Global ambitions and local realities: achieving equity and sustainability in two high-value natural product trade chains

References

• [ACB] African Centre for Biosafety. 2008. Knowledge not for sale: Umckaloabo and the Pelargonium patent challenges. Briefing paperJohannesburg: African Centre for Biosafety.
   Google Scholar
• [ACB] African Centre for Biosafety. 2010a. Biopiracy under fire: the Pelargonium patent hearing. Briefing paper, 2010 JanJohannesburg: African Centre for Biosafety.
   Google Scholar
• [ACB] African Centre for Biosafety. 2010b. Joy as Pelargonium patent revoked. Press Release, 2010 Jan 26. Available from: http://www.acbio.org.za/index.php/media/64-media-releases/260-joy-as-pelargonium-patent-revoked.
   Google Scholar
• BrendlerT, van WykBE. 2008. A historical, scientific and commercial perspective on the medicinal use of Pelargonium sidoides (Geraniaceae). J Ethnopharmacol.119:420–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [CITES] Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna. 2004. Amendments to Appendices I and II of CITES. Proposal to the 13th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties; Oct 2–14 Bangkok, Thailand.
   Google Scholar
• Cronkleton P, Taylor PL, Barry D, Stone-Jovicich S, Schmink M. 2008. Environmental governance and the emergence of forest-based social movements, CIFOR Occasional Paper 49, Centre for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.
   Google Scholar
• CrouchN, DouwesaE, WolfsonM, SmithGF, EdwardsTJ. 2008. South Africa's bioprospecting, access and benefit-sharing legislation: current realities, future complications, and a proposed alternative. S Afr J Sci.104(Sep/Oct):355–366.
   Google Scholar
• [DEA] Department of Environmental Affairs. 2010. Biotraders' workshop on the Bioprospecting, Access and Benefit Sharing Regulations, 2010 Aug 5Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• [DEAT] Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism.2008. National environmental management: biodiversity act – regulations on bio-prospecting, Access and Benefit Sharing (R138 2008).
   Google Scholar
• De BeerJH, McDermottMJ. 1989. The economic value of non-timber forest products in Southeast Asia with emphasis on Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand. Amsterdam: Netherlands Committee for IUCN.
   Google Scholar
• DoveMR. 1995. Political versus techno-economic factors in the development of non-timber forest products: lessons from a comparison of natural and cultivated rubbers in Southeast Asia (and South America). Soc Nat Resour.8:193–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DutfieldG. 2002. Sharing the benefits of biodiversity: is there a role for the patent system?J Intellect Property. 5(6):899–932.
   Google Scholar
• GereffiG, HumphreyJ, SturgeonT. 2005. The governance of global value chains. Rev Int Polit Econ.12(1):1–27.
   Google Scholar
• GibbonP, PonteS. 2005. Trading down: Africa, value chains and the global economy. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harilal KN, Kanji N, Jeyaranjan J, Eapen M, Swaminathan P. 2006. Power in global value chains: implications for employment and livelihoods in the cashew nut industry in India. London: IIED.
   Google Scholar
• Homer-DixonT, BoutwellJ, RathjensG. 1993. Environmental change and violent conflict. Sci Am.268(Feb):38–45.
   Google Scholar
• HommaAKO. 1992. The dynamics of extraction in Amazonia: a historical perspective. Adv Econ Bot.9:23–31. New York Botanical Garden.
   Google Scholar
• KingSR, MezaEN, CarlsonTJS, ChinnockJA, MoranK, BorgesJR. 1999. Issues in the commercialisation of medicinal plants. Herbalgram. 47:46–51.
   Google Scholar
• LairdS, McLainRJ, WynbergRP, editors. 2009. Wild product governance – finding policies that work for non-timber forest products. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• [LECAWU] Lesotho Clothing & Allied Workers' Union. 2006. Highlights of current labor market conditions in Lesotho. Maseru.
   Google Scholar
• LeleS, PattanaikM, RaiDN. 2010. NTFPs in India: rhetoric and reality. In: LairdS, McLainRJ, WynbergRP, editors. Wild product governance – finding policies that work for non-timber forest products. London: Earthscan. p. 85–111.
   Google Scholar
• MorrisC. 2012. Pharmaceutical bioprospecting and the law: the case of Umckaloabo in a former Apartheid Homeland of South Africa. Anthropology News, 2012 Dec 3American Anthropological Association, Arlington, VA.
   Google Scholar
• NeumannRP, HirschE. 2000. Commercialisation of non-timber forest products: review and analysis of research. CIFOR, Bogor.
   Google Scholar
• NovellinoD. 2010. From indigenous customary practices to policy interventions: the ecological and socio-cultural underpinnings of the non-timber forest trade on Palawan Island, the Philippines. In: LairdS, McLainRJ, WynbergRP, editors. Wild product governance – finding policies that work for non-timber forest products. London: Earthscan. p. 183–197.
   Google Scholar
• Ntsebeza L. 2002. Decentralisation and natural resource management in rural South Africa: problems and prospects. Paper presented to the 9th Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property, Jun 17–21, Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe.
   Google Scholar
• RibotJ. 1995. From exclusion to participation – turning Senegal's forest policy around?World Dev.23(9):1587–1599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RijkersT, OgbazghiW, WesselM, BongersF. 2006. The effect of tapping for frankincense on sexual reproduction in Boswellia papyrifera. J Appl Ecol.43:1188–1195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [RSA] Republic of South Africa. 2013. National environmental management: biodiversity act (10/2004): biodiversity management plan for Pelargonium Sidoides in South Africa 2011–2020. Government Gazette No. 36411, 2013 Apr 26, Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• SchippmannU, LeamanDJ, CunninghamAB. 2002. Impact of cultivation and gathering of medicinal plants on biodiversity: global trends and issues. In: Biodiversity and the ecosystem approach in agriculture, forestry and fisheries. Satellite event on the occasion of the ninth regular session of the CGRFA, 2002 Oct 12–13, Rome.
   Google Scholar
• SchroederD, PisupatiB. 2010. Ethics, justice and the convention on biological diversity. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi and University of Central Lancashire, Preston.
   Google Scholar
• Schwabe Pharmaceuticals. 2010. Umckaloabo in discussion: current position and sustainability perspectives. Media Release, 2010 Apr 26.
   Google Scholar
• SunderlandTCH, HarrisonST, NdoyeO. 2004. Commercialisation of non-timber forest products in Africa: history, context and prospects. In: SunderlandT, NdoyeO, editors. Forest products, livelihoods and conservation. Case studies of non-timber forest product systems. Vol. 2 – Africa. Bogor: Centre for International Forestry Research. p. 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• TaylorM, WynbergR. 2008. Regulating access to South Africa's biodiversity and ensuring the fair sharing of benefits from its use. S Afr J Environ Sci Policy. 15(2):217–243.
   Google Scholar
• TiktinT, ShackletonC. 2011. Harvesting non-timber forest products sustainably: opportunities and challenges. In: ShackletonS, ShackletonC, ShanleyP, editors. Non-timber forest products in the global context. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. p. 149–169.
   Google Scholar
• TreibO, BahrH, FalknerG. 2007. Modes of governance: towards a conceptual clarification. J Eur Pub Policy.12(1):1–20.
   Google Scholar
• van NiekerkJ, WynbergP. 2012. The trade in Pelargoniumsidoides: rural livelihood relief or bounty for the ‘bio-buccaneers’?Dev S Afr.29(4):530–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WestawayA. 2012. Rural poverty in the Eastern Cape Province: legacy of apartheid or consequence of contemporary segregationism?Dev S Afr.29(1):115–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WhiteA, SloaneBL. 1937. The Stapelieae III. 2nd ed. Pasadena, CA: Abbey San Encino Press.
   Google Scholar
• WiersumKF, IngramVJ, Ros-TonenMAF. 2013. Governing access to resources and markets in non-timber forest product chains. For Trees Livelihoods. (in press).
   Google Scholar
• WynbergR. 2004. Rhetoric, realism and benefit-sharing – use of traditional knowledge of Hoodia species in the development of an appetite suppressant. World J Intellect Property. 6(7):851–876.
   Google Scholar
• WynbergR. 2010. Navigating a way through regulatory frameworks for Hoodia use, conservation, trade and benefit sharing. In: LairdS, McLainR, WynbergR, editors. Wild product governance: finding policies that work for non-timber forest products. London: Earthscan. p. 309–326.
   Google Scholar
• WynbergR, ChennellsR. 2009. Green diamonds of the South: an overview of the San-Hoodia case. In: WynbergR, SchroederD, ChennellsR, editors. Indigenous peoples, consent and benefit sharing: lessons from the San-Hoodia case. London: Springer. p. 89–124.
   Google Scholar
• WynbergRP, LairdSL. 2007. Bioprospecting: tracking the policy debate. Environment. 49(10):20–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WynbergR, SchroederD, WilliamsS, VermeylenS. 2009. Sharing benefits fairly: decision-making and governance. In: WynbergR, SchroederD, ChennellsR, editors. Indigenous peoples, consent and benefit sharing: lessons from the San-Hoodia case. London: Springer. p 231–257.
   Google Scholar