642
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Brain power: cruel optimism and neuro-liberalism in the work of Catherine Malabou

References

  • Abi-Rached, J. and Rose, N. 2013. Neuro: The New Brain Sciences and the Management of the Mind. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Bataille, G. 1985. ‘Materialism’. In A. Stoekl (ed), Visions of Excess: Selected Writings, 1927-1939. Translated by Allan Stoekl, Carl R. Lovitt and Donald M. Leslie Jr. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 15–16.
  • Berlant, L. 2011. Cruel Optimism. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Bhandar, B. and Goldberg-Hiller, J. ‘Introduction: Staging Encounters’. In B. Bhandar and J. Goldberg-Hiller (ed), Plastic Materialities: Politics, Legality, and Metamorphosis in the Work of Catherine Malabou. Durham: Duke University Press, 1–33.
  • Brenninkmeijer, J. 2010. ‘‘Taking Care of One’s Brain: How Manipulating the Brain Changes People’s Selves’’. History of the Human Sciences 23:1, 107–26. doi: 10.1177/0952695109352824
  • Brenninkmeijer, J. 2017. ‘From ‘Hard’ Neuro-Tools to ‘Soft’ Neuro-Toys? Refocussing the Neuro-Enhancement Debate’. Neuroethics 10, 337–48. doi: 10.1007/s12152-016-9283-6
  • Brown, W. 2016. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books.
  • Chiew, F. 2012. ‘Neuroplasticity as an Ecology of Mind: A Conversation with Gregory Bateson and Catherine Malabou’. Journal of Consciousness Studies 19:11–12, 32–54.
  • Dardot, P. and Laval, C. 2013. The New Way of the World: On Neoliberal Society. Trans. Gregory Elliot. London: Verso.
  • Doidge, N. 2008. The Brain That Changes Itself: Stories of Personal Triumph From the Frontiers of Brain Science. London: Penguin.
  • Fitzgerald, D. and Callard, F. 2015. ‘Social Science and Neuroscience Beyond Interdisciplinary: Experimental Entanglements’. Theory Culture & Society 32:1, 3–32. doi: 10.1177/0263276414537319
  • Geuss, R. 2008. Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Healy, D. 2002. The Creation of Psychopharmacology. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  • Johnston, A. and Malabou, C. 2013. Self and Emotional Life: Philosophy, Psychoanalysis, and Neuroscience. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Lazzarato, M. 2012. The Making of the Indebted Man. Trans. Joshua David Jordan. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
  • Lazzarato, M. 2015. Governing by Debt. Trans. Joshua David Jordan. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
  • Lemke, T. 2018. ‘‘An Alternative Model of Politics? Prospects and Problems of Jane Bennett’s Vital Materialism’’. Theory Culture & Society 0:0, 1–24.
  • Lettow, S. 2017. ‘Turning the Turn: New Materialism, Historical Materialism and Critical Theory’. Thesis Eleven 140:1, 106–121. doi: 10.1177/0725513616683853
  • Lipton, B. 2017. ‘‘Measures of Success: Cruel Optimism and the Paradox of Academic Women’s Participation in Australian Higher Education’’. Higher Education Research & Development 36, 486–97. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2017.1290053
  • MacLeod, N. 2016. ‘Response to Catherine Mabalou, ‘One Life Only: Biological Resistance, Political Resistance’’. Critical Inquiry 43, 191–99. doi: 10.1086/688308
  • Malabou, C. 2008. What Should We Do with Our Brain? Trans. Sebastian Rand. New York: Fordham University Press.
  • Malabou, C. 2012. The New Wounded: From Neurosis to Brain Damage. Trans. Steven Miller. New York: Fordham University Press.
  • Malabou, C. 2013. Ontology of The Accident: An Essay on Destructive Plasticity. Trans. Carolyn Shread. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Malabou, C. 2014a. ‘The King’s Two (Biopolitical) Bodies’. Representations 127:1, 98–106. doi: 10.1525/rep.2014.127.1.98
  • Malabou, C. 2014b. ‘Can We Relinquish the Transcendental?’. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy 28:3, 242–55. doi: 10.5325/jspecphil.28.3.0242
  • Malabou, C. 2016a. ‘One Life Only: Biological Resistance, Political Resistance’. Trans. Carolyn Shread. Critical Inquiry 42:3, 429–38. doi: 10.1086/685601
  • Malabou, C. 2016b. ‘Philosophers, Biologists: Some More Effort If You Wish to Become Revolutionaries!’. Critical Inquiry 43, 200–206. doi: 10.1086/688309
  • Malabou, C. 2016c. ‘‘Your Are (Not) Your Synapses’: Towards a Critical Approach to Neuroscience’. In D. Bates and N. Bassiri (ed), Plasticity and Pathology: On the Formation of the Neural Subject. New York: Fordham University Press. 20–34.
  • Malabou, C. 2016d. Before Tomorrow: Epigenesis and Rationality. Trans. Carolyn Shread. London: Polity.
  • Malabou, C. 2019. Morphing Intelligence: From IQ Measurement to Artificial Brains. Trans. Carolyn Shread. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Marx, K. 1978. ‘The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte’. In R. C. Tucker (ed), The Marx-Engels Reader: Second Edition. New York: W.W. Norton & Company., 594–617.
  • Moncrieff, J. 2009. The Myth of the Chemical Cure: A Critique of Psychitaric Drug Treatment. Revised Edition. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Moncrieff, J. 2013. The Bitterest Pills: The Troubling Story of Anti-Psychotic Drugs. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Mouffe, C. 1999. ‘Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism?’. Social Research 66:3, 745–58.
  • Mouffe, C. 2013. Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. London: Verso.
  • Rose, N. 2007. The Politics of Life Itself. Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Ruti, M. 2015. The Age of Scientific Sexisim: How Evolutionary Psychology Promotes Gender Profiling and Fans the Battle of the Sexes. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Scull, A. 2016. Madness in Civilisation: A Cultural History of Insanity From the Bible to Freud, From the Madhouse to Modern Medicine. London: Thames & Hudson.
  • Tallis, R. 2011. Aping Mankind: Neuromania, Darwinitis, and the Misrepresentation of Humanity. London: Routledge.
  • Toscano, A. 2015. ‘Plasticity, Capital, and the Dialectic’. In B. Bhandar and J. Goldberg-Hiller (ed), Plastic Materialities: Politics, Legality, and Metamorphosis in the Work of Catherine Malabou. Durham: Duke University Press, 91–109.
  • Zembylas, M. 2016. ‘Political Depression, Cruel Optimism and Pedagogies of Reparation: Questions of Criticality and Affect in Human Rights Education’. Critical Studies in Education 59:1, 1–17. doi: 10.1080/17508487.2016.1176065

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.