868
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Children’s technologies of the self within neoliberal governmentality at the educational transition to Gymnasium in Zurich

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1201-1215 | Received 14 Feb 2023, Accepted 28 Jun 2023, Published online: 25 Jul 2023

References

  • Ball, S. J. 2016. “Neoliberal Education? Confronting the Slouching Beast.” Policy Futures in Education 14 (8): 1046–1059. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210316664259.
  • Bauer, I. 2018. “Framing, Overflowing, and Fuzzy Logic in Educational Selection: Zurich as a Case Study.” Geographica Helvetica 73 (1): 19–30. https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-73-19-2018.
  • Bauer, I., and S. Landolt. 2022. “Studying Region, Network, Fluid, and Fire in an Educational Programme Working Against Social Inequalities.” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 136 (July): 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2022.08.004.
  • Becker, J., L. Hartwich, and A. Haslam. 2021. “Neoliberalism Can Reduce Well-Being by Promoting a Sense of Social Disconnection, Competition, and Loneliness.” British Journal of Social Psychology 60 (3): 947–965. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12438.
  • Becker, R., and C. Zangger. 2013. “Die Bildungsexpansion in der Schweiz und ihre Folgen.” Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 65 (3): 423–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-013-0209-6.
  • Bildungsdirektion Zürich. 2012. “Empfehlungen zur Durchführung von Vorbereitungskursen für die Aufnahmeprüfungen der Gymnasien.” https://www.zh.ch/content/dam/zhweb/bilder-dokumente/themen/bildung/informationen-fuer-schulen/informationen-fuer-die-volksschule/organisation/schulstufen-uebergaenge/uebergang-sekundarschule/empfehlungen_vorbereitungskursen_gymnasien.pdf.
  • BISTA. 2023. “Kennzahlen von Schulgemeinden.” https://pub.bista.zh.ch/de/zahlen-und-fakten/andere/kennzahlen-von-schulgemeinden/vergleich-von-schulgemeinden/.
  • Bradbury, A. 2019. “Making Little Neo-Liberals: The Production of Ideal Child/Learner Subjectivities in Primary School Through Choice, Self-Improvement and Growth Mindsets.” Power and Education 11 (3): 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757743818816336.
  • Bray, M. 2017. “Schooling and Its Supplements: Changing Global Patterns and Implications for Comparative Education.” Comparative Education Review 61 (3): 469–491. https://doi.org/10.1086/692709
  • Bröckling, U. 2016. The Entrepreneurial Self: Fabricating a New Type of Subject. London: Sage.
  • Brown, G. 2011. “Emotional Geographies of Young People’s Aspirations for Adult Life.” Children’s Geographies 9 (1): 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2011.540435.
  • Carlson, D. L. 2009. “Producing Entrepreneurial Subjects: Neoliberal Rationalities and Portfolio Assessment.” In Governmentality Studies in Education, edited by M. A. Peters, T. Besley, M. Olssen, S. Maurer, and S. Weber, 257–269. Rotterdam: SensePublishers.
  • Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage.
  • Criblez, L. 2014. “Das Schweizer Gymnasium: Ein Historischer Blick auf Ziele und Wirklichkeit.” In Abitur und Matura Zwischen Hochschulvorbereitung und Berufsorientierung, edited by F. Eberle, B. Schneider-Taylor, and D. Bosse, 15–49. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.
  • Dahlstedt, M., and A. Fejes, eds. 2019. Neoliberalism and Market Forces in Education: Lessons from Sweden. London: Routledge.
  • Davidson, E. 2008. “Marketing the Self: The Politics of Aspiration among Middle-Class Silicon Valley Youth.” Environment and Planning A 40 (12): 2814–2830. https://doi.org/10.1068/a4037.
  • Davidson, E. 2015. “Responsible Girls: The Spatialized Politics of Feminine Success and Aspiration in a Divided Silicon Valley, USA.” Gender, Place and Culture 22 (3): 390–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2013.879099.
  • Davies, B., and P. Bansel. 2007. “Neoliberalism and Education.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 20 (3): 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390701281751.
  • Dlabač, O., A. Amrhein, and F. Hug. 2021. Durchmischung in Städtischen Schulen – Eine politische Aufgabe?. Optimierte schulische Einzugsgebiete für Schweizer Städte. Aarau: Zentrum für Demokratie.
  • Flick, U. 2000. “Episodic Interviewing.” In Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound, edited by M. W. Bauer and G. Gaskell, 75–92. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209731.
  • Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Pantheon.
  • Foucault, M. 1988. “Technologies of the Self.” In Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault, edited by L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, and P. H. Hutton, 16–49. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
  • Foucault, M. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France, 1978–1979. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Goldstein, H. 2004. “International Comparisons of Student Attainment: Some Issues Arising from the PISA Study.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 11 (3): 319–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594042000304618.
  • Grant, T. 2017. “The Complexity of Aspiration: The Role of Hope and Habitus in Shaping Working-Class Young People’s Aspirations to Higher Education.” Children’s Geographies 15 (3): 289–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2016.1221057.
  • Hangartner, J., R. Frankhauser, J. Budde, T. Forkby, and K. Alstam. 2022. “How the Self-Governing Imperative Alters the Classroom as a Public Space.” Going Public?, 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-34085-8_9.
  • Herzing, J. M. E., S. Seiler, R. Benz, and A. B. Erzinger. 2022. Die Überprüfung des Erreichens der Grundkompetenzen in der Schweiz: Porträt des Kantons Zürich. Bern: ICER, Universität Bern.
  • Hof, S., and S. C. Wolter. 2014. Ausmass und Wirkung Bezahlter Nachhilfe in der Schweiz. Aarau: SKBF.
  • Holloway, S. L., P. Hubbard, H. Jöns, and H. Pimlott-Wilson. 2010. “Geographies of Education and the Significance of Children, Youth and Families.” Progress in Human Geography 34 (5): 583–600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510362601
  • Holloway, S. L., and P. Kirby. 2020. “Neoliberalising Education: New Geographies of Private Tuition, Class Privilege, and Minority Ethnic Advancement.” Antipode 52 (1): 164–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12587.
  • Holloway, S. L., and H. Pimlott-Wilson. 2011. “The Politics of Aspiration: Neo-Liberal Education Policy, “low” Parental Aspirations, and Primary School Extended Services in Disadvantaged Communities.” Children’s Geographies 9 (1): 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2011.540441.
  • Holloway, S. L., and H. Pimlott-Wilson. 2012. “Neoliberalism, Policy Localisation and Idealised Subjects: A Case Study on Educational Restructuring in England.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 37 (4): 639–654. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00498.x.
  • Hörschelmann, K. 2008. “Transitions to Work and the Making of Neoliberal Selves: Growing Up in (the Former) East Germany.” In Social Justice and Neoliberalism. Global Perspectives, edited by A. Smith, A. Stenning, and K. Willis, 135–163. New York, London: Zed.
  • Kaffarnik, U., and M. Stoll. 2020. Bericht Situationsanalyse Prüfungsvorbereitung für die Mittelschulen. Zürich: Zürcher Schulpflege.
  • Katz, C. 2018. “The Angel of Geography: Superman, Tiger Mother, Aspiration Management, and the Child as Waste.” Progress in Human Geography 42 (5): 723–740. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132517708844.
  • Kelly, A. L. 2019. The High Stakes of Testing. Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV.
  • Landolt, S., and M. Kaegi. 2020. “«Go for it!»: Ein Projekt für Mehr Chancengleichheit am Gymnasium in Zürich.” Open Spaces 2: 30–41. https://doi.org/10.17185/duepublico/77310.
  • Laval, C., and P. Dardot. 2013. The New Way of the World: On Neoliberal Society. London, New York: Verso.
  • Lemke, T., S. Krasmann, and U. Bröckling. 2000. “Gouvernmentalität, Neoliberalismus und Selbsttechnologien.” In Gouvernmentalität der Gegenwart. Studien zur Ökonomisierung des Sozialen, edited by U. Bröckling, S. Krasmann, and T. Lemke, 7–40. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
  • Longhurst, R. 2010. “Semi-structured Interviews and Focus Groups.” In Key Methods in Geography, edited by N. Clifford, F. Shaun, and V. Gill, 103–115. London: Sage.
  • Massey, D. 2013. “Vocabularies of the Economy.” Soundings: A Journal of Politics and Culture, 9–22. https://www.muse.jhu.edu/article/522125.
  • Mitchell, K. 2018. Making Workers: Radical Geographies of Education. London: Pluto.
  • Morrin, K. 2018. “Tensions in Teaching Character: How the ‘Entrepreneurial Character’ is Reproduced, ‘Refused’, and Negotiated in an English Academy School.” Sociological Research Online 23 (2): 459–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780418769670.
  • Neuenschwander, M. 2014. “Selektion Beim Übergang in die Sekundarstufe I und in den Arbeitsmarkt im Vergleich.” In Selektion in Schule und Arbeitsmarkt: Forschungsbefunde und Praxisbeispiele, edited by M. Neuenschwander, 63–97. Zürich: Rüegger.
  • Nguyen, N., D. Cohen, and A. Huff. 2017. “Catching the Bus: A Call for Critical Geographies of Education.” Geography Compass 11 (8): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12323.
  • Peters, M. A., T. Besley, M. Olssen, S. Maurer, and S. Weber. 2009. Governmentality Studies in Education. Rotterdam: SensePublishers.
  • Pfister, A. 2022. Neue Schweizer Bildung: Upskilling für die Moderne. Bern: hep.
  • Phillippo, K. 2019. A Contest Without Winners: How Students Experience Competitive School Choice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Phillippo, K., and B. Griffin. 2016. “‘If You Don’t Score High Enough, Then That’s Your Fault’: Student Civic Dispositions in the Context of Competitive School Choice Policy.” Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies 14 (2): 67–95. http://www.jceps.com/archives/3066.
  • Phillippo, K., B. Griffin, B. J. Del Dotto, C. Lennix, and H. Tran. 2020. “Seeing Merit as a Vehicle for Opportunity and Equity: Youth Respond to School Choice Policy.” Urban Review 53 (4): 591–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-020-00590-y.
  • Pike, J. 2008. “Foucault, Space and Primary School Dining Rooms.” Children’s Geographies 6 (4): 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733280802338114.
  • Pimlott-Wilson, H. 2019. “Individualising the Future: The Emotional Geographies of Neoliberal Governance in Young People’s Aspirations.” Area 49 (3): 288–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12222.
  • Raco, M. 2009. “From Expectations to Aspirations: State Modernisation, Urban Policy, and the Existential Politics of Welfare in the UK.” Political Geography 28 (7): 436–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2009.10.009.
  • Rose, N. 1999. Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schreiber, V., C. Stein, and R. Pütz. 2016. “Governing Childhood Through Crime Prevention: The Case of the German School System.” Children’s Geographies 14 (3): 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2015.1048426.
  • Schwiter, K. 2013. “Neoliberal Subjectivity – Difference, Free Choice and Individualised Responsibility in the Life Plans of Young Adults in Switzerland.” Geographica Helvetica 68 (3): 153–159. https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-68-153-2013.
  • SKBF. 2018. Bildungsbericht Schweiz. Aarau: SKBF.
  • Tett, L., and M. Hamilton, eds. 2019. Resisting Neoliberalism in Education: Local, National and Transnational Perspectives. Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Themelis, S., ed. 2020. Critical Reflections on the Language of Neoliberalism in Education: Dangerous Words and Discourses of Possibility. New York: Routledge.
  • von Felden, H. 2020. “Das Konzept der Gouvernementalität Nach Foucault.” In Identifikation, Anpassung, Widerstand. Rezeptionen von Appellen des Lebenslangen Lernens, edited by F. von Heide and R. Egger, 49–62. Wiesbaden: Spinger.
  • Youdell, D. 2006. Impossible Bodies, Impossible Selves: Exclusions and Student Subjectivities. Dordrecht: Springer.