3,587
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Regular Articles

The lamination machine and laminating as thing-power in early childhood pedagogical practice

&
Pages 701-713 | Received 03 Sep 2020, Accepted 25 Jul 2021, Published online: 11 Aug 2021

References

  • Bae, B. (2005). Å se barn som subjekt -noen konsekvenser for pedagogisk arbeid i barnehage. Oslo: Barne og familiedepartementet, www.odin.dep.no.
  • Bae, B. 2012. “Children and Teachers as Partners in Communication: Focus on Spacious and Narrow Interactional Patterns.” International Journal of Early Childhood 44 (1): 53–69. doi:10.1007/s13158-012-0052-3.
  • Barrow, W. J. 1965. “Deacidification and Lamination of Deteriorated Documents, 1938-63.” American Archivist 28: 285–290.
  • Bennett, J. 2001. The Enchantment of Modern Life. Attachments, Crossings and Ethics. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Bennett, J. 2004. “The Force of Things.” Political Theory 32 (3): 347–372.
  • Bennett, J. 2010. Vibrant Matter. A Political Ecology of Things. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
  • Berge, A. 2015. Barnehagen i en Brytningstid: Tradisjoner i Spill og Praksiser Under Press i den Store Barnehagen. Stavanger: Universitetet i Stavanger.
  • Bille, M., and T. F. Sørensen. 2019. Materialitet. En Indføring i Kultur, Identitet og Teknologi. 2nd ed. Fredriksberg: Samfundslitteratur.
  • Børhaug, K. 2011. “Barnehageorganisasjonen-autonomi Eller Standardisering.” FoU i Praksis 5 (2): 49–66.
  • Burnett, C. 2013. “Investegating Pupils’ Interactions Around Texts: a Spatial Perspective on the “Classroom-Ness” of Digital Literacy Practices in Schools.” Educational Reveiw 66 (2): 192–209.
  • Burnett, C., and G. Merchant. 2018. “Affective Encounters: Enchantment and the Possibility of Reading Pleasure.” Literacy 56: 62–69. doi:10.1111/lit.12144.
  • Chiong, C., and C. Shuler. 2010. Learning: Is There an Application for That? Investigations of Young Children’s Usage and Learning With Mobile Devices and Applications. New York: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.
  • Dahlberg, G., and P. Moss. 2012. Contesting Early Childhood and Opening for Change. London: Routledge.
  • Dale, T. S. 2017. Hva står på planen i dag?: Et etnografisk arbeid om barnehagelærerens bruk av styringsdokumenter i planlegging og Hva står på planen i dag?: Et etnografisk arbeid om barnehagelærerens bruk av styringsdokumenter i planlegging ogKristiansandHva står på planen i dag?: Et etnografisk arbeid om barnehagelærerens bruk av styringsdokumenter i planlegging og University of Agder.
  • De Jong, M. 2005. “Rummets Magt og Magten Over Rummet i Daginstitution og Skole.” In Arktitektur, Krop og Læring, edited by K. Larsen, 89–117. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
  • Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. [1987] 2004. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Translated by B. Massumi. London: Continuum.
  • Eide, B. J., and N. Winger. 2008. Glimt fra småbarns hverdagsliv i barnehagen. https://skriftserien.oslomet.no/index.php/skriftserien/issue/view/15.
  • Eide, B., N. Winger, and K. D. Wolf. 2019. “Alt Henger Sammen – Hverdagslogistikk og små Barns Muligheter for Tilhørighet i Barnehagen.” Nordisk Barnehageforskning 18: 1–15. doi:10.7577/nbf.2688.
  • Goble, E. 2017. “Beyond Human Subjectivity and Back to Things Themselves: Jane Bennett's Vibrant Matter.” Phenomenology and Practice 11 (2): 71–78.
  • Habermas, J. 2010. “Technical Life and the Social Life-World.” In Technology and Values. Essential Readings, edited by C. Hanks, 169–175. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Hultman, K., and H. Lenz Taguchi. 2010. “Challenging Anthropocentric Analysis of Visual Data: A Relational Materialist Methodological Approach to Educational Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education: Thinking with Deleuze in Qualitative Research 23 (5): 525–542.
  • Ihde, D. 1979. Technics and Praxis. A Philosophy of Technology. Vol. 130. Dordrecht: Holland/ Boston: USA/London: D Reidel Publishing Company.
  • Ihde, D. 2010. “A Phenomelogy of Technics.” In Technology and Values. Essential Readings, edited by C. Hanks, 134–156. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Ingold, T. 2012. “Toward an Ecology of Materials.” Annual Review of Anthropology 41: 427–442.
  • Johansson, E. 2006. “Childrens's Morality. Perspectives and Research.” In Handbook of Research on the Education of Young Children, edited by B. Spodek and O. N. Saracho, 55–82. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Assosiates, Inc.
  • Juelskjær, M. 2019. At tænke med agential realisme. København: Nyt fra Samfundsvidenskaberne.
  • Keane, W. 2005. “Signs are not the Garb of Meaning: On the Social Analysis of Material Things.” In Materiality, edited by Keane, Webb, 182–205. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Kopytoff, I. 1986. “The Cultural Biography of Things: Commodization as Process.” In The Socal Life of Things. Commodeties in Cultural Perspective, edited by A. Appadurai, 65–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kunnskapsdepartementet. 2011. Rammeplan for Innhaldet i og Oppgåvene til Barnehagen. Oslo: Kunnskapsdepartementet.
  • Leafgren, S. 2013. “This is Not a Pencil: A Deleuzoguattarian Re-Imagining of the Classroom Milieu.” Global Studies of Childhood 3 (3): 276–288.
  • Lenz Taguchi, H., and A. Sjøbu. 2010. Bortenfor skillet mellom teori og praksis: en introduksjon til intra-aktiv pedagogikk i barnehagefeltet. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
  • Løkken, G., and T. Moser. 2012. “Space and Materiality in Early Childhood Pedagogy - Introductory Notes.” Education Inquiry 3 (3): 303–315.
  • Lupton, D. 2019. “The Thing-Power of the Human-app Health Assemblage: Thinking with Vital Materialism.” Social Theory Health 17: 125–139. doi:10.1057/s41285-019-00096-y.
  • Mak, D., and D. Nathan-Roberts. 2017. “Design Considerations for Educational Mobile Apps for Young Children.” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 61 (1): 1156–1160. doi:10.1177/1541931213601773.
  • Melhuus, C. E. 2012. “Outdoor Day-Care Centres - A Culturalization of Nature: How Do Children Relate to Nature as Educational Practice?” European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 20 (3): 455–467.
  • Miller, D. 2005. Materiality. Durham, SC: Duke University Press Books.
  • Moore, S. 2010. “The Local History of Space.” In Technology and Values. Essential Readings, edited by C. Hanks, 373–384. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Nordin-Hultman, E., A. Solli, and T. T. Jansen. 2004. Pedagogiske miljøer og barns subjektskaping. Oslo: Pedagogisk forum.
  • Nordtømme, S. 2012. “Place, Space and Materiality for Pedagogy in a Kindergarten.” Education Inquiry 3 (3): 317–333.
  • Nordtømme, S. 2015. “En teoretisk utdyping av rom og materialitet som pedagogisk ressurs i barnehagen.” Nordisk Barnehageforskning 10 (4): 1–14.
  • Opler, M. E. 1945. Themes as dynamic forces in culture. American Journal of Sociology 5: 198–206.
  • Osgood, J. 2020. “‘You Can't Separate It from Anything': Glitter's Doings as Materialized Figurations of Childhood (and) Art.” In Postdevelopmental Approaches to Childhood Art, edited by M. Sakr, and J. Osgood, 111–137. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Østrem, S. 2012. Barnet som subjekt. Etikk, demokrati og pedagogisk ansvar. Oslo: Cappelen Damm.
  • Pacini-Ketchabaw, V. 2012. “Acting with the Clock: Clocking Practices in Early Childhood.” Contemporary Issues of Early Childhood 11 (2): 154–209.
  • Preston, C., and L. Mowbray. 2008. “Use of SMART Boards for Teaching, Learning and Assessment in Kindergarten Science.” Teaching Science 54 (2): 50–53.
  • Roggia, S. 2002. “William James Barrow a Biographical Study of his Formative Years and his Role in the History of Library and Archives Conservation from 1931-1941.” PhD diss., Columbia University.
  • Ryan, G. W., and R. H. Bernard. 2003. “Techniques to Identify Themes.” Field Methods 15 (1): 85–109.
  • Seldin, T., and P. Epstein. 2003. The Montessori Way: An Education for Life. Sarasota, FL: The Montessori Foundation Press.
  • Skreland, L. L. 2018. Regler i barnehagen. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
  • Van Dyke, R. 2015. Practicing Materiality. Tuscon: University of Arizona Press.
  • Zaranis, N., and E. Synodi. 2017. “A Comparative Study on the Effectiveness of the Computer Assisted Method and the Interactionist Approach to Teaching Geometry Shapes to Young Children.” Education and Information Technologie 22 (4): 1377–1393.