User-centred design of a digital advisory service: enhancing public agricultural extension for sustainable intensification in Tanzania

References

• Abdulai, A. N. (2016). Impact of conservation agriculture technology on household welfare in Zambia. Agricultural Economics, 47, 729–741. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R., & Feder, G. (2004). Agricultural extension: Good intentions and hard realities. The World Bank Research Observer, 19(1), 41–60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkh013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bangor, A., Kortum, P. T., & Miller, J. T. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 24(6), 574–594. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802205776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barakabitze, A., Kitindi, E., Sanga, C., Shabani, A., Philip, J., & Kibirige, G. (2015). New technologies for disseminating and communicating agriculture knowledge and information: Challenges for agricultural research institutes in Tanzania. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 70(2), 1–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2015.tb00502.x
   Google Scholar
• Batchelor, S., Scott, N., Manfre, C., & Edwards, D. (2014). Is there a role for mobiles to support sustainable agriculture in Africa? 2nd International conference on ICT for sustainability (ICT4S) (pp. 272–280). Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Baumüller, H. (2018). The little we know: An exploratory literature review on the utility of mobile phone-enabled services for smallholder farmers. Journal of International Development, 30(1), 134–154. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooke, J. (1996). SUS – a quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in Industry. In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, & I. L. McClelland (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189–194). London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Brooke, J. (2013). SUS: A retrospective. Journal of Usability Studies, 8(2), 29–40.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, B., Nuberg, I., & Llewellyn, R. (2017). Stepwise frameworks for understanding the utilisation of conservation agriculture in Africa. Agricultural Systems, 153, 11–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daudi, H., Shimelis, H., Laing, M., Okori, P., & Mponda, O. (2018). Groundnut production constraints, farming systems, and farmer-preferred traits in Tanzania. Journal of Crop Improvement, 32(6), 812–828. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15427528.2018.1531801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodson, L., Sterling, S. R., & Bennett, J. K. (2012). Considering failure: Eight years of ITID research. Information Technologies and International Development, 9(2), 19–34.
   Google Scholar
• Dorner, J. W. (2008). Management and prevention of mycotoxins in peanuts. Food Additives and Contaminants, 25(2), 203–208. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02652030701658357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eitzinger, A., Cock, J., Atzmanstorfer, K., Binder, C. R., Läderach, P., Bonilla-Findji, O., … Jarvis, A. (2019). Geofarmer: A monitoring and feedback system for agricultural development projects. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 158, 109–121. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.01.049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabregas, R., Kremer, M., & Schilbach, F. (2019). Realizing the potential of digital development: The case of agricultural advice. Science, 366, 6471. eaay3038. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay3038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feder, G., Anderson, J. R., Birner, R., & Deininger, K. (2010). Promises and realities of community-based agricultural extension, IFPRI Discussion Paper No. 959. Washington D.C: International Food Policy Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Finstad, K. (2006). The system usability scale and non-native English speakers. Journal of Usability Studies, 1(4), 185–188.
   Google Scholar
• Garnett, T., Appleby, M. C., Balmford, A., Bateman, I. J., Benton, T. G., Bloomer, P., … Godfray, H. C. J. (2013). Sustainable intensification in agriculture: Premises and policies. Science, 341(6141), 33–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1234485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godfray, H. C. J. (2015). The debate over sustainable intensification. Food Security, 7(2), 199–208. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-015-0424-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godfray, H. C. J., & Garnett, T. (2014). Food security and sustainable intensification. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1639), 20120273. doi: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GSMA. (2019a). Connected society. The state of mobile internet connectivity 2019. Retrieved from http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2010/6/comScore_Reports_April_2010_U.S._Mobile_Subscriber_Market_Share.
   Google Scholar
• GSMA. (2019b). The mobile economy Sub-Saharan Africa 2019. Retrieved from https://www.gsma.com/r/mobileeconomy/sub-saharan-africa/.
   Google Scholar
• Gulliksen, J., Göransson, B., Boivie, I., Blomkvist, S., Persson, J., & Cajander, A. (2003). Key principles for user-centred systems design. Behaviour & Information Technology, 22(6), 397–409. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290310001624329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haider Rizvi, S. M. (2011). Lifelines: Livelihood solutions through mobile technology in India. In D. J. Grimshaw & S. Kala (Eds.), Strengthening rural livelihoods: The impact of information and communication technologies in Asia (pp. 53–70). Ottawa: Practical Action Publishing and International Development Research Centre, Rugby.
   Google Scholar
• Heeks, R. (2002). Information systems and developing countries: Failure, success, and local improvisations. The Information Society, 18, 101–112. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240290075039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall, L., & Dearden, A. (2017). ICTs for agroecology. In International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries (ICT4D 2017) (pp. 451–462), Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnan, P., & Patnam, M. (2014). Neighbors and extension agents in Ethiopia: Who matters more for technology adoption? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 96, 308–327. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aat017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loos, J., Abson, D. J., Chappell, M. J., Hanspach, J., Mikulcak, F., Tichit, M., & Fischer, J. (2014). Putting meaning back into “sustainable Intensification”. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 12(6), 356–361. doi: https://doi.org/10.1890/130157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masiero, S. (2016). The origins of failure: Seeking the causes of design–reality gaps. Information Technology for Development, 22(3), 487–502. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2016.1143346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minkler, M. (2004). Ethical challenges for the “outside” researcher in community-based participatory research. Health Education & Behavior, 31(6), 684–697. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198104269566
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mlozi, M. R. S., Sanga, C., Tumbo, S., Mussa, M., Kadeghe, F., & Haug, R. (2016). Delivery of agricultural extension service can be improved through mobile phones. EPINAV Policy Brief 2/2016.
   Google Scholar
• Munthali, N., Leeuwis, C., van Paassen, A., Lie, R., Asare, R., van Lammeren, R., & Schut, M. (2018). Innovation intermediation in a digital age: Comparing public and private new-ICT platforms for agricultural extension in Ghana. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 86, 64–76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2018.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ODK. (2019). Open data kit documentation. Retrieved from https://docs.opendatakit.org/_downloads/ODK-Documentation.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ollenburger, B. M., Crane, T., Descheemaeker, K., & Giller, K. E. (2019). Are farmers searching for an African green revolution? Exploring the solution space for agricultural intensification in Southern Mali. Experimental Agriculture, 55(2), 288–310. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479718000169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otsuki, T., Wilson, J. S., & Sewadeh, M. (2001). What price precaution? European harmonisation of aflatoxin regulations and African groundnut exports. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 28(3), 263–284. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/28.3.263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, E., & Lee, S. (2015). Multidimensionality: Redefining the digital divide in the smartphone era. Info, 17(2), 80–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/info-09-2014-0037
   Google Scholar
• Patel, N., Chittamuru, D., Jain, A., Dave, P., & Parikh, T. S. (2010). Avaaj Otalo – A field study of an interactive voice forum for small farmers in rural India. Proceedings of the CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Atlanta, USA (733–742).
   Google Scholar
• Perfect, J., & Majule, A. E. (2010). Livelihood zones analysis. A tool for planning agricultural water management investments. Tanzania: International Water Management Institute (IWMI).
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, B., & Snapp, S. (2015). What is sustainable intensification? Views from experts. Land Use Policy, 46, 1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretty, J. (2018). Intensification for redesigned and sustainable agricultural systems. Science, 362(6417), eaav0294. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav0294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretty, J. N. (1997). The sustainable intensification of agriculture. Natural Resources Forum, 21(4), 247–256. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.1997.tb00699.x
   Google Scholar
• Pretty, J., & Bharucha, Z. P. (2014). Sustainable intensification in agricultural systems. Annals of Botany, 114(8), 1571–1596. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcu205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robens, J. F., & Richard, J. L. (1992). Aflatoxins in animal and human health. Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 127, 69–94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9751-9_3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockström, J., Williams, J., Daily, G., Noble, A., Matthews, N., Gordon, L., … de Fraiture, C. (2017). Sustainable intensification of agriculture for human prosperity and global sustainability. Ambio, 46(1), 4–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0793-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röling, N. G., & Jiggins, J. (1996). The ecological knowledge system. 2nd European symposium on rural and farming systems research: Technical and social systems approaches to sustainable rural development, Granada, Spain (pp. 116–120).
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, F., & Coe, R. (2019). The options by context approach: A paradigm shift in agronomy. Experimental Agriculture, 55(S1), 1–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479719000139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., Snapp, S., Chikowo, R., Thorne, P., Bekunda, M., & Glover, J. (2017). Measuring sustainable intensification in smallholder agroecosystems: A review. Global Food Security, 12, 127–138. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2016.11.002
   Google Scholar
• Steinke, J., Achieng, J. A., Hammond, J., Kebede, S. S., Mengistu, D. K., Mgimiloko, M. G., … van Etten, J. (2019b). Household-specific targeting of agricultural advice via mobile phones: Feasibility of a minimum data approach for smallholder context. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 162, 991–1000. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.05.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinke, J., Mgimiloko, M. G., Graef, F., Hammond, J., van Wijk, M. T., & van Etten, J. (2019a). Prioritizing options for multi-objective agricultural development through the positive deviance approach. PLoS ONE, 14(2), e0212926. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulaiman V, R., Hall, A., Kalaivani, N. J., Dorai, K., & Reddy, T. V. (2012). Necessary, but not sufficient: Critiquing the role of information and communication technology in putting knowledge into use. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 18(4), 331–346. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2012.691782
   Google Scholar
• Šūmane, S., Kunda, I., Knickel, K., Strauss, A., Tisenkopfs, T., Rios, I., … Ashkenazy, A. (2018). Local and farmers’ knowledge matters! How integrating informal and formal knowledge enhances sustainable and resilient agriculture. Journal of Rural Studies, 59, 232–241. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.01.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, M., & Bhasme, S. (2018). Model farmers, extension networks and the politics of agricultural knowledge transfer. Journal of Rural Studies, 64, 1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.09.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• URT. (2013). National agricultural policy. Dar Es Salaam: MAFC.
   Google Scholar
• URT. (2015). Agricultural sector development strategy II, 2015/2016–2025/2026. Dar Es Salaam: MAFC.
   Google Scholar
• van Etten, J., Beza, E., Calderer, L., van Duijvendijk, K., Fadda, C., Fantahun, B., … Zimmerer, K. (2019). First experiences with a novel farmer citizen science approach: Crowdsourcing participatory variety selection through on-farm triadic comparisons of technologies (tricot). Experimental Agriculture, 55(S1), 275–296. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479716000739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyche, S., & Steinfield, C. (2016). Why don’t farmers use cell phones to access market prices? Technology affordances and barriers to market information services adoption in rural Kenya. Information Technology for Development, 22(2), 320–333. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2015.1048184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoundji, G. C., Okry, F., Vodouhê, S. D., & Bentley, J. W. (2018). Towards sustainable vegetable growing with farmer learning videos in Benin. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 16(1), 54–63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2018.1428393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar