794
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

5th–10th-grade in-service teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) for sustainable development in outdoor environment

&

References

  • Abd‐El‐Khalick, F., Boujaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok‐Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., … Tuan, H. L. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397–419.
  • Ampuero, D., Miranda, C. E., Delgado, L. E., Goyen, S., & Weaver, S. (2015). Empathy and critical thinking: Primary students solving local environmental problems through outdoor learning. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 15(1), 64–78.
  • Bentsen, P., Jensen, F. S., Mygind, E., & Randrup, T. B. (2010). The extent and dissemination of udeskole in Danish schools. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 9(3), 235–243.
  • Blatt, E., & Patrick, P. (2014). An exploration of pre-service teachers’ experiences in outdoor ‘places’ and intentions for teaching in the outdoors. International Journal of Science Education, 36(13), 2243–2264.
  • Burmeister, M., Rauch, F., & Eilks, I. (2012). Education for sustainable development (ESD) and chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13(2), 59–68.
  • Dillon, J. (2012). Science, the environment and education beyond the classroom. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 1081–1095). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
  • Dillon, J., Rickinson, M., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D., & Benefield, P. (2006). The value of outdoor learning: Evidence from research in the UK and elsewhere. School Science Review, 87(320), 107–111.
  • Education Review Office. (2011). Education outside the classroom: Schools’ use of EOTC guidelines | Full report (pdf). Retrieved from Wellington: https://thehub.sia.govt.nz/assets/documents/Education-Outside-the-Classroom-Schools-Use-of-EOTC-Guidelines-October-2011.pdf
  • European Commission. (2007). Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
  • Fägerstam, E. (2014). High school teachers’ experience of the educational potential of outdoor teaching and learning. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 14(1), 56–81.
  • Fägerstam, E., & Blom, J. (2013). Learning biology and mathematics outdoors: Effects and attitudes in a Swedish high school context. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 13(1), 56–75.
  • Fischer, H. E., Borowski, A., & Tepner, O. (2012). Professional knowledge of science teachers. In B. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 435–448). New York: Springer.
  • Gardner, H. (1991). The unschooled mind: How children think and how schools should teach. New York: Basic Books Inc.
  • Gilbert, J. K. (2006). On the nature of “context” in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 957–976.
  • Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. (2007). Children’s cognitive development and learning (Vol. Research Survey 2/1a). Cambridge: University of Cambridge Faculty of Education.
  • Hashweh, M. Z. (1996). Effects of science teachers’ epistemological beliefs in teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: the Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 33(1), 47–63.
  • Jegstad, K. M., Gjøtterud, S. M., & Sinnes, A. T. (2018). Science teacher education for sustainable development: A case study of a residential field course in a Norwegian pre-service teacher education programme. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 18(2), 99–114.
  • Lock, R. (2010). Biology fieldwork in schools and colleges in the UK: An analysis of empirical research from 1963 to 2009. Journal of Biological Education, 44(2), 58–64.
  • Lugg, A. (2007). Developing sustainability-literate citizens through outdoor learning: Possibilities for outdoor education in higher education. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 7(2), 97–112.
  • Lugg, A., & Slattery, D. (2003). Use of national parks for outdoor environmental education: An Australian case study. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 3(1), 77–92.
  • Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Marcum-Dietrich, N., Marquez, L., Gill, S. E., & Medved, C. (2011). No teacher left inside: Preparing a new generation of teachers. Journal of Geoscience Education, 59(1), 1–4.
  • Ministry of Education and Research. (2017). Overordna del – Verdiar og prinsipp for grunnopplæringa [Core curriculum - quality framework]. Regjeringen.no. Retrieved from https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/37f2f7e1850046a0a3f676fd45851384/overordnet-del—verdier-og-prinsipper-for-grunnopplaringen.pdf
  • Nadelson, L. S., & Jordan, J. R. (2012). Student attitudes toward and recall of outside day: An environmental science field trip. The Journal of Educational Research, 105(3), 220–231.
  • Nilsson, P. (2014). When teaching makes a difference: Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge through learning study. International Journal of Science Education, 36(11), 1794–1814.
  • Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. (2013). Natural science subject curriculum (NAT1-03/Naturfag). Retrieved from https://www.udir.no/kl06/NAT1-03
  • Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. (2019). Høring - læreplaner i naturfag [Consultation draft - natural science curriculum]. Retrieved from https://hoering.udir.no/Hoering/v2/346?notatId=659
  • Paulus, S. C. (2016). Exploring a pluralist understanding of learning for sustainability and its implications for outdoor education practice. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 16(2), 117–130.
  • Pilot, A., & Bulte, A. M. (2006). The use of “contexts” as a challenge for the chemistry curriculum: Its successes and the need for further development and understanding. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 1087–1112.
  • Priest, S. (1986). Redefining outdoor education: A matter of many relationships. The Journal of Environmental Education, 17(3), 13–15.
  • Prince, H. E. (2017). Outdoor experiences and sustainability. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 17(2), 161–171.
  • Remmen, K. B., & Frøyland, M. (2014). Implementation of guidelines for effective fieldwork designs: Exploring learning activities, learning processes, and student engagement in the classroom and the field. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 23(2), 103–125.
  • Remmen, K. B., & Frøyland, M. (2017). «Utvidet klasserom»–Et verktøy for å designe uteundervisning i naturfag. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 13(2), 218–229.
  • Rundgren, C.-J., & Rundgren, S.-N. C. (2018). Aiming for responsible and competent citizenship through teacher professional development on teaching socioscientific inquiry-based learning (SSIBL). Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 19(2), Article 2.
  • Rundgren, S.-N. C. (2015). Is the moon more round in the Western world? Some important aspects of comparative education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10(3), 707–718.
  • Sandell, K., & Öhman, J. (2010). Educational potentials of encounters with nature: Reflections from a Swedish outdoor perspective. Environmental Education Research, 16(1), 113–132.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23.
  • Skår, M., Wold, L. C., Gundersen, V., & O’Brien, L. (2016). Why do children not play in nearby nature? Results from a Norwegian survey. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 16(3), 239–255.
  • Stuckey, M., Hofstein, A., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Eilks, I. (2013). The meaning of ‘relevance’in science education and its implications for the science curriculum. Studies in Science Education, 49(1), 1–34.
  • Ulset, V., Vitaro, F., Brendgen, M., Bekkhus, M., & Borge, A. I. (2017). Time spent outdoors during preschool: Links with children’s cognitive and behavioral development. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 52, 69–80.
  • UN World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • UNESCO. (2015). Education 2030 Incheon declaration and framework for action. Paris: Author.
  • United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York: Author.
  • Vadala, C. E., Bixler, R. D., & James, J. J. (2007). Childhood play and environmental interests: Panacea or snake oil? The Journal of Environmental Education, 39(1), 3–18.
  • Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: the Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137–158.
  • Wong, D., & Pugh, K. (2001). Learning science: A Deweyan perspective. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 317–336.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.