Embodying parkour’s visual subculture: ethos, style and the emergence of a visual habitus

References

• Archer, N. 2010. “Virtual Poaching and Altered Space: Reading Parkour in French Visual Culture.” Modern & Contemporary France 18 (1): 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639480903504284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, M. 2009. “Parkour, Anarcho-Environmentalism, and Poiesis.” Journal of Sport and Social Issues 33 (2): 169–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193723509332582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, C. 2004. Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice. London/New Delhi: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bavinton, N. 2007. “From Obstacle to Opportunity: Parkour, Leisure, and the Reinterpretation of Constraints.” Annals of Leisure Research 10 (3-4): 391–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/11745398.2007.9686773.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, J. 1972. Ways of Seeing. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction. A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1986. “The Forms of Capital.” In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, edited by J. G. Richardson, 241–258. Westport: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Brick, C. 2001. “Anti-consumption or ‘New’ Consumption? Commodification, Identity and ‘New’ Football.” In Leisure Cultures, Consumption and Commodification, edited by J. Horne, 3–15. Brighton: Leisure Studies Association.
   Google Scholar
• Borden, I. 2001. Skateboarding, Space and The City: Architecture and The Body. Oxford: Berg Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Crary, J. 1988. “Techniques of the Observer.” October 45: 3–35. https://doi.org/10.2307/779041.
   Google Scholar
• Daskalaki, M., A. Stara, and M. Imas. 2008. “The ‘Parkour Organisation’: Inhabitation of Corporate Spaces.” Culture and Organization 14 (1): 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759550701659029.
   Google Scholar
• Delanty, G. 2010. Community. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Diani, M. 2004. “Networks and Participation.” In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, and H. Kriesi, 339–359. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Fuggle, S. 2008. “Le Parkour: Reading or Writing the City.” In Rhythms: Essays in French Literature, Thought and Culture, edited by E. Lindley, and L. McMahon, 159–170. Oxford: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Geyh, P. 2006. “Urban Free Flow: A Poetics of Parkour.” M/C Journal 9: 3. https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.2635.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, M. 1995. Television, Ethnicity and Cultural Change. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., and A. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Gladden, J., and D. Funk. 2002. “Developing an Understanding of Brand Associations in Team Sports: Empirical Evidence from Consumers of Professional Sport.” Journal of Sport Management 16 (1): 54–81. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.16.1.54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gugutzer, R. 2004. “Trendsport im Schnittfeld von Körper, Selbst und Gesellschaft: Leib- und körpersoziologische Überlegungen.” Sport und Gesellschaft – Sport and Society 1 (3): 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1515/sug-2004-0305.
   Google Scholar
• Hebdige, D. 1979. Subculture: The Meaning of Style. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, M. (1927) 2006. Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Hietzge, M. 2014. “Freilaufen? Trendsportforschung aus dem Blickwinkel ihrer medialen Inszenierung am Beispiel eines Parkour Videos.” In Transkription von Video- und Filmdaten in der Qualitativen Sozialforschung. Multidisziplinäre Annäherungen an einen komplexen Datentypus, edited by Moritz Ch, 107–124. Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, S. Q. 2006. “Rethinking subcultural capital.” Young 2006 (3): 257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1103308806065820.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. (1781) 1995. Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Kidder, J. L. 2012. “Parkour, the Affective Appropriation of Urban Space, and the Real/Virtual Dialectic.” City & Community 11 (3): 229–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6040.2012.01406.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidder, J. L. 2013. “Parkour: Adventure, Risk, and Safety in the Urban Environment.” Qualitative Sociology 36 (3): 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-013-9254-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knorr Cetina, K. 2003. “From Pipes to Scopes: The Flow Architecture of Financial Markets.” Distinktion 7: 7–23.
   Google Scholar
• Knorr Cetina, K. 2005. “Complex Global Microstructures: The New Terrorist Societies.” Theory Culture Society 22 (5): 213–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276405057200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knorr Cetina, K., and B. Grimpe. 2008. “Global Financial Technologies: Scoping Systems That Raise the World.” In Living in a Material World: Economic Sociology Meets Science and Technology Studies, edited by T. J. Pinch, and R. Swedberg, 161–189. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ladewig, R. 2008. “Play, but Play Seriously: Zur medialen Inszenierung von Le Parkour.” Montage AV 17 (1): 109–130.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, M. D. 2014. “Self and the City: Parkour, Architecture, and the Interstices of the `Knowable`Citiy.” Liminalities: A Journal of Performance Studies 10 (2): 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Lauschke, A. 2010. Parkour: Subversive Choreographien des Urbanen. Marburg: Textum.
   Google Scholar
• Lünenborg, M., and T. Maier. 2019. “Analyzing Affective Media Practices by the Use of Video Analysis.” In Analyzing Affective Societies. Methods and Methodologies, edited by A. Kahl, 140–161. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945) 2005. Phenomenology of Perception. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Merritt, C. J., and I. J. Tharp. 2013. “Personality, Self-efficacy and Risk-taking in Parkour (Free-running).” Psychology of Sport and Exercise 14 (5): 608–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muggleton, D. 2000. Inside Subculture: The Postmodern Meaning of Style. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Muggleton, D., and R. Weinzierl. 2003. “What Is ‘Post-subcultural Studies’ Anyway?” In The Post-Subcultures Reader, edited by D. Muggleton, and R. Weinzierl, 3–23. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, M. R. 2012. “Figurative Hermeneutik. Zur methodologischen Konzeption einer Wissenssoziologie des Bildes.” sozialer sinn 13 (1): 129–162. https://doi.org/10.1515/sosi-2012-0107.
   Google Scholar
• Raab, J. 2008. Visuelle Wissenssoziologie. Theoretische Konzeption und materiale Analysen. Konstanz: UVK.
   Google Scholar
• Raymen, T. 2019. Parkour, Deviance and Leisure in the Late-Capitalist City: An Ethnography. Emerald: Bingley.
   Google Scholar
• Saville, S. J. 2008. “Playing with Fear: Parkour and the Mobility of Emotion.” Social & Cultural Geography 9 (8): 891–914. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360802441440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soeffner, H. G. 1995. Die Ordnung der Rituale: Die Auslegung des Alltags 2. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. 2017. “Parkour Can Be Dangerous—but More and More People Are Doing It.” National Geographic 26 October). https://www.nationalgeographic.com/adventure/features/parkour-urban-adventure-sport-photos/ (accessed 15 March 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Tappolet, C. 2016. Emotions, Value, and Agency. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, S. 1995. Club Cultures: Music, Media and Subcultural Capital. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, S. 1997. “General Introduction.” In The Subcultures Reader, edited by K. Gelder, and S. Thornton, 1–8. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Toscano, J. 2020. “Parkour as a Visual Urban Subculture: An Aesthetic Understanding of its Performative Scope.” Liminalities: A Journal of Performance Studies 16 (4): 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Von Busch, K., and I. Därmann. 2007. Pathos: Konturen eines kulturwissenschaflichen Grundbegriffs. Bielefeld: Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M. 2012. Affect and Emotion: A New Social Science Understanding. Los Angeles and London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wheaton, B., and B. Beal. 2003. “Keeping It Real’. Subcultural Media and the Discourses of Authenticity in Alternative Sport.” International Review For The Sociology of Sport 38 (2): 155–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690203038002002.
   Google Scholar
• Wheaton, B. 2007. “After Sport Culture. Rethinking Sport and Post-Subcultural Theory.” Journal of Sport and Social 31 (3): 283–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheaton, B. 2013. The Cultural Politics of Lifestyle Sports. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B., and B. Carrington. 2001. “One Continent under a Groove: Rethinking the Politics of Youth Subcultural Theory.” Soundscapes (on-line journal of media culture), 4. http://www.icce.rug.nl/∼soundscapes/.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. (1953) 2009. Philosophical Investigations II. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Films and videos
   Google Scholar
• Bretsch, D. 2011. Parkour. Der Weg ist das Ziel. Parkour One/Spiegel. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bYFIMrbZL4 (accessed 15 March 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Haluze, J. 2009. Parkour Project: Pilgrimage – Czech Subtitles. Available at: https://vimeo.com/5037001 (accessed 15 March 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Paul, J. 2017. Learn Parkour & Freerunning – Ultimate Tutorial for Beginners. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXTzunSQnGM (accessed 15 March 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Tapp, J. 2014. Ultimate Beginners Guide to Parkour – How to Get Started in Parkour Training. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NL0HYcrQupE (accessed 15 March 2021).
   Google Scholar
• teamfarang. 2019. Is social media killing parkour authenticity? | Hardcore Parkour Podcast. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAfsKQGWcvw (accessed 15 March 2021).
   Google Scholar