Deforestation control policies in Brazil: sovereignty versus the market

References

• ABIOVE (Brazilian Vegetable Oil Industries Association). 2014. New agenda for soybeans in the Amazon biome. São Paulo (Brazil). Available from: www.abiove.com.br.
   Google Scholar
• Arima EY, Barreto P, Araújo E, Soares-Filho B. 2014. Public policies can reduce tropical deforestation: lessons and challenges from Brazil. Land Use Policy. 41:465–473. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.06.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assunção J, Gandour C, Rocha Ru. 2012. Deforestation slowdown in the legal Amazon: prices or policies? Rio de Janeiro (Brazil): PUC-RIO. Climate Policy Initiative Rio de Janeiro, Nucleo de Avaliação de Politicas Climaticas.
   Google Scholar
• Assunção J, Gandour C, Rocha Ro, Rocha Ru. 2013. Does credit affect deforestation? Evidence from a rural credit policy in the Brazilian Amazon. Rio de Janeiro (Brazil): PUC-RIO. Climate Policy Initiative Rio de Janeiro, Nucleo de Avaliação de Politicas climaticas.
   Google Scholar
• Aubertin C. 2012. Repensar o desenvolvimento mundial: o Brasil se coloca em cena na Rio+20. [Rethinking world development: Brazil takes the stage in Rio+20]. Revista de Direito Internacional. Edição especial: Direito Internacional Ambiental, Brasília. 9(3):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• BNDES (Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social). 2012. Amazon fund management. Three years in operation. Rio de Janeiro, october 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Becker BK. 2005. Amazônia: geopolitica na virada do III milênio [Amazon: geopolitics at the turn of the millennium III]. Saõ Paulo: Ed. Garamond.
   Google Scholar
• Boisvert V, Méral P, Froger G. 2013. Market-based instruments for ecosystem services: institutional innovation or renovation? Soc Nat Res. 26(10):1122–1136. doi:10.1080/08941920.2013.820815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho Filho O. 2012. Posicionamento dos Atores brasileiros e Categorias de analise [Positioning of Brazilian Actors and categories of analysis]. In: Proceeding of the restitution project paying for the environment?  CIRAD, GRET, Brasilia, 2012 Oct 23.
   Google Scholar
• Daily GC. 1997. Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engel S, Pagiola S, Wunder S. 2008. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecol Econ. 65(4):663–674. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fundo Amazônia. 2014. Portoflolio report, December 31, 2014. Available from: http://www.fundoamazonia.gov.br.
   Google Scholar
• GCF (Governors' Task Force on Climate and Forests). 2014. Contribuições para a estratégia nacional de REDD+: uma proposta de alocação entre estados e União [Contributions to national REDD+ strategy]. Manaus (Brazil): IDESAM.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs HK, Rausch L, Munger J, Schelly I, Morton DC, Noojipady P, Soares-Filho B, Barreto P, Micol L, Walker NF. 2015. Brazil's soy moratorium. Science. 347(6220):377–378. doi:10.1126/science.aaa0181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godar J, Gardner TA, Tizado EJ, Pacheco P. 2014. Actor-specific contributions to the deforestation slowdown in the Brazilian Amazon. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 111(43):15591–15596. doi:10.1073/pnas.1322825111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-baggethun E, de groot R, Lomas PL, Montes C. 2010. The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecol Econ. 69(6):1209–1218. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall A. 2012. Forests and climate change. The social dimensions of REDD in Latin America. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht SB. 2012. From eco-catastrophe to zero deforestation? Interdisciplinarities, politics, environmentalisms and reduced clearing in Amazonia. Environ Conserv. 39(1):4–19. doi:10.1017/S0376892911000452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IFF (Interim Forest Finance). 2014. Stimulating interim demand for REDD+ emission reductions: the need for a strategic intervention from 2015 to 2020, January 2014.
   Google Scholar
• IMAZON (Instituto do Homem e Meio Ambiente da Amazônia), Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV-CVes. 2012. Marcoregulatorio sobre PSA no Brasil [Regulatory framework sobre PSE]. Available from: http://imazon.org.br/PDFimazon/Portugues/livros/Marco%20Regulatorio%20PSA.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ISA (Instituto SocioAmbiental). 2010. Desmatamento evitado (REDD) e povos indígenas: experiências, desafios e oportunidades no contexto amazônico [Avoided deforestation (REDD) and indigenous peoples]. São Paulo.
   Google Scholar
• TEEB. 2010. The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: ecological and economic foundations. In: Kumar P, editor. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• MCT (Ministério da Ciência e da Tecnologia). 2010. Segunda Comunicação Nacional do Brasil à Convenção-Quadro das Nações Unidas sobre Mudança do Clima [Second National Communication of Brazil to the UNFCCC]. Coordenação-Geral de Mudanças Globais do Clima. 2v. Brasília.
   Google Scholar
• MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• MMA (Ministerio do Meio Ambiente). 2013. Estrategia nacional de REDD do Brasil [REDD+ national strategy]. Documento para consulta publica. Secretaria de Mudanças Climáticas e Qualidade Ambiental, Brasilia.
   Google Scholar
• MMA-SMCQ-IDESAM. 2012. REDD+ nos estados da Amazônia: mapeamento de iniciativas e desafios para integração com a estrategia brasileira [REDD+ in the amazonian states]. 2a edição, nov. de 2012.
   Google Scholar
• MMA-CNUC (Ministerio do Meio Ambiente), Cadastro nacional das unidades de conservação. 2014. Tabela consolidada das Unidades de Conservação [Consolidated statement of conservation units]. [cited 2014 Oct 27]. Available from: http://www.mma.gov.br/cadastro_uc.
   Google Scholar
• Margulis S. 2004. Causes of deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon. World Bank. Working Paper 22.
   Google Scholar
• Nepstad D, McGrath D, Stickler C, Alencar A, Azevedo A, Swette B, Bezerra T, DiGiano M, Shimada J, Seroa da Motta R, et al. 2014. Slowing Amazon deforestation through public policy and interventions in beef and soy supply chains. Science. 344(6188):1118–1123. doi:10.1126/science.1248525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norgaard RB. 2010. Ecosystem services: from eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder. Ecol Econ. 69(6):1219–1227. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagiola S, Bishop J, Landell-Mills N. 2002. Selling forest environmental services: market-based mechanisms for conservation and development. Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Pires MO. 2013. O cadastro ambiental rural: das origens às perspectivas para a política ambiental [The environmental register for rural properties: from origins to the prospects for environmental policy]. Brasília: Projeto Inovacar, Conservação Internacional.
   Google Scholar
• Presidência da Republica. 2010. Decreto n° 7.390, de 9 de dezembro de 2010. Regulamenta os arts. 6°, 11 e 12 Lei n° 12.187, de 29 de dezembro de 2009, que institui a Política Nacional sobre Mudança do Clima – PNMC, e dá outras providências [Decree 7390 of 9 December 2010. Regulates the arts. 68, 11 and 12, Law 12.187 of December 29, 2009, establishing the National Policy on Climate Change].
   Google Scholar
• Rudorff BFT, Adami M, Aguiar DA, Moreira MA, Mello MP, Fabiani L, Amaral DF, Pires BM. 2011. The soy moratorium in the Amazon biome monitored by remote sensing images. Remote Sens. 3(12):185–202. doi:10.3390/rs3010185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santilli M, Moutinho P, Schwartzman S, Nepstad D, Curran L, Nobre C. 2003. Tropical deforestation and the kyoto protocol: an editorial essay. Paper presented at COP 9. UNFCCC, December 2003, Milan, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• SEEG (Greenhouse Gas Emission Estimate System). 2014. Tabela geral de emissões. [cited 2014 Dec 06]. Available from: http://www.seeg.eco.br.
   Google Scholar
• Soares Filho B. 2013. Impacto da revisão do Código Florestal: como viabilizar o grande desafio adiante? [Impact of the revision of the Forest Code: How to enable the great challenge ahead?]. Secretaria de Assuntos Estratégicos/Presidência da República. Desenvolvimento Sustentável. Brasília.
   Google Scholar
• Soares Filho B, Rajão R, Macedo M, Carneiro A, Costa W, Coe M, Rodrigues H, Alencar A. 2014. Cracking Brazil's Forest Code. Science. 344:363–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tietenberg T. 1999. Tradable permit approaches to pollution control: Faustian bargain or paradise regained. In: Property rights, economics, and the environment. Stamford, CT. [cited 2003 August 28]. Available from:http://www.colby.edu/personal/thtieten/MSPap.pdf JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Toni F, Ferreira IAR, Ferreira INR. 2011. Adaptação institucional entre povos tradicionais: os projetos de REDD+ nos territórios indígenas dos Suruí e dos Cinta Larga, IX Encontro nacional da Sociedade Brasileira de Economia Ecologica, Outubro de 2011, Brasília.
   Google Scholar
• Valeriano DM, Escada MIS, Câmara G, Amaral LS, Maurano LE, Renno CD, Almeida CA, Monteiro AMV. 2012. O Monitoramento do Desmatamento [Deforestation Monitoring]. In: Martine G, Ojima R, Barbieri AF, Carmo RD, editors. População e Sustentabilidade na era das mudanças ambientais globais: Contribuições para uma Agenda Brasileira. Belo Horizonte: ABEP; p. 223–238.
   Google Scholar
• Viana V, Cenamo M, Manfrinato W. 2005. Reducing emissions from deforestation in Amazonas, Brazil: a state government's proposal for action. Discussion paper for COP11, United Nations framework convention on climate change, Montréal, Canada.
   Google Scholar