1,618
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Children and young people as co-researchers – researching subjective well-being in residential area with visual and verbal methods

, &
Pages 184-195 | Received 29 Sep 2015, Accepted 02 Jun 2017, Published online: 28 Jun 2017

References

  • Barker, J., and S. Weller. 2003. “Is It Fun? Developing Children Centered Research Methods.” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 1 (2): 33–58. doi:10.1108/01443330310790435.
  • Bradshaw, J., A. Keung, G. Rees, and H. Goswami. 2011. “Children’s Subjective Well-being: International Comparative Perspectives.” Children and Youth Services Review 33 (4): 548–556. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.05.010.
  • Bronfenbrenner, U., and G. Evans. 2000. “Developmental Science in the 21st Century: Emerging Questions, Theoretical Models, Research Designs and Empirical Findings.” Social Development 9 (1): 115–125. doi:10.1111/1467-9507.00114.
  • Buckingham, D. 2009. “‘Creative’ Visual Methods in Media Research: Possibilities, Problems and Proposals.” Media, Culture and Society 31 (4): 633–652. doi:10.1177/0163443709335280.
  • Cherney, I., C. Seiwert, T. Dickey, and J. Flichtbeil. 2006. “Children’s Drawings: A Mirror to Their Minds.” Educational Psychology 26 (1): 127–142. doi:10.1080/01443410500344167.
  • Christensen, J., L. Mygind, and P. Bentsen. 2015. “Conceptions of Place: Approaching Space, Children and Physical Activity.” Children’s Geographies 13 (5): 589–603. doi:10.1080/14733285.2014.927052.
  • Cook, T., and E. Hess. 2007. “What the Camera Sees and from Whose Perspective. Fun Methodologies for Engaging Children in Enlightening Adults.” Childhood 14 (1): 29–45. doi:10.1177/0907568207068562.
  • Country, B., S. Wright, S. Suchet-Pearson, K. Lloyd, L. Burarrwanga, R. Ganambarr, M. Ganambarr-Stubbs, B. Ganambarr, D. Maymuru, and J. Sweeney. 2015. “Co-becoming Bawaka. Towards a Relational Understanding of Place/Space.” Progress in Human Geography 40 (4): 455–475. doi:10.1177/0309132515589437.
  • Crivello, G., L. Camfield, and M. Woodhead. 2009. “How Can Children Tell Us About Their Wellbeing? Exploring the Potential of Participatory Research Approaches Within Young Lives.” Social Indicators Research 90: 51–72. doi:10.1007/s11205-008-9312-x.
  • Duhn, I. 2012. “Places for Pedagogies, Pedagogies for Places.” Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood 13 (2): 99–107. doi:10.2304/ciec.2012.13.2.99.
  • Einarsdottir, J. 2005. “Playschool in Pictures: Children’s Photographs as a Research Method.” Early Child Development and Care 175 (6): 523–541. doi:10.1080/03004430500131320.
  • Einarsdottir, J., S. Dockett, and B. Perry. 2009. “Making Meaning: Children’s Perspectives Expressed Through Drawings.” Early Child Development and Care 179 (2): 217–232. doi:10.1080/03004430802666999.
  • Farrugia, D. 2014. “Towards a Spatialised Youth Sociology: The Rural and the Urban in Times of Change.” Journal of Youth Studies 17 (3): 293–307. doi:10.1080/13676261.2013.830700.
  • Fattore, T., J. Mason, and E. Watson. 2007. “Children’s Conceptualisations of their Well-being.” Social Indicators Research 80 (1): 5–29. doi: 10.1007/s11205-006-9019-9
  • Fattore, T., J. Mason, and E. Watson. 2012. “Locating the Child Centrally as Subject in Research: Towards a Child Interpretation of Well-being.” Child Indicators Research 5 (3): 423–435. doi:10.1007/s12187-012-9150-x.
  • Gallacher, L. -A., and M. Gallagher. 2008. “Methodological Immaturity in Childhood Research? Thinking Through ‘Participatory Methods’.” Childhood 15 (4): 499–516. doi:10.1177/0907568208091672.
  • Hill, M. 2006. “Children’s Voices on Ways of Having a Voice: Children’s and Young People’s Perspectives on Methods Used in Research and Consultation.” Childhood 13 (1): 69–89. doi:10.1177/0907568206059972.
  • Hohti, R., and L. Karlsson. 2012. “Kevätjuhla – Koululaisena toimimisen tilat ja rajat.” [The Spring Festival – Acting as the Student Within the Spaces and Boundaries of School.] In Lapset ja nuoret instituutioiden kehyksissä. Nuorten elinolot vuosikirja 2012 [Children and Young People in Institutional Framework. The Young People’s Living Conditions Yearbook 2012], edited by Elina Pekkarinen, Kaisa Vehkalahti, and Sami Myllyniemi, 128–142. Helsinki: THL.
  • Holland, S., E. Renold, N. J. Ross, and A. Hillman. 2010. “Power, Agency and Participatory Agendas: A Critical Exploration of Young People’s Engagement in Participative Qualitative Research.” Childhood 17 (3): 360–375. doi:10.1177/090756821036931 doi: 10.1177/0907568210369310
  • Honan, E., M. Knobel, C. Baker, and B. Davies. 2000. “Producing Possible Hannahs: Theory and the Subject of Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 6 (1): 9–32. doi: 10.1177/107780040000600102
  • Huberman, A. M., and M. B. Miles. 2002. The Qualitative Researcher’s Companion. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • James, A., and A. James. 2008. Key Concepts in Childhood Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Karlsson, L. 2006. “Lapsitiedosta lasten omaan tietoon ja kulttuuriin.” [From Knowledge on Child to Children’s Own Knowledge and Culture.] In Lapset kertovat …  [Children Tell …], edited by Liisa Karlsson, Aino Ritala-Koskinen, and Niina Rutanen, 8–17. Helsinki: Stakes.
  • Karlsson, L. 2009. “To Construct a Bridge of Sharing Between Children’s Culture and Adult Culture with the Storycrafting Method.” In Arts Contact Points Between Cultures: 1st International Journal of Intercultural Arts Education Conference: Post-Conference Book. Research Report, edited by Heikki Ruismäki and Inkeri Ruokonen, 117–127. Helsinki: Department of Applied Sciences of Education. Faculty of Behavioural Sciences. https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10138/14969/RR312_verkkoversio.pdf.
  • Karlsson, L. 2010. “Lapsinäkökulmainen tutkimus ja aineiston tuottaminen.” [Child Perspective Research and Production of the Research Data.] In Missä lapsuutta tehdään? [Where Is the Childhood Made?], edited by Kirsi-Pauliina Kallio, Aino Ritala-Koskinen, and Niina Rutanen, 121–141. Helsinki: Nuorisotutkimusseura.
  • Karlsson, L. 2013. “Storycrafting Method – To Share, Participate, Tell and Listen in Practice and Research.” The European Journal of Social & Behavioural Sciences 6 (3): 1109–1117. doi:10.15405/ejsbs.88.
  • Kinnunen, S. 2015. “Kato, papukaija! Spontaanit piirustushetket lapsen ja tutkijan kohtaamisen ja tiedonrakentumisen tilana.” [Look, the Parrot! Spontaneous Drawing Moments as a Space of Child’s and Researcher’s Encounter and Knowledge Production. ] In Visuaaliset menetelmät lapsuuden- ja nuorisotutkimuksessa [Visual Methods in Childhood Studies and Youth Research], edited by Marleena Mustola, Johanna Mykkänen, Marja Leena Böök, and Antti-Ville Kärjä, 35–45. Helsinki: Nuorisotutkimusseura.
  • Kullman, K. 2012. “Experiments with Moving Children and Digital Cameras.” Children’s Geographies 10 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1080/14733285.2011.638174.
  • Leonard, M., and M. McKnight. 2015. “Look and Tell: Using Photo-elicitation Methods with Teenagers.” Children’s Geographies 13 (6): 629–642. doi:10.1080/14733285.2014.887812.
  • Manderson, L. 2005. “Introduction: The Social Context of Wellbeing.” In Rethinking Wellbeing, edited by Lenore Manderson, 1–25. Perth: API Network.
  • Mykkänen, J., and M. -L. Böök. 2013. “Photographing as a Research Method – Finnish Children’s Views of Everyday Life.” In Women, Men and Children in Families: Private Troubles and Public Issues, edited by Eriikka Oinonen and Katja Repo, 169–194. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
  • Myllyniemi, S., and P. Berg. 2014. Nuoria liikkeellä! Nuorten vapaa-aikatutkimus 2013 [Young People on the Go! Study of Young People’s Leisure Activities 2013]. https://tietoanuorista.fi/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Nuoria_liikkeell%C3%A4_Julkaisu_Nettiversio_korjattu.pdf.
  • Nansen, B., L. Gibbs, C. McDougall, F. Veter, N. J. Ross, and J. McKendrick. 2015. “Children’s Interdependent Mobility: Compositions, Collaborations and Compromises.” Childreńs Geographies 13 (4): 467–481. doi:10.1080/14733285.2014.887813.
  • Permentier, M., G. Bolt, and M. van Ham. 2011. “Determinants of Neighbourhood Satisfaction and Perception of Neighbourhood Reputation.” Urban Studies 48 (5): 977–996. doi:10.1177/0042098010367860.
  • Poikolainen, J. 2013. “Promoting Children’s Positive Well-being at School and Home. Methodological Considerations.” BARN 31 (4): 61–75.
  • Poikolainen, J. 2014. “Lasten positiivisen hyvinvoinnin tutkimus – metodologisia huomioita.” [Research into the Positive Well-being of Children – Methodological Findings. ]Nuorisotutkimus [The Finnish Journal of Youth Research] 32 (2): 3–22.
  • Punch, S. 2002a. “Research with Children: The Same or Different from Research with Adults?” Childhood 9 (3): 321–341. doi:10.1177/0907568202009003005.
  • Punch, S. 2002b. “Interviewing Strategies with Young People: The ‘Secret Box’, Stimulus Material and Task-based Activities.” Children and Society 16: 45–56. doi:10.1002/CHI.685.
  • Pyle, A. 2013. “Engaging Young Children in Research Through Photo Elicitation.” Early Child Development and Care 183 (11): 1544–1558. doi:10.1080/03004430.2012.733944.
  • Ridge, T. 2003. “Listening to Children Developing a Child-centred Approach to Childhood Poverty in the UK.” Family Matters 65: 4–9.
  • Roche, S. 2016. “Geographic Information Science II: Less Space, More Places in Smart Cities.” Progress in Human Geography 40 (4): 565–573. doi:10.1177/0309132515586296.
  • Rogers, M. 2012. “‘They Are There for You’: The Importance of Neighbourhood Friends to Children’s Well-being.” Child Indicator Research 5: 483–502. doi:10.1007/s12187-012-9146-6.
  • Rose, G. 2012. Visual Methodologies. An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Seppänen, M., I. Haapola, K. Puolakka, and E. Tiilikainen. 2012. Takaisin Liipolaan. Lähiö fyysisenä ja sosiaalisena asuinympäristönä [Back to Liipola. Suburb as Physical and Social Residential Environment]. Helsinki: Ympäristöministeriö.
  • Statistics Finland. 2012. Households’ Consumption. Distance of Households from Services Based on the Urban-Rural Classification of the Area of Residence in 2012. http://www.stat.fi/til/ktutk/2012/ktutk_2012_2014-05-26_tau_001_en.html.
  • Thomson, F. 2007. “Are Methodologies for Children Keeping Them in Their Place?” Children’s Geographies 5 (3): 207–218. doi:10.1080/14733280701445762.
  • TILDA. 2014. TILDA Statistics from the City of Lahti. http://www4.lahti.fi/verkkotilastointi/.
  • Tisdall, E., and S. Punch. 2012. “Not So ‘New’? Looking Critically at Childhood Studies.” Children’s Geographies 10 (3): 249–264. doi:10.1080/14733285.2012.693376.
  • White, A., N. Bushin, F. Carpena-Mendez, and C. Ni Laoire. 2010. “Using Visual Methodologies to Explore Contemporary Irish Childhoods.” Qualitative Research 10 (2): 143–158. doi:10.1177/1468794109356735.
  • Zartler, U. 2014. “Photo Interviews with Children: Relating the Visual and the Verbal from a Participation Perspective.” International Journal of Child, Youth, and Family Studies 5 (4.1): 629–648. doi:10.18357/ijcyfs.zartleru.5412014.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.