Choreographing collaboratories: studios of situated improvisations

References

• Ahmed, Sara. 2006. Queer Phenomenology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Albright, Ann Cooper. 1997. Choreographing Difference: The Body and Identity in Contemporary Dance. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Albright, Ann Cooper. 2018. How to Land. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Australia Council for the Arts. 2020. Cultivating Creativity: A Study of the Sydney Opera House’s Creative Leadership in Learning Program in Schools. n.d. https://www.australiacouncil.gov.au/research/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Cultivating-Creativity-Report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, Estelle, and Barbara Bolt. 2007. Practice as Research. London: I.B.Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, C. 2006. Participation: Documents of Contemporary Art. Whitechapel Art Gallery.
   Google Scholar
• Center for the Study of Childhood Art. 2021. “[CSCA: Childhood Art Speaker Series] Dr. Sylvia Kind And Dr. Cristina Delgado Vintimilla.” YouTube. February 1, 2021. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cV6UNFyOSaU&feature=emb_logo.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty, C, ed. 2009. Situation: Documents of Contemporary Art. London: Whitechapel Art Gallery.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, Maxine. 1978. Landscapes of Learning. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, M. 2008. “Commentary: Education and the Arts: The Windows of Imagination.” Learning Landscapes 1: 17–21.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. 1990. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London: Free Assn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, Timothy. 2013. Making. Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture. London: Routledge. doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203559055.
   Google Scholar
• Kind, S. 2018. “Collective Improvisations: The Emergence of the Early Childhood Studio as an Event-Full Place.” In Communities of Practice: Art, Play, and Aesthetics in Early Childhood, edited by C. Thompson and C. Schulte, 5–21. New York: Springer Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kind, S. 2020. “Wool Works, Cat’s Cradle, and the Art of Paying Attention.” In Ethics and Research with Young Children: New Perspectives, edited by C. Schulte. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kind, S. n.d. “A/r/Tographic Becomings, Choreographies, and Materialities.” In A/r/Tography: Essential Readings and Conversations, edited by R. L. Irwin, A. Lasczik, A. Sinner, and V. Triggs. Intellect.
   Google Scholar
• Kontturi, K. 2018. Ways of Following: Art, Materiality, Collaboration. London: Open Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Land, N., C. D. Vintimilla, V. Pacini-Ketchabaw, and L. Angus. 2020. “Propositions Toward Decentering the Child in Pedagogical Collaboration with Early Childhood Educators.” Journal of Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949120953522.
   Google Scholar
• Lasczik Cutcher, A., and R. L. Irwin. 2018. “A/r/Tographic Peripatetic Inquiry and the Flâneur.” In In The Flâneur and Education Research: A Metaphor for Knowing. Ethical Actions and Data Production, edited by A. Lasczik Cutcher and R. L. Irwin, 131–154. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Leavy, Patricia. 2015. Method Meets Art: Arts-Based Research Practice. New York: Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• LeBlanc, N., and R. Irwin. 2019. “A/r/Tography.” In Oxford Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods in Education, edited by George Noblit, 1–21. New York: Oxford University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.393.
   Google Scholar
• Leggo, C., and R. L. Irwin. 2013. “A/r/Tography: Always in Process.” In New Methods in Literacy Research, edited by Peggy Albers, Teri Holbrook, and Amy Seely Flint, 150–162. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, Erin. 2009. Relationscapes: Movement, Art, Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, Erin. 2012. Relationscapes Movement Art Philosophy. Technologies of Lived Abstraction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, Erin. 2016. The Minor Gesture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, Erin, and Brian Massumi. 2014. Thought in the Act. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neimanis, A., C. Åsberg, and J. Hedrén. 2015. “Four Problems, Four Directions for Environmental Humanities: Toward Critical Posthumanities for the Anthropocene.” Ethics and the Environment 20: 67–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.2979/ethicsenviro.20.1.67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ono, Yoko. 1964. Grapefruit. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Page, Tara. 2018. “Teaching and Learning with Matter.” Arts 7 (4): 82. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/arts7040082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, Maggi. 2014. “Choreographies of Thought: Dancing Time Back Into Writing.” In Doctoral Writing in the Creative and Performing Arts, edited by L. Ravelli, B. Paltridge, and S. Starfield, 281–297. Faringdon: Libri Pub Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, J. 2001. Accumulated Response in Live Improvised Dance Performance. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/1038.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, Jo, and Lilly Blue. 2013. “Into the Dark”. BIG Kids Magazine (4) Perth and Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, Jo, Maitland Schnaars, and Lilly Blue. 2019. “Kep Waangkiny.” Art Gallery of Western Australia. 2019. https://vimeo.com/371526014.
   Google Scholar
• Randi, Nygard. 2020. “Wild Living Marine Resources Belong to Society as a Whole– On art and laws” Ensyos. https://ensayostierradelfuego.net/field-notes/on-art-and-laws/.
   Google Scholar
• Rinaldi, Carlina. 2006. In Dialogue with Reggio Emilia: Listening Researching and Learning. London: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sollins, S., S. Dowling, and C. Tatge. 2016. Art 21: Art in the Twenty-First Century. Kanopy Streaming. https://art21.org/watch/art-in-the-twenty-first-century/s2/do-ho-suh-in-stories-segment/.
   Google Scholar
• Springgay, S., R. Irwin, and S. Kind. 2008. “A/r/tographers and Living Inquiry.” In Handbook of the Arts in Qualitative Research: Perspectives, Methodologies, Examples, and Issues, edited by J. Gary Knowles and A. L. Cole, 83–92. New York: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications. https://www-doi-org.ezproxy.ecu.edu.au/https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226545.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, G. 2005. Art Practice as Research: Inquiry in the Visual Arts. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Vechhi, V. 2010. Art and Creativity in Reggio Emilia. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vintimilla, D. C., and I. Berger. 2019. “Co-Labouring.” In Feminist Post-Qualitative Research for 21st-Century Childhoods, edited by D. Hodgings. London: Bloomsburry.
   Google Scholar
• Vintimilla, C. D., and S. Kind. 2021. “Choreographies of Practice: Mutualities and Sympoetic Becomings in Early Childhood Teacher Education.” In Visual Arts with Young Children: Practice, edited by H. Park and C. Schulte, 33–47. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vintimilla, C. D. n.d. What Is Pedagogy? BC Early Childhood Pedagogy Network Website. https://www.ecpn.ca/blog/reflection/what-is-pedagogy.
   Google Scholar
• Vintimilla, C. D., and V. Pacini-Ketchabaw. 2020. “Developmentalism and Pedagogy: Opening Horizons in Early Childhood Education.” European Early Childhood Education and Research 28 (5): 628–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar