References
- Adams, A. E., Lombard, J. E., Fossler, C. P., Roman-Muniz, I. N., & Kopral, C. A. (2017). Associations between housing and management practices and the prevalence of lameness, hock lesions, and thin cows on US dairy operations. Journal of Dairy Science, 100(3), 2119–2136. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11517
- AHDB. (2019). UK milk yield. AHDB Dairy. Retrieved August 14, 2020, from https://ahdb.org.uk/dairy/uk-milk-yield
- AHDB Dairy. (2020). Mobility scoring: how to score your cows. AHDB Dairy. Retrieved January 17, 2020, from https://ahdb.org.uk/knowledge-library/mobility-scoring-how-to-score-your-cows
- Arnott, G., Ferris, C. P., & O'Connell, N. E. (2017). Review: Welfare of dairy cows in continuously housed and pasture-based production systems. Animal, 11(2), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731116001336
- Brenninkmeyer, C., Dippel, S., March, S., Brinkmann, J., Winckler, C., & Knierim, U. (2007). Reliability of a subjective lameness scoring system for dairy cows. Animal Welfare, 16(2), 127–129.
- Browne, W. J., Goldstein, H., & Rasbash, J. (2001). Multiple membership multiple classification (MMMC) models. Statistical Modelling, 1(2), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471082X0100100202
- Buller, H., Blokhuis, H., Jensen, P., & Keeling, L. (2018). Towards farm animal welfare and sustainability. Animals, 8(6), 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8060081
- Burkner, P. C. (2018). Advanced Bayesian multilevel modeling with the R package brms. R Journal, 10(1), 395–411. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2018-017
- CHAWG. (2010). Dairy cow welfare strategy. UK.
- CHAWG. (2018). Fourth Report. UK.
- Compassion in World Farming. (2012). Statistics: Dairy cows. UK.
- Defra. (2001). Condition scoring of dairy cows. Defra Publications.
- Dillon, E. J., Hennessy, T., Buckley, C., Donnellan, T., Hanrahan, K., Moran, B., & Ryan, M. (2016). Measuring progress in agricultural sustainability to support policy-making. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 14(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2015.1012413
- FarmingUK. (2016). Smaller herd and reduced milk yield reasons for decrease in British milk production. Retrieved September 11, 2020, from https://www.farminguk.com/news/smaller-herd-and-reduced-milk-yield-reasons-for-decrease-in-british-milk-production_44284.html
- FAWC. (2009). Opinion on the welfare of the dairy cows.
- Free Range Dairy. (2018). Who we are. Free range dairy. Retrieved June 15, 2018, from http://www.freerangedairy.org/who-we-are/.
- Giammarino, M., Mattiello, S., Battini, M., Quatto, P., Battaglini, L. M., Vieira, A. C. L., Stilwell, G., & Renna, M. (2021). Evaluation of inter-observer reliability of animal welfare indicators: Which is the best index to use? Animals, 11(5), 1445. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11051445
- Godfray, H. C. J. (2015). The debate over sustainable intensification. Food Security, 7(2), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-015-0424-2
- Griffiths, B., Grove White, D., & Oikonomou, G. (2018). A cross-sectional study into the prevalence of dairy cattle lameness and associated herd-level risk factors in England and wales. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 5(65). https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2018.00065
- Hut, P. R., Hostens, M. M., Beijaard, M. J., van Eerdenburg, F., Hulsen, J., Hooijer, G. A., Stassen, E. N., & Nielen, M. (2021). Associations between body condition score, locomotion score, and sensor-based time budgets of dairy cattle during the dry period and early lactation. Journal of Dairy Science, 104(4), 4746–4763. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-19200
- Ito, K., von Keyserlingk, M. A. G., LeBlanc, S. J., & Weary, D. M. (2010). Lying behavior as an indicator of lameness in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 93(8), 3553–3560. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2951
- Ji, K. J., Booth, R. E., & Blackie, N. (2021). A retrospective case study into the effect of hoof lesions on the lying behaviour of Holstein-Friesian in a loose-housed system. Animals, 11 (4), 1120. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11041120
- Main, D. C. J., Clegg, J., Spatz, A., & Green, L. E. (2000). Repeatability of a lameness scoring system for finishing pigs. Veterinary Record, 147(20), 574–576. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.147.20.574
- Main, D. C. J., Mullan, S., Atkinson, C., Bond, A., Cooper, M., Fraser, A., & Browne, W. J. (2012). Welfare outcomes assessment in laying hen farm assurance schemes. Animal Welfare, 21(3), 389–396. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.21.3.389
- Main, D. C. J., Rogerson, I., Crawley, M. C., Avizenius, J., Fraser, A., & Mullan, S. (2012). Welfare outcomes assessment in dairy farm assurance schemes. Cattle Practice, 20, 142–145.
- March, S., Brinkmann, J., & Winkler, C. (2007). Effect of training on the inter-observer reliability of lameness scoring in dairy cattle. Animal Welfare, 16(2), 131–133. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0496
- McInerney, J. (1991). A socioeconomic perspective on animal-welfare. Outlook on Agriculture, 20(1), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/003072709102000110
- Mullan, S., Edwards, S. A., Butterworth, A., Ward, M., Whay, H. R., & Main, D. C. J. (2011). Welfare science into practice: A successful case example of working with industry. Animal Welfare, 20(4), 597–601.
- Mullan, S., Edwards, S. A., Butterworth, A., Whay, H. R., & Main, D. C. J. (2011). Inter-observer reliability testing of pig welfare outcome measures proposed for inclusion within farm assurance schemes. Veterinary Journal (London, England, 1997), 190(2), e100–e109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.01.012
- Mullan, S., Szmaragd, C., Cooper, M. D., Wrathall, J. H. M., Jamieson, J., Bond, A., Atkinson, C., & Main, D. C. J. (2016). Animal welfare initiatives improve feather cover of cage-free laying hens in the UK. Animal Welfare, 25(2), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.25.2.243
- Pandolfi, F., Stoddart, K., Wainwright, N., Kyriazakis, I., & Edwards, S. A. (2017). The 'real welfare’ scheme: Benchmarking welfare outcomes for commercially farmed pigs. Animal, 11(10), 1816–1824. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117000246
- Pasture for Life. (2018). The best animal welfare. The pasture-fed livestock association. Retrieved June 15, 2018, from https://www.pastureforlife.org/why-pasture/the-best-animal-welfare/
- Red Tractor. (2013). Red tractor annual review. London, UK.
- Red Tractor. (2014). Red tractor annual review. London, UK.
- Red Tractor. (2015). Red tractor annual review. London, UK.
- Red Tractor. (2017). Red tractor assurance for farms - dairy standards. London, UK.
- Robbins, J. A., von Keyserlingk, M. A. G., Fraser, D., & Weary, D. M. (2016). Invited review: Farm size and animal welfare. Journal of Animal Science, 94(12), 5439–5455. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2016-0805
- Runhaar, H. (2021). Four critical conditions for agroecological transitions in Europe. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 19(3-4), 227–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2021.1906055
- Solano, L., Barkema, H. W., Pajor, E. A., Mason, S., LeBlanc, S. J., Nash, C. G. R., Haley, D. B., Pellerin, D., Rushen, J., de Passille, A. M., Vasseur, E., Orsel, K. (2016). Associations between lying behavior and lameness in Canadian Holstein-Friesian cows housed in freestall barns. Journal of Dairy Science, 99(3), 2086–2101. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10336
- Thomsen, P. T., & Baadsgaard, N. P. (2006). Intra- and inter-observer agreement of a protocol for clinical examination of dairy cows. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 75(1-2), 133–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2006.02.004
- Whitfield, S., & Marshall, A. (2017). Defining and delivering ‘sustainable’ agriculture in the UK after Brexit: Interdisciplinary lessons from experiences of agricultural reform. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 15(5), 501–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2017.1337837
- Wood, S. (2006). Generalized additive models. An Introduction with R. Chapman and Hall.