Professional judgement and decision-making in the planning process of high-level adventure sports coaching practice

References

• Abraham, A., & Collins, D. (2011). Taking the next step: Ways forward for coaching science. Quest, 63(4), 366–384. doi:10.1080/00336297.2011.10483687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronson, J. (1994). A pragmatic view of thematic analysis. The Qualitative Report, 2(1), 1–3. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/BackIssues/QR2-1/aronson.html
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D., & Ball-King, L. (2013). Safety management and public spaces: restoring balance. Risk Analysis, 33(5), 763–771. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01900.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bannigan, K., & Morres, A. (2009). A model of p thinking: Integrating reflective practice and evidence based practice. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76(5), 342–350. Retrieved from http://cjo.sagepub.com
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Breakwell, G. M. (2007). The psychology of risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cain, K. D., & McAvoy, L. H. (1990). Experience based judgement. In J. C. Miles & S. Priest (Eds.), Adventure education (pp. 241–250). State College, PA: Venture Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cleermans, A., & Jimenez, L. (2002). Implicit learning and consciousness: A graded, dynamical perspective. In R. M. French & A. Cleeremans (Eds.), Implicit learning and consciousness: An empirical, philosophical and computational consensus in the making (pp. 1–40). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1994). Research methods in education (4th ed.). London, UK: Routeledge.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, L., & Collins, D. (2013). Decision-making and risk management in adventure sports coaching. Quest, 65(1), 72–82. doi:10.1080/00336297.2012.727373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, L., & Collins, D. (2014). Integration of in-action reflective practice as a component of professional judgment and decision making in high level adventure sports coaching practice. Journal of Sports Science. doi:10.1080/02640414.2014.953980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, L., Collins, D., & Grecic, D. (2014). The epistemological chain in high level adventure sports coaches. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 15(3), 224–238. doi:10.1080/14729679.2014.950592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crabtree, B. F., & Miller, W. L. (1999). Using codes and code manuals: A template organizing style of interpretation. In B. F. Crabtree & W. L. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 163–177). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Donaghy, M. E., & Morss, K. (2000). Guided reflection: A framework to facilitate and assess reflective practice within the discipline of physiotherapy. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 16(1), 3–14. doi:10.1080/095939800307566
   Google Scholar
• Drury, J., Bonney, B., Berman, D., & Wagstaff, M. (2005). The back country classroom: Lesson plans for teaching in the wilderness (2nd ed.). Guilford, CY: The Globe Pequot press.
   Google Scholar
• Effken, J. A. (2001). Nursing theory and concept development and analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 34(2), 246–260. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01751.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• English, I. (1993). Intuition as a function of the expert nurse: A critique of Benner’s novice to expert model. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 18(3), 387–393. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1993.18030387.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92. Retrieved from http://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/5_1/html/fereday.htm
   Google Scholar
• Galloway, S. (2005). Judgment and decision-making in outdoor leadership: Critical factors, common missteps, and keys to success. In Proceedings of the 2005 National Conference on Outdoor Leadership (pp. 69–73). Dresden, OH: Wilderness Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Galloway, S. (2007). Experience and medical decision making in outdoor leaders. Journal of Experiential Education, 30(2), 99–116. doi:10.5193/JEE.30.2.99
   Google Scholar
• Loland, S. (2007). Outline of a phenomenology of snowboarding. In M. McNamee (Ed.), Philosophy, Risk and Adventure Sports. London: Routledge, Taylor Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Lyle, J. (2003). Stimulated recall: A report on its use in naturalistic research. British Educational Research Journal, 29(6), 861–878. doi:10.1080/0141192032000137349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyle, J., & Cushion, C. (2010). Sports coaching: Professionalization and practice. London, UK: Churchhill Livingstone.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, B., Cashel, C., Wagstaff, M., & Breunig, M. (2006). Outdoor leadership. theory and practice. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Martindale, A., & Collins, D. (2010). But why does what works work? A response to Fifer, Henschen, Gould, and Ravizza. The Sport Psychologist, 24(1), 113–116. Retrieved from http://journals.humankinetics.com/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCammon, I. (2004). Heuristic traps in recreational avalanche accidents: Evidence and implications. Avalanche News, 68(1), 1–10. Retrieved from http://avtrainingadmin.org/pubs/McCammonHTraps.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Militello, L. G., & Hutton, R. J. (1998). Applied cognitive task analysis (ACTA): A practitioner’s toolkit for understanding cognitive task demands. Ergonomics, 41, 1618–1641. doi:10.1080/001401398186108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow, S. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counselling psychology. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 52(2), 250–260. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moshman, D. (2000). Diversity in reasoning and rationality: Meta cognitive and developmental considerations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 689–690. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00483433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muir, T., & Beswick, K. (2007). Stimulating reflection on practice: Using the supportive classroom reflection process. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 8, 74–93. Retrieved from http://www.merga.net.au/node/42
   Google Scholar
• Nash, C., & Collins, D. (2006). Tacit knowledge in expert coaching: Science or art? Quest, 58(4), 465–477. doi:10.1080/00336297.2006.10491894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, C., Martindale, R., Collins, D., & Martindale, A. (2012). Parameterising expertise in coaching: Past, present and future. Journal of Sports Sciences, 10, 985–994. doi:10.1080/02640414.2012.682079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priest, S., & Gass, M. A. (2005). Effective leadership in adventure programming (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenstein, B. (2002). Video use in social science research and program evaluation. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(3), 22–43. Retrieved from http://www.ualberta.ca/~ijqm
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A. (2011). Evaluating the contribution of interpretative phenomenological analysis. Health and Psychology Review, 5(1), 9–27. doi:10.1080/17437199.2010.510659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2012). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sparkes, A. (1998). Validity in qualitative inquiry and the problem of criteria: Implications for sport psychology. The Sport Psychologist, 12(4), 363–386. Retrieved from http://journals.humankinetics.com/tsp
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(5), 645–665. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00003435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stemba, B. (2005, February 18–20). Traps and tips of decision making for outdoor leaders (p. 124). Proceedings of the 2005 national conference on Outdoor Leadership, YMCA of the Rockies – Estes Park, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C., & Dowding, D. (2002). Decision making and judgment in nursing: An introduction. London, UK: Churchill Livingston.
   Google Scholar