‘Did you enjoy your holiday?’ Can residential outdoor learning benefit mainstream schooling?

References

• Amos, R., & Reiss, M. (2011). The benefits of residential fieldwork for school science: Insights from a five-year initiative for inner-city students in the UK. International Journal of Science Education, 34(4), 485–511. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.585476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakeman, R. (1992). Understanding social science statistics: A spreadsheet approach. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Barret, J., & Greenaway, R. (1995). Why adventure? Coventry: Foundation for Outdoor Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Beames, S., Atencio, M., & Ross, H. (2009). Taking excellence outdoors. Scottish Educational Review, 41(2), 32–45.
   Google Scholar
• Cason, D., & Gillis, H. (1994). A meta-analysis of outdoor adventure programming with adolescents. Journal of Experiential Education, 17(1), 40–47.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, B., & Higgins, P. (2012). Residential outdoor learning experiences and Scotland’s school curriculum: An empirical and philosophical consideration of progress, connection and relevance. Scottish Educational Review, 44(2), 45–59.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, E. (2004). Raising achievement in Scottish secondary schools? A study of outdoor experiential learning (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, G. (2004). Changing roles for outdoor education centres. Walsall: National Association for Environmental Education.
   Google Scholar
• Coopersmith, S. (1959). A method for determining types of self-esteem. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59(1), 87–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J., & Garrett, A. (2008). The ‘movement’ of mixed methods research and the role of educators. South African Journal of Education, 28(3), 321–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLisle, J. (2011). The benefits and challenges of mixing methods and methodologies. Caribbean Curriculum, 18, 87–120.
   Google Scholar
• Feilzer, M. (2010). Doing mixed methods research pragmatically: Implications for the rediscovery of pragmatism as a research paradigm. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(1), 6–16. doi:10.1177/1558689809349691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielding, N. (2010). Mixed methods research in the real world. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(2), 127–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvberj, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1991). The tensions between education and development. Journal of Moral Education, 20(2), 113–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1999). Are there additional intelligences? The case for naturalist, spiritual, and existential intelligences. In J. Cain (Ed.), Education: Information and transformation (pp. 111–132). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. (2008). Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology?. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(1), 7–22. doi:10.1177/1558689807309969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., Marsh, H., Neill, J., & Richards, G. (1997). Adventure education and Outward Bound: Out-of-class experiences that make a lasting difference. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 43–87. doi:10.3102/00346543067001043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, P. (1995). Outdoor education provision at Moray House Institute of Education. Scottish Journal of Physical Education, 23(3), 4–11.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, D., & Putnam, R. (1993). Personal growth through adventure? Abingdon: David Fulton Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R., & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. doi:10.3102/0013189X033007014
   Google Scholar
• Learning and Teaching Scotland. (2000). The structure and balance of the curriculum. Glasgow: Learning and Teaching Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Learning and Teaching Scotland. (2010a). Curriculum for excellence through outdoor learning. Glasgow: Learning and Teaching Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Learning and Teaching Scotland. (2010b). Curriculum for excellence. Glasgow: Learning and Teaching Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Mannion, G., Doyle, L., Sankey, K., Mattu, L., & Wilson, M. (2007). Young people’s interaction with natural heritage through outdoor learning. Retrieved May 1, 2011, from http://www.snh.org.uk/pdfs/publications/commissioned_reports/ReportNo225.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mayo, E. (1933). The human problems of an industrial civilization. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mortlock, C. (1984). The adventure alternative. Milnthorpe: Cicerone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neill, J. (1999). The melting pot of outdoor education effects: Testing the flavours of the programme type, distribution and participant age. In Proceedings of the 11th National Conference of the Camping and Outdoor Education Association of Western Australia, 1991, Perth, WA (pp. 112–118).
   Google Scholar
• Neill, J., & Flory, M. (1999). ‘Girlz in the wood’: A pilot study of the effects of courses on adolescents’ personal effectiveness and self-esteem. Boulder, CO: The Women’s Wilderness Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Neill, J., Marsh, H., & Richards, G. (1997). The Life Effectiveness Questionnaire: Development and psychometrics. University of Western Sydney. Unpublished document.
   Google Scholar
• Neill, J., & Richards, G. (1998). Does outdoor education really work? A summary of recent meta-analyses. Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 3(1), 2–9.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, R. (2001). Outdoor education for sustainable living?: An investigation into the potential of Scottish local authority residential outdoor centres to deliver programmes relating to sustainable living (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, R., Higgins, P., Ross, H., & Mannion, G. (2007). Outdoor education in Scotland: A summary of recent research. Perth: Scottish Natural Heritage.
   Google Scholar
• North Lanarkshire Council. (1998). Raising achievement for all: A draft policy framework (amended version following consultation). Unpublished document.
   Google Scholar
• Rickinson, M., Dillon, J., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D., & Benefield, P. (2004). A review of research on outdoor learning. Shrewsbury: National Foundation for Educational Research and King’s College London.
   Google Scholar
• Robson, C. (2004). Real world research. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salkind, N. (2000). Statistics for people who think they hate statistics. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Office Education Department. (1991). Personal and social development 5–14: Curriculum and assessment in Scotland national guidelines. Glasgow: Learning and Teaching Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, P. (2007). Residential outdoor education in Scotland (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Stirling, Stirling.
   Google Scholar
• Telford, J. (2010). Meanings, values, and life course: A study of participants’ experiences at a Scottish outdoor education centre (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Waite, S. (2010, September 22–25). Pedagogies in the outdoors: A tale of two (?) places. Paper presented at Encountering, Experiencing and Exploring Nature in Education, 10th Annual European Institute for Outdoor Adventure Education And Experiential Learning, Slovenia.
   Google Scholar