3,721
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Norwegian teenagers’ experiences of developing second language fluency in an outdoor context

& ORCID Icon

References

  • Allen, H. W., & Herron, C. (2003). A mixed-methodology investigation of the linguistic and affective outcomes of summer study abroad. Foreign Language Annals, 36(3), 370–385.
  • Beames, S., & Ross, H. (2010). Journeys outside the classroom. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 10(2), 95–109.
  • Bølling, M., Otte, C. R., Elsborg, P., Nielsen, G., & Bentsen, P. (2018). The association between education outside the classroom and students’ school motivation: Results from a one-school-year quasi-experiment. International Journal of Educational Research, 89, 22–35.
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
  • Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communivcative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1–47.
  • Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. London: Sage.
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
  • DeKeyser, R. (2012). Cognitive bases of second language fluency. norman segalowitz. london: routledge, 2010. pp. xvii + 220. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(1), 158-160. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263111000544
  • Derwing, T. M. (2017). L2 fluency development. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 246–259). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Dettweiler, U., Becker, C., Auestad, B. H., Simon, P., & Kirsch, P. (2017). Stress in school. Some empirical hints on the circadian cortisol rhythm of children in outdoor and indoor classes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(5), 475.
  • Dettweiler, U., Unlu, A., Lauterbach, G., Becker, C., & Gschrey, B. (2015). Investigating the motivational behaviour of pupils during outdoor science teaching within self-determination theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00125
  • Dewaele, J.-M. (2002). Psychological and sociodemographic correlates of communicative anxiety in L2 and L3 production. International Journal of Bilingualism, 6(1), 23–38.
  • Dismore, H., & Bailey, R. (2005). “If only”: Outdoor and adventurous activities and generalised academic development. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 5(1), 9–19.
  • Elkhafaifi, H. (2008). Listening comprehension and anxiety in the arabic language classroom. The Modern Language, 89(2), 206–220.
  • Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Fägerstam, E. (2014). High school teachers’ experience of the educational potential of outdoor teaching and learning. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 14(1), 56–81.
  • Fägerstam, E., & Blom, J. (2013). Learning biology and mathematics outdoors: Effects and attitudes in a Swedish high school context. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 13(1), 56–75.
  • Fägerstam, E., & Grothérus, A. (2018). Secondary school students’ experience of outdoor learning: A Swedish case study. Education, 138(4), 378–392.
  • Fägerstam, E., & Samuelsson, J. (2014). Learning arithmetic outdoors in junior high school - influence on performance and self-regulating skills. Education 3-13, 42(4), 419–431.
  • Fiskum, T. A. (2014). Uteområdet til inspirasjon og motivasjon for allsidig aktivitet [The outdoors as inspiration and motivation for varied activities]. In T. A. Fiskum & J. A. Husby (Eds.), Uteskoledidaktikk (pp. 70–80). Oslo: Cappelen Damm akademisk.
  • Fiskum, T. A., & Jacobsen, K. (2012a). Individual differences and possible effects from outdoor education: Long time and short time benefits. World Journal of Education, 2(4). doi:https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v2n4p20
  • Fiskum, T. A., & Jacobsen, K. (2012b). Relation between the school environment and the children’s behaviour. The Open Education Journal, 5(1), 39–51.
  • Fiskum, T. A., & Jacobsen, K. (2015). Children with reading disabilities and outdoor education. International Education Research, 3(4), 1–15.
  • Freed, B., Segalowitz, N., & Dewey, D. (2004). Context of learning and second language fluency in French: Comparing regular classroom, study abroad, and intensive domestic immersion programs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 275–301.
  • Gardner, R. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (1993). On the measurement of affective variables in second language learning. Language Learning, 43(2), 157–194.
  • Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Gregersen, T. (2003). To err is human: A reminder to teachers of language-anxious students. Foreign Language Annals, 36(1), 25–32.
  • Harris, F. (2017). The nature of learning at forest school: Practitioners’ perspectives. Education 3-13, 45(2), 272–291.
  • Hartmeyer, R., & Mygind, E. (2016). A retrospective study of social relations in a Danish primary school class taught in “udeskole”. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 16(1), 78–89.
  • Heft, H. (1988). Affordances of children’s environments: A functional approach to environmental description. Children’s Environments Quarterly, 5(3), 29–37.
  • Horwitz, E. K. (1996). Even teachers get the blues: Recognizing and alleviating language teachers’ feelings of foreign language anxiety. Foreign Language Annals, 29(3), 365–372.
  • Horwitz, E. K. (2010). Foreign and second language anxiety. Language Teaching, 43(2), 154–167.
  • Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132.
  • Housen, A., & Kuiken, F. (2009). Complexity, accuracy and fluency (CAF) in second language acquisition research [Special Issue]. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 461–601.
  • Hymes, D. H. (1972). On communicative competence. Great Britain: Penguin Books.
  • Jordet, A. N. (1998). Nærmiljøet som klasserom: Uteskole i teori og praksis [The nearby surroundings as classroom: Outdoor education in theory and practice]. Oslo: Cappelen akademisk forl.
  • Kleinmann, H. (1977). Avoidance behavior in adult second language acquisition. Language Learning, 27, 93–107.
  • Kyttä, M. (2002). Affordances of children’s environments in the context of cities, small towns, suburbs and rural villages in Finland and Belarus. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22(1–2), 109–123.
  • Kyttä, M. (2004). The extent of children’s independent mobility and the number of actualized affordances as criteria for child-friendly environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(2), 179–198.
  • Littlewood, W. (2014). Communication-oriented language teaching: Where are we now? Where do we go from here? Language Teaching, 47(3), 349–362.
  • Long, M. H., & Porter, P. A. (1985). Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19(2), 207–228.
  • MacIntyre, P. D. (2007). Willingness to communicate in the second language: Understanding the decision to speak as a volitional process. Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 564–576.
  • MacIntyre, P. D., Baker, S. C., Clement, R., & Donovan, L. A. (2003). Talking in order to learn: Willingness to communicate and intensive language programs. Canadian Modern Language Review-Revue Canadienne Des Langues Vivantes, 59(4), 589–607.
  • MacIntyre, P. D., Dörnyei, Z., Clement, R., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Kournal, 82(4), 545–562.
  • Mygind, E. (2014). Udeskole - hvad ved vi? [Outdoor education - What do we know?]. Retrieved from http://www.skoven-i-skolen.dk/l%C3%A6ring/udeskole-hvor-st%C3%A5r-forskningen
  • Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328–346.
  • Nicholls, J. G. (1989). The competitive ethos and democratic education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Nicol, R. (2002). Outdoor environmental education in the United Kingdom: A conceptual framework of epistemological diversity and its educational implications. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 7(2), 207–223.
  • Norwegian National Research Ethics Committees. (2014). General guidelines for research ethics. Retrieved from https://www.etikkom.no/en/ethical-guidelines-for-research/general-guidelines-for-research-ethics/
  • Nundy, S. (2001). Raising achievement through the environment: The case for fieldwork and field centres. Walsall: NAFSO.
  • Oxford, R. (1999). Anxiety and the language learner: New insights. In A. Jane (Ed.), Affect in language learning (pp. 58–67). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rennstam, J., & Wästerfors, D. (2015). Från stoff till studie: Om analysarbete i kvalitativ forskning [From material to study: On analysis in qualitative research]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Richards, J. C. (2015). The changing face of language learning: Learning beyond the classroom. RELC Journal: A Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 46(1), 5–22.
  • Rickinson, M., Dillon, J., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D., & Benefield, P. (2004). A review of research on outdoor learning. Shrewsbury: National Foundation for Educational Research and King’s College London.
  • Savignon, S. J. (1983). Communicative competence: Theory and classroom practice. Reading, MA: Addison‐Wesley.
  • Savignon, S. J. (2002). Communicative language teaching: Linguistic theory and classroom practice. In S. J. Savignon (Ed.), Interpreting communicative language teaching (pp. 12–39). New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Segalowitz, N. (2010). The cognitive basis of second language fluency. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Skaugen, R., & Fiskum, T. A. (2015). How schools with good academic results justify their use of outdoor education. International Education Research, 3(4), 16–31.
  • Steinberg, F. S., & Horwitz, E. K. (1986). The effect of induced anxiety on the denotative and interpretative content of second language speech. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 131–136.
  • Tavakoli, P. (2011). Pausing patterns: Differences between L2 learners and native speakers. Elt Journal, 65(1), 71–79. Retrieved from <Go to ISI>://WOS:000286772200009 doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq020
  • Tavakoli, P., & Hunter, A.-M. (2017). Is fluency being ‘neglected’ in the classroom?: Teacher understanding of fluency and related classroom practices. Language Teaching Research, 136216881770846. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817708462
  • Wertz, F. J. (2011). Five ways of doing qualitative analysis: Phenomenological psychology, grounded theory, discourse analysis, narrative research and intuitive inquiry. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Harlow: Longman.
  • Wood, D. (2006). Uses and functions of formulaic sequences in second-language speech: An exploration of the foundations of fluency. Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 13–33. Retrieved from
  • Wood, D. (2010). Formulaic language and second language speech fluency: Background, evidence and classroom applications. London: Continuum.
  • Young, D. (1990). An investigation of studets’ perspectives on anxiety and speaking. Foreign Language Annals, 23(6), 539–553.
  • Young, D. (1999). Affect in foreign language and second language learning: A practical guide to creating a low anxiety classroom atmosphere. Boston: McGraw- Hill.