Ethical considerations and limited guidance for research in adventure sports coaching

References

• Batuev, M., & Robinson, L. (2019). Organizational evolution and the olympic games: The case of sport climbing. Sport in Society, 22(10), 1674–1690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogner, A., & Menz, W. (2009). The theory-generating expert interview: Epistemological interest, forms of knowledge, interaction. In A. Bogner, B. Littig, & W. Menz (Eds.), Interviewing experts (pp. 1–294). Basingstoke, UK: PALGRAVE MACMILLAN. doi:10.1057/9780230244276
   Google Scholar
• Bola, M. (1995). Questions of legitimacy? The fit between researcher and researched. Feminism & Psychology, 5(2), 290–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt, A. M. (1978). Racism and research: The case of the tuskegee syphilis study. The Hastings Center Report, 8(6), 21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, A., & Groundwater-Smith, S. (2007). An ethical approach to practitioner research: Dealing with issues and dilemmas in action research. Oxford, UK: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203939277
   Google Scholar
• Carson, H. J., Davies, N., & Collins, L. (2020). The hills are alive with … Many different folk! Rationalising and operationalising a professional judgment and decision making approach within mountain leadership. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 1–12. doi:10.1080/14729679.2020.1784768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christian, E., Berry, M., & Kearney, P. (2017). The identity, epistemology and developmental experiences of high-level adventure sports coaches. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 17(4), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christian, E., Hodgson, C. I., Berry, M., & Kearney, P. (2019). It’s not what, but where: How the accentuated features of the adventure sports coaching environment promote the development of sophisticated epistemic beliefs. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 1–13. doi:10.1080/14729679.2019.1598879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, L., & Brymer, E. (2020). Understanding nature sports: A participant centred perspective and its implications for the design and facilitating of learning and performance. Annals of Leisure Research, 23(1), 110–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, L., Carson, H. J., & Collins, D. (2016). Metacognition and professional judgment and decision making in coaching: Importance, application and evaluation. Human Kinetics in International Sport Coaching Journal, 3(3), 355–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, L., & Collins, D. (2012). Conceptualizing the adventure-sports coach. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 12(1), 81–93.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, L., & Collins, D. (2015). Integration of professional judgement and decision-making in high-level adventure sports coaching practice. Journal of Sports Sciences, 33(6), 622–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, L., & Collins, D. (2016). Challenges in adventures sports coaching. In H. P. Barbara Humberstone & K. A. Henderson (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of outdoor studies. (pp 455–462). Oxford, UK: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315768465.ch44
   Google Scholar
• DeCuir-Gunby, J. T., Marshall, P. L., & McCulloch, A. W. (2011). Developing and using a codebook for the analysis of interview data: An example from a professional development research project. Field Methods, 23(2), 136–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durán-Sánchez, A., Álvarez-García, J., & Del Río-rama, M. D. L. C. (2020). Nature sports: State of the art of research. Annals of Leisure Research, 23(1), 52–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastabrook, C., & Collins, L. (2020). Why do individuals seek out adventure sport coaching? Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 20(3), 245–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• England, S. (2019). Active lives adult survey 17/18 report. In  Lisa O'Keefe (Eds.). Sports England, London, UK, (pp. 1-24)
   Google Scholar
• Gray, P., & Collins, D. (2016). The adventure sports coach: All show and no substance? Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 16(2), 160–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groundwater-Smith, S., & Mockler, N. (2007). Ethics in practitioner research: An issue of quality. Research Papers in Education, 22(2), 199–211.
   Google Scholar
• Guttmann, A. (1978). From ritual to record: The nature of modern sports. In Sport in Britain: A social history (1989th ed.). New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Head, E. (2009). The ethics and implications of paying participants in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(4), 335–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, K. A. (2011). Post-positivism and the pragmatics of leisure research. Leisure Sciences, 33(4), 341–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden, M. T., & Lynch, P. (2004). Choosing the appropriate methodology: Understanding research philosophy. The Marketing Review, 4(4), 397–409.
   Google Scholar
• Huisman, J., & Naidoo, R. (2006). The professional doctorate: From Anglo-Saxon to European challenges. Higher Education Management and Policy, 18(2), 51–63.
   Google Scholar
• Humberstone, B., & Nicol, R. (2019). Autoethnography: Creating stories that make a difference. In B. Humberstone & H. Prince (Eds.), Research methods in outdoor studies (pp. 111–120). Oxford, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, S. (2013). “David Clutterbuck, mentoring and coaching”: Reply. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 8(1), 245–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen-Hart, S., & Williams, D. J. (2010). Blending voices: Autoethnography as a vehicle for critical reflection in social work. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 30(4), 450–467.
   Google Scholar
• Lapadat, J. C. (2017). Ethics in autoethnography and collaborative autoethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(8), 589–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lietz, C. A., & Zayas, L. E. (2010). Evaluating qualitative research for social work practitioners. Advances in Social Work, 11(2), 188–202.
   Google Scholar
• MacLean, D., MacIntosh, R., & Grant, S. (2002). Mode 2 management research. British Journal of Management, 13(3), 189–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morlacchi, P., & Martin, B. R. (2009). Emerging challenges for science, technology and innovation policy research: A reflexive overview. Research Policy, 38(4), 571–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow, S. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 250–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, C., Martindale, R., Collins, D., & Martindale, A. (2012). Parameterising expertise in coaching: Past, present and future. Journal of Sports Sciences, 30(10), 985–994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, R. (2013). Returning to the richness of experience: Is autoethnography a useful approach for outdoor educators in promoting pro-environmental behaviour? Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 13(1), 3–17.
   Google Scholar
• Olive, R. (2020). Thinking the social through myself: Reflexivity in research practice. In B. Humberstone & H. Prince (Eds.), Research methods in outdoor studies (pp. 121–129). Oxford, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sarewitz, D. (2016). The pressure to publish pushes down quality. Nature, 533(7602), 147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Scrutton, R., & Beames, S. (2015). Measuring the unmeasurable: Upholding rigor in quantitative studies of personal and social development in outdoor adventure education. Journal of Experiential Education, 38(1), 8–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenton, A. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(August), 63–75.
   Google Scholar
• Sieber, J., & Sieber, J. E. (2006). Introduction: Data sharing and disclosure limitation techniques. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1(3), 47–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinfield, D., Allen, J., & Collins, L. (2019). A comparative analysis of the coaching skills required by coaches operating in different non-competitive paddlesport settings. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 1–15. doi:10.1080/14729679.2019.1609998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, B., & McGannon, K. R. (2018). Developing rigor in qualitative research: Problems and opportunities within sport and exercise psychology. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11(1), 101–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoszkowski, J., & Collins, D. (2014). Communities of practice, social learning and networks: Exploiting the social side of coach development. Sport, Education and Society, 19(6), 773–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valkonen, J., Huilaja, H., & Koikkalainen, S. (2013). Looking for the right kind of person: Recruitment in nature tourism guiding. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 13(3), 228–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan, J., Mallett, C. J., Davids, K., Potrac, P., & López-Felip, M. A. (2019). Developing creativity to enhance human potential in sport: A wicked transdisciplinary challenge. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(September), 1–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar