The perceived benefits of and barriers to nature-based play and learning in South Australian public primary schools: A cross-sectional study

References

• Almond, C., Swain, M., Hanson, D., Gibney, V. H., & Shelnutt, K. (2020). Evaluating the Utilization of School Gardens in Florida Through a Teacher Survey. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 52(7), S39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2020). Data on students, staff, schools, rates and ratios for government and non-government schools, for all Australian states and territories. Accessed 02 November 2021. Retrieved from https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/education/schools/2019
   Google Scholar
• Barrable, A., & Lakin, L. (2020). Nature relatedness in student teachers, perceived competence and willingness to teach outdoors: An empirical study. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 20(3), 189–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, C., Lauterbach, G., Spengler, S., Dettweiler, U., & Mess, F. (2017). Effects of regular classes in outdoor education settings: A systematic review on students’ learning, social and health dimensions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(5), 485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentsen, P., Jensen, F., Mygind, E., & Randrup, T. (2010). The extent and dissemination of udeskole in Danish schools. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 9(3), 235–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brussoni, M., Gibbons, R., Gray, C., Ishikawa, T., Sandseter, E. B. H., Bienenstock, A., … Janssen, I. (2015). What is the relationship between risky outdoor play and health in children? A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(6), 6423–6454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruyere, B. L., Wesson, M., & Teel, T. (2012). Incorporating environmental education into an urban after-school program in New York City. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 7(2), 327–341.
   Google Scholar
• Chawla, L., Keena, K., Pevec, I., & Stanley, E. (2014). Green schoolyards as havens from stress and resources for resilience in childhood and adolescence. Health & Place, 28, 1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chawla, L. (2015). Benefits of nature contact for children. Journal of Planning Literature, 30(4), 433–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coe, D. P., Flynn, J. I., Wolff, D. L., Scott, S. N., & Durham, S. (2014). Children’s physical activity levels and utilization of a traditional versus natural playground. Children Youth and Environments, 24(3), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Cutter-Mackenzie, A., & Smith, R. (2003). Ecological literacy: The ‘missing paradigm’ in environmental education (part one). Environmental Education Research, 9(4), 497–524.
   Google Scholar
• Dankiw, K. A., Tsiros, M. D., Baldock, K. L., & Kumar, S. (2020). The impacts of unstructured nature play on health in early childhood development: A systematic review. PLoS One, 15(2), e0229006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyment, J. E. (2005). Green school grounds as sites for outdoor learning: Barriers and opportunities. International Research in Geographical & Environmental Education, 14(1), 28–45.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards-Jones, A., Waite, S., & Passy, R. (2018). Falling into LINE: School strategies for overcoming challenges associated with learning in natural environments (LINE). Education, 46(1), 49–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, J. (2007). Factors associated with K-12 teachers’ use of environment-based education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 38(3), 15–32.
   Google Scholar
• Ernst, J. (2009). Influences on US middle school teachers’ use of environment‐based education. Environmental Education Research, 15(1), 71–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, J., & Tornabene, L. (2012). Preservice early childhood educators’ perceptions of outdoor settings as learning environments. Environmental Education Research, 18(5), 643–664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, J. (2014). Early childhood educators’ use of natural outdoor settings as learning environments: An exploratory study of beliefs, practices, and barriers. Environmental Education Research, 20(6), 735–752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feille, K., & Nettles, J. (2019). Permission as support: Teacher perceptions of schoolyard pedagogy. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 23(3), 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gaddis, G. M., & Gaddis, M. L. (1990). Introduction to biostatistics: Part 5, statistical inference techniques for hypothesis testing with nonparametric data. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 19(9), 1054–1059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geeraerts, K., Tynjälä, P., & Heikkinen, H. L. (2018). Inter-generational learning of teachers: What and how do teachers learn from older and younger colleagues? European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(4), 479–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giallo, R., & Little, E. (2003). Classroom behaviour problems: The relationship between preparedness, classroom experiences, and self-efficacy in graduate and student teachers. Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 3(1), 21–34.
   Google Scholar
• The Government of South Australia. (2012). Index of educational disadvantage analysis. Accessed 20 October 2021. Retrieved from https://www.education.sa.gov.au/sites/default/files/educational_disadvantage_index_explanation.pdf?acsf_files_redirect
   Google Scholar
• Hassan, Z. A., Schattner, P., & Mazza, D. (2006). Doing a pilot study: Why is it essential? Malaysian Family Physician: the Official Journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia, 1(2–3), 70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• IBM Corp. (2019). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, K., Clark, B., Brown, V., & Sitzia, J. (2003). Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 15(3), 261–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriemler, S., Meyer, U., Martin, E., van Sluijs, E. M., Andersen, L. B., & Martin, B. W. (2011). Effect of school-based interventions on physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents: A review of reviews and systematic update. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 45(11), 923–930.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, M., Barnes, M., & Jordan, C. (2019). Do experiences with nature promote learning? Converging evidence of a cause-and-effect relationship. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, H., & Wyver, S. (2008). Outdoor play: Does avoiding the risks reduce the benefits? Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 33(2), 33–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacQuarrie, S. (2018). Everyday teaching and outdoor learning: Developing an integrated approach to support school-based provision. Education, 46(3), 345–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainella, F. P., Agate, J. R., & Clark, B. S. (2011). Outdoor‐based play and reconnection to nature: A neglected pathway to positive youth development. New Directions for Student Leadership, 2011(130), 89–104.
   Google Scholar
• Maller, C., & Townsend, M. (2006). Children’s mental health and wellbeing and hands-on contact with nature. International Journal of Learning, 12(4), 359–372.
   Google Scholar
• Maller, C., Townsend, M., Pryor, A., Brown, P., & St Leger, L. (2006). Healthy nature healthy people:‘contact with nature’as an upstream health promotion intervention for populations. Health Promotion International, 21(1), 45–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malone, K., & Tranter, P. J. (2003). School grounds as sites for learning: Making the most of environmental opportunities. Environmental Education Research, 9(3), 283–303.
   Google Scholar
• Marchant, E., Todd, C., Cooksey, R., Dredge, S., Jones, H., Reynolds, D., … Brophy, S. (2019). Curriculum-based outdoor learning for children aged 9-11: A qualitative analysis of pupils’ and teachers’ views. PLoS One, 14(5), e0212242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maskan, A. K. (2007). Preservice science and math teachers’ difficulties in disruptive behavior and class management. International Journal of Educational Reform, 16(4), 336–349.
   Google Scholar
• Mastrilli, T., & Sardo-Brown, D. (2002). Novice teachers’ cases: A vehicle for reflective practice. Education, 123(1), 56–62.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard, T., Waters, J., & Clement, J. (2013). Moving outdoors: Further explorations of ‘child-initiated’ learning in the outdoor environment. Education, 41(3), 282–299.
   Google Scholar
• McCormick, R. (2017). Does access to green space impact the mental well-being of children: A systematic review. Journal of Pediatric Nursing: Nursing Care of Children and Families, 37, 3–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarland, L., & Laird, S. G. (2018). Parents’ and early childhood educators’ attitudes and practices in relation to children’s outdoor risky play. Early Childhood Education Journal, 46(2), 159–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehtälä, M. A. K., Sääkslahti, A. K., Inkinen, M. E., & Poskiparta, M. E. H. (2014). A socio-ecological approach to physical activity interventions in childcare: A systematic review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 11(1), 1–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller, N. C., Kumar, S., Pearce, K. L., & Baldock, K. L. (2021). The outcomes of nature-based learning for primary school aged children: A systematic review of quantitative research. Environmental Education Research, 27(8), 1115–1140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momentive Inc. (2020). SurveyMonkey Online Survey Software, San Mateo, California, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Mygind, L., Kjeldsted, E., Hartmeyer, R., Mygind, E., Bølling, M., & Bentsen, P. (2019). Mental, physical and social health benefits of immersive nature-experience for children and adolescents: A systematic review and quality assessment of the evidence. Health & Place, 58, 102136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nature Play, S. A. (2021). About. Accessed 06 August 2021. Retrieved from https://natureplaysa.org.au/about/
   Google Scholar
• Naylor, P.-J., Macdonald, H. M., Reed, K. E., & McKay, H. A. (2006). Action Schools! BC: A socioecological approach to modifying chronic disease risk factors in elementary school children. Preventing Chronic Disease, 3(2), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Nulty, D. D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: What can be done? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 301–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, B. J., Tsunetsugu, Y., Kasetani, T., Kagawa, T., & Miyazaki, Y. (2010). The physiological effects of Shinrin-yoku (taking in the forest atmosphere or forest bathing): Evidence from field experiments in 24 forests across Japan. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, 15(1), 18–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sallis, J. F., & Owen, N. (2015). Ecological Models of Health Behaviour. In Glanz, K., Rimer, B. K., Viswanath, K (eds). Health behavior: Theory, Research, and Practice. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sandseter, E. B. H. (2009). Characteristics of risky play. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 9(1), 3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Sauermann, H., & Roach, M. (2013). Increasing web survey response rates in innovation research: An experimental study of static and dynamic contact design features. Research Policy, 42(1), 273–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy, J., Zechmeister, E. B., & Zeichmeister, J.S. (2011). Research Methods in Psychology (pp. 161–175). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Shih, T.-H., & Fan, X. (2009). Comparing response rates in e-mail and paper surveys: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 4(1), 26–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shurr, J., Bouck, E. C., & McCollow, M. (2021). Examining Teacher and Teacher Educator Perspectives of Teacher Leadership in Extensive Support Needs. Teacher Education and Special Education. doi:10.1177/08884064211001455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöblom, P., Eklund, G., & Fagerlund, P. (2021). Student teachers’ views on outdoor education as a teaching method− two cases from Finland and Norway. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 1–15. doi:10.1080/14729679.2021.2011338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich, R. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery. Science, 224(4647), 224–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Annals of Internal Medicine, 147(8), 573–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar