Exploring physical education teachers’ perceptions and attitudes towards digital technology in outdoor education

References

• Adam, Z. (2008). Technology works in the outdoors. Pathways: The Ontario Journal of Outdoor Education, 20(2), 8–10.
   Google Scholar
• Backman, E. (2009). To acquire a taste for friluftsliv – A part of becoming a PE teacher? – Swedish physical education teacher educators’ thoughts about their students’ preferences for friluftsliv. Moving Bodies, 7(1), 9–26.
   Google Scholar
• Backman, E. (2010). Friluftsliv in Swedish Physical Education – a Struggle of Values. Educational and Sociological Perspectives. ( Phd Thesis). Stockholms Universitet. Phd Thesis. Retrieved November 3, 2021, from http://su.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:308124/FULLTEXT01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Backman, E. (2011a). What controls teaching of friluftsliv? Analysing a pedagogic discourse in Swedish PE. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 11(2), 51–65.
   Google Scholar
• Backman, E. (2011b). Friluftsliv: A contribution to equity and democracy in Swedish physical education? An analysis of codes in Swedish physical education curricula. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(2), 269–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, D., Barker-Ruchti, N., Carlén, U., Maivorsdotter, N., Nielsen, J., & Wahlström, M. (2016). Pedagogical narrative: Working with technology as student teachers. In A. Casey, V. Goodyear, & K. Armour (Eds.), Pedagogical cases: Digital technologies in youth physical activity, physical education & sport (pp. 231–246). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (1990). The structuring of pedagogic discourse: Class, codes & control (Vol. 4). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity. In Theory, research, critique. (Vol. 5, Class, Codes and Control). London & New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control & identity: Theory, research, critique (2nd ed.). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Bertram, C. (2020). Remaking history: The pedagogic device and shifting discourses in the South African school history curriculum. Yesterday and Today, 23, 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Bolliger, D. U., McCoy, D., Kilty, T., & Shepherd, C. E. (2020). Smartphone use in outdoor education: A question of activity progression and place. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 21(1), 53–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Curtner-Smith, M. D., & Meek, G. A. (2000). Teachers’ value orientations and their compatibility with the national curriculum for physical education. European Physical Education Review, 6(1), 27–45.
   Google Scholar
• Cuthbertson, B., Socha, T. L., & Potter, T. G. (2004). The double-edged sword: Critical reflections on traditional and modern technology in outdoor education. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 4(2), 133–144.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Dyment, J., Downing, J., Hill, A., & Smith, H. (2018). ‘I did think it was a bit strange taking outdoor education online’: Exploration of initial teacher education students’ online learning experiences in a tertiary outdoor education unit. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 18(1), 70–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasson, J. (2013). Tools for Designing Mobile Interaction with the Physical Environment in Outdoor Lessons ( Phd Thesis). Stockholms Universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Fauville, G., Lantz-Andersson, A., & Säljö, R. (2014). ICT tools in environmental education: Reviewing two newcomers to schools. Environmental Education Research, 20(2), 248–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, T., Quennerstedt, M., & Larsson, H. (2017). Teaching dance in physical education using exergames. European Physical Education Review, 23(2), 237–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hills, D., & Thomas, G. (2020). Digital technology and outdoor experiential learning. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 20(2), 155–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hougham, R. J., Nutter, M., & Graham, C. (2018). Bridging natural and digital domains: Attitudes, confidence, and interest in using technology to learn outdoors. Journal of Experiential Education, 41(2), 154–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King Rice, J. (2010). The impact of teacher experience: Examining the evidence and implications for policy. In Research brief for the center for longitudinal data in education research. Washington DC: The Urban Institute. Retrieved october 7, 2021, from https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/33321/1001455-The-Impact-of-Teacher-Experience.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, S., & Meckbach, J. (2008). Mind the gap: Physical education and health and the frame factor theory as a tool for analysing educational settings. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 13(4), 36–345.
   Google Scholar
• Mikaels, J. (2017). Becoming-place. (Re)conceptualising friluftsliv in the Swedish physical education and health curriculum ( Phd Thesis). Stockholm: Gymnastik och idrottshögskolan.
   Google Scholar
• Mikaels, J., Backman, E., & Lundvall, S. (2016). In and out of place: Exploring the discursive effects of teachers’ talk about outdoor education in secondary schools in New Zealand. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 16(2), 91–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulsen, C. A., & Andrews, J. R. (2019). Using screen time to promote green time: Outdoor STEM education in OST settings. Afterschool Matters, 30, 24–32.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, S., & Wilson, H. (2019). The pedagogy of technology in outdoor learning or use of the gopro to enhance learning and teaching. Paper presented at The mediation of experiences by technology in the outdoors – Opening or losing connections with the world, 19–23 September 2018, Bohinj/Slovenia.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, P. (2002). Pedagogising knowledge: Bernstein’s theory of the pedagogic device. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(4), 571–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siskind, D., Conlin, D., Hestenes, L., Kim, S.-A., Barnes, A., & Yaya-Bryson, D. (2020). Balancing technology and outdoor learning: Implications for early childhood teacher educators. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 1–17. Advance online publication, doi:10.1080/10901027.2020.1859024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C. A., Parks, R., Parrish, J., & Swirski, R. (2018). Disruptive silence: Deepening experiential learning in the absence of technology. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 18(1), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, B., & Sparkes, A. C. (2019). Routledge handbook of qualitative research in sport and exercise. London and New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• SNAE. (2018). Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and school-age educare 2011. Revised (pp. 308, Vol. 2018). Stockholm: Skolverket.
   Google Scholar
• Svendsen, J. T., & Svendsen, M. A. (2020). Not for free! An analysis of two digital tools recommended as learning resources for physical education in upper secondary schools in Denmark. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 65(2), 331–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Research Council. (2015). Ethics. Retrieved september 13, 2021, from Available at: https://www.vr.se/english/calls-and-decisions/grant-terms-and-conditions/ethical-research.html
   Google Scholar
• van Hilvoorde, I. V., & Koekoek, J. (2018). Digital technologies: A challenge for physical education. In C. Scheuer, A. Bund, & M. Holzweg (Eds.), Changes in childhood and adolescence: Current challenges for physical education (pp. 54–63). Berlin: Logos.
   Google Scholar
• Wattchow, B. (2001). A pedagogy of production: Craft, technology and outdoor education. Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 5(2), 19–27.
   Google Scholar