396
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Building internal reputation in stigmatised neighbourhoods: the use of remote participatory photo mapping

References

  • Agustoni, A., A. Alietti, and R. Cucca. 2015. “Neoliberismo, Migrazioni e Segregazione Spaziale.” Politiche Abitative e Mix Sociale nei Casi Europeo e Italiano, Sociologia Urbana e Rurale 106: 118–136.
  • Arthurson, K. 2013. “Mixed Tenure Communities and the Effects on Neighbourhood Reputation and Stigma: Residents’ Experiences from Within.” Cities 35: 432–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.03.007.
  • Arthurson, K., I. Levin, and A. Ziersch. 2015. “What is the Meaning of ‘Social Mix’? Shifting Perspectives in Planning and Implementing Public Housing Estate Redevelopment.” Australian Geographer 46 (4): 491–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049182.2015.1075270.
  • Bacqué, M. H., Y. Fijalkow, L. Launay, and S. Vermeersch. 2011. “Social Mix Policies in Paris: Discourses, Policies and Social Effects.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35 (2): 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00995.x.
  • Bakare, G. O. and G. D. James. 2022 "Remote Ethnography: Using Photo-Elicitation as an Alternative to Participant Observation in a Study of Urban Livelihoods in Nigeria." In Sage Research Methods: Doing Research Online. London: SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529603200
  • Barker, R., S. Rowland, C. Thompson, K. Lock, K. Hunter, J. Lim, and D. Marks. 2022. “Ties That Bind: Young People, Community and Social Capital in the Wake of the Pandemic.” SSM – Qualitative Research in Health 2 (100155): 1–10.
  • Barwick, C. 2018. “Social mix Revisited: Within- and Across- Neighbourhood Ties Between Ethnic Minorities of Differing Socioeconomic Backgrounds.” Urban Geography 39 (6): 916–934. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2017.1405690.
  • Bolt, G., R. Van Kempen, and J. Van Weesep. 2009. “After Urban Restructuring: Relocations and Segregation in Dutch Cities.” Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 100 (4): 502–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2009.00555.x.
  • Bristol City Council. 2018. “The Population of Bristol”, December 2018. Accessed January 15, 2021. www.bristol.gov.uk/population.
  • Bryman, A. 2012. Social Research Methods. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Calvaresi, C. and L. Cossa. 2011. Un ponte a colori. Accompagnare la rigenerazione di un quartiere di periferia milanese. Rimini: Politecnica, Maggioli Editore.
  • Carpenter, J. 2022. “Picture This: Exploring Photovoice as a Method to Understand Lived Experiences in Marginal Neighbourhoods.” Urban Planning 7 (3): 351–362. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i3.5451.
  • Cheng, Y.-W. 2021. "Sleepless in Taipei: The Application of Photovoice Method to Explore the Major Challenges Perceived by Homeless People Facing Multifaceted Social Exclusion." Critical Social Policy 41 (4): 606--627. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018320981849.
  • Chetty, R., N. Hendren, and L. F. Katz. 2016. “The Effects of Exposure to Better Neighborhoods on Children: New Evidence from the Moving to Opportunity Experiment.” American Economic Review 106 (4): 855–902. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20150572.
  • Community at Heart. 2005. Revised Strategic Plan 2005–2010. Bristol: Community at Heart.
  • Comune di Milano (Milan City Council). 2011. I dati del censimento 2011 a Milano. Le schede territoriali sui Municipi, NIL e Aree di Censimento. Settore Statistica. Milano. Accessed February 25, 2022. http://www.comune.milano.it/wps/portal/ist/it/amministrazione/datistatistici/indicatori_Censimento_2011.
  • Comune di Milano (Milan City Council). 2022. Quartiere Ponte Lambro. Sgomberato lo stabile di proprietà comunale in via Ucelli di Nemi. Ufficio Stampa. Milano. Accessed February 25, 2022. https://www.comune.milano.it/-/quartiere-pontelambro.-sgomberato-lo-stabile-di-proprieta-comunalein-via-ucelli-di-nemi?fbclid=IwAR0yIufDqKI91ogruVFxl8WztaHxcbNBFhpkE2yK6-S14gwuS06w44KdSdc.
  • Corbett, J. 2009. Good Practices in Participatory Mapping, A Review Prepared for the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). Rome: IFAD.
  • DeLuca, S., and T. Rosenblatt. 2010. “Does Moving to Better Neighborhoods Lead to Better Schooling Opportunities? Parental School Choice in an Experimental Housing Voucher Program.” Teachers College Record 112 (5): 1443–1491. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811011200504.
  • Department for Work and Pensions. 2010. Postcode Selection? Employers’ Use of Area and Address-Based Information Shortcuts in Recruitment Decisions, Research Report No 664.
  • Dowling, R. 2010. “Power, Subjectivity and Ethics in Qualitative Research.” In Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography, edited by I. Hay, 26–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Dunn, K. 2001. “Representation of Islam in the Politics of Mosque Development in Sydney.” Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Social Geografie 92 (3): 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9663.00158.
  • Edwards, C., and R. Imrie. 2015. The Short Guide to Urban Policy. Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Fairclough, N. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Fairclough, N. 2003. Analysing Discourse, Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
  • Foucault, M. 1981. “The Order of Discourse.” In Untying the Text: A Post-Structuralist Reader, edited by R. Young, 48–78. Boston, London and Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Garbin, G., and G. Millington. 2012. “Territorial Stigma and the Politics of Resistance in a Parisian Banlieue: La Courneuve and Beyond.” Urban Studies 49 (10): 2067–2083. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098011422572.
  • Gratton, N., R. Fox, and T. Elder. 2020. “Keep Talking: Messy Research in Times of Lockdown.” In Researching in the Age of COVID-19: Volume II: Care and Resilience, edited by H. Kara and S. Khoo, 101–110. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
  • Hastings, A. 2000. “Discourse Analysis: What Does It Offer Housing Studies?” Housing, Theory and Society 17 (3): 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036090051084441
  • Howlett, M. 2020. “Looking at the ‘Field’ Through a Zoom Lens: Methodological Reflections on Conducting Online Research During a Global Pandemic.” Qualitative Research 22 (3): 387–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120985691.
  • Huckin, T. N. 1997. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Functional Approaches to Written Text: Classroom Applications, edited by Tom Miller, 78-92. Washington, DC: English Language Programs United States Information Agency.
  • Jacobs, K. 2006. “Discourse Analysis and its Utility for Urban Policy Research.” Urban Policy and Research 24 (1): 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111140600590817.
  • Jeon, Y., and S. Kim. 2023. “Fear of Vacant Houses: Analyzing Perceptions on Housing Abandonment in Shrinking Inner-city Neighborhoods.” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 38 (3): 1819–1842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-023-10018-0.
  • Jones, A., and P. Dantzler. 2020. “Neighbourhood Perceptions and Residential Mobility.” Urban Studies 00(0): 1–19.
  • Kara, H. 2015. Creative Research Methods in the Social Sciences, A Practical Guide. Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Kearns, A., O. Kearns, and L. Lawson. 2013. “Notorious Places: Image, Reputation, Stigma.” The Role of Newspapers in Area Reputations for Social Housing Estates, Housing Studies 28 (4): 579–598.
  • Keats, P. A. 2009. “Multiple Text Analysis in Narrative Research: Visual, Written, and Spoken Stories of Experiences.” Qualitative Research 9 (2): 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794108099320.
  • Lam-Knott, S. 2020. “Reclaiming Urban Narratives: Spatial Politics and Storytelling Amongst Hong Kong Youths.” Space and Polity 24 (1): 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2019.1670052.
  • Lees, L. 2004. “Urban Geography: Discourse Analysis and Urban Research.” Progress in Human Geography 28 (1): 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132504ph473pr.
  • Liebenberg, L. 2019. “Thinking Critically About Photovoice: Achieving Empowerment and Social Change.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 17: 1–9.
  • MacLeavy, J. 2009. “(Re)Analysing Community Empowerment: Rationalities and Technologies of Government in Bristol’s New Deal for Communities.” Urban Studies 46 (4): 849–875. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009102132.
  • McIntyre, A. 2003. “Through the Eyes of Women: Photovoice and Participatory Research as Tools for Reimagining Place.” Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography 10 (1): 47–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369032000052658
  • Mendenhall, R., S. DeLuca, and G. Duncan. 2006. “Neighborhood Resources, Racial Segregation, and Economic Mobility: Results from the Gautreaux Program.” Social Science Research 35 (4): 892–923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2005.06.007.
  • Monno, V., and A. Khakee. 2012. “Tokenism or Political Activism? Some Reflections on Participatory Planning.” International Planning Studies 17 (1): 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2011.638181.
  • Moreira de Souza, T. 2019. “Urban Regeneration and Tenure mix: Exploring the Dynamics of Neighbour Interactions.” Housing Studies 34 (9): 1521–1542. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2019.1585520.
  • Partlow, E. 2020. “Prioritizing Inclusion, Ethical Practice and Accessibility During a Global Pandemic: The Role of the Researcher in Mindful Decision Making.” In Researching in the Age of COVID-19: Volume II: Care and Resilience, edited by H. Kara and S. Khoo, 121–130. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
  • Permentier, M., G. Bolt, and M. van Ham. 2011. “Determinants of Neighbourhood Satisfaction and Perception of Neighbourhood Reputation.” Urban Studies 48 (5): 977–996. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098010367860.
  • Permentier, M., M. van Ham, and G. Bolt. 2007. “Behavioural Responses to Neighbourhood Reputations.” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 22 (2): 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-007-9075-8.
  • Permentier, M., M. van Ham, and G. Bolt. 2008. “Same Neighbourhood … Different Views? A Confrontation of Internal and External Neighbourhood Reputations.” Housing Studies 23 (6): 833–855. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030802416619.
  • Richardson, T. 1996. “Foucauldian Discourse: Power and Truth in Urban and Regional Policy Making.” European Planning Studies 4 (3): 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654319608720346.
  • Richardson D. M., H. Pickus, and L. Parks. 2019. "Pathways to Mobility: Engaging Mexican American Youth Through Participatory Photo Mapping." Journal of Adolescent Research 34 (1): 55–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558417713303
  • Rose, G. 2016. Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials. London: Sage Publications.
  • Saldana, J. 2016. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. London: Sage Publications Inc.
  • Slater, T. 2021. “The Production and Activation of Territorial Stigma.” In Shaking Up the City, Ignorance, Inequality, and the Urban Question, edited by T. Slater, 137–163. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Souto-Manning, M. 2014. “Critical Narrative Analysis: The Interplay of Critical Discourse and Narrative Analyses.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 27 (2): 159–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2012.737046.
  • Teixeira, S. 2015. “It Seems Like No One Cares”: Participatory Photo Mapping to Understand Youth Perspectives on Property Vacancy.” Journal of Adolescent Research 30 (3): 390–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558414547098.
  • Teixeira, S., D. Hwang, B. Spielvogel, K. Cole, and R. L. Coley. 2020. “Participatory Photo Mapping to Understand Youths’ Experiences in a Public Housing Neighborhood Preparing for Redevelopment.” Housing Policy Debate 30 (5): 766–782. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2020.1741422.
  • Töppel, M., and C. Reichel. 2021. “Qualitative Methods and Hybrid Maps for Spatial Perception with an Example of Security Perception.” Urban Planning 6 (1): 105–119. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v6i1.3614.
  • Van Auken, P. M., S. V. Frisvoll, and S. I. Stewart. 2010. “Visualising Community: Using Participant-Driven Photo-Elicitation for Research and Application.” Local Environment 15 (4): 373–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549831003677670.
  • Wacquant, L. 2007. “Territorial Stigmatization in the age of Advanced Marginality.” Thesis Eleven 91 (1): 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513607082003.
  • Waitt, G. 2010. “Doing Foucauldian Discourse Analysis – Revealing Social Identities” in Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography, edited by I. Hay, 217–240. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Watt, P. 2008. “Underclass’ and ‘Ordinary People’ Discourses: Representing/re-Presenting Council Tenants in a Housing Campaign.” Critical Discourse Studies 5 (4): 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900802405288.