References
- Bower, L. 1997. ‘Queer Problems/Straight Solutions: The Limits of a Politics of “Official Recognition”’. In Shane Phelan (ed), Playing with Fire: Queer Politics, Queer Theories. New York: Routledge, 267–291.
- Butler, J. 2002. ‘Is Kinship Always Already Heterosexual?’ Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 13:1, 14–44. doi: 10.1215/10407391-13-1-14
- Butler, J. 2006. ‘Undiagnosing Gender’. In Paisley Currah, Richard M. Juang and Shannon Price Minter (eds), Transgender Rights. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 274–298.
- Chakrabarty, D. 2000. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Chan, C. 2011. ‘Deference and the Separation of Powers: An Assessment of the Court’s Constitutional and Institutional Competence’. Hong Kong Law Journal 41:1, 7–25.
- Chen, K. H. 2010. Asia as Method: Toward Deimperialization. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- Chen, Y. C. 2013. ‘Narratives, Lives, and Law: Legal Queeries Refabrication in Taiwan’. Paper presented at the 2013 Inter-Asia Cultural Studies Conference, Singapore.
- Cheung, P. K. E. 2012. ‘Transgenders in Hong Kong: From Shame to Pride’. In Howard Chiang (ed), Transgender China. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 263–284.
- Chiang, H. 2013. ‘(De)Provincializing China: Queer Historicism and Sinophone Postcolonial Critique’. In Howard Chiang and Ari Larissa Heinrich (eds), Queer Sinophone Cultures. London: Routledge, 19–51.
- Chiang, H. and Heinrich, A. L. (eds). 2013. Queer Sinophone Cultures. London: Routledge.
- Chiang, H. and Wong, A. 2016. ‘Queering the Transnational Turn: Regionalism and Queer Asias’. Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography 23:11, 1643–1656. doi: 10.1080/0966369X.2015.1136811
- Cruz, D. 2010. ‘Getting Sex “Right”: Heteronormativity and Biologism in Trans and Intersex Marriage Litigation and Scholarship’. Duke Journal of Gender Law and Policy 18, 203–222.
- Currah, P. 2006. ‘Gender Pluralisms under the Transgender Umbrella’. In Paisley Currah, Richard M. Juang and Shannon Price Minter (eds), Transgender Rights. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 3–31.
- Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. 1986. Kafka: Toward a Minor Literature. Translated by Dana Polan. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Duggan, L. 2003. The Twilight of Equality? Neoliberalism, Cultural Politics, and the Attack on Democracy. Boston: Beacon Press.
- Eng, D. L. 2010. The Feeling of Kinship: Queer Liberalism and the Racialization of Intimacy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- Eng, D., Ruskola, T. and Shen, S. 2011. ‘Introduction: China and the Human’. Social Text 29:4, 1–27. doi: 10.1215/01642472-1416073
- Engebretsen, E. L. 2013. Queer Women in Urban China: An Ethnography. London: Routledge.
- Erni, J. N. 2013. ‘Legitimating Transphobia: The Legal Disavowal of Transgender Rights in Prison’. Cultural Studies 27:1, 136–159. doi: 10.1080/09502386.2012.722305
- Erni, J. N. 2014. ‘Marriage Rights for Transgender People in Hong Kong: Reading the W Case’. In Deborah S. Davis and Sara L. Friedman (eds), Wives, Husbands, and Lovers: Marriage and Sexuality in Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Urban China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 189–216.
- Esty, J. and Lye, C. 2012. ‘Peripheral Realisms Now’. Modern Language Quarterly 73:3, 269–288. doi: 10.1215/00267929-1631397
- Freeman, E. 2007. ‘Queer Belongings: Kinship Theory and Queer Theory’. In George E. Haggerty and Molly McGarry (eds), A Companion to Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Studies. Oxford: Blackwell, 295–314.
- Friedman, S. Forthcoming. ‘Stranger Anxiety: Failed Legal Equivalences and the Challenges of Intimate Recognition in Taiwan’. Public Culture.
- Fujitani, T. 2011. Race for Empire: Koreans as Japanese and Japanese as Americans during World War II. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Guo, X. F. 2015. ‘Wusheng wuxi de bianqian: Zhongguofa shiyiexia de bianxingren hunyinquan’ [A silent and subtle transformation: Transsexual marriage rights in China]. Paper presented at the “Twenty Years of Gender/Sexualities” Conference (organised by the Centre for the Study of Sexualities at National Central University), Taipei, Taiwan.
- Hao, Q. 2004. ‘Zhongguo shoulie bianxingren hunyin de ganga’ [The awkwardness of the first case of transsexual marriage in China]. Xiandai kuaibao. March 16. Available online at http://big5.huaxia.com/xw/shgj/00186663.html (accessed 7 June 2015).
- Hausman, B. 1995. Changing Sex: Transsexualism, Technology, and the Idea of Gender. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- Hutton, C. 2011. ‘Objectification and Transgender Jurisprudence: The Dictionary as Quasi-statute’. Hong Kong Law Journal 41:1, 27–47.
- Johnson, P. 2012. Homosexuality and the European Court of Human Rights. London: Routledge.
- Kam, L. Y. L. 2013. Shanghai Lalas: Female Tongzhi Communities and Politics in Urban China. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
- Kapai, R. 2011. ‘A Principled Approach Towards Judicial Review: Lessons from W v Registrar of Marriages’. Hong Kong Law Journal 41:1, 49–74.
- Kaplan, M. B. 1994. ‘Intimacy and Equality: The Question of Lesbian and Gay Marriage’. Philosophical Forum 25:4, 333–360.
- Kogan, T. S. 2003. ‘Transsexuals, Intersexuals, and Same-sex Marriage’. Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law 18:2, 371–418.
- Lau, H. and Loh, D. 2011. ‘Misapplication of ECHR Jurisprudence in W v Registrar of Marriages’. Hong Kong Law Journal 41:1, 75–87.
- Leung, H. 2008. Undercurrents: Queer Culture and Postcolonial Hong Kong. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
- Lionnet, F. and Shih, S. M. 2005. Minor Transnationalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- Liu, A. 2011. ‘Exacerbating Corbett: W v Registrar of Marriages’. Hong Kong Law Journal 41:3, 759–783.
- Liu, A. 2012. ‘Understanding Goodwin: W v Registrar of Marriages’. Hong Kong Law Journal 42:2, 403–430.
- Liu, P. 2012. ‘Queer Human Rights in and against China: Marxism and the Figuration of the Human’. Social Text 30:1, 71–89. doi: 10.1215/01642472-1468326
- Loper, K. 2011. ‘W v Registrar of Marriages and the Right to Equality in Hong Kong’. Hong Kong Law Journal 41:1, 88–107.
- Meyerowitz, J. 2002. How Sex Changed: A History of Transsexuality in the United States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Najmabadi, A. 2013. Professing Selves: Transsexuality and Same-sex Desire in Contemporary Iran. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- Petersen, C. J. 2013. ‘Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Hong Kong: A Case for the Strategic Use of Human Rights Treaties at the International Reporting Process’. Asian-Pacific Law and Policy Journal 14:2, 28–83.
- Scherpe, J. M. 2011. ‘Changing One’s Legal Gender in Europe – The “W” Case in Comparative Perspective’. Hong Kong Law Journal 41:1, 109–123.
- Sedgwick, E. K. 1990. Epistemology of the Closet. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Shih, S. M. 2007. Visuality and Identity: Sinophone Articulations across the Pacific. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Shih, S. M. 2011. ‘The Concept of the Sinophone’. PMLA 126:3, 709–718. doi: 10.1632/pmla.2011.126.3.709
- Shih, S. M. and Liao, P. H. (eds). 2014. Comparatizing Taiwan. London: Routledge.
- Shih, S. M., Tsai, C. H. and Bernards, B. (eds). 2013. Sinophone Studies: A Critical Reader. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Stryker, S. 2004. ‘Transgender Studies: Queer Theory’s Evil Twin’. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 10:2, 212–215. doi: 10.1215/10642684-10-2-212
- Stryker, S. 2008. ‘Transgender History, Homonormativity, and Disciplinarity’. Radical History Review 100, 145–157. doi: 10.1215/01636545-2007-026
- Stryker, S., Currah, P. and Moore, L. J. 2008. ‘Introduction: Trans-, Trans, or Transgender?’ WSQ: Women's Studies Quarterly 36:3–4, 11–22. doi: 10.1353/wsq.0.0112
- Tan, E. K. 2013. ‘A Queer Journey Home in Solos: Rethinking Kinship in Neo-confucian Singapore’. In Howard Chiang and Ari Larissa Heinrich (eds), Queer Sinophone Cultures. London: Routledge, 130–146.
- Wan, M. 2011a. ‘Doing Things with the Past: A Critique of the Use of History by Hong Kong’s Court of First Instance in W v Registrar of Marriages’. Hong Kong Law Journal 41:1, 125–138.
- Wan, M. 2011b. ‘What’s So Unusual about W?’ Hong Kong Law Journal 41:1, 5–6.
- Warner, M. 1999. The Trouble with Normal: Sex, Politics, and the Ethics of Queer Life. New York: The Free Press.
- Wesling, M. 2011. ‘Neocolonialism, Queer Kinship, and Diaspora: Contesting the Romance of the Family in Shani Mootoo’s Cereus Blooms at Night and Edwidge Danticat’s Breath, Eyes, Memory’. Textual Practice 25:4, 649–670. doi: 10.1080/0950236X.2011.586774
- Winter, S. 2011. ‘Transgender Science: How Might it Shape the Way We Think about Transgender Rights?’ Hong Kong Law Journal 41:1, 139–153.
- Wong, A. K. H. 2013. ‘Queer Sinophone Studies as Anti-capitalist Critique: Mapping Queer Kinship in the Work of Chen Ran and Wong Bik-wan’. In Howard Chiang and Ari Larissa Heinrich (eds), Queer Sinophone Cultures. London: Routledge, 109–129.
- Yee, K. L. M. 2010. ‘W v Registrar of Marriages: From Transsexual Marriage to Same-sex Marriage?’ Hong Kong Law Journal 40:3, 549–562.
- Cases cited:
- Bellinger v Bellinger [2003] 2 AC 467
- Corbett v Corbett (Otherwise Ashley) [1971] P83
- Cossey v UK (1990) 13 EHRR 622
- Goodwin v UK (2002) 35 EHRR 18
- Sheffield and Horsham v UK (1998) 27 EHRR 163
- Rees v UK (1986) 9 EHRR 56
- W v Registrar of Marriages [2010] 6 HKC 359
- W v Registrar of Marriages [2012] 1 HKC 88
- W v Registrar of Marriages [2013] HKCFA 39