Resuscitating Georg Lukács: Form, Metaphysics and the Idea of a New Realism

References

• Adorno, T. W. 1977. ‘Reconciliation under Duress’. In Theodor W. Adorno et al. (ed), Aesthetics and Politics. London and New York: Verso, 151–176.
   Google Scholar
• Adorno, T. W. 1981. Noten zur Literatur. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Adorno, T. W. 1997. Aesthetic Theory. Translated by Robert Hullot-Kentor. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad, A. 1992. ‘Jameson’s Rhetoric of Otherness and the “National Allegory”’. In In Theory: Classes, Nations, Literatures. New York: Verso, 95–122.
   Google Scholar
• Best, S. 1989. ‘Jameson, Totality, and the Poststructuralist Critique’. In Douglas Kellner (ed), Postmodernism/Jameson/Critique. Washington, DC: Maisonneuve Press, 333–368.
   Google Scholar
• Bewes, T. and Hall, T. (eds). 2011. Georg Lukács: The Fundamental Dissonance of Existence. London and New York: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Boghossian, P. 2007. Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and Constructivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, L., Srnicek, N. and Harman, G. (eds). 2011. The Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism. Melbourne: re.press.
   Google Scholar
• Bürger, P. 1992. Prosa der Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 13–54.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2010. ‘Introduction’. In John T. Sanders and Katie Terezakis (eds), György Lukács, Soul and Form. Translated by Anna Bostock. New York: Columbia University Press, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Gabriel, M. (ed). 2014. Der Neue Realismus. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Goldmann, L. 1974. ‘Über die Theorie des Romans’. In Jutta Matzner (ed), Lehrstück Lukács. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 59–64.
   Google Scholar
• Hohendahl, P. U. 1995. Prismatic Thought: Theodor W. Adorno. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 149–182.
   Google Scholar
• Hohendahl, P. U. 2011. ‘The Theory of the Novel and the Concept of Realism in Lukács and Adorno.’ In M. J. Thompson (ed), Georg Lukács Reconsidered: Critical Essays in Politics, Philosophy, and Aesthetics. London: Bloomsburg, 75–98.
   Google Scholar
• Homer, S. 1998. Fredric Jameson: Marxism, Hermeneutics, Postmodernism. Cambridge: Polity, 152–172.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, F. 1971. Marxism and Form: Twentieth-Century Dialectical Theories of Literature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, F. [1975] 2008. ‘Beyond the Cave: Demystifying the Ideology of Modernism’. In The Ideologies of Theory. New York: Verso, 415–433.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, F. [1976] 2008. ‘The Ideology of the Text’. In The Ideologies of Theory. New York: Verso, 20–76.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, F. [1977] 2008. ‘Reflections on the Brecht-Lukács Debate’. In The Ideologies of Theory. New York: Verso, 434–450.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, F. 1988. ‘Cognitive Mapping’. In Cary Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg (eds), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 347–360.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, F. 1991. Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, F. 1992. Signatures of the Visible. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, F. 2009. Valences of the Dialectic. New York: Verso, 201–222.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, F. 2013. The Antinomies of Realism. New York: Verso, 304–313.
   Google Scholar
• Jay, M. 1984. Marxism and Totality: The Adventures of a Concept from Lukács to Habermas. Berkeley: University of California Press, 81–127.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. 2001. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London and New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, N. 2004. ‘Fredric Jameson on “Third-World Literature”: A Qualified Defence’. In Douglas Kellner and Sean Homer (eds), Fredric Jameson: A Critical Reader. New York: Palgrave, 42–61.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. S. 2011. ‘Temporalized Invariance: Lukács and the Work of Form’. In Timothy Bewes and Timothy Hall (eds), Georg Lukács: The Fundamental Dissonance of Existence. London and New York: Bloomsbury, 17–35.
   Google Scholar
• Lukács, G. 1971. The Theory of the Novel: A Historico-Philosophical Essay on the Forms of Great Epic Literature. Translated by Anna Bostock. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lukács, G. 1978. Writer and Critic. Edited and translated by Arthur Kahn. London: Merlin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lukács, G. 1994. Die Theorie des Romans: Ein geschichtsphilosophischer Versuch über die Formen der großen Epik. Munich: DTV.
   Google Scholar
• Lukács, G. 2002. Studies in European Realism: Balzac, Stendhal, Tolstoy, Zola, Gorky. Translated by Edith Bone. New York: Howard Fertig.
   Google Scholar
• Lukács, G. 2006. The Meaning of Contemporary Realism. Translated by John and Necke Mander. London: Merlin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lukács, G. 2007. ‘Realism in the Balance’. Translated by Rodney Livingstone. In Aesthetics and Politics. London and New York: Verso [1977], 28–59.
   Google Scholar
• Lukács, G. 2010. Soul and Form. In John T. Sanders and Katie Terezakis (eds). Translated by Anna Bostock. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lukács, G. 2011. History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics. Translated by Rodney Livingstone. London: Merlin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lunn, E. 1982. Marxism and Modernism: An Historical Study of Lukács, Brecht, Benjamin, and Adorno. Berkeley: University of California Press, 75–145.
   Google Scholar
• Nietzsche, F. 1974. The Gay Science. Translated by Walter Kaufmann. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Plass, H. (ed). 2015. Klasse-Geschichte-Bewusstsein: Was bleibt von Georg Lukács’ Theorie?. Berlin: Verbrecher Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Radhakrishnan, R. 1989. ‘Poststructuralist Politics: Towards a Theory of Coalition’. In Douglas Kellner (ed), Postmodernism/Jameson/Critique. Washington, DC: Maisonneuve Press, 301–332.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 1999. Philosophy and Social Hope. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 2004. ‘Philosophy as a Transitional Genre’. In Seyla Benhabib and Nancy Fraser (eds), Pragmatism, Critique, Judgment: Essays for Richard J. Bernstein. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 3–28.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 2010. ‘Redemption from Egotism: James and Proust as Spiritual Exercises’. In Christopher J. Voparil and Richard J. Bernstein (eds), The Rorty Reader. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell, 389–406.
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 2011. An Ethics for Today: Finding Common Ground between Philosophy and Religion. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. [1978] 2014. The Melancholy Science: An Introduction to the Thought of Theodor W. Adorno. New York: Verso, 147–153, 156–168.
   Google Scholar
• Scheible, H. 1988. Wahrheit und Subjekt: Ästhetik im bürgerlichen Zeitalter. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt, 397–443.
   Google Scholar
• Schulenberg, U. 2015. Romanticism and Pragmatism: Richard Rorty and the Idea of a Poeticized Culture. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tally, R. T. Jr. 2014. Fredric Jameson: The Project of Dialectical Criticism. London: Pluto, 41–53.
   Google Scholar
• Terezakis, K. 2010. ‘Afterword: The Legacy of Form’. In John T. Sanders and Katie Terezakis (eds), György Lukács, Soul and Form. New York: Columbia UP, 215–234.
   Google Scholar
• Terezakis, K. 2011. ‘Living Form and Living Criticism.’ In M. J. Thompson (ed), Georg Lukács Reconsidered: Critical Essays in Politics, Philosophy, and Aesthetics. London: Bloomsbury, 211–228.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. J. 2011. ‘Ontology and Totality: Reconstructing Lukács’ Concept of Critical Theory’. In Michael J. Thompson (ed), Georg Lukács Reconsidered: Critical Essays in Politics, Philosophy, and Aesthetics. London and New York: Bloomsbury, 229–250.
   Google Scholar