2004. Teaching and Learning Portfolios: Guidebook. Ceter for the Integration of Research, Madison: Teaching and Learning/ National Science Foundation, Grant No 0227592.
   Google Scholar
• Paulson, F.L., and P.R. Paulson 1991. “The Ins and Outs of Using Portfolios to Access Performance.” ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 334250.
   Google Scholar
• Pena-Ayala, A., ed.. 2015. Metacognition: Fundaments, Application, and Trends. New York, London: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rekalidou, G., and E. Penderi. 2010. “A Collaborative Action Research Project in the Kindergarten: Perspectives and Challenges for Teacher Development through Internal Evaluation Processes.” New Horizons in Education 58 (2): 18–33.
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers, C. 2002. “Defining Reflection: Another Look at John Dewey and Reflective Thinking.” Teachers College Record 104 (4): 842–866. doi:10.1111/1467-9620.00181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, B., A. Macleod, B. O’Flynn, F. Bissette, and R. Duncan 1999. “Sketching a Good Portfolio.” Circa Art Magazine, 32–34.
   Google Scholar
• Schon, D. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner. London: Temple Smith.
   Google Scholar
• Tonon, G. 2015. Qualitative Studies in Quality of Life: Methodology and Practice. New York: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K.M., and D.P. Liston. 1996. Reflective Teaching: An Introduction. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B.J., A. Bandura, and M. Martinez-Pons. 1992. “Self-motivation for Academic Attainment: The Role of Self-efficacy Beliefs and Personal Goal Setting.” American Education Research Journal 29 (3): 663–676. doi:10.3102/00028312029003663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar