Do ‘in vitro children’ exist? The ‘ontological choreography’ between public debates and private experiences in Poland

References

• Alderson, Patricia, and Virgine Morrow. 2011. The Ethics of Research with Children and Young People: A Practical Handbook. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Althusser, Louis. 1971. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes Towards an Investigation).” In Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, 121–176. New York: Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Banchoff, Thomas. 2013. Embryo Politics. Ethics and Policy in Atlantic Democracies. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, Gay. 2000. The Elusive Embryo. How Women and Men Approach New Reproductive Technologies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann, Sven. 2012. “Resemblance That Matters: On Transnational Anonymized Egg Donation in Two European IVF Clinics.” In Reproductive Technologies as Global Form, edited by Michi Knecht, Maren Klotz, and Stefan Beck, 331–356. Frankfurt/Main: Campus Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Blake, Lucy, Polly Casey, Vasanti Jadva, and Susan Golombok. 2014. “‘I Was Quite Amazed’: Donor Conception and Parent–Child Relationships from the Child’s Perspective.” Children & Society 28: 425–437. doi: 10.1111/chso.12014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bocian sprawdza kliniki [Bocian Examines Clinics]. 2015. Report of Our Stork Association. Warszawa: Stowarzyszenie na rzecz Leczenia Nieplodnosci i Wspierania Adopcji "Nasz Bocian".
   Google Scholar
• CBOS. 2015. “ Opinie o dopuszczalności zapłodnienia in vitro. Komunikat z badań [Opinion on the IVF Admissibility. Research Report].” http://cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2015/K_096_15.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, Pia, and Alan Prout. 2002. “Working with Ethical Symmetry in Social Research with Children.” Childhood 9: 477–497. doi: 10.1177/0907568202009004007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, Cindy Dell. 2011. In a Younger Voice: Doing Child-centeres Qualitative Research. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. 1987. “ Instruction on Respect for Human Life in Its Origin and on the Dignity of Procreation Replies to Certain Questions of the Day.” http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19870222_respect-for-human-life_en.html
   Google Scholar
• Dockett, Sue, Johanna Einarsdóttir, and Bob Perry. 2012. “Young Children’s Decisions About Research Participation: Opting out.” International Journal of Early Years Education 20 (3): 244–256. doi: 10.1080/09669760.2012.715405
   Google Scholar
• Gallacher, Leslie-Ann, and Michael Gallagher. 2008. “Methodological Immaturity in Childhood Research? Thinking Through ‘Paricipatory Methods’.” Childhood 15 (4): 499–516. doi: 10.1177/0907568208091672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanafi, Zakiya. 2000. The Monster in the Machine: Magic, Medicine, and the Marvelous in the Time of the Scientific Revolution. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, Lisa Hope. 2014. Challenging Conception: A Clinical and Cultural History of In Vitro Fertilization in the United States. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, Malcolm. 2012. “Ethical Considerations in Researching Children’s Experiences.” In Researchig Children’s Experiences, edited by Sheila Greene and Diane Hogan, 61–86. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, Sally, Emma Renold, Nicola J. Ross, and Alexandra Hillman. 2010. “Power, Agency and Participatory Agendas: A Critical Exploration of Young People’s Engagement in Participative Qualitative Research.” Childhood 17 (3): 360–375. doi: 10.1177/0907568210369310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, Allison, Chris Jenks, and Allan Prout. 1998. Theorizing Childhood. London: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenks, Chris. 1996. Childhood. Key Ideas. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• John, Paul II. 1995. Evangelium Vitae.To the Bishops Priests and Deacons Men and Women Religious Lay Faithful and All People of Good Will on the Value and Inviolability of Human Life. Vatican. http://w2.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_25031995_evangelium-vitae.html.
   Google Scholar
• Jong de, Willemijn, and Olga Tkach. 2009. Making Bodies, Persons and Families. Normalising Reproductive Technologies in Russia, Switzerland and Germany. Berlin: LIT Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kołodziej, Magdalena. 2015. “Wstyd mi za Polskę [I Am Ashamed for Poland].” Newsweek, July 10. http://polska.newsweek.pl/in-vitro-pierwsza-polka-z-in-vitro-magdalena-kolodziej,artykuly,366582,1.html
   Google Scholar
• Kozioł, Katarzyna. 2013. “ In an Interview for the Portal wp.tv.” http://lifestyle.wp.tv/i,Strefa-Wolnych-Mysli-Zaplodnienie-in-vitro,mid,970061,index.html?ticaid=6e7ca#m970061
   Google Scholar
• Krawczak, Anna. 2014. “Czego nie widać. Obszary przemilczeń w polskiej debacie o in vitro na podstawie zagadnienia dawstwa heterologicznego [What Is Hidden? Fields of Silence in Polish IVF Debate on Basis of Heterologous Donations].” In Etnografie biomedycyny [Ethnographies of Biomedicine], edited by Magdalena Radkowska and Hubert Wierciński, 91–124. Warszawa: Warsaw University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kurzawa, Rafał. 2013. “Zdrowie dzieci po in vitro i innych metodach wspomaganego rozrodu [Health of Children Born After IVF and Other ARTs].” Korektor zdrowia. http://www.korektorzdrowia.pl/pattube/prof-rafal-kurzawa-zdrowie-dzieci-po-in-vitro-i-innych-metodach-wspomaganego-rozrodu/
   Google Scholar
• Longchamp de Bérier, Franciszek. 2013. “ In vitro niczego nie załatwia. [IVF Will Do Nothing].” Interview conducted by T. Krzyżak. Uważam Rze, February 11–17: 82–84.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, George. 1995. “Ethnography in/of the World System. The Emergence of an Multi-sited Ethnography.” Annual Review of Anthropology 24: 95–117. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquardt, Elisabeth, Karen Clark, and Norval D. Glenn. 2010. My Daddy’s Name Is Donor: A New Study of Young Adults Conceived Through Sperm Donation. New York: Institute for American Values.
   Google Scholar
• Mishtal, Joanna. 2012. “Irrational Non-reproduction? The ‘Dying Nation’ and the Postsocialist Logics of Declining Motherhood in Poland.” Anthropology & Medicine 19 (2): 153–169. doi: 10.1080/13648470.2012.675048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishtal, Joanna. 2015. The Politics of Morality. The Church, the State, and the Reproductive Rights in Post-Socialist Poland. Athens: Ohio University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mulkay, Michael. 1996. “Frankenstein and the Debate over Embryo Research.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 21 (2): 157–176. doi: 10.1177/016224399602100202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pieronek, Tadeusz. 2009. “ Pierwowzorem in vitro jest Frankenstein [Frankenstein Is the Prototype of In Vitro].” Interview conducted by Wojciech Harpula. http://wiadomosci.onet.pl/1527301,240,1,1,pierwowzorem_in_vitro_jest_frankenstein,kioskart.html
   Google Scholar
• Punch, Samantha. 2002. “Research with Children. The Same or Different from Research with Adults?” Childhood 9: 321–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radkowska-Walkowicz, Magdalena. 2012. “The Creation of ‘Monsters’: The Discourse of Opposition to In Vitro Fertilization in Poland.” Reproductive Health Matters 20 (40): 30–37. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(12)40647-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radkowska-Walkowicz, Magdalena. 2013. Doświadczenie in vitro. Niepłodność i nowe technologie reprodukcyjne w perspektywie antropologicznej [Experience of In Vitro. Infertility and New Reproductive Technologies in Anthropological Perspective]. Warsaw: Warsaw University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radkowska-Walkowicz, Magdalena. 2014. “Frozen Children and Despairing Embryos in the ‘New’ Post-Communist State: Debate on IVF in the Context of Poland’s Transition.” European Journal of Women's Studies 21 (4): 399–414. doi: 10.1177/1350506814542881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragoné, Helene. 2004. “Surrogate Motherhood and American Kinship.” In Kinship and Family. An Anthropological Reader, edited by R. Parkin and L. Stone, 342–361. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rusiecka, Barbara. 2009. “ Dziecko za cenę miłości [Child Even at the Expense of Love].” Interview conducted by Małgorzata Jędrzejczyk. Nasz Dziennik 20. www.naszdziennik.pl/index.php?dat=20090124&typ=ro&id=ro41.txt
   Google Scholar
• Squier, Susan Merrill. 1994. Babies in Bottles: Twentieth-century Visions of Reproductive Technology. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Charles. 1989. Sources of the Self: The Making of Modern Identity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, Charis M. 2005. Making Parents. The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Throsby, Karen. 2004. When IVF Fails: Feminism, Infertility and Negotiation of Normality. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Turney, Jon. 1998. Frankenstein's Footsteps: Science, Genetics and Popular Culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vaele, Angela. 2005. “Creative Methodologies in Participatory Research with Children.” In Researching Children's Experience, edited by Sheila Greene and Diane Hogan, 253–272. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, Karolina. 2012. “Bo wiecie, ja to jestem z in vitro [You Know: I Am from In Vitro].” E-Dziecko. http://www.edziecko.pl/przed_ciaza/2029020,87842,12769235.html
   Google Scholar
• Zelizer, Viviana. 1994. Pricing the Priceless Child. The Changing Social Value of Children. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ziółkowska, Agnieszka. 2012. “Niepokalanie poczęta. Agnieszka, najstarsze w Polsce dziecko z in vitro [Immaculately Conceived. Agnieszka, the Oldest IVF Child in Poland].” Gazeta Wyborcza. http://wyborcza.pl/energiakobiet/2029020,118219,12200284.html
   Google Scholar