279
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Lessons on telepresence from the Mars explorer Rovers: Merleau- Ponty and the open perceptual circuit

ORCID Icon

References

  • Ackerman, E. 2017. ‘Are Telepresence Robots the Best Way to Explore Other Worlds?’ IEEE SPECTRUM. Available online at https://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/space-robots/are-telepresence-robots-the-best-way-to-explore-other-worlds(accessed 22 September 2018).
  • Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Battaglia, D. 2012. ‘Coming in at an Unusual Angle: Exo-Surprise and the Fieldworking Cosmonaut’. Anthropological Quarterly 85:4, 1089–106.
  • Bracken, C. C. and Skalski, P. 2010. Immersed in Media: Telepresence in Everyday Life. New York: Routledge.
  • Braidotti, R. 2013. The Posthuman. Malden, MA: Polity.
  • Buchanan, B. 2008. Onto-Ethologies: The Animal Environments of Uexkull, Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, and Deleuze. New York, NY: SUNY Press.
  • Campanella, T. 2000. ‘Eden by Wire: Webcameras and the Telepresent Landscape’. In K. Goldberg (ed), The Robot in the Garden: Telerobotics and Telepistemology in the Age of the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 22–46.
  • Carusi, A. and Hoel, A. S. 2014. ‘Toward a New Ontology of Scientific Vision’. In C. Coopmans, J. Vertesi, M. Lynch, and S. Woolgar (eds), Representation In Scientific Practice Revisited. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 201–21.
  • Clancey, W. J. 2012. Working on Mars: Voyages of Scientific Discovery with the Mars Exploration Rovers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Dittmer J. 2007. ‘Colonialism and Place Creation in Mars Pathfinder Media Coverage’. Geographical Review 97:1, 112–30.
  • Dreyfus, H. 2000. ‘Telepistemology: Descartes’ Last Stand’. In K. Goldberg (ed), The Robot in the Garden: Telerobotics and Telepistemology in the Age of the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 48–63.
  • Fóti, V. 2013. Tracing Expression in Merleau-Ponty: Aesthetics, Philosophy of Biology, and Ontology. Chicago, IL: Northwestern University Press.
  • Goldberg, K. 2000. ‘Introduction: The Unique Phenomenon of a Distance’. In K. Goldberg (ed), The Robot in the Garden: Telerobotics and Telepistemology in the Age of the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2–10.
  • Helmreich, S. 2009. Alien Ocean: Anthropological Voyages in Microbial Seas. Berkley: University of California Press.
  • Hoel, A. S. and Carusi, A. 2015. ‘Thinking Technology with Merleau-Ponty’. In R. Rosenberger and P.-P. Verbeek (eds), Postphenomenological Investigations: Essays on Human–Technology Relations. Lanham: Lexington Books, 73–84.
  • Hoel, A. S. and Carusi, A. 2018. ‘Merleau-Ponty and the Measuring Body’. Theory, Culture and Society 35:1, 45–70.
  • Ihde, D. 1990. Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press,
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory. 2014. ‘Slip Sliding Away’. NASA. Available online at mars.nasa.gov/mer/spotlight/opportunity/b20_20040309.html(accessed 20 July 2018).
  • Jet Propulsion Laboratory. n.d. ‘Spacecraft: Surface Operations: Instruments’. NASA. Available online at mars.nasa.gov/mer/mission/spacecraft_surface_instru.html(accessed 20 July 2018).
  • Khalip, J. and Mitchell, R. 2011. Releasing the Image: From Literature to New Media. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Knoll, A. 2007. ‘Guest Editor’s Introduction: Toward High-Definition Telepresence’. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 16:5, i–iii.
  • Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Lester, D. 2013. ‘Achieving Human Presence in Space Exploration,’ Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 22:4, 345–9.
  • Limerick, P. N. 1992. ‘Imagined Frontiers: Westward Expansion and the Future of the Space Program’. In R. Byerly, Jr (ed), Space Policy Alternatives. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 249–62.
  • Mars 2030. n.d. Available online at http://mars2030-vr.com/(accessed 25 July 2018).
  • Mazmanian, M., Cohn, M. and Dourish, P. 2014. ‘Dynamic Reconfiguration in Planetary Exploration: A Sociomaterial Ethnography’. Mis Quarterly 38:3, 831–48.
  • Merleau-Ponty, M. 1968. The Visible and the Invisible: Followed by Working Notes. Translated by A. Lingus and edited by C. Lefort. Chicago: Northwestern University Press.
  • Merleau-Ponty, M. 2003. Nature: Course Notes From the Collège de France. Translated by R. Vallier. Chicago, IL: Northwestern University Press.
  • Messeri, L. 2014. ‘Earth as Analog: The Disciplinary Debate and Astronaut Training That Took Geology to the Moon’. Astropolitics 12:2&3, 196–209.
  • Messeri, L. 2016. Placing Outer Space: An Earthly Ethnography of Other Worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Messeri, L. 2017. ‘Resonant Worlds: Cultivating Proximal Encounters in Planetary Science’. American Ethnologist 44:1, 131–42.
  • Minsky, M. 1980. ‘Telepresence’. OMNI Magazine 2:9, 45–52.
  • Mirmalek, Z. 2008. ‘Working Time on Mars’. KronoScope 8:2, 159–78.
  • Mirmalek, Z. 2009. ‘Dreaming of Space, Imagining Membership: The Work Conduct of Heroes’. Management and Organizational History 4:3, 299–315.
  • NASA. 2003. ‘NASA Will Send Two Robotic Geologists to Roam on Mars’. Available online at mars.nasa.gov/mer/newsroom/pressreleases/20030604a.html(accessed 20 July 2018).
  • NASA. 2010. ‘NASA Mars Rover Getting Smarter as it Gets Older’. Available online at www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/mer/news/mer20100323.html(accessed 20 July 2018).
  • NASA. 2016. ‘“Mixed Reality” Technology Brings Mars to Earth’. Available online at www.nasa.gov/feature/jpl/mixed-reality-technology-brings-mars-to-earth(accessed 20 July 2018).
  • NASA. 2017. ‘Laser-targeting A.I. Yields More Mars Science’. Available online at ww.nasa.gov/feature/jpl/laser-targeting-ai-yields-more-mars-science(accessed 20 July 2018).
  • NASA. n.d. ‘Looking for Signs of Past Water on Mars’. Available online at https://mars.nasa.gov/mer/science/(accessed 18 July 2018).
  • Newell, C. L. 2014. ‘Without Having Seen: Faith, the Future, and the Final American Frontier’. Astropolitics 12:2–3, 48–66.
  • Pickering, A. 1995. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency and Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Prentice, R. 2013. Bodies of Information: An Ethnography of Anatomy and Surgery Education. Durham, NC: Duke University Press
  • Preston, L., Grady, M. and Barber, S. 2012. The Catalogue of Planetary Analogues. Paris, FR: The Open University/ESA.
  • Riva, G., Waterworth, J. and Murray, D. 2014. Interacting with Presence: HCI and the Sense of Presence in Computer-Mediated Environments. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Rosenberger, R. 2013. ‘Mediating Mars: Perceptual Experience and Scientific Imaging Technologies’. Foundations of Science 18:1, 75–91.
  • Rosenberger, R. and Verbeek, P. P. 2015. ‘A Field Guide to Postphenomenology’. In R. Rosenberger and D. Ihde (eds), Postphenomenological Investigations: Essays on Human-Technology Relations. Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books, 9–41.
  • Sheridan, T. B. 1995. Teleoperation, Telerobotics and Telepresence: A Progress Report. Control Engineering Practice 3:2, 205–14.
  • Shindell, M. B. 2010. ‘Domesticating the Planets: Instruments and Practices in the Development of Planetary Geology’. Spontaneous Generations: A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science 4:1, 191–230.
  • Squyres, S. 2005. Roving Mars: Spirit, Opportunity, and the Exploration of the Red Planet. New York, NY: Hachette Books.
  • Suchman, L. 2007. Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Trimble, J., Wales, R. and Gossweiler, R. 2003. ‘NASA’s MERboard’. In K. O’Hara, M. Perry, E. Churchill, and D. Russell (eds), Public and Situated Displays, Dordrecht, NL: Springer, 18–44.
  • Vertesi, J. 2012. ‘Seeing Like a Rover: Visualization, Embodiment, and Interaction on the Mars Exploration Rover Mission’. Social Studies of Science 42:3, 393–414.
  • Vertesi, J. 2015. Seeing Like a Rover: How Robots, Teams, and Images Craft Knowledge of Mars. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press
  • Zahorik, P. and Jenison, R. L. 1998. Presence as Being-in-the-World. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 7:1, 78–89.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.